[O] Shared Tasks in multiple headers?
Hi all i wonder if any one knows or has experience with using Shared Tasks in multiple headers? ie i have 2 research projects with a very similar/same task. can i link/mirror/share tasks in sub headers (projects) with orgmode? also related is there a Merge Duplicate Tasks util? best Z
Re: [O] Capture-like browser plugin?
Hello Daniele, On 2015-07-23 16:47, Daniele Pizzolli d...@toel.it writes: if you use firefox, see: https://addons.mozilla.org/it/firefox/addon/org-mode-capture/ The latest version convert html links to org-links (disclaimer: it is my little contribution). This is great! If I may suggest an addition to it: being able to specify how one calls emacs. Indeed, my emacsclient is a symbolic link to the real one, which may change as I update it, but the preference interface of the addon only gives me the target of the symbolic link. I have also a small issue with org-protocol: it creates a new frame (which is great) but does not raise it, and it displays two windows: the capture one and an unrelated one. I have some code to avoid this when I call org-capture from my system: #+begin_src emacs-lisp (defun make-orgcapture-frame () Create a new frame and run org-capture. (interactive) (make-frame '((name . remember) (width . 80) (height . 16) (top . 400) (left . 300) (font . -*-Consolas-normal-normal-normal-*-13-*-*-*-m-0-iso10646-1) )) (select-frame-by-name remember) (delete-other-windows) (flet ((switch-to-buffer-other-window (buf) (switch-to-buffer buf))) (org-capture nil c))) #+end_src but I don’t know how to integrate this with org-protocol. Is there a way to change its call to org-capture without having to rewrite the `org-protocol-do-capture' function? Thanks! Alan -- OpenPGP Key ID : 040D0A3B4ED2E5C7 Last week athmospheric CO₂ average (Updated July 19, 2015, Mauna Loa Obs.): 401.39 ppm signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [O] export to html stuck in loop scanning for org IDs
Hi Bruce, Bruce Gilstrap br...@gilstraps.org writes: This happens consistently with one file that I successfully exported last Friday under 8.2.10 but does not happen at all with some other files. So far, I have been unable to isolate exactly what it is about this file that causes the export to get stuck in this loop. I can do the legwork to track it down if someone more knowledgeable about the exporter can point me in the right direction. It seems obvious that it has something to do with IDs, but the files that still export properly contain IDs, too, so the issue isn't as simple as the existence of IDs in the file. Would it be possible to bisect your file to find the offending part? Otherwise you could try to hot-patch org-id-update-id-locations in org-id.el. For instance, try to change the last (if ...) to: (if ( ndup 0) (message WARNING: %d duplicate IDs found, check *Messages* buffer ndup) (progn (message %d unique files scanned for IDs (length org-id-files)) (message (mapconcat (lambda (x) (format %s x)) org-id-files \n To see which files it is scanning. Maybe that will give a clue as to where the problem is. Do you use #+INCLUDE? Rasmus -- Er du tosset for noge' lårt!
[O] Offline until August 2nd
Hello, FWIW, I'll be offline for a week. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou0x80A93738
[O] Change color for two words in LaTeX export using cologr package?
Hi
In an org document, I want to change the text colour of two words
{\color{red} red line } to red in a sentence and the rest should be
normal colour.
I am missing something, as this changes the text colour for the rest of
the sentence into red. How can I only change the colour of the two
words?
Thanks,
Rainer
--
Rainer M. Krug, PhD (Conservation Ecology, SUN), MSc (Conservation Biology,
UCT), Dipl. Phys. (Germany)
Centre of Excellence for Invasion Biology
Stellenbosch University
South Africa
Tel : +33 - (0)9 53 10 27 44
Cell: +33 - (0)6 85 62 59 98
Fax : +33 - (0)9 58 10 27 44
Fax (D):+49 - (0)3 21 21 25 22 44
email: rai...@krugs.de
Skype: RMkrug
PGP: 0x0F52F982
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Re: [O] org-version N/A when using git subtree
Excellent idea. I'll try that when I meddle with it next. Thank you. Johan 2015-07-22 03:00 skrev Grant Rettke: Generate autoloads with out make? http://orgmode.org/worg/org-hacks.html Grant Rettke -- g...@wisdomandwonder.com | http://www.wisdomandwonder.com/ “Wisdom begins in wonder.” --Socrates “All creativity is an extended form of a joke.” --Kay ((λ (x) (x x)) (λ (x) (x x))) “Life has become immeasurably better since I have been forced to stop taking it seriously.” --Thompson On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Johan Sandblom j...@ndblom.se wrote: This is off topic, or at least the first paragraph is, but I don't know where else to ask ... I maintain a private git repo where the org-mode git repo is included. I use it on several machines, both windows and linux, and also on a stick which I can use on the terribly restricted and firewalled computers at work (which curiously allow me to run emacs from the stick!). I used to include org-mode as a fake submodule (http://debuggable.com/posts/git-fake-submodules:4b563ee4-f3cc-4061-967e-0e48cbdd56cb) but wanted to learn more about git so I changed to a real submodule. This was annoying because then I could no longer just pull from the repo to the stick and have my new org-mode with me, I needed to update the submodule on the stick as well, which was more work than before. I then changed to using a git subtree for org-mode and lots of other bits and pieces that I wanted handy, even behind the firewall at work. This works great except for one thing: org-version is set to N/A (on topic again I hope). As far as I have been able to gather with my non-existent developer skills the org-version stems from mk/default.mk and so could be adjusted in local.mk, but I am unable to figure out where I should get it from, and how to adjust it. Can you enlighten me? Johan -- Johan Sandblom, MD PhD m +46735521477 What is wanted is not the will to believe, but the will to find out, which is the exact opposite --Bertrand Russell -- Johan Sandblom, MD PhD m +46735521477 What is wanted is not the will to believe, but the will to find out, which is the exact opposite --Bertrand Russell
Re: [O] export to html stuck in loop scanning for org IDs
Rasmus, I had started down the path of bisecting the file, but wasn't having much luck isolating the problem, so I posted the question. I had some time to get back to it this afternoon, and I eventually tracked this down. It had to do with a missing ID rather than a duplicate one. The file contained a link to an ID that no longer existed in the file (or in any other org files), but it wasn't listed in the *Messages* buffer and export kept searching through all my org files over and over until I pressed C-g. When I removed that link, I still had some other problems in the file with text links, i.e. [[target]], that didn't have a matching target, i.e., target, but now these were identified in the *Messages* buffer (one per export attempt until I found them all). Once all of those were fixed, the export ran successfully. I do use #+INCLUDE, but that is not the problem here. Thanks, Bruce On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 4:38 AM, Rasmus ras...@gmx.us wrote: Hi Bruce, Bruce Gilstrap br...@gilstraps.org writes: This happens consistently with one file that I successfully exported last Friday under 8.2.10 but does not happen at all with some other files. So far, I have been unable to isolate exactly what it is about this file that causes the export to get stuck in this loop. I can do the legwork to track it down if someone more knowledgeable about the exporter can point me in the right direction. It seems obvious that it has something to do with IDs, but the files that still export properly contain IDs, too, so the issue isn't as simple as the existence of IDs in the file. Would it be possible to bisect your file to find the offending part? Otherwise you could try to hot-patch org-id-update-id-locations in org-id.el. For instance, try to change the last (if ...) to: (if ( ndup 0) (message WARNING: %d duplicate IDs found, check *Messages* buffer ndup) (progn (message %d unique files scanned for IDs (length org-id-files)) (message (mapconcat (lambda (x) (format %s x)) org-id-files \n To see which files it is scanning. Maybe that will give a clue as to where the problem is. Do you use #+INCLUDE? Rasmus -- Er du tosset for noge' lårt!
[O] Shifting only past timestamps
Hello, I like to be reminded to check my post on Mondays and Thursdays, every week. When I've done it on Monday, I mark it 'DONE' so that I can stop org-mode reminding me until Thursday. Here's how I used to achieve this: *** URGENT [#A] Check post :important: DEADLINE: 2015-07-27 Mon +1w -0d DEADLINE: 2015-07-30 Thu +1w -0d In org-mode 8.2.10, if I mark 'Check post' as 'DONE', both timestamps will be moved forward one week. This is no good, as I need to be reminded to check my post on Thursday. I think I got the desired behaviour in the last version of org-mode I used, which I think was this 7.8.11 from this package: https://packages.debian.org/wheezy/org-mode How can I make org-mode shift only the timestamps from the past? Thanks in advance, Ed
Re: [O] Change color for two words in LaTeX export using cologr package?
On Friday, 24 Jul 2015 at 15:07, Rainer M Krug wrote:
Hi
In an org document, I want to change the text colour of two words
{\color{red} red line } to red in a sentence and the rest should be
normal colour.
I am missing something, as this changes the text colour for the rest of
the sentence into red. How can I only change the colour of the two
words?
I usually do this type of thing as follows:
#+latex: {\color{red}
red line
#+latex: }
which allows for org-isms in the text. Alternatively, you could do:
... @@latex:{\color{red} red line}@@
if you don't need to use org syntax within the {}.
--
: Eric S Fraga (0xFFFCF67D), Emacs 25.0.50.1, Org release_8.3beta-1293-g985420
Re: [O] Change color for two words in LaTeX export using cologr package?
Eric S Fraga e.fr...@ucl.ac.uk writes:
On Friday, 24 Jul 2015 at 15:07, Rainer M Krug wrote:
Hi
In an org document, I want to change the text colour of two words
{\color{red} red line } to red in a sentence and the rest should be
normal colour.
I am missing something, as this changes the text colour for the rest of
the sentence into red. How can I only change the colour of the two
words?
I usually do this type of thing as follows:
#+latex: {\color{red}
red line
#+latex: }
which allows for org-isms in the text. Alternatively, you could do:
... @@latex:{\color{red} red line}@@
if you don't need to use org syntax within the {}.
Thanks - I will try it out on Monday. But it looks good.
Thanks,
Rainer
--
Rainer M. Krug, PhD (Conservation Ecology, SUN), MSc (Conservation Biology,
UCT), Dipl. Phys. (Germany)
Centre of Excellence for Invasion Biology
Stellenbosch University
South Africa
Tel : +33 - (0)9 53 10 27 44
Cell: +33 - (0)6 85 62 59 98
Fax : +33 - (0)9 58 10 27 44
Fax (D):+49 - (0)3 21 21 25 22 44
email: rai...@krugs.de
Skype: RMkrug
PGP: 0x0F52F982
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
