Re: [O] org-review is on melpa
On 2016-09-10 22:12, Karl Voit writes: > * Alan Schmitt wrote: >> --=-=-= >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 >> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > Btw, is there a reason that those two lines are not part of the > header? I have no idea, I have no modified what message-mode and gnus do in that regard. > You might want to add this simple explanation at the top of your > README.org since it seems to summarize the main feature of your cool > tool for Org-mode savvy people. Done. Thanks for the suggestion. Alan -- OpenPGP Key ID : 040D0A3B4ED2E5C7 Monthly Athmospheric CO₂, Mauna Loa Obs. 2015-08: 398.93, 2016-08: 402.25 signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [O] org-review is on melpa
* Alan Schmitt wrote: > --=-=-= > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Btw, is there a reason that those two lines are not part of the header? With my slrn config, it seems to be the case that the two lines are not taken into account so that your non-ASCII characters are not rendered correctly: > On 2016-09-08 13:02, Karl Voit writes: > >> Hallo Alan, >> >> I don't particularly want to discuss this here because I think >> that I don't need org-review for now. However, I do think that you >> should elaborate on the fact that org-review sounds very similar to >> a simple recurring todo. What are the benefits compared to recurring >> todos? > > One could indeed use recurring todos on tasks like =E2=80=9CReview Project = > A=E2=80=9D > and =E2=80=9CReview Project B=E2=80=9D, but it requires creating such addit= > ional tasks > for each project. Org-review lets you attach another timestamp, > different from the Scheduled or Deadline ones which define when the task > has to be done, to schedule reviews of the task or project within the > task or project. I see. You might want to add this simple explanation at the top of your README.org since it seems to summarize the main feature of your cool tool for Org-mode savvy people. Thanks! -- mail|git|SVN|photos|postings|SMS|phonecalls|RSS|CSV|XML to Org-mode: > get Memacs from https://github.com/novoid/Memacs < https://github.com/novoid/extract_pdf_annotations_to_orgmode + more on github
Re: [O] org-review is on melpa
Hello Karl, On 2016-09-08 13:02, Karl Voit writes: > Hallo Alan, > > * Alan Schmitt wrote: >> >> After using this for a couple of years, I=E2=80=99ve finally taken the time= >> to >> put it on Melpa. Org-review (https://melpa.org/#/org-review) is a set of >> functions to maintain review dates for entries, so that you may generate >> agenda view of things to review. I use it every Friday during my weekly >> review to review projects and single tasks. > > I'm not familiar with org-review. I just read the description on the > page mentioned above. > > I don't particularly want to discuss this here because I think > that I don't need org-review for now. However, I do think that you > should elaborate on the fact that org-review sounds very similar to > a simple recurring todo. What are the benefits compared to recurring > todos? One could indeed use recurring todos on tasks like “Review Project A” and “Review Project B”, but it requires creating such additional tasks for each project. Org-review lets you attach another timestamp, different from the Scheduled or Deadline ones which define when the task has to be done, to schedule reviews of the task or project within the task or project. Best, Alan -- OpenPGP Key ID : 040D0A3B4ED2E5C7 Monthly Athmospheric CO₂, Mauna Loa Obs. 2015-08: 398.93, 2016-08: 402.25 signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [O] org-review is on melpa
Hallo Alan, * Alan Schmitt wrote: > > After using this for a couple of years, I=E2=80=99ve finally taken the time= > to > put it on Melpa. Org-review (https://melpa.org/#/org-review) is a set of > functions to maintain review dates for entries, so that you may generate > agenda view of things to review. I use it every Friday during my weekly > review to review projects and single tasks. I'm not familiar with org-review. I just read the description on the page mentioned above. I don't particularly want to discuss this here because I think that I don't need org-review for now. However, I do think that you should elaborate on the fact that org-review sounds very similar to a simple recurring todo. What are the benefits compared to recurring todos? -- mail|git|SVN|photos|postings|SMS|phonecalls|RSS|CSV|XML to Org-mode: > get Memacs from https://github.com/novoid/Memacs < https://github.com/novoid/extract_pdf_annotations_to_orgmode + more on github
Re: [O] org-review is on melpa
This looks great! Thanks Alan. On 2016-09-07 01:49, Alan Schmitt wrote: > Hello, > > After using this for a couple of years, I’ve finally taken the time to > put it on Melpa. Org-review (https://melpa.org/#/org-review) is a set of > functions to maintain review dates for entries, so that you may generate > agenda view of things to review. I use it every Friday during my weekly > review to review projects and single tasks. > > Best, > > Alan > signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[O] org-review is on melpa
Hello, After using this for a couple of years, I’ve finally taken the time to put it on Melpa. Org-review (https://melpa.org/#/org-review) is a set of functions to maintain review dates for entries, so that you may generate agenda view of things to review. I use it every Friday during my weekly review to review projects and single tasks. Best, Alan -- OpenPGP Key ID : 040D0A3B4ED2E5C7 Monthly Athmospheric CO₂, Mauna Loa Obs. 2015-07: 401.31, 2016-07: 404.39 signature.asc Description: PGP signature
