Re: [Elecraft] WWV Clocks -- It's really WWVB

2006-04-04 Thread John Magliacane
Hi Craig.

 We have a total of 8 automatic WWV synched clocks of various types...

 And I live 30 miles from the WWV transmitter.

Incidentially, it is _WWVB_ on 60 kHz, not WWV or WWVH on HF that is used by
these radio controlled clocks for periodic time checks, usually once a day
during the early morning hours (local time).

Despite your short distance to WWVB, you still might be experiencing poor
reception due to local interference sources.  Computer monitors, switching
power supplies, AC operated motors, and thunderstorms tend to generate a
lot of 60 kHz noise.

All three NIST stations transmit DST, leap year, UT1, and leap second
information bits.

With regard to DST flags transmitted by WWVB, NIST Publication 432 states:

Daylight saving time (DST) and standard time (ST) information is
transmitted at seconds 57 and 58. When ST is in effect, bits 57 and 58
are set to 0. When DST is in effect, bits 57 and 58 are set to 1. On the
day of a change from ST to DST bit 57 changes from 0 to 1 at  UTC,
and bit 58 changes from 0 to 1 exactly 24 hours later. On the day of a
change from DST back to ST bit 57 changes from 1 to 0 at  UTC, and bit
58 changes from 1 to 0 exactly 24 hours later.

With this in mind, poor or inconsistant reception might explain some of the
effects you've recently seen.

I'm 1622 miles east of WWVB and own a WWVB-based frequency standard / UTC clock
of my own design.  Even at this distance, when proper receiving techniques are
used, reception of WWVB is generally excellent, day or night.


73, de John, KD2BD


Visit John on the Web at:

http://kd2bd.ham.org/
.
.
.
.

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] WWV Clocks -- It's really WWVB

2006-04-04 Thread Robert McGwier
Twice a year,  I take my clocks out to the back porch and out of my 
shack/office.  That is around the time of DST/ST switches.  The rest of 
the year,  my Atomic Clock from LaCrosse is always in perfect sync to 
the ability of my eye to detect.   I always do it after the switch 
because I never remember to do it before the switch!.  In central NJ,  
FN20rg,  in eight years of owning this clock,  I have never once had 
this procedure fail: back porch with full western exposure, one night, 
the clock resets and from then until the next change over, it keeps 
great time.


After acquisition,  it seems to do some kind of matched filtering for 
what it expects to stay synchronized and gets better Eb/N0 performance 
as a result.  I have repeated this every time I need to replace a 
battery or change ST/DST.


Bob
N4HY


John Magliacane wrote:

Hi Craig.

  

We have a total of 8 automatic WWV synched clocks of various types...

And I live 30 miles from the WWV transmitter.



Incidentially, it is _WWVB_ on 60 kHz, not WWV or WWVH on HF that is used by
these radio controlled clocks for periodic time checks, usually once a day
during the early morning hours (local time).

Despite your short distance to WWVB, you still might be experiencing poor
reception due to local interference sources.  Computer monitors, switching
power supplies, AC operated motors, and thunderstorms tend to generate a
lot of 60 kHz noise.


I'm 1622 miles east of WWVB and own a WWVB-based frequency standard / UTC clock
of my own design.  Even at this distance, when proper receiving techniques are
used, reception of WWVB is generally excellent, day or night.


73, de John, KD2BD

  


--
AMSAT VP Engineering. Member: ARRL, AMSAT-DL, TAPR, Packrats,
NJQRP/AMQRP, QRP ARCI, QCWA, FRC. ARRL SDR Wrk Grp Chairman
Laziness is the number one inspiration for ingenuity.  Guilty as charged!

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] WWV Clocks -- It's really WWVB

2006-04-04 Thread Bob Nielsen


On Apr 4, 2006, at 7:43 AM, John Magliacane wrote:



Despite your short distance to WWVB, you still might be  
experiencing poor
reception due to local interference sources.  Computer monitors,  
switching
power supplies, AC operated motors, and thunderstorms tend to  
generate a

lot of 60 kHz noise.


It's also a good idea to position the clock on a non-metallic surface.

The no-name-brand clock in my shack works perfectly, but at 0700Z  
each day it beeps loudly as it goes through the reset procedure with  
WWVB.  No problem there, but I wouldn't want it in my bedroom.


73, Bob N7XY
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] WWV Clocks -- It's really WWVB

2006-04-04 Thread Mark Bayern
My old Heathkit clock received WWV on 5Mhz, 10Mhz and 15Mhz. You could
turn up the audio and listen if you wanted.

 Incidentially, it is _WWVB_ on 60 kHz, not WWV or WWVH on HF that is used by
 these radio controlled clocks for periodic time checks, usually once a day
 during the early morning hours (local time).

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] WWV Clocks -- It's really WWVB

2006-04-04 Thread Geoffrey Mackenzie-Kennedy


- Original Message - 
From: John Magliacane [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 7:00 PM


While every amateur text I've come across states that the D and E layers
disappear at night, they, in fact, do not.  They rise to higher altitudes 
and

remain ionized through background cosmic radiation.


--

So I believe, and the elevated E layer during the night could also be 
responsible for some of the single hop transcontinental openings on 6m - 
unfortunately IMHO also called Auroral Es openings since they can occur 
occasionally when the Aurora is 'quiet'. I have noticed similar openings on 
40m at this QTH.


73,
Geoff
GM4ESD



___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com