Re: [elinks-users] Printing - no not the dump way
The ELinks from the master branch draws nice looking frames in dumps. ___ elinks-users mailing list elinks-users@linuxfromscratch.org http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/elinks-users
Re: [elinks-users] Printing - no not the dump way
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 03:04:10AM EDT, witekfl wrote: The ELinks from the master branch draws nice looking frames in dumps. Now you're telling me.. :-) I indeed see it in the NEWS file: * enhancement: ``elinks --dump'' uses box-drawing characters if * supported by the charset. I haven't tried it, but this looks promising. Thanks for the good news. CJ -- Hi! My name is bobby... ___ elinks-users mailing list elinks-users@linuxfromscratch.org http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/elinks-users
Re: [elinks-users] Printing - no not the dump way
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 12:51:18AM -0400, Chris Jones wrote: | $ elinks -dump-width nnn -dump URL | lpr -P PDF Will try that out. Thanks. Not sure how it would know it should fill the gaps left between line drawing character though. Only other thing that comes to mind is that if it's just the tables bothering you, you might be able to write a script to postprocess the output of ?elinks -dump? and replace the pluses and dashes by the better-looking line-drawing characters and add it as a filter to the pipe above. Yes. Sounds a bit challenging with + used in table corners as well as within table etc. (for example). Mayuresh ___ elinks-users mailing list elinks-users@linuxfromscratch.org http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/elinks-users
Re: [elinks-users] Printing - no not the dump way
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 01:36:16PM -0400, Chris Jones wrote: Other options is to check out the ouput from lynx w3m... though I doubt they do better than ELinks. Checked already. I prefer elinks output. Mayuresh. ___ elinks-users mailing list elinks-users@linuxfromscratch.org http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/elinks-users
