Re: [O] More flyspell-overlays removed

2012-08-07 Thread Jeffrey Spencer
Re-dl'ed and works fine. Sorry about that.

On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 7:18 PM, Bastien b...@gnu.org wrote:

 Hi Jeffrey,

 Jeffrey Spencer jeffspenc...@gmail.com writes:

  Just gave this a go and seems to work well but still forgot to add I
  believe:
 
  TYP_TODO
  and
  ATTR_LATEX

 The two words above are already skipped for me.

 --
  Bastien



Re: [O] More flyspell-overlays removed

2012-08-07 Thread Bastien


Hi Jeffrey,

Jeffrey Spencer jeffspenc...@gmail.com writes:

 Just gave this a go and seems to work well but still forgot to add I
 believe:

 TYP_TODO
 and
 ATTR_LATEX

The two words above are already skipped for me.

-- 
 Bastien




Re: [O] More flyspell-overlays removed

2012-08-06 Thread Jeffrey Spencer
Just gave this a go and seems to work well but still forgot to add I
believe:

TYP_TODO
and
ATTR_LATEX

Cheers,
Jeff

On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 1:32 AM, Bastien b...@gnu.org wrote:



 Sebastien Vauban
 wxhgmqzgwmuf-genee64ty+gs+fvcfc7...@public.gmane.org writes:

  I would allow fly-prog-mode in the listins, as one normally does for
 plain
  code, no?

 This is indeed the case right now.

 --
  Bastien





Re: [O] More flyspell-overlays removed

2012-07-31 Thread Jeffrey Spencer
I don't have any problem with natbib cite commands including \ref, \cite,
\citet, \citep, etc

Maybe your version of flyspell?? But it should act exactly as it does in
auctex or your latex mode of emacs. I would check in there if it works
properly because should parse the same way if not maybe debug from there.

Cheers,
Jeff

On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 9:44 PM, Bjarte Johansen bjo...@student.uib.nowrote:


 On 30 Jul, 2012, at 13:03 , Bastien b...@gnu.org wrote:

  I've pushed a fix which should let flyspell ignore more commonly
  used Org keywords.  Please test it.

 This works great. You forgot #+LATEX_CLASS_OPTIONS: though.


 On 30 Jul, 2012, at 13:13 , Jeffrey Spencer jeffspenc...@gmail.com
 wrote:

  Will give it a test later in the week and let you know.
 
  Also you can add this hook to make it act like the fly-spell mode in
 auctex (if familiar with that) which skips most tex based commands (trips
 up though if you have only one $ because assumes another $ sign later so
 won't check spelling in that block. I would just do \$ if you need a single
 dollar sign. This is the only really limitation I have found to adding this
 that I have noticed thus far.
  (add-hook 'org-mode-hook (lambda () (setq ispell-parser 'tex)))

 I tried this and it does work for most things, but for some reason it
 doesn't like the natbib \cite commands.


Re: [O] More flyspell-overlays removed

2012-07-29 Thread Jeffrey Spencer
I was also thinking about this recently but hadn't gotten as far as writing
a patch.

I was thinking some tags you know you want to remove the fly-spell overlays
but for example caption you might or might not want the flyspell overlays
removed. If there was a variable that could be set to choose some that
might or might not want the overlays to remove. Not sure if this is
possible but what I was originally looking at doing but hadn't gotten time.

Cheers,
Jeff

On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 8:38 AM, Bjarte Johansen bjo...@student.uib.nowrote:

 On 28 Jul, 2012, at 11:27 , Bastien b...@gnu.org wrote:

 I cannot apply it because it adds keywords at the wrong place.
 For example you cannot add startup: in the first (cond ((...)))
 because startup: is not a backend specific content.  And some
 other discrepencies.


 OK, I understand. I should have spent some more time trying to
 understand the code.


 I'd welcome a patch for removing more flyspell overlays, but it
 has to be rewritten.  I'm not using flyspell so someone else will
 have to do roll his sleeves.


 I'd be willing to put in the effort to make a proper patch, but I need
 some
 help to understand what is going on in this function. It is not obvious to
 me.

 The places flyspell-overlays needs to be removed are in the startup,
 options, latex_header.  Some of structures that might be used in latex
 like
 lstlisting and verbatim where the text also should not have
 flyspell-overlays.

 There are also some other places like label, caption and attr.



Re: [O] More flyspell-overlays removed

2012-07-28 Thread Bastien
Hi Bjarte,

Bjarte Johansen bjo...@student.uib.no writes:

 I made a patch to remove some more flyspell-overlays in #-blocks. The
 reason for no : in the latex_header is that for some reason the : does
 not get captured in dc1. flyspell is also removed for the full
 verbatim, lstlisting and src blocks.

 I hope you guys can use the patch.

I cannot apply it because it adds keywords at the wrong place.  
For example you cannot add startup: in the first (cond ((...)))
because startup: is not a backend specific content.  And some
other discrepencies.

I'd welcome a patch for removing more flyspell overlays, but it
has to be rewritten.  I'm not using flyspell so someone else will
have to do roll his sleeves.

Thanks anyway for the patch!

-- 
 Bastien