Many thanks Phil.
Downloaded, installed and working as expected.
Perfect!
Appreciate your help on this and all the work on this repo.
Regards, Richard
On Tue, 29 Sep 2020, 17:00 , wrote:
> Send elrepo mailing list submissions to
> elrepo@lists.elrepo.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.elrepo.org/mailman/listinfo/elrepo
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> elrepo-requ...@lists.elrepo.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> elrepo-ow...@lists.elrepo.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of elrepo digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>1. kmod-jme for el8 (x86_64) (Richard A. Beauchamp)
>2. Re: kmod-jme for el8 (x86_64) (Phil Perry)
>3. Re: kmod-jme for el8 (x86_64) (Phil Perry)
>
>
> --
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 07:35:44 +0100
> From: "Richard A. Beauchamp"
> To: elrepo@lists.elrepo.org
> Subject: [elrepo] kmod-jme for el8 (x86_64)
> Message-ID:
> <
> cag+8wv8y70-6qek-cb3bt-f7poaq2v1cenze9nsr1erv9-w...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Hi All,
>
> I was attempting to get some old hardware running CentOS 8, but am having
> issues with an unsupported network device:
>
> 02:00.5 Ethernet controller [0200]: JMicron Technology Corp. JMC250 PCI
> Express Gigabit Ethernet Controller [197b:0250] (rev 03)
>
> I noticed that the kmod-jme package was available in the el6 (x86_64)
> packages but not el7 or el8.
>
> Is this likely to work with a re-compile or need more to work than that?
> Would it be possible to make it available?
>
> Happy to have a go if someone can point me in the right direction.
>
> Many thanks for your help and the support in Elrepo!
>
> Regards,
> Rich
> -- next part --
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.elrepo.org/pipermail/elrepo/attachments/20200929/15c27e2d/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> --
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 07:47:55 +0100
> From: Phil Perry
> To: elrepo@lists.elrepo.org
> Subject: Re: [elrepo] kmod-jme for el8 (x86_64)
> Message-ID: <04c88f1d-1b1f-9806-13bb-c13822115...@elrepo.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
>
> On 29/09/2020 07:35, Richard A. Beauchamp wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I was attempting to get some old hardware running CentOS 8, but am
> > having issues with an unsupported network device:
> >
> > 02:00.5 Ethernet controller [0200]: JMicron Technology Corp. JMC250 PCI
> > Express Gigabit Ethernet Controller [197b:0250] (rev 03)
> >
> > I noticed?that the kmod-jme package was available?in the el6 (x86_64)
> > packages but not el7 or el8.
> >
> > Is this likely to work with a re-compile or need more to work than
> > that?? Would it be possible to make it available?
> >
> > Happy to have a go if someone can point?me in the right direction.
> >
> > Many thanks for?your help and the support in Elrepo!
> >
> > Regards,
> > Rich
> >
>
> Hi Rich,
>
> Thank you for your email.
>
> We can't just recompile the el6 package for el8, but we have templates
> available for creating new packages here:
>
> https://github.com/elrepo/templates/tree/master/el8
>
> I'm happy make a kmod-jme package for el8 for you to test and post back
> here once available, hopefully later today.
>
> Regards,
>
> Phil
>
>
>
> --
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 08:16:16 +0100
> From: Phil Perry
> To: elrepo@lists.elrepo.org
> Subject: Re: [elrepo] kmod-jme for el8 (x86_64)
> Message-ID:
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
>
> On 29/09/2020 07:47, Phil Perry wrote:
> > On 29/09/2020 07:35, Richard A. Beauchamp wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> I was attempting to get some old hardware running CentOS 8, but am
> >> having issues with an unsupported network device:
> >>
> >> 02:00.5 Ethernet controller [0200]: JMicron Technology Corp. JMC250
> >> PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet Controller [197b:0250] (rev 03)
> >>
> >> I noticed?that the kmod-jme package was available?in the el6 (x86_64)
> >> packages but not el7 or el8.
> >>
> >> Is this likely to work with a re-compile or need more to work than
> >> that?? Would it be
