Hi Jameson,
De : Jameson Quinn <jameson.qu...@gmail.com> >À : MIKE OSSIPOFF <nkk...@hotmail.com> >Cc : election-meth...@electorama.com >Envoyé le : Vendredi 2 mars 2012 13h13 >Objet : Re: [EM] Kevin: My failure scenario was erroneous for ABucklin > > > >Also, since ABucklin is in all significant regards identical to MJ, Balinski >and Laraki's proof that MJ meets FBC works verbatim for ABucklin. > > >Jameson > Did they use a special term for this property? We used to have an FBC page on Wikipedia, based on content from Russ' site I believe, but eventually this was removed since the notability is unclear. The big difference between ABucklin and MJ is that in the former, raising and lowering a candidate can alter the stage at which other candidates attain majority. It occurred to me that it could happen that if you change A>B>C>D>E to A=D>B>C>E This could probably move the win from B to C or E. But then you could just top-rank B to prevent it. Kevin
---- Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
