The org-plus-contrib package is a little 'odd' in that the name of the
package is not the name of the library being installed. To get around
this, I have a use-package witht he following form
(use-package org
:pin org
:ensure org-plus-contrib
:init
)
Note the :ensure line. Basically, this tells use-package to install org,
but from the org-plus-contrib package.
HTH
Tim
Lawrence Bottorff writes:
> I've got this in my init, which is in an org file with embedded elisp
> blocks:
>
> (use-package org-plus-contrib
> :defer t
> :ensure t
> )
>
> then right after I have
>
> (use-package org
> :ensure t
> :bind (("C-c a" . org-agenda)
>("C-c c" . org-capture)
>("C-c l" . org-store-link))
> :config
> (setq org-ellipsis " ")
>. . .
> )
>
> where the use-package org form has extensive config info in it. Am I wrong
> with having both? In my ELPA directory I only see org-plus-contrib-20...
> which has such things as org.el. I'm using "https://orgmode.org/elpa/ BTW.
>
> LB
--
Tim Cross
