Re: [Elecraft] K3 PR6 preamp

2012-07-10 Thread Phil & Debbie Salas
I also went with 3-ft cables for the PR6.  I used a couple of these:
www.allelectronics.com/make-a-store/item/CBL-27/3-BNC-BNC-CABLE-RG-58/1.html

Phil - AD5X 

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 PR6 preamp

2012-07-09 Thread Ron D'Eau Claire
Where? (Especially if you have the KPA3, KRX3 and K144XV installed)

73, Ron AC7AC

-Original Message-
From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net
[mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Gary K9GS
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2012 8:07 PM
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 PR6 preamp

I haven't purchased a PR6...yet.  I wonder if anyone has successfully
installed the preamp INSIDE the K3?  It sure would be slick to do so.


On 7/9/2012 7:39 PM, Randy Farmer wrote:
> Oh, yes! I used to have my PR6 installed directly to the rear panel with
> the double male connectors. Since my station interconnect is pretty
> complex and uses essentially every connector on the rear panel, every
> time I needed to access something back there the preamp was extremely in
> the way. After lots of bad words on multiple occasions, I finally got a
> couple of 3 foot cables. Best move I've made in a long time.
>
> 73...
> Randy, W8FN
>
> On 07/09/2012 13:14, John Lemay wrote:
>> Another benefit of using short patch cables for the PR6 is that it's a
bit
>> easier to access the connectors beneath it, like the paddle socket.
>>
>>
>>
>> John G4ZT
> __
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>

-- 


73,

Gary K9GS

Greater Milwaukee DX Association: http://www.gmdxa.org
Society of Midwest Contesters: http://www.w9smc.com
CW Ops #1032   http://www.cwops.org





__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 PR6 preamp

2012-07-09 Thread Gary K9GS
I haven't purchased a PR6...yet.  I wonder if anyone has successfully 
installed the preamp INSIDE the K3?  It sure would be slick to do so.


On 7/9/2012 7:39 PM, Randy Farmer wrote:
> Oh, yes! I used to have my PR6 installed directly to the rear panel with
> the double male connectors. Since my station interconnect is pretty
> complex and uses essentially every connector on the rear panel, every
> time I needed to access something back there the preamp was extremely in
> the way. After lots of bad words on multiple occasions, I finally got a
> couple of 3 foot cables. Best move I've made in a long time.
>
> 73...
> Randy, W8FN
>
> On 07/09/2012 13:14, John Lemay wrote:
>> Another benefit of using short patch cables for the PR6 is that it's a bit
>> easier to access the connectors beneath it, like the paddle socket.
>>
>>
>>
>> John G4ZT
> __
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>

-- 


73,

Gary K9GS

Greater Milwaukee DX Association: http://www.gmdxa.org
Society of Midwest Contesters: http://www.w9smc.com
CW Ops #1032   http://www.cwops.org





__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 PR6 preamp

2012-07-09 Thread Randy Farmer
Oh, yes! I used to have my PR6 installed directly to the rear panel with 
the double male connectors. Since my station interconnect is pretty 
complex and uses essentially every connector on the rear panel, every 
time I needed to access something back there the preamp was extremely in 
the way. After lots of bad words on multiple occasions, I finally got a 
couple of 3 foot cables. Best move I've made in a long time.

73...
Randy, W8FN

On 07/09/2012 13:14, John Lemay wrote:
> Another benefit of using short patch cables for the PR6 is that it's a bit
> easier to access the connectors beneath it, like the paddle socket.
>
>   
>
> John G4ZT

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 PR6 preamp

2012-07-09 Thread John Lemay
Another benefit of using short patch cables for the PR6 is that it's a bit
easier to access the connectors beneath it, like the paddle socket.

 

John G4ZTR

 

  _  

From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net
[mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Pierfrancesco Caci
Sent: 09 July 2012 17:47
To: Mike Markowski
Cc: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 PR6 preamp

 

>>>>> "Mike" == Mike Markowski  writes:



Mike> I'd like to buy a PR6 and see in its manual a photo of it
Mike> apparently hanging off
Mike> the back of the K3.  Would the torque be unhealthy for the K3
Mike> connectors over
Mike> time?  I'm also concerned something could fall onto it and
Mike> harm the rig.  Is it
Mike> ok to connect via cables or is it necessary to minimize path
Mike> length as shown?


It's not that heavy Mike, and it has 2 connectors to hold it.
It is also "protected" by the rats nest of connectors above it, in
particular the serial one :-)
That said, someone in the past posted that he used 2 semi-rigid cables
and placed it under the K3 which he keeps tilted.

Pf


--
Pierfrancesco Caci, ik5pvx
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 7283 (20120709) __

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com





__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 7283 (20120709) __

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com


__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 7284 (20120709) __

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com



__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 7284 (20120709) __

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 PR6 preamp

2012-07-09 Thread Pierfrancesco Caci
> "Mike" == Mike Markowski  writes:



Mike> I'd like to buy a PR6 and see in its manual a photo of it
Mike> apparently hanging off 
Mike> the back of the K3.  Would the torque be unhealthy for the K3
Mike> connectors over 
Mike> time?  I'm also concerned something could fall onto it and
Mike> harm the rig.  Is it 
Mike> ok to connect via cables or is it necessary to minimize path
Mike> length as shown? 


It's not that heavy Mike, and it has 2 connectors to hold it.
It is also "protected" by the rats nest of connectors above it, in
particular the serial one :-)
That said, someone in the past posted that he used 2 semi-rigid cables
and placed it under the K3 which he keeps tilted. 

Pf


-- 
Pierfrancesco Caci, ik5pvx
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 PR6 preamp

2012-07-09 Thread n4qs
Mike,

I just bought the PR6 and added it to my K3 last week.  I just connected it to 
the back using the bnc barrel connectors that came with it.  Seems very secure, 
but I would probably remove it when transporting the rig.  Makes a huge 
difference on receive. 

Dave, N4QS
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T

-Original Message-
From: Mike Markowski 
Sender: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net
Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 10:06:01 
To: 
Subject: [Elecraft] K3 PR6 preamp

I'd like to buy a PR6 and see in its manual a photo of it apparently hanging off
the back of the K3.  Would the torque be unhealthy for the K3 connectors over
time?  I'm also concerned something could fall onto it and harm the rig.  Is it
ok to connect via cables or is it necessary to minimize path length as shown?

Thanks and 73,
Mike ab3ap
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 PR6 preamp

2012-07-09 Thread Rose
Mark,

I have the PR6 and it works very well.  I would -not- consider
hanging it off the back of the K3 via M<->M BNC's.  Mine's
connected via two 6" BNC cables.

73!

Ken Kopp - K0PP
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 PR6 preamp

2010-06-25 Thread Jim Brown
On Thu, 24 Jun 2010 23:15:52 -0800, Edward R Cole wrote:

>Then you state that you are not suggesting the ARR is better.  Not 
>better than what?

The Elecraft 6M preamp

73, Jim K9YC



__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 PR6 preamp

2010-06-25 Thread Edward R Cole
Jim,

Your comment is a little confusing.  First you state that you believe 
the External preamp definitely improves sensitivity (when external 
noise level is low).  I agree.  I said the same in my original e-mail.

Then you state that you are not suggesting the ARR is better.  Not 
better than what?

It is definitely better than the internal preamp, but it is probably 
close to the same performance as the PR6 (regarding 
sensitivity).  Elecraft claims exceptional dynamic range for the PR6 
which the ARR probably does not have (which is important in urban 
high noise environs or in high density QRM that happen in openings/contests).

I did some checking of the K3 specs:  Sensitivity with (internal) 
preamp turned-on is spec at -136 to -138 dBm at 500-Hz bw.  -138 dBm 
is equivalent to  noise figure of 9.5 dB.  With the PR6, the K3 is 
spec at -143 to -144 dBm at 500-Hz bw.  That is equivalent to a noise 
figure of 5-dB.  Since the PR6 spec is 0.5 DBNF with 18 dBG this 
implies that the K3 receiver has a NF of 20-dB (all preamps off).

The ARR preamp is spec at 0.5 dBNF with 22-dBG so the resulting 
sensitivity should be -148 dBm.

So doing a little more reverse analysis, this implies the internal 
preamp NF is something like 5-dB if you assume the gain is 10-dB (I 
could not find what the gain of the internal preamp is).

How does this translate for the 6m operator?  In high noise environs 
the internal preamp is probably adequate since external noise 
predominates.  In low noise areas the PR6 or ARR definitely will 
improve sensitivity by 7 to 10 dB.  If you are considering doing eme 
or meteor scatter on 6m the low-noise external preamp is going to 
help quite a bit.  Antennas elevated above the horizon do not see the 
thermal noise of the ground or as much man-made noise.  Sky noise at 
6m is still quite high compared to higher VHF and UHF frequencies so 
placing the preamp at the K3 is acceptable if your coax is not lossy.

Remember my statement that I though running both internal and 
external preamps might not result in better sensitivity?  I took the 
numbers I developed for both the PR6 and internal preamp and input to 
my spreadsheet.  The result is total sensitivity of -152 dBm.  So 
maybe running both internal and external preamps is better.  (As jim 
point out) you have to evaluate this in real conditions as results 
will differ depending on your local noise environment.  One caveat is 
turning on both preamps may lead to overdriving the receiver 
resulting in reduced dynamic range or even distortion.

73, Ed - KL7UW
Final note: SSB sensitivity numbers at bw of 2.8 KHz are 7.5 dB lower 
than at bw of 500-Hz.

--

Message: 31
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 13:15:30 -0700
From: "Jim Brown" 
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 PR6 preamp
To: "elecraft@mailman.qth.net" 
Message-ID: <20100624201535.eeeca58...@gw1.nlenet.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

On Thu, 24 Jun 2010 11:52:46 -0800, Edward R Cole wrote:

 >Running both preamps probably only raises the noise level and
 >does not  improve receiver sensitivity in any significant
 >manner.

I suggest that you defer judgment on this until you're trying to
copy very weak signals during a band opening. The additional preamp
at the patch point (in my case an ARR) definitely DOES improve RX
sensitivity at times when the external noise level is low. I'm not
suggesting that the ARR is better -- indeed, I doubt that it is.
But it was bought and paid for when the K3 showed up, and it works
fine. :)

73, Jim K9YC



73, Ed - KL7UW, WD2XSH/45
==
BP40IQ   500 KHz - 10-GHz   www.kl7uw.com
EME: 144-600w, 432-100w, 1296-60w, 3400-fall 2010
DUBUS Magazine USA Rep dubus...@hotmail.com
==

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 PR6 preamp

2010-06-24 Thread Jim Brown
On Thu, 24 Jun 2010 11:52:46 -0800, Edward R Cole wrote:

>Running both preamps probably only raises the noise level and 
>does not  improve receiver sensitivity in any significant 
>manner.  

I suggest that you defer judgment on this until you're trying to 
copy very weak signals during a band opening. The additional preamp 
at the patch point (in my case an ARR) definitely DOES improve RX 
sensitivity at times when the external noise level is low. I'm not 
suggesting that the ARR is better -- indeed, I doubt that it is. 
But it was bought and paid for when the K3 showed up, and it works 
fine. :) 

73, Jim K9YC


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 PR6 preamp

2010-06-24 Thread Edward R Cole
OK, I did as you suggested and turned off AGC and set RF gain = 50% 
and here is the result:
Meter  IntPre  ExtPre  Ant  Load
-20dbV   NN N N  K3 disconnected
-19.7  NN N Y  K3 connected to load
-18.2  YN N Y
-15.5  NY N Y
-3.3YY N Y
-19.5  NN Y N  K3 connected to 3-elem 
yagi at 55-feet
-15.4  YN Y N
-1.1NY Y N
+8.4   YY Y N
N=off, Y=on

There is slightly more noise on the antenna than with the 50-ohm 
load, only 3.2 dbV difference using only the Internal Preamp.  The 
External Preamp shows a 14.4 dbV increase over the 50-ohm 
load.  Running both preamps probably only raises the noise level and 
does not  improve receiver sensitivity in any significant 
manner.  Note that the gain difference between preamps influences the 
meter reading as well as noise figure.

Running the ExtPreamp  by itself is likely the best configuration for 
best sensitivity.

Using Y-factor between the load and the antenna one could determine 
the G/T ratio and maybe overall noise temperature (and noise figure).

Theoretically, T = Tsky + Tant + Trx
Tsky at 6m is high, perhaps 2000K  (but this was the question that 
started this thread)
Tant is unknown, but probably a significant portion of the 290K 
ground noise, assume 150K  (a factor of F/B ratio and sidelobe levels)
Trx should be determined primarily by the preamp:
  Tpre = 290*10^(NF/10)-1 = 290*10^(0.5/10)-1 = 290*(10^.05 - 
1) = 290*0.122 = 35K
The K3 noise figure will add a little but is reduced by a factor of 
the preamp gain (if NF(K3) = 5 dB then Tk3 = 290*2.16 = 676K
  The cascaded noise temp, Trx = Tpre + Tk3/158 = 35 + 676/158 = 40K
Sensitivity looking at the load is -139 dBm using the 2.8 KHz SSB bandwidth*
Looking at a 2000K sky the noise floor is -130 dBm*, assuming antenna 
noise to add 150K

One would need to calculate P = KTB from the noise voltage readings 
where P = E^2/R to arrive at actual noise power.

I wonder how linear the dbV meter readings are with this approach?

73, Ed
*Note calculations using my eme pathlink sw: http://www.kl7uw.com/emelink.xls
Ext Preamp P50VDG: 0.5 dBNF, 22-dBG - I would expect similar results 
from the PR6



--

Message: 36
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 11:38:45 +0100
From: "Graham Kimbell \(G3TCT\)" 
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 PR6 preamp
To: "Edward R Cole" ,  
Message-ID: <004901cb1389$6e506180$0602a...@a>
Content-Type: text/plain;   charset="iso-8859-1"

>Ed
>There's a more reliable way of doing this. Turn on the dBV measurement
>facility on the K3 and turn off the agc, reduce rf gain a bit. Arrange for
>50ohm resistor noise to indicate 0dB and then substitute the 6m antenna and
>see the difference.
>
>BTW the preamps won't be "below a 290K source" - they're already at 290K or
>more!
>
>73
>Graham


73, Ed - KL7UW, WD2XSH/45
==
BP40IQ   500 KHz - 10-GHz   www.kl7uw.com
EME: 144-600w, 432-100w, 1296-60w, 3400-fall 2010
DUBUS Magazine USA Rep dubus...@hotmail.com
==

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 PR6 preamp

2010-06-24 Thread Graham Kimbell (G3TCT)
Ed
There's a more reliable way of doing this. Turn on the dBV measurement
facility on the K3 and turn off the agc, reduce rf gain a bit. Arrange for
50ohm resistor noise to indicate 0dB and then substitute the 6m antenna and
see the difference.

BTW the preamps won't be "below a 290K source" - they're already at 290K or
more!

73
Graham

> With both preamps on S=4
> Both preamps on with antenna disconnected; S=3
> So its a pretty quiet area with only one s-unit rise in noise.
> For comparison with a 50-ohm termination both preamps see S=4
> This indicates the preamps are low-noise below a 290K source.
>

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 PR6 preamp

2010-06-22 Thread Edward R Cole
Bill,

AS usual you have made an important observation.  You made me curious 
about my 6m environment so:
I turned off both my external preamp (RX ANT) and my internal preamp 
(PRE) and merely looked at s-meter reading (S=1).  I removed the 
antenna with no discernable change in audible noise and s-meter is 
the same S=1.

So with antenna connected I turned on internal preamp (PRE) and S=2.
With internal preamp off and my external preamp* on (RX ANT) S=2/3
With both preamps on S=4
Both preamps on with antenna disconnected; S=3
So its a pretty quiet area with only one s-unit rise in noise.
For comparison with a 50-ohm termination both preamps see S=4
This indicates the preamps are low-noise below a 290K source.

NOW for that QRO and 8-element long-boom yagi - hmm.

73, Ed - KL7UW
  *Note external preamp is ARR P50VDG Gasfet 0.5 dBNF, 22-dBG


--

Message: 24
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 20:05:00 -0600
From: "Bill VanAlstyne W5WVO" 
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 PR6 preamp [was:  Another Happy Customer]
To: 
Message-ID: 
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
 reply-type=original

From: "K5RC" 

 > I also added the GaAsFet 6M preamp to the station and it makes a HUGE
 > difference on Six.

It needs to be pointed out from time to time that whether the PR6 makes "no
discernible difference" or "a HUGE difference" depends on one critically
important variable: YOUR NOISE LEVEL!

Because I live in a large-city metro area complete with big mountain-top RF
outlets broadcasting thousands of kilowatts of RF (along with plenty of
spurious broadband crud), my noise level on 6 meters is relatively high.
Only in my quietest direction (northwest) at the quietest time of day (early
morning) does adding the PR6 preamp allow me to hear anything that I can't
hear just as well without it. Wouldn't it be nice to really NEED that PR6?
Yeah, it sure would... but the realties are what they are.

The WSJT software package (for weak-signal digital modes FSK441, JT6M, et
al.) includes an easy way to roughly assess your noise level, reading out
directly in dB above the receiver's internal noise floor (MDS). If, while
using the K3's internal preamp, your antenna noise reads 8-10 dB or more
above MDS (typical when using a decent gain antenna in a metro area), the
sad fact is that the PR6 probably won't help you. If your antenna noise is
only a few dB above MDS, then the PR6 might help, as it is very quiet (i.e.,
has a low noise figure) and could contribute to a better overall
signal-to-noise ratio.

On the other hand, if you are lucky enough to not really be able to hear any
6m antenna noise with the K3's internal preamp on... First, double-check to
make sure you actually have connected the antenna... And if you have, you
should congratulate yourself and get ready to REALLY have some fun on 6
meters once you connect in that PR6 preamp! You might also want to get a
good RF power amplifier, as you will want to be able to work all the DX
stations you can hear -- some of whom are running REALLY BIG QRO, trust me.
You will be in no danger of being an "alligator" station (all mouth and no
ears).

Bill W5WVO
DM65qh



73, Ed - KL7UW, WD2XSH/45
==
BP40IQ   500 KHz - 10-GHz   www.kl7uw.com
EME: 144-600w, 432-100w, 1296-60w, 3400-fall 2010
DUBUS Magazine USA Rep dubus...@hotmail.com
==

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 PR6 preamp

2010-06-22 Thread Bill W4ZV


W8JI wrote:
> 
> What is the noise figure of the K3 on six meters?
> 

"The noise figure of the preamp itself is typically 0.5 dB."

http://www.elecraft.com/manual/PR6_Owners_Manual_Rev_A.pdf



-- 
View this message in context: 
http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/Another-Happy-Customer-tp5205110p5210008.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 PR6 preamp

2010-06-22 Thread Tom W8JI
What is the noise figure of the K3 on six meters?

On SSB bandwidth I barely hear a noise increase when I switch from a dummy 
load to my antenna.

73 Tom 

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 PR6 preamp [was: Another Happy Customer]

2010-06-21 Thread Bill VanAlstyne W5WVO
From: "K5RC" 

> I also added the GaAsFet 6M preamp to the station and it makes a HUGE
> difference on Six.

It needs to be pointed out from time to time that whether the PR6 makes "no 
discernible difference" or "a HUGE difference" depends on one critically 
important variable: YOUR NOISE LEVEL!

Because I live in a large-city metro area complete with big mountain-top RF 
outlets broadcasting thousands of kilowatts of RF (along with plenty of 
spurious broadband crud), my noise level on 6 meters is relatively high. 
Only in my quietest direction (northwest) at the quietest time of day (early 
morning) does adding the PR6 preamp allow me to hear anything that I can't 
hear just as well without it. Wouldn't it be nice to really NEED that PR6? 
Yeah, it sure would... but the realties are what they are.

The WSJT software package (for weak-signal digital modes FSK441, JT6M, et 
al.) includes an easy way to roughly assess your noise level, reading out 
directly in dB above the receiver's internal noise floor (MDS). If, while 
using the K3's internal preamp, your antenna noise reads 8-10 dB or more 
above MDS (typical when using a decent gain antenna in a metro area), the 
sad fact is that the PR6 probably won't help you. If your antenna noise is 
only a few dB above MDS, then the PR6 might help, as it is very quiet (i.e., 
has a low noise figure) and could contribute to a better overall 
signal-to-noise ratio.

On the other hand, if you are lucky enough to not really be able to hear any 
6m antenna noise with the K3's internal preamp on... First, double-check to 
make sure you actually have connected the antenna... And if you have, you 
should congratulate yourself and get ready to REALLY have some fun on 6 
meters once you connect in that PR6 preamp! You might also want to get a 
good RF power amplifier, as you will want to be able to work all the DX 
stations you can hear -- some of whom are running REALLY BIG QRO, trust me. 
You will be in no danger of being an "alligator" station (all mouth and no 
ears).

Bill W5WVO
DM65qh



--
 


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html