Re: [O] Collaborative Team Project Management with Orgmode?
Eric Abrahamsen writes: The following message is a courtesy copy of an article that has been posted to gmane.emacs.orgmode as well. John Kitchin jkitc...@andrew.cmu.edu writes: Let's see... the org-contacts vs BBDB issue isn't a big deal, since Gnorb doesn't actually do all that much with contacts right now. I'd be happy to add tweaks to it to make it more org-contacts friendly. Email tracking is a bigger issue. Gnorb uses the Gnus registry to track correspondences between messages and headlines, and obviously none of that would work with mu4e. Earlier versions did tracking by storing message ids as a property on a headline. I suppose I could go back to doing that in a mu4e-specific library. Message id tracking is likely the way to do it in mu4e. mu4e links seem to store this for links. [[mu4e:msgid:bn3pr0301mb0851db3e4c53993daa1e8a98b2...@bn3pr0301mb0851.namprd03.prod.outlook.com]] Yup, I think most of the MUA links end up looking something like that. Message IDs are the one constant across MUAs and (most) mail sources, so everything in Gnorb is keyed to that. It is pretty easy to get these from a message. I use this variable in a send callback function: (setq *email-message-id* (concat mu4e:msgid: ;; borrowed from https://github.com/girzel/gnorb/blob/master/gnorb-utils.el#L137 (replace-regexp-in-string \\(\\`\\|\\'\\) (mail-fetch-field Message-ID and then later use (org-set-property Message-ID *email-message-id*) and I get a clickable link in the property that will go back to the message (after mu indexes again for freshly sent emails). To me, the most useful thing about message tracking isn't the identification and hinting of incoming emails. The two most useful things (I think) are: 1. Taking a message and saying this message should trigger a state change on that Org heading there 2. Seeing all messages associated with a heading in their own virtual mailbox Number one shouldn't be too difficult to implement for mu4e, as it would mostly rely on Org's own mu4e support. Number two would be nearly impossible, or at least impractical given my lack of familiarity with mu4e. I am still learning many things about emails. mu4e has pretty powerful search capability via the underlying Xapian database. Well, on second thought, maybe it wouldn't need to be that hard, then. The Org heading would have its list of msg-ids, and if mu4e search has an easy way of saying search for all messages whose IDs are in this list, then that it would be quite easy. Much easier than in Gnus, I have to say! If that search works across mail accounts and folders, then Gnorb wouldn't even have to care about messages being moved between folders, which is one of the main uses of the registry. This seems to do what you describe. When I run it, I get an mu4e buffer with those two messages in it. Basically you just create a mu query. #+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp (let ((ids '(871teq3c9p@ericabrahamsen.net 201508260407.t7q479ls026...@relay.andrew.cmu.edu) )) (mu4e-headers-search (mapconcat (lambda (id) (concat msgid: id)) ids or ))) #+END_SRC Another thing I find hugely useful is automatically transferring files attached to incoming messages to Org headings (via org-attach). Presumably mu4e has a way of getting at the attachments on a message, so in theory this wouldn't be that hard, either. This sounds pretty interesting. I have never gotten that into attachments, but this might change my mind. There are functions in mu4e to view and save attachments, so this might not be hard. Much of my work involves throwing attachments around (or rather, receiving attachments and sending back plain text whenever possible), so this is pretty crucial for me. While org-attach is very sound, I found its surface-layer interface a bit cumbersome, and this makes it a lot easier to use. Me too ;) I just have not progressed to org-attach yet. I usually have to edit the attachments. How easy is it to reattach them to send back? I am pretty interested in pursuing this, but am pretty busy for a while so progress on my end will be slow ;( Mine as well, ha! BTW, mu4e still uses message mode for composition and sending, right? yes. Anyway, those are some thoughts on the issue. If you all had some particular feature where you'd like mu4e support, let me know and I can take a stab at it. Eric On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 12:39 PM, Eric Abrahamsen e...@ericabrahamsen.net wrote: John Kitchin jkitc...@andrew.cmu.edu writes: unless those services have some kind of API, and you have the desire to implement it in emacs, you might be out of luck. I am trying to figure out a way to do collaborative work via email, where I am the project coordinator. The idea is to use my email.el code to send headlines to people I need information or action
Re: [O] Collaborative Team Project Management with Orgmode?
John Kitchin jkitc...@andrew.cmu.edu writes: Eric Abrahamsen writes: The following message is a courtesy copy of an article that has been posted to gmane.emacs.orgmode as well. John Kitchin jkitc...@andrew.cmu.edu writes: Let's see... the org-contacts vs BBDB issue isn't a big deal, since Gnorb doesn't actually do all that much with contacts right now. I'd be happy to add tweaks to it to make it more org-contacts friendly. Email tracking is a bigger issue. Gnorb uses the Gnus registry to track correspondences between messages and headlines, and obviously none of that would work with mu4e. Earlier versions did tracking by storing message ids as a property on a headline. I suppose I could go back to doing that in a mu4e-specific library. Message id tracking is likely the way to do it in mu4e. mu4e links seem to store this for links. [[mu4e:msgid:bn3pr0301mb0851db3e4c53993daa1e8a98b2...@bn3pr0301mb0851.namprd03.prod.outlook.com]] Yup, I think most of the MUA links end up looking something like that. Message IDs are the one constant across MUAs and (most) mail sources, so everything in Gnorb is keyed to that. It is pretty easy to get these from a message. I use this variable in a send callback function: (setq *email-message-id* (concat mu4e:msgid: ;; borrowed from https://github.com/girzel/gnorb/blob/master/gnorb-utils.el#L137 (replace-regexp-in-string \\(\\`\\|\\'\\) (mail-fetch-field Message-ID and then later use (org-set-property Message-ID *email-message-id*) and I get a clickable link in the property that will go back to the message (after mu indexes again for freshly sent emails). [...] This seems to do what you describe. When I run it, I get an mu4e buffer with those two messages in it. Basically you just create a mu query. #+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp (let ((ids '(871teq3c9p@ericabrahamsen.net 201508260407.t7q479ls026...@relay.andrew.cmu.edu) )) (mu4e-headers-search (mapconcat (lambda (id) (concat msgid: id)) ids or ))) #+END_SRC All this looks very encouraging! Another thing I find hugely useful is automatically transferring files attached to incoming messages to Org headings (via org-attach). Presumably mu4e has a way of getting at the attachments on a message, so in theory this wouldn't be that hard, either. This sounds pretty interesting. I have never gotten that into attachments, but this might change my mind. There are functions in mu4e to view and save attachments, so this might not be hard. Much of my work involves throwing attachments around (or rather, receiving attachments and sending back plain text whenever possible), so this is pretty crucial for me. While org-attach is very sound, I found its surface-layer interface a bit cumbersome, and this makes it a lot easier to use. Me too ;) I just have not progressed to org-attach yet. I usually have to edit the attachments. How easy is it to reattach them to send back? When you use `gnorb-org-handle-mail' on a heading, that composes a new reply to most recently-associated message (or does something else, depending), and runs `map-y-or-n-p' over the org-attach files, offering to attach them to the outgoing message. This works pretty well for me. The only org-attach commands I'm really missing now would be `org-attach-copy-attachment' (to somewhere else on my filesystem), and `org-attach-refile-attachment' (to move an attachment to a different heading). Anyway, all looks promising! Now to find the time... Eric
Re: [O] Collaborative Team Project Management with Orgmode?
John Kitchin jkitc...@andrew.cmu.edu writes: Let's see... the org-contacts vs BBDB issue isn't a big deal, since Gnorb doesn't actually do all that much with contacts right now. I'd be happy to add tweaks to it to make it more org-contacts friendly. Email tracking is a bigger issue. Gnorb uses the Gnus registry to track correspondences between messages and headlines, and obviously none of that would work with mu4e. Earlier versions did tracking by storing message ids as a property on a headline. I suppose I could go back to doing that in a mu4e-specific library. Message id tracking is likely the way to do it in mu4e. mu4e links seem to store this for links. [[mu4e:msgid:bn3pr0301mb0851db3e4c53993daa1e8a98b2...@bn3pr0301mb0851.namprd03.prod.outlook.com]] Yup, I think most of the MUA links end up looking something like that. Message IDs are the one constant across MUAs and (most) mail sources, so everything in Gnorb is keyed to that. To me, the most useful thing about message tracking isn't the identification and hinting of incoming emails. The two most useful things (I think) are: 1. Taking a message and saying this message should trigger a state change on that Org heading there 2. Seeing all messages associated with a heading in their own virtual mailbox Number one shouldn't be too difficult to implement for mu4e, as it would mostly rely on Org's own mu4e support. Number two would be nearly impossible, or at least impractical given my lack of familiarity with mu4e. I am still learning many things about emails. mu4e has pretty powerful search capability via the underlying Xapian database. Well, on second thought, maybe it wouldn't need to be that hard, then. The Org heading would have its list of msg-ids, and if mu4e search has an easy way of saying search for all messages whose IDs are in this list, then that it would be quite easy. Much easier than in Gnus, I have to say! If that search works across mail accounts and folders, then Gnorb wouldn't even have to care about messages being moved between folders, which is one of the main uses of the registry. Another thing I find hugely useful is automatically transferring files attached to incoming messages to Org headings (via org-attach). Presumably mu4e has a way of getting at the attachments on a message, so in theory this wouldn't be that hard, either. This sounds pretty interesting. I have never gotten that into attachments, but this might change my mind. There are functions in mu4e to view and save attachments, so this might not be hard. Much of my work involves throwing attachments around (or rather, receiving attachments and sending back plain text whenever possible), so this is pretty crucial for me. While org-attach is very sound, I found its surface-layer interface a bit cumbersome, and this makes it a lot easier to use. I am pretty interested in pursuing this, but am pretty busy for a while so progress on my end will be slow ;( Mine as well, ha! BTW, mu4e still uses message mode for composition and sending, right? Anyway, those are some thoughts on the issue. If you all had some particular feature where you'd like mu4e support, let me know and I can take a stab at it. Eric On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 12:39 PM, Eric Abrahamsen e...@ericabrahamsen.net wrote: John Kitchin jkitc...@andrew.cmu.edu writes: unless those services have some kind of API, and you have the desire to implement it in emacs, you might be out of luck. I am trying to figure out a way to do collaborative work via email, where I am the project coordinator. The idea is to use my email.el code to send headlines to people I need information or action from, and then to have them reply to the email. Then, I would have some easy way to get information out of the reply back to the heading (e.g. TODO state change, info etc...). Probably I would embed some org-id link in the email, and train the users not to delete it. This is only a half-baked idea so far. It would integrate org-contacts, mu4e, and org-mode in my setup. Sounds exactly like Gnorb! Except org-contacts instead of BBDB, and mu4e instead of Gnus :( depending in your role in the project, you might get something like that to work too. Tory S. Anderson writes: I've relied on Orgmode heavily for over half a decade, and I'm loathe to leave it. But what solutions have been found out there for using it collaboratively (where others are not using emacs), rather than just for personal task management (where it excels)? It has some integration with Trello, I know; some of my co-workers are advocating BaseCamp (...) and PivotalTracker. PivotalTracker looks pretty good, but I would rather find a way to leverage orgmode in a way
Re: [O] Collaborative Team Project Management with Orgmode?
Let's see... the org-contacts vs BBDB issue isn't a big deal, since Gnorb doesn't actually do all that much with contacts right now. I'd be happy to add tweaks to it to make it more org-contacts friendly. Email tracking is a bigger issue. Gnorb uses the Gnus registry to track correspondences between messages and headlines, and obviously none of that would work with mu4e. Earlier versions did tracking by storing message ids as a property on a headline. I suppose I could go back to doing that in a mu4e-specific library. Message id tracking is likely the way to do it in mu4e. mu4e links seem to store this for links. [[mu4e:msgid:bn3pr0301mb0851db3e4c53993daa1e8a98b2...@bn3pr0301mb0851.namprd03.prod.outlook.com]] To me, the most useful thing about message tracking isn't the identification and hinting of incoming emails. The two most useful things (I think) are: 1. Taking a message and saying this message should trigger a state change on that Org heading there 2. Seeing all messages associated with a heading in their own virtual mailbox Number one shouldn't be too difficult to implement for mu4e, as it would mostly rely on Org's own mu4e support. Number two would be nearly impossible, or at least impractical given my lack of familiarity with mu4e. I am still learning many things about emails. mu4e has pretty powerful search capability via the underlying Xapian database. Another thing I find hugely useful is automatically transferring files attached to incoming messages to Org headings (via org-attach). Presumably mu4e has a way of getting at the attachments on a message, so in theory this wouldn't be that hard, either. This sounds pretty interesting. I have never gotten that into attachments, but this might change my mind. There are functions in mu4e to view and save attachments, so this might not be hard. I am pretty interested in pursuing this, but am pretty busy for a while so progress on my end will be slow ;( Anyway, those are some thoughts on the issue. If you all had some particular feature where you'd like mu4e support, let me know and I can take a stab at it. Eric On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 12:39 PM, Eric Abrahamsen e...@ericabrahamsen.net wrote: John Kitchin jkitc...@andrew.cmu.edu writes: unless those services have some kind of API, and you have the desire to implement it in emacs, you might be out of luck. I am trying to figure out a way to do collaborative work via email, where I am the project coordinator. The idea is to use my email.el code to send headlines to people I need information or action from, and then to have them reply to the email. Then, I would have some easy way to get information out of the reply back to the heading (e.g. TODO state change, info etc...). Probably I would embed some org-id link in the email, and train the users not to delete it. This is only a half-baked idea so far. It would integrate org-contacts, mu4e, and org-mode in my setup. Sounds exactly like Gnorb! Except org-contacts instead of BBDB, and mu4e instead of Gnus :( depending in your role in the project, you might get something like that to work too. Tory S. Anderson writes: I've relied on Orgmode heavily for over half a decade, and I'm loathe to leave it. But what solutions have been found out there for using it collaboratively (where others are not using emacs), rather than just for personal task management (where it excels)? It has some integration with Trello, I know; some of my co-workers are advocating BaseCamp (...) and PivotalTracker. PivotalTracker looks pretty good, but I would rather find a way to leverage orgmode in a way that facilitates collaboration. What has worked for you? -- Professor John Kitchin Doherty Hall A207F Department of Chemical Engineering Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA 15213 412-268-7803 @johnkitchin http://kitchingroup.cheme.cmu.edu -- Professor John Kitchin Doherty Hall A207F Department of Chemical Engineering Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA 15213 412-268-7803 @johnkitchin http://kitchingroup.cheme.cmu.edu
Re: [O] Collaborative Team Project Management with Orgmode?
Peter Salazar cycleofs...@gmail.com writes: So what would it take to make Gnorb work with org-contacts and mu4e? I know Gnorb works with Gnus, but in my opinion, Gnorb's ability to automatically catch and identify incoming emails isn't as useful as its other features. In other words, if using Gnorb with mu4e required the user to manually flag an incoming email through a function like add-message-to-gnorb, Gnorb would still retain 99% of its usefulness. The most useful functionality, as John Kitchin noted, would be to capture information from a mu4e email reply, and process it and incorporate it back into an org-mode file. Let's see... the org-contacts vs BBDB issue isn't a big deal, since Gnorb doesn't actually do all that much with contacts right now. I'd be happy to add tweaks to it to make it more org-contacts friendly. Email tracking is a bigger issue. Gnorb uses the Gnus registry to track correspondences between messages and headlines, and obviously none of that would work with mu4e. Earlier versions did tracking by storing message ids as a property on a headline. I suppose I could go back to doing that in a mu4e-specific library. To me, the most useful thing about message tracking isn't the identification and hinting of incoming emails. The two most useful things (I think) are: 1. Taking a message and saying this message should trigger a state change on that Org heading there 2. Seeing all messages associated with a heading in their own virtual mailbox Number one shouldn't be too difficult to implement for mu4e, as it would mostly rely on Org's own mu4e support. Number two would be nearly impossible, or at least impractical given my lack of familiarity with mu4e. Another thing I find hugely useful is automatically transferring files attached to incoming messages to Org headings (via org-attach). Presumably mu4e has a way of getting at the attachments on a message, so in theory this wouldn't be that hard, either. Anyway, those are some thoughts on the issue. If you all had some particular feature where you'd like mu4e support, let me know and I can take a stab at it. Eric On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 12:39 PM, Eric Abrahamsen e...@ericabrahamsen.net wrote: John Kitchin jkitc...@andrew.cmu.edu writes: unless those services have some kind of API, and you have the desire to implement it in emacs, you might be out of luck. I am trying to figure out a way to do collaborative work via email, where I am the project coordinator. The idea is to use my email.el code to send headlines to people I need information or action from, and then to have them reply to the email. Then, I would have some easy way to get information out of the reply back to the heading (e.g. TODO state change, info etc...). Probably I would embed some org-id link in the email, and train the users not to delete it. This is only a half-baked idea so far. It would integrate org-contacts, mu4e, and org-mode in my setup. Sounds exactly like Gnorb! Except org-contacts instead of BBDB, and mu4e instead of Gnus :( depending in your role in the project, you might get something like that to work too. Tory S. Anderson writes: I've relied on Orgmode heavily for over half a decade, and I'm loathe to leave it. But what solutions have been found out there for using it collaboratively (where others are not using emacs), rather than just for personal task management (where it excels)? It has some integration with Trello, I know; some of my co-workers are advocating BaseCamp (...) and PivotalTracker. PivotalTracker looks pretty good, but I would rather find a way to leverage orgmode in a way that facilitates collaboration. What has worked for you? -- Professor John Kitchin Doherty Hall A207F Department of Chemical Engineering Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA 15213 412-268-7803 @johnkitchin http://kitchingroup.cheme.cmu.edu
Re: [O] Collaborative Team Project Management with Orgmode?
So what would it take to make Gnorb work with org-contacts and mu4e? I know Gnorb works with Gnus, but in my opinion, Gnorb's ability to automatically catch and identify incoming emails isn't as useful as its other features. In other words, if using Gnorb with mu4e required the user to manually flag an incoming email through a function like add-message-to-gnorb, Gnorb would still retain 99% of its usefulness. The most useful functionality, as John Kitchin noted, would be to capture information from a mu4e email reply, and process it and incorporate it back into an org-mode file. On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 12:39 PM, Eric Abrahamsen e...@ericabrahamsen.net wrote: John Kitchin jkitc...@andrew.cmu.edu writes: unless those services have some kind of API, and you have the desire to implement it in emacs, you might be out of luck. I am trying to figure out a way to do collaborative work via email, where I am the project coordinator. The idea is to use my email.el code to send headlines to people I need information or action from, and then to have them reply to the email. Then, I would have some easy way to get information out of the reply back to the heading (e.g. TODO state change, info etc...). Probably I would embed some org-id link in the email, and train the users not to delete it. This is only a half-baked idea so far. It would integrate org-contacts, mu4e, and org-mode in my setup. Sounds exactly like Gnorb! Except org-contacts instead of BBDB, and mu4e instead of Gnus :( depending in your role in the project, you might get something like that to work too. Tory S. Anderson writes: I've relied on Orgmode heavily for over half a decade, and I'm loathe to leave it. But what solutions have been found out there for using it collaboratively (where others are not using emacs), rather than just for personal task management (where it excels)? It has some integration with Trello, I know; some of my co-workers are advocating BaseCamp (...) and PivotalTracker. PivotalTracker looks pretty good, but I would rather find a way to leverage orgmode in a way that facilitates collaboration. What has worked for you? -- Professor John Kitchin Doherty Hall A207F Department of Chemical Engineering Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA 15213 412-268-7803 @johnkitchin http://kitchingroup.cheme.cmu.edu
Re: [O] Collaborative Team Project Management with Orgmode?
Haha! I have been interested in gnorb a long time but I don't use bbdb or gnus. On Sunday, August23, 2015, Eric Abrahamsen e...@ericabrahamsen.net wrote: John Kitchin jkitc...@andrew.cmu.edu javascript:; writes: unless those services have some kind of API, and you have the desire to implement it in emacs, you might be out of luck. I am trying to figure out a way to do collaborative work via email, where I am the project coordinator. The idea is to use my email.el code to send headlines to people I need information or action from, and then to have them reply to the email. Then, I would have some easy way to get information out of the reply back to the heading (e.g. TODO state change, info etc...). Probably I would embed some org-id link in the email, and train the users not to delete it. This is only a half-baked idea so far. It would integrate org-contacts, mu4e, and org-mode in my setup. Sounds exactly like Gnorb! Except org-contacts instead of BBDB, and mu4e instead of Gnus :( depending in your role in the project, you might get something like that to work too. Tory S. Anderson writes: I've relied on Orgmode heavily for over half a decade, and I'm loathe to leave it. But what solutions have been found out there for using it collaboratively (where others are not using emacs), rather than just for personal task management (where it excels)? It has some integration with Trello, I know; some of my co-workers are advocating BaseCamp (...) and PivotalTracker. PivotalTracker looks pretty good, but I would rather find a way to leverage orgmode in a way that facilitates collaboration. What has worked for you? -- Professor John Kitchin Doherty Hall A207F Department of Chemical Engineering Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA 15213 412-268-7803 @johnkitchin http://kitchingroup.cheme.cmu.edu -- John --- Professor John Kitchin Doherty Hall A207F Department of Chemical Engineering Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA 15213 412-268-7803 @johnkitchin http://kitchingroup.cheme.cmu.edu
Re: [O] Collaborative Team Project Management with Orgmode?
John Kitchin jkitc...@andrew.cmu.edu writes: unless those services have some kind of API, and you have the desire to implement it in emacs, you might be out of luck. I am trying to figure out a way to do collaborative work via email, where I am the project coordinator. The idea is to use my email.el code to send headlines to people I need information or action from, and then to have them reply to the email. Then, I would have some easy way to get information out of the reply back to the heading (e.g. TODO state change, info etc...). Probably I would embed some org-id link in the email, and train the users not to delete it. This is only a half-baked idea so far. It would integrate org-contacts, mu4e, and org-mode in my setup. Sounds exactly like Gnorb! Except org-contacts instead of BBDB, and mu4e instead of Gnus :( depending in your role in the project, you might get something like that to work too. Tory S. Anderson writes: I've relied on Orgmode heavily for over half a decade, and I'm loathe to leave it. But what solutions have been found out there for using it collaboratively (where others are not using emacs), rather than just for personal task management (where it excels)? It has some integration with Trello, I know; some of my co-workers are advocating BaseCamp (...) and PivotalTracker. PivotalTracker looks pretty good, but I would rather find a way to leverage orgmode in a way that facilitates collaboration. What has worked for you? -- Professor John Kitchin Doherty Hall A207F Department of Chemical Engineering Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA 15213 412-268-7803 @johnkitchin http://kitchingroup.cheme.cmu.edu
Re: [O] Collaborative Team Project Management with Orgmode?
This thread should merge with recent ongoing thread titled [O] Help testing orgmode connection to interactive web environment -k. Please excuse brevity. Sent from pocket computer with tiny non-haptic feedback keyboard. On Aug 21, 2015, at 11:33, Tory S. Anderson torys.ander...@gmail.com wrote: I've relied on Orgmode heavily for over half a decade, and I'm loathe to leave it. But what solutions have been found out there for using it collaboratively (where others are not using emacs), rather than just for personal task management (where it excels)? It has some integration with Trello, I know; some of my co-workers are advocating BaseCamp (...) and PivotalTracker. PivotalTracker looks pretty good, but I would rather find a way to leverage orgmode in a way that facilitates collaboration. What has worked for you?
Re: [O] Collaborative Team Project Management with Orgmode?
unless those services have some kind of API, and you have the desire to implement it in emacs, you might be out of luck. I am trying to figure out a way to do collaborative work via email, where I am the project coordinator. The idea is to use my email.el code to send headlines to people I need information or action from, and then to have them reply to the email. Then, I would have some easy way to get information out of the reply back to the heading (e.g. TODO state change, info etc...). Probably I would embed some org-id link in the email, and train the users not to delete it. This is only a half-baked idea so far. It would integrate org-contacts, mu4e, and org-mode in my setup. depending in your role in the project, you might get something like that to work too. Tory S. Anderson writes: I've relied on Orgmode heavily for over half a decade, and I'm loathe to leave it. But what solutions have been found out there for using it collaboratively (where others are not using emacs), rather than just for personal task management (where it excels)? It has some integration with Trello, I know; some of my co-workers are advocating BaseCamp (...) and PivotalTracker. PivotalTracker looks pretty good, but I would rather find a way to leverage orgmode in a way that facilitates collaboration. What has worked for you? -- Professor John Kitchin Doherty Hall A207F Department of Chemical Engineering Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA 15213 412-268-7803 @johnkitchin http://kitchingroup.cheme.cmu.edu
Re: [O] Collaborative Team Project Management with Orgmode?
Heh, well I did add a todo item to the project when I saw this thread, but Leisure doesn't yet handle agenda items. This is the type of feedback I'm looking for though. I'm also wondering if there are any orgmode hackers out there with some JS/HTML skillz who might like to help out with modding the project for things like this. We do have an orgmode parser that can pick out things like tags and properties, etc. -- Bill On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 3:03 PM Ken Mankoff mank...@gmail.com wrote: This thread should merge with recent ongoing thread titled [O] Help testing orgmode connection to interactive web environment -k. Please excuse brevity. Sent from pocket computer with tiny non-haptic feedback keyboard. On Aug 21, 2015, at 11:33, Tory S. Anderson torys.ander...@gmail.com wrote: I've relied on Orgmode heavily for over half a decade, and I'm loathe to leave it. But what solutions have been found out there for using it collaboratively (where others are not using emacs), rather than just for personal task management (where it excels)? It has some integration with Trello, I know; some of my co-workers are advocating BaseCamp (...) and PivotalTracker. PivotalTracker looks pretty good, but I would rather find a way to leverage orgmode in a way that facilitates collaboration. What has worked for you?
[O] Collaborative Team Project Management with Orgmode?
I've relied on Orgmode heavily for over half a decade, and I'm loathe to leave it. But what solutions have been found out there for using it collaboratively (where others are not using emacs), rather than just for personal task management (where it excels)? It has some integration with Trello, I know; some of my co-workers are advocating BaseCamp (...) and PivotalTracker. PivotalTracker looks pretty good, but I would rather find a way to leverage orgmode in a way that facilitates collaboration. What has worked for you?
