A couple of further comments, Bob... There are pictures of the K2 BFO leakage being displayed in PowerSDR/IF through LP-PAN using the two connection points that you can compare to each other and also to the results you are seeing. They are in the K2 installation manual for the Z10000,
http://www.cliftonlaboratories.com/Documents/Installing%20the%20Z10000B-K2%20In%20an%20Elecraft%20K2%20Transceiver.pdf Since the connection that reduces the K2 leakage the most also reduces sensitivity a bit, if you try LP-PAN you might also want to get the new preamp option, which adds a high gain, low noise preamp to the front end of LP-PAN. Larry N8LP On 10/5/2010 9:10 PM, elecraft-requ...@mailman.qth.net wrote: > Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2010 14:39:26 -0400 > From: Jack Smith<jack.sm...@cliftonlaboratories.com> > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Softrock vs. LP-PAN > To:elecraft@mailman.qth.net,rbsolo...@verizon.net > Message-ID:<4cab70de.5090...@cliftonlaboratories.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > Bob: > > There are two possible 'spike' concerns here. > > One is the so-called 'zero' point spike in the software defined > receivers. This is mostly a function of ground loops between the sound > card and the Softrock. It can be removed by transformers or some careful > work with the audio cables and connections. This spike will be located > at the Softrock center frequency and will be present whether or not the > Softrock is connected to the K2. The LP-PAN has transformers but similar > transformers can be externally added to a Softrock. > > The second spike is BFO leakage from the K2 back into the panadapter. > This spike will shift slightly in frequency as USB or LSB or CW CW-R is > selected. This spike is radiated from the K2 for reasons that are > discussed at my web page > http://www.cliftonlaboratories.com/k2_interface.htm and in the Z10000B > buffer amplifier K2 installation instructions. > http://www.cliftonlaboratories.com/Documents/Installing%20the%20Z10000B-K2%20In%20an%20Elecraft%20K2%20Transceiver.pdf > It will be present at the same level in any panadapter connected to the > K2, whether it is the LP-PAN or Softrock, one of my HP spectrum > analyzers or, for that matter, a P3. > > However, the strength of the leakage signal depends upon where the > Z10000B buffer amplifier obtains its IF sample. The Z10000B K2 > installation instructions suggest two possible sample points, one at the > output from the post mixer amplifier and the second at the input to the > post mixer amplifier. There are plus and minus points with respect to > each possible connection point, but the BFO leakage will be much reduced > if the connection is made at the input to the post mixer amplifier, as > the post mixer amplifier provides additional BFO leakage isolation. The > Z10000B K2 installation instructions show examples of leakage with both > connection points. > > Additionally, I suspect some variation in BFO leakage level is possible > depending on cable routing and the like. > > Jack K8ZOA > www.cliftonlaboratories.com > > > > As the > On 10/5/2010 2:19 PM, Bob wrote: >> > I've been using a K2 IF version of V6.2 Softrock Lite as a pandapter >> > interface with my K2, and the results are OK but not great - among other >> > things, the K2 IF is very prominent on the screen. How much improvement >> > could I expect if I replace the Softrock with an LP-PAN? (I have a Z10000 >> > buffer amp in my K2, I'm using an E-MU 0202 sound card and I'm using >> > PowerSDR-IF software in my computer). >> > >> > Thanks, >> > >> > Bob W1SRB ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
