[Orgmode] Re: Publishing bug: FOOTNOTE DEFINITION NOT FOUND: 0
On Sun, 17 Oct 2010, Erik L. Arneson wrote: I'm running into a very strange bug when publishing to HTML. Even when a page contains no footnotes, a footnote section is added with one footnote an the text FOOTNOTE DEFINITION NOT FOUND: 0. I am, by the way, running the latest 7.01trans from Git. I just now did an update and this strange footnote behavior is still happening. -- Erik Arneson dyb...@lnouv.com GPG Key ID : 1024D/62DA1D25 BitCoin : 1LqvuGUqJ4ZUSoE7YE9ngETjwp4yZ2uSdP Office : +1.541.291.9776Skype : callto://pymander http://www.leisurenouveau.com/ pgpOSIhnAgBQl.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
Re: [Orgmode] Re: Publishing bug: FOOTNOTE DEFINITION NOT FOUND: 0
Erik L. Arneson dyb...@lnouv.com writes: On Sun, 17 Oct 2010, Erik L. Arneson wrote: I'm running into a very strange bug when publishing to HTML. Even when a page contains no footnotes, a footnote section is added with one footnote an the text FOOTNOTE DEFINITION NOT FOUND: 0. I am, by the way, running the latest 7.01trans from Git. I just now did an update and this strange footnote behavior is still happening. Do you have a `[0]' somewhere in your text? I just found, that that footnote section is generated for this piece of text. Work-around: ~[0]~ HTH Sebastian ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
[Orgmode] Re: Publishing bug: FOOTNOTE DEFINITION NOT FOUND: 0
On Sun, 17 Oct 2010, Sebastian Rose wrote: Erik L. Arneson dyb...@lnouv.com writes: On Sun, 17 Oct 2010, Erik L. Arneson wrote: I'm running into a very strange bug when publishing to HTML. Even when a page contains no footnotes, a footnote section is added with one footnote an the text FOOTNOTE DEFINITION NOT FOUND: 0. I am, by the way, running the latest 7.01trans from Git. I just now did an update and this strange footnote behavior is still happening. Do you have a `[0]' somewhere in your text? Ah, I found it! In one of the files I'm using via #+INCLUDE there is some JavaScript in an HTML block with [0] in it. I'm going to experiment with getting that to work properly, but it still seems odd that a #+BEGIN_HTML block would be able to include footnotes. -- Erik Arneson dyb...@lnouv.com GPG Key ID : 1024D/62DA1D25 BitCoin : 1LqvuGUqJ4ZUSoE7YE9ngETjwp4yZ2uSdP Office : +1.541.291.9776Skype : callto://pymander http://www.leisurenouveau.com/ pgpXTrfXjmUsv.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
