Re: [O] unexpected failure on all formulas

2011-09-20 Thread Nick Dokos 
Jude DaShiell jdash...@shellworld.net wrote:


 |+--+---+---|
 | mode   |  |   |   |
 | Min|  |   |   |
 | Max| 127. |   81. |   74. |
 #+TBLFM: @$2..@$4=vmode(@i..@ii) :: @$2..@$4=vmin(@i..@ii) :: 
 @$2..@$4=vmax(@i..@ii)
 
 
 # Local Variables:
 # kept-new-versions: 100
 # version-control: t
 # End:
 cut here.
 What did I do wrong with this #+TBLFM: line?
 

Two things:

o as Christian Moe pointed out, calc does not provide a vmode() function.

o the separator lines in the formulas have to be specified using capital
I letters.

Nick

Re: [O] unexpected failure on all formulas

2011-09-20 Thread Nick Dokos 
Nick Dokos nicholas.do...@hp.com wrote:

 Jude DaShiell jdash...@shellworld.net wrote:
 
 
  |+--+---+---|
  | mode   |  |   |   |
  | Min|  |   |   |
  | Max| 127. |   81. |   74. |
  #+TBLFM: @$2..@$4=vmode(@i..@ii) :: @$2..@$4=vmin(@i..@ii) :: 
  @$2..@$4=vmax(@i..@ii)
  
  
  # Local Variables:
  # kept-new-versions: 100
  # version-control: t
  # End:
  cut here.
  What did I do wrong with this #+TBLFM: line?
  
 
 Two things:
 
 o as Christian Moe pointed out, calc does not provide a vmode() function.
 
 o the separator lines in the formulas have to be specified using capital
 I letters.
 

Here is an implementation of vmode - afaict, it works correctly but
that may be because I've only tested it on a single set of data. If
you find something wrong, please let me know.

--8---cut here---start-8---
| Date Stamp | Systolic | Diastolic | Pulse |
|+--+---+---|
| [2011-07-19 Tue 02:26] |  138 |92 |74 |
| [2011-07-20 Wed 04:03] |  130 |85 |74 |
| [2011-07-21 Thu 03:50] |  128 |79 |76 |
| [2011-07-22 Fri 02:33] |  121 |80 |79 |
| [2011-07-23 Sat 02:52] |  118 |75 |68 |
| [2011-07-24 Sun 04:13] |  126 |83 |78 |
| [2011-07-25 Mon 02:12] |  122 |79 |76 |
| [2011-07-26 Tue 01:57] |  124 |79 |72 |
| [2011-07-27 Wed 04:03] |  137 |74 |76 |
| [2011-07-28 Thu 03:47] |  136 |80 |76 |
| [2011-07-29 Fri 04:06] |  120 |72 |76 |
| [2011-07-30 Sat 03:18] |  128 |92 |80 |
| [2011-07-31 Sun 07:11] |  124 |84 |72 |
| [2011-08-01 Mon 04:55] |  124 |77 |69 |
| [2011-08-02 Tue 02:47] |  128 |80 |67 |
| [2011-08-03 Wed 06:00] |  132 |89 |70 |
| [2011-08-04 Thu 04:30] |  137 |82 |77 |
| [2011-08-05 Fri 06:10] |  124 |86 |77 |
| [2011-08-06 Sat 04:04] |  139 |88 |78 |
| [2011-08-07 Sun 04:02] |  124 |80 |68 |
| [2011-08-08 Mon 06:36] |  137 |93 |79 |
| [2011-08-10 Wed04:03]  |  120 |80 |68 |
| [2011-08-11 Thu 04:30] |  128 |78 |77 |
| [2011-08-12 Fri 06:36] |  143 |82 |76 |
| [2011-08-13 Sat 06:18] |  125 |76 |69 |
| [2011-08-14 Sun 04:04] |  123 |70 |69 |
| [2011-08-15 Mon 04:04] |  135 |83 |76 |
| [2011-08-16 Tue 04:03] |  128 |80 |69 |
| [2011-08-17 Wed 04:04] |  124 |80 |68 |
| [2011-08-18 Thu 05:58] |  136 |87 |72 |
| [2011-08-19 Fri 05:50] |  116 |80 |64 |
| [2011-08-20 Sat 06:38] |  139 |84 |64 |
| [2011-08-21 Sun 08:20] |  124 |84 |73 |
| [2011-08-22 Mon 03:50] |  138 |76 |70 |
| [2011-08-23 Tue 05:52] |  126 |79 |68 |
| [2011-08-24 Wed 04:53] |  125 |81 |64 |
| [2011-08-25 Thu 05:37] |  124 |79 |68 |
| [2011-08-26 Fri 06:41] |  124 |87 |74 |
| [2011-08-27 Sat 05:44] |  133 |74 |61 |
| [2011-08-28 Sun 03:22] |  124 |76 |61 |
| [2011-08-29 Mon 04:06] |  124 |76 |65 |
| [2011-08-30 Tue 05:52] |  139 |87 |71 |
| [2011-08-31 Wed 06:47] |  152 |86 |68 |
| [2011-09-01 Thu 06:00] |  136 |86 |78 |
| [2011-09-02 Fri 01:22] |  142 |   100 |78 |
| [2011-09-03 Sat 09:12] |  126 |79 |70 |
| [2011-09-04 Sun 11:53] |  130 |90 |72 |
| [2011-09-05 Mon 06:29] |  138 |77 |65 |
| [2011-09-06 Tue 05:42] |  121 |76 |68 |
| [2011-09-07 Wed 06:47] |  131 |77 |68 |
| [2011-09-08 Thu 06:02] |  122 |76 |72 |
| [2011-09-10 Sat 05:38] |  126 |76 |69 |
| [2011-09-11 Sun 10:12] |  137 |87 |64 |
| [2011-09-12 Mon 04:00] |  135 |78 |89 |
| [2011-09-13 Tue 06:00] |  132 |82 |66 |
| [2011-09-14 Wed 06:01] |  137 |77 |77 |
| [2011-09-15 Thu 04:08] |  141 |87 |64 |
| [2011-09-17 Sat 08:35] |  121 |78 |66 |
| [2011-09-18 Sun 07:04] |  124 |69 |65 |
| [2011-09-19 Mon 06:00] |  133 |81 |69 |
|+--+---+---|
| mode   |  125 |81 |69 |
| min|  116 |69 |61 |
| max|  152 |   100 |89 |
#+TBLFM: @$2..@$4=vmode(@I..@II) :: @$2..@$4=vmin(@I..@II) :: 
@$2..@$4=vmax(@I..@II)

#+begin_src elisp

(defun calcFunc-vmode (rest vecs)
  (let* ((flat (copy-sequence

Re: [O] unexpected failure on all formulas

2011-09-20 Thread Lawrence Mitchell 
Nick Dokos wrote:

[...]

 I cribbed heavily from the implementation of vmedian. Although there is
 no key binding, you can even use the above in an interactive Calc
 session, by entering the formula in algebraic form. I yanked the vector
 twice onto the Calc stack and then entered 'vmode($) with the following
 result:


This does the wrong thing for bimodal lists of numbers, since the
correct answer in that case is the list of modes.  Here's an
elisp implementation that's a bit shorter:

(require 'cl)

(defun mode (rest list)
  (let ((ret nil) val count)
(loop for n in list
  if (assq n ret)
  do (incf (cdr (assq n ret)))
  else
  do
  (push (cons n 1) ret))
(setq ret (sort ret (lambda (a b) ( (cdr a) (cdr b)
(setq val (list (caar ret))
  count (cdar ret))
(loop for (n . c) in (cdr ret)
  while (= c count)
  do (push n val))
val))

And here's how to use it in the proffered table:

| Date Stamp | Systalic | Diastalic | Pulse |
|+--+---+---|
| [2011-07-19 Tue 02:26] |  138 |92 |74 |
| [2011-07-20 Wed 04:03] |  130 |85 |74 |
|+--+---+---|
| min|  130 |85 |74 |
| max|  138 |92 |74 |
| mode   | 138, 130 |92, 85 |74 |
#+TBLFM: 
@II+1$2..@II+1$4=vmin(@I..@II)::@II+2$2..@II+2$4=vmax(@I..@II)::@II+3$2..@II+3$4='(mapconcat
 'number-to-string (mode @I..@II) , );N

Lawrence
-- 
Lawrence Mitchell we...@gmx.li

Re: [O] unexpected failure on all formulas

2011-09-20 Thread Christian Moe 

Hi, Nick,

I think your vmode() needs to subtract one from the result. The mode 
in the systolic column of Jude's dataset should be 124 (f=12), not 
125 (f=2).


For Jude's limited purposes I got by with less code (but note the 
caveats):


#+begin_src emacs-lisp
  (defmath vmode (vec)
Returns the mode (most frequent value) of a unimodal vector of
  integers VEC.  WARNING: Will not work with non-integer values or
  multiple vectors. Will only return the lowest mode for multimodal
  data.
(let ((freq (histogram vec (1+ (vmax vec)
(1- (find freq (vmax freq)
#+end_src

Using :=vmode(@I..@II), I get 124 (systolic), 80 (diastolic), 68 (pulse).

Yours,
Christian

On 9/20/11 10:26 AM, Nick Dokos wrote:

Nick Dokosnicholas.do...@hp.com  wrote:


Jude DaShielljdash...@shellworld.net  wrote:



|+--+---+---|
| mode   |  |   |   |
| Min|  |   |   |
| Max| 127. |   81. |   74. |
#+TBLFM: @$2..@$4=vmode(@i..@ii) :: @$2..@$4=vmin(@i..@ii) :: 
@$2..@$4=vmax(@i..@ii)


# Local Variables:
# kept-new-versions: 100
# version-control: t
# End:
cut here.
What did I do wrong with this #+TBLFM: line?



Two things:

o as Christian Moe pointed out, calc does not provide a vmode() function.

o the separator lines in the formulas have to be specified using capital
I letters.



Here is an implementation of vmode - afaict, it works correctly but
that may be because I've only tested it on a single set of data. If
you find something wrong, please let me know.

--8---cut here---start-8---
| Date Stamp | Systolic | Diastolic | Pulse |
|+--+---+---|
| [2011-07-19 Tue 02:26] |  138 |92 |74 |
| [2011-07-20 Wed 04:03] |  130 |85 |74 |
| [2011-07-21 Thu 03:50] |  128 |79 |76 |
| [2011-07-22 Fri 02:33] |  121 |80 |79 |
| [2011-07-23 Sat 02:52] |  118 |75 |68 |
| [2011-07-24 Sun 04:13] |  126 |83 |78 |
| [2011-07-25 Mon 02:12] |  122 |79 |76 |
| [2011-07-26 Tue 01:57] |  124 |79 |72 |
| [2011-07-27 Wed 04:03] |  137 |74 |76 |
| [2011-07-28 Thu 03:47] |  136 |80 |76 |
| [2011-07-29 Fri 04:06] |  120 |72 |76 |
| [2011-07-30 Sat 03:18] |  128 |92 |80 |
| [2011-07-31 Sun 07:11] |  124 |84 |72 |
| [2011-08-01 Mon 04:55] |  124 |77 |69 |
| [2011-08-02 Tue 02:47] |  128 |80 |67 |
| [2011-08-03 Wed 06:00] |  132 |89 |70 |
| [2011-08-04 Thu 04:30] |  137 |82 |77 |
| [2011-08-05 Fri 06:10] |  124 |86 |77 |
| [2011-08-06 Sat 04:04] |  139 |88 |78 |
| [2011-08-07 Sun 04:02] |  124 |80 |68 |
| [2011-08-08 Mon 06:36] |  137 |93 |79 |
| [2011-08-10 Wed04:03]  |  120 |80 |68 |
| [2011-08-11 Thu 04:30] |  128 |78 |77 |
| [2011-08-12 Fri 06:36] |  143 |82 |76 |
| [2011-08-13 Sat 06:18] |  125 |76 |69 |
| [2011-08-14 Sun 04:04] |  123 |70 |69 |
| [2011-08-15 Mon 04:04] |  135 |83 |76 |
| [2011-08-16 Tue 04:03] |  128 |80 |69 |
| [2011-08-17 Wed 04:04] |  124 |80 |68 |
| [2011-08-18 Thu 05:58] |  136 |87 |72 |
| [2011-08-19 Fri 05:50] |  116 |80 |64 |
| [2011-08-20 Sat 06:38] |  139 |84 |64 |
| [2011-08-21 Sun 08:20] |  124 |84 |73 |
| [2011-08-22 Mon 03:50] |  138 |76 |70 |
| [2011-08-23 Tue 05:52] |  126 |79 |68 |
| [2011-08-24 Wed 04:53] |  125 |81 |64 |
| [2011-08-25 Thu 05:37] |  124 |79 |68 |
| [2011-08-26 Fri 06:41] |  124 |87 |74 |
| [2011-08-27 Sat 05:44] |  133 |74 |61 |
| [2011-08-28 Sun 03:22] |  124 |76 |61 |
| [2011-08-29 Mon 04:06] |  124 |76 |65 |
| [2011-08-30 Tue 05:52] |  139 |87 |71 |
| [2011-08-31 Wed 06:47] |  152 |86 |68 |
| [2011-09-01 Thu 06:00] |  136 |86 |78 |
| [2011-09-02 Fri 01:22] |  142 |   100 |78 |
| [2011-09-03 Sat 09:12] |  126 |79 |70 |
| [2011-09-04 Sun 11:53] |  130 |90 |72 |
| [2011-09-05 Mon 06:29] |  138 |77 |65 |
| [2011-09-06 Tue 05:42] |  121 |76 |68 |
| [2011-09-07 Wed 06:47] |  131 |77 |68 |
| [2011-09-08 Thu 06:02] |  122 |76 |72 |
| [2011-09-10 Sat 05:38] |  126 |76 |69 |
| [2011-09-11 Sun 10:12] |  137 |87 |64 |
| [2011-09-12 Mon 04:00] |  135 |78 |89 |
| [2011-09-13 Tue 06:00] |  132 |82 |

Re: [O] unexpected failure on all formulas

2011-09-20 Thread Nick Dokos 
Christian Moe m...@christianmoe.com wrote:


 I think your vmode() needs to subtract one from the result. The mode
 in the systolic column of Jude's dataset should be 124 (f=12), not
 125 (f=2).
 

Yes, this is an off-by-one error: in vfreqs, I should cons prev onto
freqs, not (nth 0 vec). In addition to this and the multimodal problem
that both you and Lawrence Mitchell pointed out, there is another
off-by-one error when vfreqs gets to the end of the list.

All in all, a disaster: can a posting be deleted? or at least marked
with a big, red X so that it won't mislead in the future? I'll try to
post a corrected version later on.

OTOH, my main interest in this was the hooking up of a user function
onto calc and the example, though deeply flawed, does illustrate that.

Thanks to both Christian and Lawrence for the whacks in the head
(although now I have a headache...)

Nick


 For Jude's limited purposes I got by with less code (but note the
 caveats):
 
 #+begin_src emacs-lisp
   (defmath vmode (vec)
 Returns the mode (most frequent value) of a unimodal vector of
   integers VEC.  WARNING: Will not work with non-integer values or
   multiple vectors. Will only return the lowest mode for multimodal
   data.
 (let ((freq (histogram vec (1+ (vmax vec)
 (1- (find freq (vmax freq)
 #+end_src
 
 Using :=vmode(@I..@II), I get 124 (systolic), 80 (diastolic), 68 (pulse).
 
 Yours,
 Christian
 
 On 9/20/11 10:26 AM, Nick Dokos wrote:
  Nick Dokosnicholas.do...@hp.com  wrote:
 
  Jude DaShielljdash...@shellworld.net  wrote:
 
 
  |+--+---+---|
  | mode   |  |   |   |
  | Min|  |   |   |
  | Max| 127. |   81. |   74. |
  #+TBLFM: @$2..@$4=vmode(@i..@ii) :: @$2..@$4=vmin(@i..@ii) :: 
  @$2..@$4=vmax(@i..@ii)
 
 
  # Local Variables:
  # kept-new-versions: 100
  # version-control: t
  # End:
  cut here.
  What did I do wrong with this #+TBLFM: line?
 
 
  Two things:
 
  o as Christian Moe pointed out, calc does not provide a vmode() function.
 
  o the separator lines in the formulas have to be specified using capital
  I letters.
 
 
  Here is an implementation of vmode - afaict, it works correctly but
  that may be because I've only tested it on a single set of data. If
  you find something wrong, please let me know.
 
  --8---cut here---start-8---
  | Date Stamp | Systolic | Diastolic | Pulse |
  |+--+---+---|
  | [2011-07-19 Tue 02:26] |  138 |92 |74 |
  | [2011-07-20 Wed 04:03] |  130 |85 |74 |
  | [2011-07-21 Thu 03:50] |  128 |79 |76 |
  | [2011-07-22 Fri 02:33] |  121 |80 |79 |
  | [2011-07-23 Sat 02:52] |  118 |75 |68 |
  | [2011-07-24 Sun 04:13] |  126 |83 |78 |
  | [2011-07-25 Mon 02:12] |  122 |79 |76 |
  | [2011-07-26 Tue 01:57] |  124 |79 |72 |
  | [2011-07-27 Wed 04:03] |  137 |74 |76 |
  | [2011-07-28 Thu 03:47] |  136 |80 |76 |
  | [2011-07-29 Fri 04:06] |  120 |72 |76 |
  | [2011-07-30 Sat 03:18] |  128 |92 |80 |
  | [2011-07-31 Sun 07:11] |  124 |84 |72 |
  | [2011-08-01 Mon 04:55] |  124 |77 |69 |
  | [2011-08-02 Tue 02:47] |  128 |80 |67 |
  | [2011-08-03 Wed 06:00] |  132 |89 |70 |
  | [2011-08-04 Thu 04:30] |  137 |82 |77 |
  | [2011-08-05 Fri 06:10] |  124 |86 |77 |
  | [2011-08-06 Sat 04:04] |  139 |88 |78 |
  | [2011-08-07 Sun 04:02] |  124 |80 |68 |
  | [2011-08-08 Mon 06:36] |  137 |93 |79 |
  | [2011-08-10 Wed04:03]  |  120 |80 |68 |
  | [2011-08-11 Thu 04:30] |  128 |78 |77 |
  | [2011-08-12 Fri 06:36] |  143 |82 |76 |
  | [2011-08-13 Sat 06:18] |  125 |76 |69 |
  | [2011-08-14 Sun 04:04] |  123 |70 |69 |
  | [2011-08-15 Mon 04:04] |  135 |83 |76 |
  | [2011-08-16 Tue 04:03] |  128 |80 |69 |
  | [2011-08-17 Wed 04:04] |  124 |80 |68 |
  | [2011-08-18 Thu 05:58] |  136 |87 |72 |
  | [2011-08-19 Fri 05:50] |  116 |80 |64 |
  | [2011-08-20 Sat 06:38] |  139 |84 |64 |
  | [2011-08-21 Sun 08:20] |  124 |84 |73 |
  | [2011-08-22 Mon 03:50] |  138 |76 |70 |
  | [2011-08-23 Tue 05:52] |  126 |79 |68 |
  | [2011-08-24 Wed 04:53] |  125 |81 |64 |
  | [2011-08-25 Thu 05:37] |  124 |79 |68 |
  | [2011-08-26 Fri 06:41] |  124 |87 |74 |
  | [2011-08-27 Sat 05:44] |  133 |74 |61 |
  | [2011-08-28 Sun 03:22] |  124 |

Re: [O] unexpected failure on all formulas

2011-09-20 Thread Nick Dokos 
Nick Dokos nicholas.do...@hp.com wrote:

 All in all, a disaster: can a posting be deleted? or at least marked
 with a big, red X so that it won't mislead in the future? I'll try to
 post a corrected version later on.
 

Here's an attempt to correct the problems that Christian, Lawrence and I
found in my previous attempt. I include two tables, Jude's original and
a truncated version to force multimodality. I hope that this is correct
(but I would not be surprised if there are other errors lurking - but at
least it is better than the previous version). As always, I'd appreciate
corrections etc.

Nick

--8---cut here---start-8---
| Date Stamp | Systolic | Diastolic | Pulse |
|+--+---+---|
| [2011-07-19 Tue 02:26] |  138 |92 |74 |
| [2011-07-20 Wed 04:03] |  130 |85 |74 |
| [2011-07-21 Thu 03:50] |  128 |79 |76 |
| [2011-07-22 Fri 02:33] |  121 |80 |79 |
| [2011-07-23 Sat 02:52] |  118 |75 |68 |
| [2011-07-24 Sun 04:13] |  126 |83 |78 |
| [2011-07-25 Mon 02:12] |  122 |79 |76 |
| [2011-07-26 Tue 01:57] |  124 |79 |72 |
| [2011-07-27 Wed 04:03] |  137 |74 |76 |
| [2011-07-28 Thu 03:47] |  136 |80 |76 |
| [2011-07-29 Fri 04:06] |  120 |72 |76 |
| [2011-07-30 Sat 03:18] |  128 |92 |80 |
| [2011-07-31 Sun 07:11] |  124 |84 |72 |
| [2011-08-01 Mon 04:55] |  124 |77 |69 |
| [2011-08-02 Tue 02:47] |  128 |80 |67 |
| [2011-08-03 Wed 06:00] |  132 |89 |70 |
| [2011-08-04 Thu 04:30] |  137 |82 |77 |
| [2011-08-05 Fri 06:10] |  124 |86 |77 |
| [2011-08-06 Sat 04:04] |  139 |88 |78 |
| [2011-08-07 Sun 04:02] |  124 |80 |68 |
| [2011-08-08 Mon 06:36] |  137 |93 |79 |
| [2011-08-10 Wed 04:03] |  120 |80 |68 |
| [2011-08-11 Thu 04:30] |  128 |78 |77 |
| [2011-08-12 Fri 06:36] |  143 |82 |76 |
| [2011-08-13 Sat 06:18] |  125 |76 |69 |
| [2011-08-14 Sun 04:04] |  123 |70 |69 |
| [2011-08-15 Mon 04:04] |  135 |83 |76 |
| [2011-08-16 Tue 04:03] |  128 |80 |69 |
| [2011-08-17 Wed 04:04] |  124 |80 |68 |
| [2011-08-18 Thu 05:58] |  136 |87 |72 |
| [2011-08-19 Fri 05:50] |  116 |80 |64 |
| [2011-08-20 Sat 06:38] |  139 |84 |64 |
| [2011-08-21 Sun 08:20] |  124 |84 |73 |
| [2011-08-22 Mon 03:50] |  138 |76 |70 |
| [2011-08-23 Tue 05:52] |  126 |79 |68 |
| [2011-08-24 Wed 04:53] |  125 |81 |64 |
| [2011-08-25 Thu 05:37] |  124 |79 |68 |
| [2011-08-26 Fri 06:41] |  124 |87 |74 |
| [2011-08-27 Sat 05:44] |  133 |74 |61 |
| [2011-08-28 Sun 03:22] |  124 |76 |61 |
| [2011-08-29 Mon 04:06] |  124 |76 |65 |
| [2011-08-30 Tue 05:52] |  139 |87 |71 |
| [2011-08-31 Wed 06:47] |  152 |86 |68 |
| [2011-09-01 Thu 06:00] |  136 |86 |78 |
| [2011-09-02 Fri 01:22] |  142 |   100 |78 |
| [2011-09-03 Sat 09:12] |  126 |79 |70 |
| [2011-09-04 Sun 11:53] |  130 |90 |72 |
| [2011-09-05 Mon 06:29] |  138 |77 |65 |
| [2011-09-06 Tue 05:42] |  121 |76 |68 |
| [2011-09-07 Wed 06:47] |  131 |77 |68 |
| [2011-09-08 Thu 06:02] |  122 |76 |72 |
| [2011-09-10 Sat 05:38] |  126 |76 |69 |
| [2011-09-11 Sun 10:12] |  137 |87 |64 |
| [2011-09-12 Mon 04:00] |  135 |78 |89 |
| [2011-09-13 Tue 06:00] |  132 |82 |66 |
| [2011-09-14 Wed 06:01] |  137 |77 |77 |
| [2011-09-15 Thu 04:08] |  141 |87 |64 |
| [2011-09-17 Sat 08:35] |  121 |78 |66 |
| [2011-09-18 Sun 07:04] |  124 |69 |65 |
| [2011-09-19 Mon 06:00] |  133 |81 |69 |
|+--+---+---|
| mode   |  124 |80 |68 |
| min|  116 |69 |61 |
| max|  152 |   100 |89 |
#+TBLFM: @$2..@$4=vmode(@I..@II) :: @$2..@$4=vmin(@I..@II) :: 
@$2..@$4=vmax(@I..@II)


| Date Stamp |   Systolic | Diastolic | Pulse |
|++---+---|
| [2011-07-19 Tue 02:26] |138 |92 |74 |
| [2011-07-20 Wed 04:03] |130 |85 |74 |
| [2011-07-21 Thu 03:50] |128 |79 |76 |
| [2011-07-22 Fri 02:33] |121 |80 |79 |
| [2011-07-23 Sat 02:52] |118 |75

Re: [O] unexpected failure on all formulas

2011-09-20 Thread Christian Moe 

Hi, Nick,

No whacks intended! It was an easy catch because I was mulling over 
similar problems with my code. My own second pass at a vmode 
implementation for Calc is below, now with support for negative values 
and bimodal data. It takes a different route and is a bit shorter, but 
doesn't handle all the cases your code does (I guess; I don't grok it 
all).


Yours,
Christian


(defmath vmode (vec)
  Return the mode(s), i.e. most frequent value(s), of a vector
  of integers VEC.
  (let ((results (vec)) ; hold results
(index 1)
offset maxfreq)
(setq offset (- 1 (vmin vec))
  vec (+ offset vec) ; bump all ints positive
  freq (histogram vec (1+ (vmax vec)))
  offset (1+ offset) ; histogram added `0' slot
  maxfreq (vmax freq))
;; Collect indexes (less offset) of all max freqs
(while ( (setq index (find freq maxfreq index)) 0)
  (setq results (vconcat results index)
index (1+ index)))
(setq results (- results offset)) ; get neg ints back
;; Return results as vector or number
(if ( (vlen results) 1)
results
  (head results


On 9/20/11 4:59 PM, Nick Dokos wrote:

Christian Moem...@christianmoe.com  wrote:



I think your vmode() needs to subtract one from the result. The mode
in the systolic column of Jude's dataset should be 124 (f=12), not
125 (f=2).



Yes, this is an off-by-one error: in vfreqs, I should cons prev onto
freqs, not (nth 0 vec). In addition to this and the multimodal problem
that both you and Lawrence Mitchell pointed out, there is another
off-by-one error when vfreqs gets to the end of the list.

All in all, a disaster: can a posting be deleted? or at least marked
with a big, red X so that it won't mislead in the future? I'll try to
post a corrected version later on.

OTOH, my main interest in this was the hooking up of a user function
onto calc and the example, though deeply flawed, does illustrate that.

Thanks to both Christian and Lawrence for the whacks in the head
(although now I have a headache...)

Nick

[O] unexpected failure on all formulas

2011-09-19 Thread Jude DaShiell 
cut here.
| Date Stamp | Systalic | Diastalic | Pulse |
|+--+---+---|
| [2011-07-19 Tue 02:26] |  138 |92 |74 |
| [2011-07-20 Wed 04:03] |  130 |85 |74 |
| [2011-07-21 Thu 03:50] |  128 |79 |76 |
| [2011-07-22 Fri 02:33] |  121 |80 |79 |
| [2011-07-23 Sat 02:52] |  118 |75 |68 |
| [2011-07-24 Sun 04:13] |  126 |83 |78 |
| [2011-07-25 Mon 02:12] |  122 |79 |76 |
| [2011-07-26 Tue 01:57] |  124 |79 |72 |
| [2011-07-27 Wed 04:03] |  137 |74 |76 |
| [2011-07-28 Thu 03:47] |  136 |80 |76 |
| [2011-07-29 Fri 04:06] |  120 |72 |76 |
| [2011-07-30 Sat 03:18] |  128 |92 |80 |
| [2011-07-31 Sun 07:11] |  124 |84 |72 |
| [2011-08-01 Mon 04:55] |  124 |77 |69 |
| [2011-08-02 Tue 02:47] |  128 |80 |67 |
| [2011-08-03 Wed 06:00] |  132 |89 |70 |
| [2011-08-04 Thu 04:30] |  137 |82 |77 |
| [2011-08-05 Fri 06:10] |  124 |86 |77 |
| [2011-08-06 Sat 04:04] |  139 |88 |78 |
| [2011-08-07 Sun 04:02] |  124 |80 |68 |
| [2011-08-08 Mon 06:36] |  137 |93 |79 |
| [2011-08-10 Wed04:03]  |  120 |80 |68 |
| [2011-08-11 Thu 04:30] |  128 |78 |77 |
| [2011-08-12 Fri 06:36] |  143 |82 |76 |
| [2011-08-13 Sat 06:18] |  125 |76 |69 |
| [2011-08-14 Sun 04:04] |  123 |70 |69 |
| [2011-08-15 Mon 04:04] |  135 |83 |76 |
| [2011-08-16 Tue 04:03] |  128 |80 |69 |
| [2011-08-17 Wed 04:04] |  124 |80 |68 |
| [2011-08-18 Thu 05:58] |  136 |87 |72 |
| [2011-08-19 Fri 05:50] |  116 |80 |64 |
| [2011-08-20 Sat 06:38] |  139 |84 |64 |
| [2011-08-21 Sun 08:20] |  124 |84 |73 |
| [2011-08-22 Mon 03:50] |  138 |76 |70 |
| [2011-08-23 Tue 05:52] |  126 |79 |68 |
| [2011-08-24 Wed 04:53] |  125 |81 |64 |
| [2011-08-25 Thu 05:37] |  124 |79 |68 |
| [2011-08-26 Fri 06:41] |  124 |87 |74 |
| [2011-08-27 Sat 05:44] |  133 |74 |61 |
| [2011-08-28 Sun 03:22] |  124 |76 |61 |
| [2011-08-29 Mon 04:06] |  124 |76 |65 |
| [2011-08-30 Tue 05:52] |  139 |87 |71 |
| [2011-08-31 Wed 06:47] |  152 |86 |68 |
| [2011-09-01 Thu 06:00] |  136 |86 |78 |
| [2011-09-02 Fri 01:22] |  142 |   100 |78 |
| [2011-09-03 Sat 09:12] |  126 |79 |70 |
| [2011-09-04 Sun 11:53] |  130 |90 |72 |
| [2011-09-05 Mon 06:29] |  138 |77 |65 |
| [2011-09-06 Tue 05:42] |  121 |76 |68 |
| [2011-09-07 Wed 06:47] |  131 |77 |68 |
| [2011-09-08 Thu 06:02] |  122 |76 |72 |
| [2011-09-10 Sat 05:38] |  126 |76 |69 |
| [2011-09-11 Sun 10:12] |  137 |87 |64 |
| [2011-09-12 Mon 04:00] |  135 |78 |89 |
| [2011-09-13 Tue 06:00] |  132 |82 |66 |
| [2011-09-14 Wed 06:01] |  137 |77 |77 |
| [2011-09-15 Thu 04:08] |  141 |87 |64 |
| [2011-09-17 Sat 08:35] |  121 |78 |66 |
| [2011-09-18 Sun 07:04] |  124 |69 |65 |
| [2011-09-19 Mon 06:00] |  133 |81 |69 |
||  |   |   |
|+--+---+---|
| mode   |  |   |   |
| Min|  |   |   |
| Max| 127. |   81. |   74. |
#+TBLFM: @$2..@$4=vmode(@i..@ii) :: @$2..@$4=vmin(@i..@ii) :: 
@$2..@$4=vmax(@i..@ii)


# Local Variables:
# kept-new-versions: 100
# version-control: t
# End:
cut here.
What did I do wrong with this #+TBLFM: line?

Jude jdash...@shellworld.net
I love the Pope, I love seeing him in his Pope-Mobile, his three feet
of bullet proof plexi-glass. That's faith in action folks! You know he's
got God on his side.
~ Bill Hicks