Re: [Orgmode] Differences html/pdf

2009-10-29 Thread Carsten Dominik


On Oct 28, 2009, at 11:23 PM, Nick Dokos wrote:


Bastien bastiengue...@googlemail.com wrote:


Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com writes:


In the latex version they're not exported for some reasons...


That is correct, we have not implemented keeping all line breaks in
LaTeX.


I've searched around a bit, and to my big surprise, I cannot find a
LaTeX package preserving line breaks.  I understand such a function
doesn't come along nicely with the general LaTeX philosophy, but it
should be possible after all...

Did anyone already tried to find such a package ?



Not a package, but there is \obeylines (plain TeX) that will
preserve line breaks - e.g. Knuth[1] suggests that it be used for
typesetting poetry:

{\obeylines\smallskip
Roses are red,
\quad Violets are blue;
Rhymes can be typeset
\quad with boxes and glue.
\smallskip}

It apparently works by pretending that the newline is a \par token.


OK, this is pretty good, and I have added it to be inserted
as a consequence of setting org-export-preserve-breaks.  But I
believe in complex documents there might be problems, so I would
be interested in test results.  Only then we will decide if this
should stay in.

- Carsten





___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


[Orgmode] Differences html/pdf

2009-10-28 Thread andrea Crotti
I normally prefer to export to pdf but I see that there are
some differences.

I added
#+OPTIONS: toc:nil \n:nil todo:nil
and

toc is not exported in both, todo are anyway always exported
and newline are kept only in html.

In the latex version they're not exported for some reasons...

Should I set some nice secret variable?



___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


Re: [Orgmode] Differences html/pdf

2009-10-28 Thread Carsten Dominik


On Oct 28, 2009, at 3:16 PM, andrea Crotti wrote:


I normally prefer to export to pdf but I see that there are
some differences.

I added
#+OPTIONS: toc:nil \n:nil todo:nil
and

toc is not exported in both, todo are anyway always exported


This is about the TODO keywords, and they are stripped in both


and newline are kept only in html.




In the latex version they're not exported for some reasons...


That is correct, we have not implemented keeping all line breaks in  
LaTeX.

Too hard, unfortunately.

- Carsten



___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


Re: [Orgmode] Differences html/pdf

2009-10-28 Thread Bastien
Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com writes:

 In the latex version they're not exported for some reasons...

 That is correct, we have not implemented keeping all line breaks in
 LaTeX.

I've searched around a bit, and to my big surprise, I cannot find a
LaTeX package preserving line breaks.  I understand such a function
doesn't come along nicely with the general LaTeX philosophy, but it
should be possible after all...

Did anyone already tried to find such a package ?

-- 
 Bastien


___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


Re: [Orgmode] Differences html/pdf

2009-10-28 Thread Thomas S. Dye

On Oct 28, 2009, at 6:26 AM, Bastien wrote:


Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com writes:


In the latex version they're not exported for some reasons...


That is correct, we have not implemented keeping all line breaks in
LaTeX.


I've searched around a bit, and to my big surprise, I cannot find a
LaTeX package preserving line breaks.  I understand such a function
doesn't come along nicely with the general LaTeX philosophy, but it
should be possible after all...

Did anyone already tried to find such a package ?

--
Bastien



Aloha Bastien,

Plain LaTeX has \linebreak and \nolinebreak, that might be appropriate.

Tom


___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


Re: [Orgmode] Differences html/pdf

2009-10-28 Thread Nick Dokos
Bastien bastiengue...@googlemail.com wrote:

 Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com writes:
 
  In the latex version they're not exported for some reasons...
 
  That is correct, we have not implemented keeping all line breaks in
  LaTeX.
 
 I've searched around a bit, and to my big surprise, I cannot find a
 LaTeX package preserving line breaks.  I understand such a function
 doesn't come along nicely with the general LaTeX philosophy, but it
 should be possible after all...
 
 Did anyone already tried to find such a package ?
 

Not a package, but there is \obeylines (plain TeX) that will
preserve line breaks - e.g. Knuth[1] suggests that it be used for
typesetting poetry:

{\obeylines\smallskip
Roses are red,
\quad Violets are blue;
Rhymes can be typeset
\quad with boxes and glue.
\smallskip}

It apparently works by pretending that the newline is a \par token.

Nick

[1] Knuth, The TeXbook, p. 94


___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode