Re: [O] orgalist list item spacing
On Saturday, 15 Sep 2018 at 11:03, Eric Abrahamsen wrote: > Eric S Fraga writes: >> Long standing "feature" of org. Unless you do require a blank line >> between items, it is impossible to differentiate between the start of a >> numbered item and the continuation of the previous item in this case. > > Huh, I've never seen this in org-mode proper. Silly me. I was comparing apples and oranges. In org mode, I use visual-line-mode and no filling; in message mode, I use auto-fill. Sorry for my intervention! -- Eric S Fraga via Emacs 27.0.50, Org release_9.1.13-783-g97fac4
Re: [O] Bug: org-agenda-filter-by-top-heading does not filter [9.1.14 (release_9.1.14-908-gf1269e)]
Hello, Lem Ming writes: > In the agenda list `org-agenda-list` buffer, when I do > `org-agenda-filter-by-top-headline` when the point is over a line with a > headline, nothing is filtered. > I've never used org-agenda-filter-by-top-headline, but taking a quick look at it and its helper, org-find-top-headline, the intention seems to be to find the level-one parent of the current heading. So, in your example, > * Root > ** TODO task 2 > :tag_2: >DEADLINE: <2018-09-14 Fri 12:00:00> >:PROPERTIES: >:ADD_TIME: <2018-09-07 Fri 23:47:00> >:END: > *** TODO task 2.1 > DEADLINE: <2018-09-14 Fri 11:00:00> > :PROPERTIES: > :ADD_TIME: <2018-09-07 Fri 23:47:00> > :END: [...] > ** TODO task 7 >DEADLINE: <2018-09-14 Fri 12:00:00> SCHEDULED: <2018-09-12 Wed 10:00:00> ... it'd find "Root" if point were on any of the tasks. If I'm reading your report correctly, you're assuming that with point on the "task 2", it'd take *that* as the top-level heading and filter to all the tasks under it (task 2.1, etc). Instead, it finds "Root" and filters to everything thing under that, which---in your example file---is the same thing, so you don't see any change. -- Kyle
Re: [O] Move (the children of) a subtree to another subtree programmatically
See the SCOPE argument to org-map-entries. I'd also recommend using org-refile instead of org-cut/paste-subtree. You may also find the org-datetree system helpful.
Re: [O] bug#32722: bug#32722: 26.1; Org-publish depend on non-free platform ?
I'm not an expert on this package nor this situation, however, looking at the htmlize.el file shows: ;; Copyright (C) 1997-2003,2005,2006,2009,2011,2012,2014,2017,2018 So it would appear that the package has existed longer than either GitHub or Org. I'm guessing that its author moved its primary repo to GitHub after Org started using it. In hindsight, perhaps it would have been better to move htmlize into Emacs before adding it to Org proper. But many things are clearer in hindsight. Regardless of where it is hosted, htmlize.el is Free Software, and it's an optional addon to Org. We can encourage its author to add it to Emacs proper, or to ELPA. But surely it's not necessary to censor the mention of "GitHub" in the manual; it's simply a fact that GitHub exists and that htmlize.el is currently hosted there. It would seem unreasonable for the Org maintainers to have reacted to htmlize.el's moving to GitHub by removing htmlize.el support while it remains Free Software, yet that's the logical conclusion of this argument. So please do not remove support for this package because of where its repo happens to be hosted at the moment. That would be a major regression, and it would not be in users' best interests. It would not be fair to remove a major feature used by thousands of users and demand that "someone" (since there is no one ultimately responsible) rewrite large parts of ox-html.el to fix it. It would at least seem fair for those insisting on the change to do the necessary work.
