Re: [elrepo] Dual boot rhel 7.5 - gui not starting

2018-05-31 Thread John Adegbile
So I scrutinized my Xorg.log file as suggested and found some lines showing
failures:

*[28.568] (EE) Failed to load
/usr/lib64/xorg/modules/extensions/nvidia/libglx.so:
libnvidia-tls.so.390.59: cannot open shared object file: No such file or
directory*
*[28.568] (II) UnloadModule: "glx"*
*[28.568] (II) Unloading glx*
*[28.568] (EE) Failed to load module "glx" (loader failed, 7)*
*...*
*...*
*[28.700] (EE) [drm] Failed to open DRM device for (null): -2*
*[28.710] (II) modeset(0): using drv /dev/dri/card1*
*[28.710] (WW) Falling back to old probe method for fbdev*

I checked the directories and the missing shared object is actually in
/usr/lib64/nvidia.
However, I have configured my bumblebee.conf file exactly as specified in
the bumblebee wiki which has the XorgModulePath specifying the directory
path which fails above.

I don't think I should be attempting to change the directory path for
XorgModulePath
to point to /usr/lib64/nvidia since the bumblebee wiki does not say to do
that.


On Tue, 29 May 2018 at 09:58, Akemi Yagi  wrote:

> On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 4:40 PM, Akemi Yagi  wrote:
> > On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 2:45 PM, John Adegbile 
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sat, 26 May 2018 at 01:13, Akemi Yagi  wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 7:20 PM, John Adegbile  >
> >>> wrote:
> >>> > Hello,
> >>> >
> >>> > I am struggling a bit to get a GUI installation completed on my MSI
> >>> > GS63VR
> >>> > laptop. It comes with windows 10 and I have dual booted with RHEL
> 7.5 .
> >>> > I
> >>> > have completed the rhel installation and have installed the nvidia
> >>> > drivers
> >>> > from elrepo.
> >>> >
> >>> > I can't get the GUI to work though. Would someone kindly be able to
> give
> >>> > me
> >>> > some pointers as to where I'm going wrong? I have enabled default
> >>> > graphical.target via systemctl but the GUI does not launch. The
> error I
> >>> > get
> >>> > when I attempt to run startx manually is:
> >>> >
> >>> > [  1740.462] (EE) Screen(s) found, but none have a usable
> configuration.
> >>> > Fatal server error:
> >>> > [  1740.462] (EE) no screens found(EE)
> >>> > [  1740.463] (EE)
> >>> >
> >>> > Output of lspci is:
> >>> > 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Device 591b (rev
> >>> > 04)
> >>> > 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation GP106M [GeForce
> >>> > GTX
> >>> > 1060 Mobile] (rev a1)
> >>> >
> >>> > Output of nvidia-detect is:
> >>> > Probing for supported NVIDIA devices...
> >>> > [10de:1c20] NVIDIA Corporation GP106M [GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile]
> >>> > This device requires the current 390.59 NVIDIA driver kmod-nvidia
> >>> > [8086:591b] Intel Corporation Device 591b
> >>> >
> >>> > RPMs installed:
> >>> > nvidia-x11-drv-390.59-1.el7_5.elrepo.x86_64
> >>> > yum-plugin-nvidia-1.0.2-1.el7.elrepo.noarch
> >>> > kmod-nvidia-390.59-1.el7_5.elrepo.x86_64
> >>> > nvidia-detect-390.59-1.el7.elrepo.x86_64
> >>> >
> >>> > uname -a:
> >>> > 3.10.0-862.3.2.el7.x86_64
> >>> >
> >>> > Thanks in advance
> >>> >
> >>> > J
> >>>
> >>> You seem to have two graphics devices, an integrated graphics (Intel)
> >>> and an Nvidia card. Can you disable the former in the BIOS? If this is
> >>> not possible, you need to make use of the Nvidia Optimus technology.
> >>> For detailed instructions, please see the bumblebee wiki page at:
> >>>
> >>> http://elrepo.org/tiki/bumblebee
> >>>
> >>> Akemi
> >
> >> Thanks for the tip.
> >>
> >> I installed and configured bumblebee (using primus as an alternative to
> >> optirun). I followed the instructions and machine now hangs when I get
> to:
> >> [OK] Started GNOME display Manager.
> >> [OK] Started Virtualization daemon.
> >
> > Did you see any error message while installing the required packages?
> > No steps missed when configuring it?
> >
> > Not using it myself, I cannot provide better support than referring
> > you to what has already been written. There is an instruction note
> > given by a CentOS user:
> >
> >
> https://www.centos.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=49=61162=10#p266381
> >
> > It's basically the same except the addition of the last step (10).
> >
> > Akemi
>
> I'm copying a message from Nicolas Thierry-Mieg below. Hope this helps
> you figure out why things are not working.
>
> Akemi
>
> "you might have some useful info in /var/log/Xorg.*
>
> I had set up bumblebee on my son's laptop in the past and had to move
> some things around, because [some reason, can't remember the details
> but it was something like X not looking in the correct folders for the
> 2 cards]. Carefully reading through the Xorg.* logfiles had allowed me
> to find the source problem. I can look it up one of these evenings if
> needed."
> ___
> elrepo mailing list
> elrepo@lists.elrepo.org
> http://lists.elrepo.org/mailman/listinfo/elrepo
>
___
elrepo mailing list
elrepo@lists.elrepo.org
http://lists.elrepo.org/mailman/listinfo/elrepo


[elrepo] Announcement: EL7 Updated kernel-lt Package Set [4.4.135-1]

2018-05-31 Thread Alan Bartlett
Announcing the release of the kernel-lt-4.4.135-1.el7.elrepo package
set into the EL7 elrepo-kernel repository:

https://elrepo.org/tiki/kernel-lt

The upstream changelog:

https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/ChangeLog-4.4.135

The following files are currently synchronising to our mirror sites:

x86_64
kernel-lt-4.4.135-1.el7.elrepo.x86_64.rpm
kernel-lt-devel-4.4.135-1.el7.elrepo.x86_64.rpm
kernel-lt-doc-4.4.135-1.el7.elrepo.noarch.rpm
kernel-lt-headers-4.4.135-1.el7.elrepo.x86_64.rpm
kernel-lt-tools-4.4.135-1.el7.elrepo.x86_64.rpm
kernel-lt-tools-libs-4.4.135-1.el7.elrepo.x86_64.rpm
kernel-lt-tools-libs-devel-4.4.135-1.el7.elrepo.x86_64.rpm
perf-4.4.135-1.el7.elrepo.x86_64.rpm
python-perf-4.4.135-1.el7.elrepo.x86_64.rpm

nosrc
kernel-lt-4.4.135-1.el7.elrepo.nosrc.rpm

We provide these kernels for hardware testing in an effort to identify
new/updated drivers which can then be targeted for backporting as kmod
packages. Meanwhile, these kernels may provide interim relief to
people with non-functional hardware. We stress that we consider such
kernels as a last resort for those who are unable to get their
hardware working using the RHEL-7 kernel with supplementary kmod
packages.

These packages are provided "As-Is" with no implied warranty or
support. Using the kernel-lt may expose your system to security,
performance and/or data corruption issues. Since timely updates may
not be available from the ELRepo Project, the end user has the
ultimate responsibility for deciding whether to continue using the
kernel-lt packages in regular service.

The packages are intentionally named kernel-lt so as not to conflict
with the RHEL-7 kernels and, as such, they may be installed and
updated alongside the regular kernel. The kernel configuration is
based upon a default RHEL-7 configuration with added functionality
enabled as appropriate.

If a bug is found when using these kernels, the end user is encouraged
to report it upstream to the Linux Kernel Bug Tracker [1] and, for our
reference, to the ELRepo bug tracker [2]. By taking such action, the
reporter will be assisting the kernel developers, Red Hat and the Open
Source Community as a whole.

Thank you,

The ELRepo Team.

[1] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/
[2] https://elrepo.org/bugs/
___
elrepo mailing list
elrepo@lists.elrepo.org
http://lists.elrepo.org/mailman/listinfo/elrepo


[elrepo] Announcement: EL6 Updated kernel-lt Package Set [4.4.135-1]

2018-05-31 Thread Alan Bartlett
Announcing the release of the kernel-lt-4.4.135-1.el6.elrepo package
set into the EL6 elrepo-kernel repository:

https://elrepo.org/tiki/kernel-lt

The upstream changelog:

https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/ChangeLog-4.4.135

The following files are currently synchronising to our mirror sites:

x86_32
kernel-lt-4.4.135-1.el6.elrepo.i686.rpm
kernel-lt-devel-4.4.135-1.el6.elrepo.i686.rpm
kernel-lt-doc-4.4.135-1.el6.elrepo.noarch.rpm
kernel-lt-headers-4.4.135-1.el6.elrepo.i386.rpm
kernel-lt-NONPAE-4.4.135-1.el6.elrepo.i686.rpm
kernel-lt-NONPAE-devel-4.4.135-1.el6.elrepo.i686.rpm
perf-4.4.135-1.el6.elrepo.i686.rpm
python-perf-4.4.135-1.el6.elrepo.i686.rpm

x86_64
kernel-lt-4.4.135-1.el6.elrepo.x86_64.rpm
kernel-lt-devel-4.4.135-1.el6.elrepo.x86_64.rpm
kernel-lt-doc-4.4.135-1.el6.elrepo.noarch.rpm
kernel-lt-headers-4.4.135-1.el6.elrepo.x86_64.rpm
perf-4.4.135-1.el6.elrepo.x86_64.rpm
python-perf-4.4.135-1.el6.elrepo.x86_64.rpm

nosrc
kernel-lt-4.4.135-1.el6.elrepo.nosrc.rpm

We provide these kernels for hardware testing in an effort to identify
new/updated drivers which can then be targeted for backporting as kmod
packages. Meanwhile, these kernels may provide interim relief to
people with non-functional hardware. We stress that we consider such
kernels as a last resort for those who are unable to get their
hardware working using the RHEL-6 kernel with supplementary kmod
packages.

These packages are provided "As-Is" with no implied warranty or
support. Using the kernel-lt may expose your system to security,
performance and/or data corruption issues. Since timely updates may
not be available from the ELRepo Project, the end user has the
ultimate responsibility for deciding whether to continue using the
kernel-lt packages in regular service.

The packages are intentionally named kernel-lt so as not to conflict
with the RHEL-6 kernels and, as such, they may be installed and updated
alongside the regular kernel. The kernel configuration is based upon a
default RHEL-6 configuration with added functionality enabled as
appropriate.

If a bug is found when using these kernels, the end user is encouraged
to report it upstream to the Linux Kernel Bug Tracker [1] and, for our
reference, to the ELRepo bug tracker [2]. By taking such action, the
reporter will be assisting the kernel developers, Red Hat and the Open
Source Community as a whole.

Thank you,

The ELRepo Team.

[1] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/
[2] https://elrepo.org/bugs/
___
elrepo mailing list
elrepo@lists.elrepo.org
http://lists.elrepo.org/mailman/listinfo/elrepo