Re: [O] words pre-lexed for use as keywords in an agenda view
Hello Bastien Thanks for your kind answer, I'd like to hack something along those lines as a hackish practise. I'd better ask before. best Haroldo 2014-05-09 9:41 GMT-03:00 Bastien b...@gnu.org: Hi Haroldo, Haroldo Stenger haroldo.sten...@gmail.com writes: is there alredy a word lexer connected somehow to org-mode, that uses the most frequent words in the org-agenda-files , and offers them to you to look for the lines in which they occur in an agenda view ? I'm not aware of anything like that, but this would be cool indeed. -- Bastien
Re: [O] words pre-lexed for use as keywords in an agenda view
Hello Alexander I'd like a sort of pareto (the top fifth of the whole set of words sorted by usage/frequency) index of words which are in the .org documents . Then, in some of the agenda views that look for the string that you type, you'd be offered word expansion on those frequent word set, just like you're offered word expansion on TODO/DONE and the like. Let's say that somehow it's a starting point for a self learning helper. Possibly not big deal if well thought of. Possibly of great coolness as Bastien told. :-) best Haroldo 2014-05-09 8:13 GMT-03:00 Alexander Baier lexi.ba...@gmail.com: Hello Haroldo, On 2014-05-08 20:31 Haroldo Stenger wrote: is there alredy a word lexer connected somehow to org-mode, that uses the most frequent words in the org-agenda-files , and offers them to you to look for the lines in which they occur in an agenda view ? I am not really sure I know what you are asking. What do you mean by keywords? I think a little example or a more elaborate explanation might help me and others understand what it is you are asking for. Regards, -- Alexander Baier
Re: [O] words pre-lexed for use as keywords in an agenda view
Yes, especially the search prompt in the minibuffer. Indeed I was thinking more of C-c a T 'ish view, but not restricted to the list of TODO tags, instead focused in the top used words. 2014-05-09 15:29 GMT-03:00 Alexander Baier lexi.ba...@gmail.com: On 2014-05-09 20:00 Haroldo Stenger wrote: Hello Alexander I'd like a sort of pareto (the top fifth of the whole set of words sorted by usage/frequency) index of words which are in the .org documents . Then, in some of the agenda views that look for the string that you type, Do you mean agenda views like the one generated by pressing `C-c a /' ? you'd be offered word expansion on those frequent word set, just like you're offered word expansion on TODO/DONE and the like. Let's say that somehow it's a starting point for a self learning helper. Regards, -- Alexander Baier
[O] words pre-lexed for use as keywords in an agenda view
hello, is there alredy a word lexer connected somehow to org-mode, that uses the most frequent words in the org-agenda-files , and offers them to you to look for the lines in which they occur in an agenda view ? best haroldo
Re: [Orgmode] 'Double-entry' journals
hi , 2010/3/19 Jan Böcker jan.boec...@jboecker.de: generated the project specific ones automatically from that. The normal Org approach is to go the opposite direction: you edit your project files directly and use the agenda to view tasks (and notes, if you include an active timestamp in them or tell the agenda to show inactive timestamps) by date in daily, weekly or monthly views. Combining these two posibilities , I wondered myself whether it would we useful to have a org-mode tree-like view of the agenda view , and other reports. Something like a text generator that bases its output on agenda output , and renders or re-renders output based on agenda view. If someone comments on it , I'd be wishful to start hacking it , up to my knowledge, which is lispy to some extend (a common-lisp background, and little elisp yet.) best regards , haroldo ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
Re: [Orgmode] Prefixing a function call with C-digit
Raffi, Off the top of mi mind, you pass arguments to commands by issueing C-u parameter command keychord best, haroldo 2009/9/8 Raffi R raf...@gmail.com Dear org users, I'd like to write some advice or a wrapper function for org-export such that it defaults to a heading level of 0. In org-mode normally, I can get this behaviour by pressing C-0 C-x C-e. Looking at org.el suggested that I should be able to simply provide the 0 as an argument, i.e. using (org-export 0). However, org-export seems to ignore that 0. Thank you very much, - Raffi. ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
Re: [Orgmode] formula
Carsten, Nick, I finally could solve the issue. I got confused by what I consider are two typos in the mails, I was mislead by 'filed formula' which I thought was something new to me, when it was really a simple 'field formula'. Moreover, column formulas (as the docs say, since I checked) start like $3= and not as %3=. Finally, I understood that the only thing I had missing (which you kindly provided) was the field formula that initializes the column to zero, when instead I was trying to achieve by putting a zero directly, which (I don't know why) does not work in combination with a column formula. I just write this as feedback, not to bother anyone. And thanks a lot for your kind help. best, haroldo 2009/8/4 Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com On Aug 4, 2009, at 4:23 PM, Haroldo Stenger wrote: Carsten , I take for granted that a filed formula is a column formula , like the one I was using. No. A column formula starts like %3=... and applies to all fields in column 3. A field formula starts like @2$3=... and applies to a single field. I did out the correct formulas into the table I sent with my last email. For the rest I don't know what is wrong. Maybe you have some local setup binding `C-c *' to a different function? Maybe you C-u is bound to something else? You can try to move the cursor into the #+TBLFM line and press `C-c C-c' there, this should also update the entire table, as should `C-u C-c C-c' anywhere in the table. - Carsten I upgraded to the las org-mode version. I must be doing something really wrong, since C-u C-c * doesn't recalculate the column, it just moves the point to the first row after the hline. What can be that is missing here ? best regards, haroldo 2009/8/4 Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com Hi Haroldo, Well, I am using the newest version of Org-mode for which you'd have to use a filed formula for the first field in the balance column. Then using your formulas, `C-u C-c *' does fill the entire table: | in | out | balance | |-+-+-| | | | 0 | | 30 | | 30 | | | 25 | 5 | | 100 | | 105 | | 500 | | 605 | | | 400 | 205 | | | | 205 | #+TBLFM: $...@-1$3 + @+0$1 - @+0$2::@2$3=0 So I don't know why this is not working for you. - Carsten On Aug 4, 2009, at 8:28 AM, Haroldo Stenger wrote: Sure, sorry, that's what text is for :) | in | out | balance | |-+-+-| | | | | | 30 | | 30 | | | 25 | 5 | | 100 | | 105 | | 500 | | | | | 400 | | | | | | #+TBLFM: $...@-1$3 + @+0$1 - @+0$2 That's how the table looks like after - creating the table - filling columns 1 and 2 with numbers - creating the column formula in column 3, and - typing C-c * in @3$3 , @4$3 and @5$3 The complete filling of the $3 column doesn't take place by issuing the commands in http://orgmode.org/org.html#Updating-the-table. If I go to @6$3 , @7$3 and @8$3 and type C-c * I obtain what I want, being: | in | out | balance | |-+-+-| | | | | | 30 | | 30 | | | 25 | 5 | | 100 | | 105 | | 500 | | 605 | | | 400 | 205 | | | | 205 | #+TBLFM: $...@-1$3 + @+0$1 - @+0$2 I know that what I'm asking should be of easy achievement on my own, but I got somewhat frustrated when I use the commands and the filling doesn't happen. Thanks for helping me. best, haroldo 2009/8/4 Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com Hi Haroldo, instead of keeping us guessing what your table might look like, maybe you can just post it - Carsten On Aug 4, 2009, at 1:53 AM, Haroldo Stenger wrote: Dear Carsten , Thanks ! That's exactly what I was in need of: a combination of a column-formula and relative references in the formula. So far, so good. Now, I have the formula line like this #+TBLFM: $...@-1$5 + @-0$3 - @-0$4 and the very line I typed the formula gets calculated fine. If I want another line into the bus, I go to the empty field in the same column in another line, and go to the Calculate menu, and choose recalculate line, and the fine result appears there , as expected. But if I approach Calculate / Recalculate all , in fact , nothing happens. I tried many times, without result. Recalc line works perfectly, but that does not seem what I'm looking for, which would be a recalculation of all the fields in the column that holds my column-formula. I'll continue reading until I find out, but if you come up with an answer earlier I'd be grateful in advance ! :-) best , haroldo 2009/8/3 Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com Hi Haroldo, You cannot copy a formula easily from one field t the next with shifting the reference like you would do in a normal spreadsheet. However, you can use
Re: [Orgmode] formula
Sure, sorry, that's what text is for :) | in | out | balance | |-+-+-| | | | | | 30 | | 30 | | | 25 | 5 | | 100 | | 105 | | 500 | | | | | 400 | | | | | | #+TBLFM: $...@-1$3 + @+0$1 - @+0$2 That's how the table looks like after - creating the table - filling columns 1 and 2 with numbers - creating the column formula in column 3, and - typing C-c * in @3$3 , @4$3 and @5$3 The complete filling of the $3 column doesn't take place by issuing the commands in http://orgmode.org/org.html#Updating-the-table. If I go to @6$3 , @7$3 and @8$3 and type C-c * I obtain what I want, being: | in | out | balance | |-+-+-| | | | | | 30 | | 30 | | | 25 | 5 | | 100 | | 105 | | 500 | | 605 | | | 400 | 205 | | | | 205 | #+TBLFM: $...@-1$3 + @+0$1 - @+0$2 I know that what I'm asking should be of easy achievement on my own, but I got somewhat frustrated when I use the commands and the filling doesn't happen. Thanks for helping me. best, haroldo 2009/8/4 Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com Hi Haroldo, instead of keeping us guessing what your table might look like, maybe you can just post it - Carsten On Aug 4, 2009, at 1:53 AM, Haroldo Stenger wrote: Dear Carsten , Thanks ! That's exactly what I was in need of: a combination of a column-formula and relative references in the formula. So far, so good. Now, I have the formula line like this #+TBLFM: $...@-1$5 + @-0$3 - @-0$4 and the very line I typed the formula gets calculated fine. If I want another line into the bus, I go to the empty field in the same column in another line, and go to the Calculate menu, and choose recalculate line, and the fine result appears there , as expected. But if I approach Calculate / Recalculate all , in fact , nothing happens. I tried many times, without result. Recalc line works perfectly, but that does not seem what I'm looking for, which would be a recalculation of all the fields in the column that holds my column-formula. I'll continue reading until I find out, but if you come up with an answer earlier I'd be grateful in advance ! :-) best , haroldo 2009/8/3 Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com Hi Haroldo, You cannot copy a formula easily from one field t the next with shifting the reference like you would do in a normal spreadsheet. However, you can use relative references (see the manual) in order to write formulas in an invariant way, and then use basic editing commands in the C-c ' buffer to define the formula for many fields. Even better, use a column formula which allows you to write a single formula for an entire column. - Carsten On Aug 3, 2009, at 12:58 AM, Haroldo Stenger wrote: hi , I wonder how can a formula in a table be copied to a location below, and its references be shifted alongwise automatically. I checked every documentation I've found , but that feature does not show up. I'm forced to copy the formula in in the C-c ' and then go to each of the references and type S-downarrow as many times. I'd thank any idea here. best regards, haroldo. (thanks for org-mode, it's great) ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
Re: [Orgmode] formula
Carsten , I take for granted that a filed formula is a column formula , like the one I was using. I upgraded to the las org-mode version. I must be doing something really wrong, since C-u C-c * doesn't recalculate the column, it just moves the point to the first row after the hline. What can be that is missing here ? best regards, haroldo 2009/8/4 Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com Hi Haroldo, Well, I am using the newest version of Org-mode for which you'd have to use a filed formula for the first field in the balance column. Then using your formulas, `C-u C-c *' does fill the entire table: | in | out | balance | |-+-+-| | | | 0 | | 30 | | 30 | | | 25 | 5 | | 100 | | 105 | | 500 | | 605 | | | 400 | 205 | | | | 205 | #+TBLFM: $...@-1$3 + @+0$1 - @+0$2::@2$3=0 So I don't know why this is not working for you. - Carsten On Aug 4, 2009, at 8:28 AM, Haroldo Stenger wrote: Sure, sorry, that's what text is for :) | in | out | balance | |-+-+-| | | | | | 30 | | 30 | | | 25 | 5 | | 100 | | 105 | | 500 | | | | | 400 | | | | | | #+TBLFM: $...@-1$3 + @+0$1 - @+0$2 That's how the table looks like after - creating the table - filling columns 1 and 2 with numbers - creating the column formula in column 3, and - typing C-c * in @3$3 , @4$3 and @5$3 The complete filling of the $3 column doesn't take place by issuing the commands in http://orgmode.org/org.html#Updating-the-table. If I go to @6$3 , @7$3 and @8$3 and type C-c * I obtain what I want, being: | in | out | balance | |-+-+-| | | | | | 30 | | 30 | | | 25 | 5 | | 100 | | 105 | | 500 | | 605 | | | 400 | 205 | | | | 205 | #+TBLFM: $...@-1$3 + @+0$1 - @+0$2 I know that what I'm asking should be of easy achievement on my own, but I got somewhat frustrated when I use the commands and the filling doesn't happen. Thanks for helping me. best, haroldo 2009/8/4 Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com Hi Haroldo, instead of keeping us guessing what your table might look like, maybe you can just post it - Carsten On Aug 4, 2009, at 1:53 AM, Haroldo Stenger wrote: Dear Carsten , Thanks ! That's exactly what I was in need of: a combination of a column-formula and relative references in the formula. So far, so good. Now, I have the formula line like this #+TBLFM: $...@-1$5 + @-0$3 - @-0$4 and the very line I typed the formula gets calculated fine. If I want another line into the bus, I go to the empty field in the same column in another line, and go to the Calculate menu, and choose recalculate line, and the fine result appears there , as expected. But if I approach Calculate / Recalculate all , in fact , nothing happens. I tried many times, without result. Recalc line works perfectly, but that does not seem what I'm looking for, which would be a recalculation of all the fields in the column that holds my column-formula. I'll continue reading until I find out, but if you come up with an answer earlier I'd be grateful in advance ! :-) best , haroldo 2009/8/3 Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com Hi Haroldo, You cannot copy a formula easily from one field t the next with shifting the reference like you would do in a normal spreadsheet. However, you can use relative references (see the manual) in order to write formulas in an invariant way, and then use basic editing commands in the C-c ' buffer to define the formula for many fields. Even better, use a column formula which allows you to write a single formula for an entire column. - Carsten On Aug 3, 2009, at 12:58 AM, Haroldo Stenger wrote: hi , I wonder how can a formula in a table be copied to a location below, and its references be shifted alongwise automatically. I checked every documentation I've found , but that feature does not show up. I'm forced to copy the formula in in the C-c ' and then go to each of the references and type S-downarrow as many times. I'd thank any idea here. best regards, haroldo. (thanks for org-mode, it's great) ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
Re: [Orgmode] formula
Dear Carsten , Thanks ! That's exactly what I was in need of: a combination of a column-formula and relative references in the formula. So far, so good. Now, I have the formula line like this #+TBLFM: $...@-1$5 + @-0$3 - @-0$4 and the very line I typed the formula gets calculated fine. If I want another line into the bus, I go to the empty field in the same column in another line, and go to the Calculate menu, and choose recalculate line, and the fine result appears there , as expected. But if I approach Calculate / Recalculate all , in fact , nothing happens. I tried many times, without result. Recalc line works perfectly, but that does not seem what I'm looking for, which would be a recalculation of all the fields in the column that holds my column-formula. I'll continue reading until I find out, but if you come up with an answer earlier I'd be grateful in advance ! :-) best , haroldo 2009/8/3 Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com Hi Haroldo, You cannot copy a formula easily from one field t the next with shifting the reference like you would do in a normal spreadsheet. However, you can use relative references (see the manual) in order to write formulas in an invariant way, and then use basic editing commands in the C-c ' buffer to define the formula for many fields. Even better, use a column formula which allows you to write a single formula for an entire column. - Carsten On Aug 3, 2009, at 12:58 AM, Haroldo Stenger wrote: hi , I wonder how can a formula in a table be copied to a location below, and its references be shifted alongwise automatically. I checked every documentation I've found , but that feature does not show up. I'm forced to copy the formula in in the C-c ' and then go to each of the references and type S-downarrow as many times. I'd thank any idea here. best regards, haroldo. (thanks for org-mode, it's great) ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
[Orgmode] formula
hi , I wonder how can a formula in a table be copied to a location below, and its references be shifted alongwise automatically. I checked every documentation I've found , but that feature does not show up. I'm forced to copy the formula in in the C-c ' and then go to each of the references and type S-downarrow as many times. I'd thank any idea here. best regards, haroldo. (thanks for org-mode, it's great) ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
