Re: [O] Merge 9.0.5 to emacs master?
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017, 1:40 PM Kyle Meyerwrote: > Rasmus writes: > > [...] > > > I think we have discussed it before, but the best way seems to just copy > > the Org tree to the Emacs tree, right? > > Given the current setup, I think copying the files is best. I've > already resolved the conflicts when backporting Org-related commits from > the Emacs repo. > Just a minor nudge. If I understand correctly, everyone is in agreement that the org maint branch should be merged into emacs master branch now. This issue came up recently in an emacs-devel discussion. I don't have experience merging mega branches, but I can help in any other way in that direction. > -- Kaushal Modi
Re: [O] Merge 9.0.5 to emacs master?
Rasmuswrites: [...] > I think we have discussed it before, but the best way seems to just copy > the Org tree to the Emacs tree, right? Given the current setup, I think copying the files is best. I've already resolved the conflicts when backporting Org-related commits from the Emacs repo. -- Kyle
Re: [O] Merge 9.0.5 to emacs master?
Kyle Meyerwrites: > Hi Bastien, > > Bastien Guerry writes: > >> Kyle Meyer writes: >> >>> Kaushal Modi writes: >>> Kyle -- Would this be a good time to start the merge to emacs master? >>> From my standpoint, that'd be fine. I'm not aware of any outstanding >>> patches that need to be backported from the Emacs repo. >> >> Before undertaking this, we need to make sure the Emacs maintainers >> are fine with it -- I'm late in reading the related discussions. >> >> Can you wait a few days for my "go" ? > > I'll do better than that and wait indefinitely since the plan isn't for > me to do the syncing :) I also haven't caught up with all the messages about sync the "new" plans. AFAIR Eli said to go ahead in one of the early messages. > I also mentioned [*2*] that I had created a branch, emacs-sync, in the > Org repo that contains a few extra changes that I think are appropriate > for the sync. That branch is up-to-date with 9.0.5. I think we have discussed it before, but the best way seems to just copy the Org tree to the Emacs tree, right? Rasmus -- Summon the Mothership!
Re: [O] Merge 9.0.5 to emacs master?
Hi Bastien, Bastien Guerrywrites: > Kyle Meyer writes: > >> Kaushal Modi writes: >> >>> Kyle -- Would this be a good time to start the merge to emacs master? >> >>>From my standpoint, that'd be fine. I'm not aware of any outstanding >> patches that need to be backported from the Emacs repo. > > Before undertaking this, we need to make sure the Emacs maintainers > are fine with it -- I'm late in reading the related discussions. > > Can you wait a few days for my "go" ? I'll do better than that and wait indefinitely since the plan isn't for me to do the syncing :) To give a bit more context to Kaushal's question, when he asked the list previously [*1*] about syncing 9.0.4 with the Emacs repo, I replied [*2*, *3*] that we should wait for the next release because there were Emacs commits that still needed to be backported, as well as white space touch-ups that were needed in order for the Org files to pass Emacs's pre-commit check. I also mentioned [*2*] that I had created a branch, emacs-sync, in the Org repo that contains a few extra changes that I think are appropriate for the sync. That branch is up-to-date with 9.0.5. [*1*] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2017-01/msg00551.html [*2*] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2017-01/msg00571.html [*3*] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2017-01/msg00584.html -- Kyle
Re: [O] Merge 9.0.5 to emacs master?
Hi Kyle, Kyle Meyerwrites: > Kaushal Modi writes: > >> Kyle -- Would this be a good time to start the merge to emacs master? > >>From my standpoint, that'd be fine. I'm not aware of any outstanding > patches that need to be backported from the Emacs repo. Before undertaking this, we need to make sure the Emacs maintainers are fine with it -- I'm late in reading the related discussions. Can you wait a few days for my "go" ? Thanks, -- Bastien
Re: [O] Merge 9.0.5 to emacs master? (Was: Release 9.0.5)
Kaushal Modiwrites: > Kyle -- Would this be a good time to start the merge to emacs master? >From my standpoint, that'd be fine. I'm not aware of any outstanding patches that need to be backported from the Emacs repo. -- Kyle