Re: [O] [bug] Problem when tangling into LaTeX
Hi Eric, Eric S Fraga wrote: Sebastien Vauban wxhgmqzgw...@spammotel.com writes: If it does not take you too much time, can you enlighten me on the diffs between the chunks? Why was it well working for the second one? I think you'll find that the asymmetry is due to the placement of your comment strings which have the characters, misinterpreted in this case to indicate the start of a noweb reference... That must be it. Due to the correct highlighting as comments, it did not occur to me that the `%' I inserted looked like noweb refs... And Eric's fix does solve this. Best regards, Seb -- Sebastien Vauban
Re: [O] [bug] Problem when tangling into LaTeX
Hi Eric,
Sebastien Vauban wrote:
Though, there is an annoying diff in the tangled LaTeX: the first block gets
an extra blank line (I don't understand why it differs from the others) which
will cause layout problem when compiling the document -- not this one, it's
just an not-so-valid ECM, but real ones...
#+begin_src latex
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage[utf8x]{inputenc}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\begin{document}
\begin{textblock}{85}(98,35)
\titlebox{9.4cm}{Foo}{% HERE
ToMe
}
\end{textblock}
\begin{textblock}{110}(25,195)
Some sentence
BeforeDate
\hfill{}% HERE
Rest
EUR% HERE
\end{textblock}
\end{document}
#+end_src
This isn't priority anymore: currently, I'm not hit by that bug/feature in the
real file I'm working on.
Thanks for the fix you've readily made available...
Best regards,
Seb
--
Sebastien Vauban
Re: [O] [bug] Problem when tangling into LaTeX
Hi Eric,
Eric Schulte wrote:
Sebastien Vauban wxhgmqzgw...@spammotel.com writes:
I use 3 chunks of LaTeX code which I wanna insert in a LaTeX document.
While 1 of them is correctly tangled into the LaTeX document, the 2 others
generate errors when C-c C-v C-t'ing:
if: reference 'who' not found in this buffer
and, if I temporarily replace `who()' by `who', I get the next error:
if: reference 'solde' not found in this buffer
What I don't understand is that there is no -- sorry, I mean: I don't see --
the difference between the 3 noweb references. They all seem correctly
written...
* Example
** Part 1
#+name: who
#+begin_src org :results latex
ToMe
#+end_src
** Part 2
#+name: before
#+begin_src org :results latex
BeforeDate
#+end_src
** Part 3
#+name: solde
#+begin_src org :results latex
Rest
#+end_src
** Composed letter
#+begin_src latex :noweb yes :tangle yes
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage[utf8x]{inputenc}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\begin{document}
\begin{textblock}{85}(98,35)
\titlebox{9.4cm}{Foo}{% HERE
who()
}
\end{textblock}
\begin{textblock}{110}(25,195)
Some sentence
before() \hfill{}% HERE
solde() EUR% HERE
\end{textblock}
\end{document}
#+end_src
Currently newlines are allowed in noweb reference names causing the problems
you noticed above.
If it does not take you too much time, can you enlighten me on the diffs
between the chunks? Why was it well working for the second one?
I've just pushed up a change which disallows newline characters in noweb
references and fixes the odd behavior you describe.
References are working well. Thanks a lot!
Though, there is an annoying diff in the tangled LaTeX: the first block gets
an extra blank line (I don't understand why it differs from the others) which
will cause layout problem when compiling the document -- not this one, it's
just an not-so-valid ECM, but real ones...
#+begin_src latex
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage[utf8x]{inputenc}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\begin{document}
\begin{textblock}{85}(98,35)
\titlebox{9.4cm}{Foo}{% HERE
ToMe
}
\end{textblock}
\begin{textblock}{110}(25,195)
Some sentence
BeforeDate
\hfill{}% HERE
Rest
EUR% HERE
\end{textblock}
\end{document}
#+end_src
Best regards,
Seb
--
Sebastien Vauban
Re: [O] [bug] Problem when tangling into LaTeX
Sebastien Vauban wxhgmqzgw...@spammotel.com writes: [...] If it does not take you too much time, can you enlighten me on the diffs between the chunks? Why was it well working for the second one? I think you'll find that the asymmetry is due to the placement of your comment strings which have the characters, misinterpreted in this case to indicate the start of a noweb reference... -- : Eric S Fraga (GnuPG: 0xC89193D8FFFCF67D) in Emacs 24.0.92.1 : using Org-mode version 7.8.03 (release_7.8.03.283.g171ea)
[O] [bug] Problem when tangling into LaTeX
#+TITLE: Noweb references in LaTeX document
#+DATE: 2012-01-30
* Summary
** Problem
I use 3 chunks of LaTeX code which I wanna insert in a LaTeX document.
While 1 of them is correctly tangled into the LaTeX document, the 2 others
generate errors when C-c C-v C-t'ing:
if: reference 'who' not found in this buffer
and, if I temporarily replace `who()' by `who', I get the next error:
if: reference 'solde' not found in this buffer
What I don't understand is that there is no -- sorry, I mean: I don't see --
the difference between the 3 noweb references. They all seem correctly
written...
** Note
Remember that, up to now, such a document *must be first tangled* and then
post-processed via =PDFLaTeX=. It can not be exported directly to PDF/HTML
(=args
out of range= error).
* Example
** Part 1
#+name: who
#+begin_src org :results latex
ToMe
#+end_src
** Part 2
#+name: before
#+begin_src org :results latex
BeforeDate
#+end_src
** Part 3
#+name: solde
#+begin_src org :results latex
Rest
#+end_src
** Composed letter
#+begin_src latex :noweb yes :tangle yes
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage[utf8x]{inputenc}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\begin{document}
\begin{textblock}{85}(98,35)
\titlebox{9.4cm}{Foo}{% HERE
who()
}
\end{textblock}
\begin{textblock}{110}(25,195)
Some sentence
before() \hfill{}% HERE
solde() EUR% HERE
\end{textblock}
\end{document}
#+end_src
Best regards,
Seb
--
Sebastien Vauban
Re: [O] [bug] Problem when tangling into LaTeX
Sebastien Vauban wxhgmqzgw...@spammotel.com writes:
#+TITLE: Noweb references in LaTeX document
#+DATE: 2012-01-30
* Summary
** Problem
I use 3 chunks of LaTeX code which I wanna insert in a LaTeX document.
While 1 of them is correctly tangled into the LaTeX document, the 2 others
generate errors when C-c C-v C-t'ing:
if: reference 'who' not found in this buffer
and, if I temporarily replace `who()' by `who', I get the next error:
if: reference 'solde' not found in this buffer
What I don't understand is that there is no -- sorry, I mean: I don't see --
the difference between the 3 noweb references. They all seem correctly
written...
** Note
Remember that, up to now, such a document *must be first tangled* and then
post-processed via =PDFLaTeX=. It can not be exported directly to PDF/HTML
(=args
out of range= error).
* Example
** Part 1
#+name: who
#+begin_src org :results latex
ToMe
#+end_src
** Part 2
#+name: before
#+begin_src org :results latex
BeforeDate
#+end_src
** Part 3
#+name: solde
#+begin_src org :results latex
Rest
#+end_src
** Composed letter
#+begin_src latex :noweb yes :tangle yes
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage[utf8x]{inputenc}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\begin{document}
\begin{textblock}{85}(98,35)
\titlebox{9.4cm}{Foo}{% HERE
who()
}
\end{textblock}
\begin{textblock}{110}(25,195)
Some sentence
before() \hfill{}% HERE
solde() EUR% HERE
\end{textblock}
\end{document}
#+end_src
Best regards,
Seb
Currently newlines are allowed in noweb reference names causing the
problems you noticed above. I've just pushed up a change which
disallows newline characters in noweb references and fixes the odd
behavior you describe.
Best,
--
Eric Schulte
http://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte/
