I mostly try to use qualified imports instead of exposing variables into my
namespace. This leads me to using the `as` keyword often, like this:
```
import Module.B as B
import Module.C as C
{- etc. -}
```
In Go, accessing a namespace through the last part of it's name, is
implicit. If that was true of Elm as well, the example above would be the
same as:
```
import Module.B
import Module.C
{- etc. -}
```
For me, having this in Elm would remove most of my uses of the `as`
keyword. If my other import proposal was also implemented, import handling
would be simpler, at least for me, without sacrificing readability.
What do people think?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm
Discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to elm-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
