[O] Should org-catch-invisible-edits default to non-nil? (was: Editing folded headlines and ellipses)
Hi Darlan, Mhh... yes, I see. I'm not against changing the default for `org-catch-invisible-edits' but I'd like to know what other contributors think. So here it is: what do you guys think the defauld should be? Thanks, -- Bastien
Re: [O] Should org-catch-invisible-edits default to non-nil? (was: Editing folded headlines and ellipses)
On 12.3.2013, at 15:21, Bastien b...@altern.org wrote: Hi Darlan, Mhh... yes, I see. I'm not against changing the default for `org-catch-invisible-edits' but I'd like to know what other contributors think. So here it is: what do you guys think the defauld should be? I think the default should be nil. Org-mode is also a basic text mode, and I think it should not deviate too much from other modes. I think better advertising this might be all that is needed. - Carsten
Re: [O] Should org-catch-invisible-edits default to non-nil? (was: Editing folded headlines and ellipses)
Dnia 2013-03-12, o godz. 15:21:53 Bastien b...@altern.org napisał(a): Hi Darlan, Mhh... yes, I see. I'm not against changing the default for `org-catch-invisible-edits' but I'd like to know what other contributors think. So here it is: what do you guys think the defauld should be? I'm not (yet?) a contributor, just a simpleton user, but for me: nil is a bad idea here. Thanks, Best, -- Marcin Borkowski http://octd.wmi.amu.edu.pl/en/Marcin_Borkowski Adam Mickiewicz University
Re: [O] Should org-catch-invisible-edits default to non-nil? (was: Editing folded headlines and ellipses)
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 03:21:53PM +0100, Bastien wrote: I'm not against changing the default for `org-catch-invisible-edits' but I'd like to know what other contributors think. So here it is: what do you guys think the defauld should be? Although I set it to 'show, I still think the default should be nil. My reasoning is simple; the alternatives are too many and too varied. Cheers, -- Suvayu Open source is the future. It sets us free.
