Re: [Orgmode] Checkboxes in Agenda

2010-06-24 Thread Carsten Dominik


On Jun 23, 2010, at 6:05 PM, Nick Parker wrote:

Is there a way to allow checkboxes to be displayed within an agenda  
view?  I am currently just seeing the root element associated to the  
checkboxes in my agenda.


No, checkboxes do not make it into the agenda.  You can press SPC to  
see them in another window, but that's it.


Cheers

- Carsten


___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


Re: [Orgmode] Checkboxes in Agenda

2010-06-24 Thread Carsten Dominik


On Jun 24, 2010, at 3:33 PM, Nick Parker wrote:


Carsten,

Thank you for your reply.  Was it intentionally designed to keep  
checkboxes out of the agenda view or is it just that way because no  
one has submitted a patch to provide that yet?



This is by design.  As Dave writes, Checkboxes have no meta data to  
decide about inclusion in the agenda view.  They are meant as fine- 
grained subdivision of tasks.


- Carsten




Nick Parker
www.developernotes.com


On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 1:18 AM, Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com 
 wrote:


On Jun 23, 2010, at 6:05 PM, Nick Parker wrote:

Is there a way to allow checkboxes to be displayed within an agenda  
view?  I am currently just seeing the root element associated to the  
checkboxes in my agenda.


No, checkboxes do not make it into the agenda.  You can press SPC to  
see them in another window, but that's it.


Cheers

- Carsten



___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


- Carsten




___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


Re: [Orgmode] checkboxes and agenda invisibility

2009-02-19 Thread Carsten Dominik

Hi John,

I agree with your reasoning and have implemented this.
Tasks that are blocked because of checkboxes will not be made
invisible, only dim.

- Carsten

On Feb 1, 2009, at 9:44 PM, John Rakestraw wrote:


I noticed today that, at least in my set-up, setting these variables
this way:

(setq org-agenda-dim-blocked-tasks 'invisible)
(setq org-enforce-todo-checkbox-dependencies t)

means that a TODO task with checkboxes doesn't get included in the
agenda. However, the sub-tasks in the checkbox list don't get  
included,
either. So the TODO task with checkboxes doesn't show up in the  
agenda.


It makes sense given the way the variables work. However, I wonder if
it makes more sense for a task with checklisted sub-tasks to be
included in the agenda so that the tasks and sub-tasks don't get lost.
Or, to put the point slightly differently, I think that a TODO that's
blocked because it has dependent TODOs might be treated differently in
agenda listings than a TODO that's blocked because it has dependent
checklist items.

Not a big deal to me because I don't typically use checkboxes for TODO
items. But I thought I'd raise it for consideration.

--John


___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode




___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


Re: [Orgmode] checkboxes and agenda invisibility

2009-02-02 Thread Carsten Dominik

Good point, but non-trivial to implement.  I'll put it on the list.

- Carsten


On Feb 1, 2009, at 9:44 PM, John Rakestraw wrote:


I noticed today that, at least in my set-up, setting these variables
this way:

(setq org-agenda-dim-blocked-tasks 'invisible)
(setq org-enforce-todo-checkbox-dependencies t)

means that a TODO task with checkboxes doesn't get included in the
agenda. However, the sub-tasks in the checkbox list don't get  
included,
either. So the TODO task with checkboxes doesn't show up in the  
agenda.


It makes sense given the way the variables work. However, I wonder if
it makes more sense for a task with checklisted sub-tasks to be
included in the agenda so that the tasks and sub-tasks don't get lost.
Or, to put the point slightly differently, I think that a TODO that's
blocked because it has dependent TODOs might be treated differently in
agenda listings than a TODO that's blocked because it has dependent
checklist items.

Not a big deal to me because I don't typically use checkboxes for TODO
items. But I thought I'd raise it for consideration.

--John


___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode




___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode