Re: [O] Org-lint complains about valid footnote?

2017-08-26 Thread Eric S Fraga 
On Friday, 25 Aug 2017 at 15:25, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Eric S Fraga  writes:
>
>> In tracking down another problem with the latest version of org (more to
>> follow probably), I thought using org-lint might help.  With the
>> attached simple example, I get:
>>
>>  5 high  Missing definition for footnote [1]
>>
>> from org-lint.
>>
>> The footnote definition is there as it's inline...
>
> Fixed. Thank you.

Thank you!

-- 
: Eric S Fraga via Emacs 26.0.50, Org release_9.0.9-796-gbae41a


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Re: [O] Org-lint complains about valid footnote?

2017-08-25 Thread Nicolas Goaziou 
Hello,

Eric S Fraga  writes:

> In tracking down another problem with the latest version of org (more to
> follow probably), I thought using org-lint might help.  With the
> attached simple example, I get:
>
>  5 high  Missing definition for footnote [1]
>
> from org-lint.
>
> The footnote definition is there as it's inline...

Fixed. Thank you.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou

[O] Org-lint complains about valid footnote?

2017-08-25 Thread Eric S Fraga 
In tracking down another problem with the latest version of org (more to
follow probably), I thought using org-lint might help.  With the
attached simple example, I get:

 5 high  Missing definition for footnote [1]

from org-lint.

The footnote definition is there as it's inline...

-- 
: Eric S Fraga via Emacs 26.0.50, Org release_9.0.9-796-gbae41a
#+TITLE: examplebug.org
#+AUTHOR:Eric S Fraga

* Link to maxima
We can use Maxima to solve our equations.[fn:1: http://maxima.sourceforge.net/]
#+index: modelling!tools


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature