Re: [O] Archiving to a subtree

[Nicolas Goaziou]

Hello,

Ken Mankoff  writes:

> I used to archive items to a subtree (in an archive file) using some
> functions provided on this list back in 2014 [1]. I recently updated
> Org and this code stopped working because the
> 'org-extract-archive-file' function has been removed. This was commit
> 9d603b1854f658202024807c17ffc1fd47a3cd74
>
> Does anyone have a replacement function that archives sub-items to
> sub-trees? I'm looking for behavior that will take **bar:

If I read the patch correctly, (car (org-archive--compute-location ...))
should replace it.

> I don't see any mention of this in the NEWS.org.

I don't mention removal of internal functions in that file.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou

[O] Archiving to a subtree

[Ken Mankoff]

Hello list,

I used to archive items to a subtree (in an archive file) using some functions 
provided on this list back in 2014 [1]. I recently updated Org and this code 
stopped working because the 'org-extract-archive-file' function has been 
removed. This was commit 9d603b1854f658202024807c17ffc1fd47a3cd74

Does anyone have a replacement function that archives sub-items to sub-trees? 
I'm looking for behavior that will take **bar:

file.org:
* Foo
** Bar

And archive it to **bar under *foo like this:

archive/file.org_archive
* Foo
** Bar

I don't see any mention of this in the NEWS.org.

Thanks,

  -k.


[1] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2014-08/msg00109.html

Re: [O] archiving in the same file always creates top-level headings

[Nicolas Goaziou]

Hello,

Hendrik Tews  writes:

> when I have this file
>
> === cut ===
> * A
> ** B
> ** C
> === cut ===
>
> and set org-archive-location to "::* Archived Tasks", as
> recommended in the documentation of this variable. Then, after
> doing C-c C-x C-a (org-archive-subtree-default) both on B and on
> C, I get
>
> === cut ===
> * A
> * Archived Tasks
>
> ** B...
>
> * Archived Tasks
>
> ** C...
> === cut ===
>
> while I would have expected
>
> === cut ===
> * A
> * Archived Tasks
> ** B...
> ** C...
> === cut ===
>
> (only one Archived Tasks heading).
>
> Is it really intended that org-archive-subtree-default inserts
> the heading, even if it does already exist?

No, it is a bug, already reported here:


Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou

[O] archiving in the same file always creates top-level headings

[Hendrik Tews]

Hi,

when I have this file

=== cut ===
* A
** B
** C
=== cut ===

and set org-archive-location to "::* Archived Tasks", as
recommended in the documentation of this variable. Then, after
doing C-c C-x C-a (org-archive-subtree-default) both on B and on
C, I get

=== cut ===
* A
* Archived Tasks

** B...

* Archived Tasks

** C...
=== cut ===

while I would have expected

=== cut ===
* A
* Archived Tasks
** B...
** C...
=== cut ===

(only one Archived Tasks heading).

Is it really intended that org-archive-subtree-default inserts
the heading, even if it does already exist?

Thanks,

Hendrik

Re: [O] Archiving?

[Johann Spies]

On 9 February 2016 at 18:28, Kyle Meyer  wrote:

>
>
>
> I'm guessing that you have an Emacs version < 25 and have a mixed
> installation issue.  If you're installing from ELPA, please uninstall
> and then, before the builtin version of Org is loaded, reinstall.
>

Thanks Kyle,

That was the correct guess.  After removing .emacs.d/elpa the archiving
worked.  I then reinstalled a few elpa/melpa packages  - most of them ox-*
in order to enable some spesific exports.

Now the archive is broken again.

What do you mean by "before the builtin version of Org is loaded"? Isn't it
loaded when I start emacs?

Regards
Johann
-- 
Because experiencing your loyal love is better than life itself,
my lips will praise you.  (Psalm 63:3)

Re: [O] Archiving?

[Kyle Meyer]

Johann Spies  writes:

> That was the correct guess.  After removing .emacs.d/elpa the archiving
> worked.  I then reinstalled a few elpa/melpa packages  - most of them ox-*
> in order to enable some spesific exports.
>
> Now the archive is broken again.
>
> What do you mean by "before the builtin version of Org is loaded"? Isn't it
> loaded when I start emacs?

The Org that comes with your Emacs is probably version 8.2.10.  Unless
you do something [1] to load Org, it will not be loaded at startup:

emacs -Q
(featurep 'org) => nil

Again, I'm just guessing here, but it sounds like you're not installing
Org from ELPA, but then you're installing some ox packages from ELPA
that depend on a newer Org and will pull it in.  If the version of Org
that comes with Emacs is already loaded when that happens, you can run
into issues with a mixed installation.

http://orgmode.org/worg/org-faq.html#mixed-install

[1] For example, call an autoloaded Org command, visit an Org file, or
explicitly load Org in your configuration.

--
Kyle

[O] Archiving?

[Johann Spies]

I cannot get archiving to work as expected.


Example:

With the cursor on

* DONE Werk aan die normalisering van skrywers
  CLOSED: [2015-10-13 Di 07:50]
  :PROPERTIES:
  :ID:   d48a7607-0a66-42a6-8819-b98be5f612aa
  :END:

and

#+ARCHIVE: %s_done::
in the file

Then I did C-c $

As a result, a buffer "werkorg.org_done  contains:

#-*- mode: org -*-


Archived entries from file /home/js/Dropbox/orgmode/werkorg.org


and

*Messages*

Copied: Subtree(s) with 232 characters
org-archive-subtree: Symbol's function definition is void: outline-show-all


And the original line in werkorg.org is unchanged and still present.

What am I doing wrong?

Regards
Johann


-- 
Because experiencing your loyal love is better than life itself,
my lips will praise you.  (Psalm 63:3)

Re: [O] Archiving method

[edward sillador]

Hi Tobias,

For archiving, I follow Bernt Hansen's nice tutorial here.

http://doc.norang.ca/org-mode.html#Archiving


On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Tobias Frischholz  wrote:

> Hi there,
>
> I’m curious about how you archive your DONE items.
> I’ve stumbled upon this snippet, which seems good enough for me:
>
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6997387/how-to-archive-all-the-done-tasks-using-a-single-command/27043756#27043756
>
> However, I think I would like to have the archived items in a datetree.
> The manual mentions that this is possible with the variable
> "org-archive-location”, but I couldn’t find any information about it.
>
>
> Best regards,
> Tobias Frischholz
>
> PGP PUBLIC KEY: http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?search=0xCD463AC1=index
>
>

[O] Archiving method

[Tobias Frischholz]

Hi there,

I’m curious about how you archive your DONE items.
I’ve stumbled upon this snippet, which seems good enough for me:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6997387/how-to-archive-all-the-done-tasks-using-a-single-command/27043756#27043756
 


However, I think I would like to have the archived items in a datetree. The 
manual mentions that this is possible with the variable "org-archive-location”, 
but I couldn’t find any information about it.


Best regards,
Tobias Frischholz

PGP PUBLIC KEY: http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?search=0xCD463AC1=index



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

[O] Archiving logbook entries

[Giorgio Valoti]

Hi all,
I remember a discussion some time ago about archiving the logbook
entries, but I can’t find it on Gmane.

If someone has a link to to the thread, by any chance, I would be really
grateful.

Thank you in advance.

--
Giorgio Valoti

[O] archiving old repeated task logbook entries

[Samuel Wales]

Just wondering if anybody has done any significant work on
automatically expiring old logbook entries for archiving.  A search
did not find anything.  I know it's been discussed here.

Samuel

-- 
The Kafka Pandemic: http://thekafkapandemic.blogspot.com

The disease DOES progress.  MANY people have died from it.  ANYBODY can get it.

Denmark: free Karina Hansen NOW.

[O] Archiving workflow suggestion?

[Vincent Beffara]

Dear list, 

I am using org-mode to track various tasks, organized chronologically, like 
this:

* 2013
** January
*** Task 1
*** Task 2
** February
*** Task 3

Once a task is completed I want to archive it, but I find it convenient to keep 
it within the same file for further reference. Optimally, using the archive 
sibling feature to save display space. So far so good, everything if fine. Once 
all tasks in a month are completed, I want to archive the month itself (so that 
the CONTENTS view is as clean as possible).

But using the default methods builds an archive-within-an-archive situation. I 
realize it's not exactly a big deal (and the correct default behavior), but I 
would like to unarchive the children of a newly archived month automatically 
to make later traversal easier.

Any suggestion how to do that? Or hints at a better workflow to achieve the 
same thing?

Thanks,

/v

-- 
Vincent Beffara

Re: [O] Archiving workflow suggestion?

[Sebastien Vauban]

Hi Vincent,

Vincent Beffara wrote:
 I am using org-mode to track various tasks, organized chronologically, like 
 this:

 * 2013
 ** January
 *** Task 1
 *** Task 2
 ** February
 *** Task 3

 Once a task is completed I want to archive it, but I find it convenient to
 keep it within the same file for further reference. Optimally, using the
 archive sibling feature to save display space. So far so good, everything if
 fine. Once all tasks in a month are completed, I want to archive the month
 itself (so that the CONTENTS view is as clean as possible).

 But using the default methods builds an archive-within-an-archive situation.
 I realize it's not exactly a big deal (and the correct default behavior),
 but I would like to unarchive the children of a newly archived month
 automatically to make later traversal easier.

 Any suggestion how to do that? Or hints at a better workflow to achieve the
 same thing?

For me, the best way to archive things is to add the tag `:ARCHIVE:' to the
entries, without moving them.

That way, you have a better view of your entries, without your display being
cluttered with all those archived entries (as they won't be opened, even in
the show all contents view). The only way to open them, for inspection, is
to C-TAB them (IIRC).

Best regards,
  Seb

-- 
Sebastien Vauban

Re: [O] Archiving logged work time

[Bastien]

Hi Torben,

Torben Hoffmann torben.leh...@gmail.com writes:

 Advice most welcome - I am in learning mode and want to improve my
 usage of org-mode.

Not really an advice, but I was in a similar situation to yours, 
and I ended up tracking at higher level.  Instead of tracking time
on small tasks, I track time in thematic subtrees.  This gives me
what I want: less logs, ability to archive small tasks, etc.  

-- 
 Bastien

[O] Archiving logged work time

[Torben Hoffmann]

Hi,

I have been using org-mode for 6 months to track my working time, but now I
am stepping my usage up a bit since I have found it useful to have all my
to-dos in one tool.

Until now I have had a template file with the things I work on, so that I
can easily create a new file every week. This is drive by a need to report
time every week to a fixed set of activities.

So far I have just moved the old file and then created a new file with all
my tasks in.

However, now that I am using more of org-mode I am not so sure that
this monolithic time tracking file is a good idea, but I am not sure about
how I can archive just the logged time entries, but keep the activity for
logging time on next week.
When I stand on a line with a CLOCK entry the archive function will archive
the whole sub-tree that I am standing in.

It might be that I should just create a number of files for the major
things I am working on and then archive the task as well as the time logged
against it every week. This means that I would have to retype the task for
the next week, but if that is the best way of doing it I will start doing
that.

Advice most welcome - I am in learning mode and want to improve my usage of
org-mode.

Cheers,
__
 /orben

-- 
http://www.linkedin.com/in/torbenhoffmann

[O] Archiving drawers?

[Loris Bennett]

Hi,

I have a small number of tasks that I clock into daily.  I have already
manually split off the older log entries into a separate draw called
OLDLOGS.  However, I was wondering whether there is a way of archiving
these log entries while preserving the heading itself in the original
org file.

Cheers,

Loris 

Re: [O] Archiving drawers?

[Bastien]

Hi Loris,

Loris Bennett loris.benn...@fu-berlin.de writes:

 I have a small number of tasks that I clock into daily.  I have already
 manually split off the older log entries into a separate draw called
 OLDLOGS.  However, I was wondering whether there is a way of archiving
 these log entries while preserving the heading itself in the original
 org file.

The question is: _where_ to archive those log entries?

The best idea I can think of is another drawer, like you did.
As for automating this a bit, a nice Elisp exercise :)

-- 
 Bastien

Re: [O] Archiving drawers?

[Loris Bennett]

Bastien b...@altern.org writes:

 Hi Loris,

 Loris Bennett loris.benn...@fu-berlin.de writes:

 I have a small number of tasks that I clock into daily.  I have already
 manually split off the older log entries into a separate draw called
 OLDLOGS.  However, I was wondering whether there is a way of archiving
 these log entries while preserving the heading itself in the original
 org file.

 The question is: _where_ to archive those log entries?

 The best idea I can think of is another drawer, like you did.
 As for automating this a bit, a nice Elisp exercise :)

I was thinking more along the lines of the way archiving works already,
but instead of moving the whole heading, a copy of the heading plus the
old logs would be made in the archive file, and the old logs would be
deleted from the original file, i.e.

gtd.org:

,-
| * Make tea
|   :LOGBOOK:
|   CLOCK: [2012-08-24 Fri 13:05]--[2012-08-24 Fri 13:40] =  0:35
|   :END:
|   :OLDLOGS:
|   CLOCK: [2011-12-23 Fri 12:45]--[2011-12-23 Fri 13:16] =  0:31
|   :END:
`-
 
would become

gtd.org:

,-
| * Make tea
|   :LOGBOOK:
|   CLOCK: [2012-08-24 Fri 13:05]--[2012-08-24 Fri 13:40] =  0:35
|   :END:
`-

gtd.org_archive:
  
,-
| * Make tea
|   :OLDLOGS:
|   CLOCK: [2011-12-23 Fri 12:45]--[2011-12-23 Fri 13:16] =  0:31
|   :END:
`-

Loris

Re: [O] Archiving drawers?

[Bastien]

Hi Loris,

Loris Bennett loris.benn...@fu-berlin.de writes:

 Bastien b...@altern.org writes:

 Hi Loris,

 Loris Bennett loris.benn...@fu-berlin.de writes:

 I have a small number of tasks that I clock into daily.  I have already
 manually split off the older log entries into a separate draw called
 OLDLOGS.  However, I was wondering whether there is a way of archiving
 these log entries while preserving the heading itself in the original
 org file.

 The question is: _where_ to archive those log entries?

 The best idea I can think of is another drawer, like you did.
 As for automating this a bit, a nice Elisp exercise :)

 I was thinking more along the lines of the way archiving works already,
 but instead of moving the whole heading, a copy of the heading plus the
 old logs would be made in the archive file, and the old logs would be
 deleted from the original file, i.e.

But then archiving the * Make tea headline would require to merge the
logs of the archived one and those of the alive one.  Quite some work.

-- 
 Bastien

Re: [O] Archiving drawers?

[Achim Gratz]

Bastien writes:
 But then archiving the * Make tea headline would require to merge the
 logs of the archived one and those of the alive one.  Quite some work.

How's the merge driver for Git coming along?  Archiving to Git would be
a really welcome feature, I guess.


Regards,
Achim.
-- 
+[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]+

Wavetables for the Waldorf Blofeld:
http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#BlofeldUserWavetables

[O] Archiving only with confirmation

[Markus Grebenstein]

Dear List,

from time to time I involuntarily archive parts of my thesis when I want 
to save (it happens when I mess up the saving keys). Since I recognized 
this a couple of days or even weeks later this makes recovering complicated.


Therefore I would love to have the possibility to be asked whether I 
really want to do that. I used 
org-archive-subtree-default-with-confirmation but I did not get what the 
meaning of that one is. When I use that command I am sure that I want to 
archive and as far as I see it does not change the default behavior.


Does anybody have an idea how to achieve what I want?
Thanks in advance,

Markus

Re: [O] Archiving only with confirmation

[cberry]

Markus Grebenstein p...@mgrebenstein.de writes:

 Dear List,

 from time to time I involuntarily archive parts of my thesis when I
 want to save (it happens when I mess up the saving keys). Since I
 recognized this a couple of days or even weeks later this makes
 recovering complicated.

 Therefore I would love to have the possibility to be asked whether I
 really want to do that.

Is this what you want:

,
| (emacs)Top  Customization  Key Bindings  Disabling 
  
| 
| 57.4.11 Disabling Commands
| --
| 
| Disabling a command means that invoking it interactively asks for
| confirmation from the user.  The purpose of disabling a command is to
| prevent users from executing it by accident; [...]
`

For example, I have this in my macbook ~/.emacs


,
| ;; get rid of pesky aquamacs-save-buffers-kill-emacs binding
| 
| (put 'aquamacs-save-buffers-kill-emacs  'disabled 
|  Use C-x C-c to quit\n)
| 
| (put 'aquamacs-print 'disabled Why print?\n)
`

To protect against the commands bound to clover-p and clover-q being
inadvertently run when what I really wanted was M-p or M-q. (The clover
key sits next to the 'M-' on my keyboard.)



HTH,

Chuck

 I used
 org-archive-subtree-default-with-confirmation but I did not get what
 the meaning of that one is. When I use that command I am sure that I
 want to archive and as far as I see it does not change the default
 behavior.

 Does anybody have an idea how to achieve what I want?
 Thanks in advance,

 Markus




-- 
Charles C. BerryDept of Family/Preventive Medicine
cberry at ucsd edu  UC San Diego
http://famprevmed.ucsd.edu/faculty/cberry/  La Jolla, San Diego 92093-0901

Re: [O] Archiving only with confirmation

[Marc-Oliver Ihm]

Am 03.03.2012 16:54, schrieb Markus Grebenstein:

Dear List,

from time to time I involuntarily archive parts of my thesis when I want to 
save (it happens
when I mess up the saving keys). Since I recognized this a couple of days or 
even weeks later
this makes recovering complicated.

Therefore I would love to have the possibility to be asked whether I really 
want to do that. I
used org-archive-subtree-default-with-confirmation but I did not get what the 
meaning of that
one is. When I use that command I am sure that I want to archive and as far as 
I see it does not
change the default behavior.

Does anybody have an idea how to achieve what I want?
Thanks in advance,

Markus





Hi Markus,

Maybe

M-x disable-command

could help.

It will ask you for the command you would like to disable (in your case probably 
org-archive-subtree)

and modify your .emacs accordingly.

You could reach the same effect by putting:

(put 'org-archive-subtree 'disabled t)

in your initialization-file (if it is not .emacs).

I think I will try this too, because I remember some occasions,
that I have used it accidentially like you ...

with kind regards, Marc

Re: [O] Archiving old instances of repeating todos

[Brian Wightman]

On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 5:33 AM, Bernt Hansen be...@norang.ca wrote:
 lbml...@hethcote.com writes:

 How do you archive old instances of repeating todos, C-c C-x C-s archives
 the whole thing. I'd like to have something that would take the following:

 ** TODO Mutter an oath
DEADLINE: 2012-02-13 Mon ++1d -0d
- State DONE   from TODO   [2012-02-12 Sun 16:25]

I also note that you do not keep your state messages inside of a
logbook drawer.  If you are just concerned with seeing the data and
not with it accumulating there, you could stuff it inside a LOGBOOK
drawer.

   (setq org-clock-into-drawer t)

or the equivalent configuration options should configure this.

--Brian

Re: [O] Archiving old instances of repeating todos

[Bernt Hansen]

lbml...@hethcote.com writes:

 How do you archive old instances of repeating todos, C-c C-x C-s archives
 the whole thing. I'd like to have something that would take the following:

 ** TODO Mutter an oath
DEADLINE: 2012-02-13 Mon ++1d -0d
- State DONE   from TODO   [2012-02-12 Sun 16:25]
- State DONE   from TODO   [2012-02-09 Thu 18:43]
- State DONE   from TODO   [2012-02-08 Wed 12:32]
- State DONE   from TODO   [2012-02-07 Tue 19:28]
- State DONE   from TODO   [2012-02-06 Mon 15:45]
- State DONE   from TODO   [2012-02-05 Sun 17:27]
- State DONE   from TODO   [2012-02-03 Fri 12:20]
- State DONE   from TODO   [2012-02-02 Thu 22:00]
- State DONE   from TODO   [2012-02-01 Wed 17:47]
- State DONE   from TODO   [2012-01-31 Tue 19:32]
- State DONE   from TODO   [2012-01-30 Mon 17:52]
- State DONE   from TODO   [2012-01-29 Sun 12:30]
- State DONE   from TODO   [2012-01-28 Sat 23:05]

 and archive it so that the active part would appear something like:

 ** TODO Mutter an oath
DEADLINE: 2012-02-13 Mon ++1d -0d
- State DONE   from TODO   [2012-02-12 Sun 16:25]
- State DONE   from TODO   [2012-02-09 Thu 18:43]
- State DONE   from TODO   [2012-02-08 Wed 12:32]
- State DONE   from TODO   [2012-02-07 Tue 19:28]


 And the archive would look something like:

 ** TODO Mutter an oath
- State DONE   from TODO   [2012-02-06 Mon 15:45]
- State DONE   from TODO   [2012-02-05 Sun 17:27]
- State DONE   from TODO   [2012-02-03 Fri 12:20]
- State DONE   from TODO   [2012-02-02 Thu 22:00]
- State DONE   from TODO   [2012-02-01 Wed 17:47]
- State DONE   from TODO   [2012-01-31 Tue 19:32]
- State DONE   from TODO   [2012-01-30 Mon 17:52]
- State DONE   from TODO   [2012-01-29 Sun 12:30]
- State DONE   from TODO   [2012-01-28 Sat 23:05]



 Any help would be appreciated.

Hi Louis,

After some time when the repeating task has accumulated enough log stuff
I clone the task with time shift of 1 day in this case.
There's a problem with ++ and cloning so I remove the repeater on the
old task (it works fine with just +1d) and delete my LOGBOOK drawer in
the new repeating task.

When the old task is DONE I archive that with C-c C-x C-s and start
accumulating new stuff in the new repeating task.

HTH,
Bernt

[O] Archiving old instances of repeating todos

[lbmlist]

How do you archive old instances of repeating todos, C-c C-x C-s archives
the whole thing. I'd like to have something that would take the following:

** TODO Mutter an oath
   DEADLINE: 2012-02-13 Mon ++1d -0d
   - State DONE   from TODO   [2012-02-12 Sun 16:25]
   - State DONE   from TODO   [2012-02-09 Thu 18:43]
   - State DONE   from TODO   [2012-02-08 Wed 12:32]
   - State DONE   from TODO   [2012-02-07 Tue 19:28]
   - State DONE   from TODO   [2012-02-06 Mon 15:45]
   - State DONE   from TODO   [2012-02-05 Sun 17:27]
   - State DONE   from TODO   [2012-02-03 Fri 12:20]
   - State DONE   from TODO   [2012-02-02 Thu 22:00]
   - State DONE   from TODO   [2012-02-01 Wed 17:47]
   - State DONE   from TODO   [2012-01-31 Tue 19:32]
   - State DONE   from TODO   [2012-01-30 Mon 17:52]
   - State DONE   from TODO   [2012-01-29 Sun 12:30]
   - State DONE   from TODO   [2012-01-28 Sat 23:05]

and archive it so that the active part would appear something like:

** TODO Mutter an oath
   DEADLINE: 2012-02-13 Mon ++1d -0d
   - State DONE   from TODO   [2012-02-12 Sun 16:25]
   - State DONE   from TODO   [2012-02-09 Thu 18:43]
   - State DONE   from TODO   [2012-02-08 Wed 12:32]
   - State DONE   from TODO   [2012-02-07 Tue 19:28]


And the archive would look something like:

** TODO Mutter an oath
   - State DONE   from TODO   [2012-02-06 Mon 15:45]
   - State DONE   from TODO   [2012-02-05 Sun 17:27]
   - State DONE   from TODO   [2012-02-03 Fri 12:20]
   - State DONE   from TODO   [2012-02-02 Thu 22:00]
   - State DONE   from TODO   [2012-02-01 Wed 17:47]
   - State DONE   from TODO   [2012-01-31 Tue 19:32]
   - State DONE   from TODO   [2012-01-30 Mon 17:52]
   - State DONE   from TODO   [2012-01-29 Sun 12:30]
   - State DONE   from TODO   [2012-01-28 Sat 23:05]



Any help would be appreciated.

Louis

[O] Archiving broken

[Jason Dunsmore]

Hello Nicolas,

It looks like the latest commit broke org-archive-subtree:
http://orgmode.org/w/?p=org-mode.git;a=commit;h=5b39df0523

I get the following error when I try to archive anything:

if: The kill is not a (set of) tree(s) - please use S-insertchar to yank 
anyway

I checked out the previous commit (71f654a182) and the problem is gone.

Regards,
Jason

Re: [O] Archiving broken

[Nicolas Goaziou]

Hello,

Jason Dunsmore emacs-orgm...@dunsmor.com writes:


 It looks like the latest commit broke org-archive-subtree:
 http://orgmode.org/w/?p=org-mode.git;a=commit;h=5b39df0523

 I get the following error when I try to archive anything:

 if: The kill is not a (set of) tree(s) - please use S-insertchar to yank 
 anyway

 I checked out the previous commit (71f654a182) and the problem is gone.

Indeed. I think it is fixed now. Thanks for the quick report.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou