[Orgmode] Re: IMPORTANT: let's make the biggest gift of FLOSS history!

2011-02-03 Thread Jambunathan K
Torsten Wagner torsten.wag...@gmail.com writes:

 Dear Bastien,

 you might consider to add a Flattr account for org-mode too.  As far
 as I understood Flattr is a micorpayment system on a monthly
 base. People donate a monthly sum and this will be shared by the
 projects they marked (by click on a clever placed icon) over a month
 period.

The argument against it would be that it `reduces' the amount. Consider
the case of micro-donors ...

When one exchanges gifts one is obliged to consider how the gift would
be perceived by the other party. If the exchange is between individuals
(as opposed to between an individual and an impersonal organization) the
above argument cannot be set aside.

 I believe this heavily lower the resistance to place a
 donation, people think Since I spend the money every month why not
 donating to org-mode, which is quite different to Ohh paypal, I need
 to pull out my credit card and enter all my credentials, wait is it
 save, wait should I do it now, wait will my spouse punish me for
 throwing out money again for my crazy interests ;)

There could be donors who wouldn't want to own a Credit Card ... For
such donors PayPal is too burdensome. Plain Old postal system trumps for
such donors. Postal addresses (real or virtual mailboxes) should be made
accessible to the community. Having a mailbox could be cumbersome for
`non-enterprisey' projects that are led by individuals. In this case,
FSF can act as an organisational intermediary aggregating and channeling
the donations to projects based on donor's discretion. (I don't know
whether they do so already)


 I guess the idea is to place those icons at places where people just
 got very happy about org-mode... maybe the manual section, or Worg,
 video tutorial page, etc.


IMHO, the landing page is the right place for it. Burying it too deep
would `smell' (whatever that means).

You seem to think that `contributions' to Free Software Projects are
likely to be impulsive decisions as opposed to well-considered ones
... I hesitate to buy this argument.

Jambunathan K.



 http://flattr.com/

 All the best

 Totti


 On 02/04/2011 12:15 AM, Bastien wrote:
 Dear all,

 as you know, some of us will meet this saturday at FOSDEM.
 It will be great to meet IRL, to discuss Org past, present
 and future -- I really can't wait for that!

 Everyone on this list already contributes with code, patches,
 feedback, tests, ideas and... patience with the new maintainer.
 And I guess Everyone at FOSDEM will express his gratitude to
 Carsten for all the work he did and continues doing.

 But... what about expressing this gratitude as a *GIFT*?

 What about taking 10 minutes of your time and make a donation?

 *Every donation* made from now until sunday evening will go to
 Carsten.  Please go to http://orgmode.org and say thanks :)

 Let's show the FOSDEM crowd that fun  fame are not the only
 rewards that such an effort deserves :)

 Thanks!!



 ___
 Emacs-orgmode mailing list
 Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
 Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
 http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode

___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


Re: [Orgmode] Re: IMPORTANT: let's make the biggest gift of FLOSS history!

2011-02-03 Thread Torsten Wagner

The argument against it would be that it `reduces' the amount. Consider
the case of micro-donors ...


Well it seems the flattr people take 10%. Guess this is still fair and 
well documented on there website, they provide a certain service which 
cost money. Paypal and other payments methods charge too.



There could be donors who wouldn't want to own a Credit Card ... For
such donors PayPal is too burdensome. Plain Old postal system trumps for
such donors. Postal addresses (real or virtual mailboxes) should be made
accessible to the community. Having a mailbox could be cumbersome for
`non-enterprisey' projects that are led by individuals. In this case,
FSF can act as an organisational intermediary aggregating and channeling
the donations to projects based on donor's discretion. (I don't know
whether they do so already)


Well postal address might be fine too. Instead of a Paypal link, a 
general donation icon could guide people to a page with different 
offers, form which they can select, Paypal, Flattr, Post,
I just think giving people as much offers as possible might lower the 
resistance to place a donation.



I guess the idea is to place those icons at places where people just
got very happy about org-mode... maybe the manual section, or Worg,
video tutorial page, etc.

IMHO, the landing page is the right place for it. Burying it too deep
would `smell' (whatever that means).


Yes landing page might be good. However, some pages have heavy traffic 
because of popularity other are real pain-relievers which might make 
people consider to place a donation. But I agree there is a thin line 
between making a careful request for donation and being fishy somehow.



You seem to think that `contributions' to Free Software Projects are
likely to be impulsive decisions as opposed to well-considered ones
... I hesitate to buy this argument.


Well I would not say it is impulsive. Its more about the 	 inhibition 
threshold to place a donation, or if you like the laziness threshold. 
If I first have to register a paypal account, attach my credit card 
credentials, which if I remember correctly take some time to being 
verified and finally place a donation, I might simply think Lets do it 
another time and this I think over and over again until my 
gratitude become that big that I go through all these above steps to 
place a donation. Clicking on a icon to place a donation is much easier 
and hence lets people quickly (and esp. in case of flattr repeatable) 
donate. Downloading a pdf which prints on an envelope the postal 
address, to send a donation via post might be easier for other people 
(e.g., because they have no credit card)... Guess it is just the point 
that it might be worse to offer more options which help people to 
overcome there individual inhibition threshold.


All the best

Totti

___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


[Orgmode] Re: IMPORTANT: let's make the biggest gift of FLOSS history!

2011-02-03 Thread Jambunathan K
Torsten Wagner torsten.wag...@gmail.com writes:

 The argument against it would be that it `reduces' the amount. Consider
 the case of micro-donors ...

 Well it seems the flattr people take 10%. Guess this is still fair and
 well documented on there website, they provide a certain service which
 cost money. Paypal and other payments methods charge too.

What I meant in my original comment was that spreading a micro-donation
over a 12-month would it make a nano-donation :-).

Jambunathan K.

___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode