Re: [O] How to avoid active timestamps to be really active?

2012-09-26 Thread Bastien 


Hi Sébastien,

wxhgmqzgw...@spammotel.com writes:

>> Information contained in source blocks are now skipped when building the
>> agenda.
>
> It does not work with my pull of 12:20 (Paris time).

Please provide a reproducible recipe.

Thanks,

-- 
 Bastien

Re: [O] How to avoid active timestamps to be really active?

2012-09-26 Thread Bastien 


Hi Sébastien,

"Sebastien Vauban"
 writes:

> I have the impression that the following code did work (i.e., wasn't seen in
> the agenda) some time ago:

I'd be curious to know when...

> * Some explanation...
>
> #+begin_src org
> ,SCHEDULED: <2012-02-13 Mon +1w/12d>
> #+end_src
>
> Now, it is part of the displayed agenda items.

Information contained in source blocks are now skipped when building the
agenda.

Thanks,

-- 
 Bastien

[O] How to avoid active timestamps to be really active?

2012-09-26 Thread Sebastien Vauban 
Hello,

I have the impression that the following code did work (i.e., wasn't seen in
the agenda) some time ago:

--8<---cut here---start->8---
* Some explanation...

#+begin_src org
,SCHEDULED: <2012-02-13 Mon +1w/12d>
#+end_src
--8<---cut here---end--->8---

Now, it is part of the displayed agenda items.

How to make that be not active -- without changing the angular brackets in an
inactive timestamp (as this is some example in a document about Org)?

Best regards,
  Seb

-- 
Sebastien Vauban