Re: [unicode-2] Chinese characters too small
On 2007-07-12 03:55 +0200, Kenichi Handa wrote: In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Leo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I configured XTerm and Emacs to use the same font with same size as follows: in .Xresources: XTerm*faceName: xft:monospace:pixelsize=16 XTerm*faceNameDoublesize: fzsongti Emacs.Font: monospace:pixelsize=16 in .emacs: (when window-system (set-fontset-font (frame-parameter nil 'font) 'han '(FZSongTi . unicode-bmp))) And then I compared Chinese characters in 'emacs -nw' running in xterm and emacs running in X11. It turns out Chinese characters are substantially smaller in Emacs running in X11. However, C-u C-x = shows that the characters have pixelsize 16. Is this a bug? I'm not sure. Is the font size of ASCII characters the same in emacs and xterm? Could you please check the actual pixel size of a Chinese character by, for instance, xmag? --- Kenichi Handa [EMAIL PROTECTED] It appears that Chinese characters have pixelsize 16 in Emacs rxvt-unicode gnome-terminal but have a larger pixelsize in gedit xterm. I am running Fedora 7. HTH, -- Leo sdl.web AT gmail.com (GPG Key: 9283AA3F) ___ emacs-pretest-bug mailing list emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
Re: Emacs 23.0.0.1 fails parsing gdb output
In GNU Emacs 23.0.0.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.10.11) of 2007-07-06 on helios I have GNU gdb 6.6-debian and it works fine with GNU Emacs 23.0.0.3 (i686-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.10.11). Does it fail with Emacs 22.1? I'm having the same or very similar problems on Solaris / Sparc using Emacs 22.1 and gdb-6.5. There might be problems with GDB on Solaris / Sparc. then post the value of gdb-debug-log to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Attached. This log looks OK but it's prior to execution. Your earlier report, which I should have looked at more carefully, shows the problem occurs after execution begins: Loading GDB sequences... *** Hope you've got /home/appeal/bin or //depot/jrockit/cce/gdbutils in your path *** I use a few helper scripts nowadays Generating isNativeIp and printmodule What happens if you start your application under GDB without the GDB scripts? I think that M-x gdb doesn't work in you start execution from within a script. In this case you must use M-x gdba. Does this work? Since this (or something very similar) is a problem with both 22.1 and 23.0.0.1 I'm posting to both bug lists. Yes, it's taken so long to release 22.1, I forget that bug-gnu-emacs is the proper mailing list for 22.1. It's probably sufficient though to keep the thread on emacs-pretest-bug and just report conclusions (if any) on bug-gnu-emacs. -- Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob ___ emacs-pretest-bug mailing list emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
Re: [unicode-2] Chinese characters too small
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Leo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It appears that Chinese characters have pixelsize 16 in Emacs rxvt-unicode gnome-terminal but have a larger pixelsize in gedit xterm. How did you specify the font pixelsize in gedit? As far as I know, what you set via Edit-Preferences-FontColors is pointsize? --- Kenichi Handa [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ emacs-pretest-bug mailing list emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
Re: [unicode-2] Chinese characters too small
Leo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [...] (when window-system (set-fontset-font (frame-parameter nil 'font) 'han '(FZSongTi . unicode-bmp))) The problem is that we can't specify different pixelsize for different script. If we specify a font in the command line: emacs --enable-font-backend -fn Bitstream Vera Sans Mono-14 then all script will use 14 pixelsize font. We could specify a different font for some scripts with `set-fontset-font', such as: (set-fontset-font (frame-parameter nil 'font) 'han '(SimSun . unicode-bmp)) but we can't change the fontsize: (set-fontset-font (frame-parameter nil 'font) 'han '(SimSun-16 . unicode-bmp)) won't work. We hope `set-fontset-font' could be used for changing fontsize also. ___ emacs-pretest-bug mailing list emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
Re: Emacs 23.0.0.1 fails parsing gdb output
I'm attaching a new debug log where I've gone one step further and done f in the GDB pane to get the source window to refresh. That did get me a bunch of error messages which might make this log a bit more interesting to you. It still doesn't seem to contain the errors but I don't think they can be avoided without deffering execution or using M-x gdba anyway. What happens if you start your application under GDB without the GDB scripts? The reason we have the scripts is that what we're debugging is a library (libjvm.so), and the scripts run load and run things long enough for us to get into our library. If we don't run the scripts, nothing will even get loaded into gdb. I see, but presumably you can do this after M-x gdb has started up: M-x gdb Run gdb (like this): gdb -annotate=3 myprog In GUD buffer: Current directory is /home/nickrob/ GNU gdb 6.6-debian ... (gdb) source myscript but, in any case, M-x gdba is probably more convenient. I think that M-x gdb doesn't work in you start execution from within a script. In this case you must use M-x gdba. Does this work? Yes! What's the difference betweeen gdb and gdba? I wasn't able to find anything documenting the difference, according to the docs they seem to do roughly the same thing. M-x gdba assumes that GDB is being run with the --annotate=3 option. M-x gdb filters the output to determine whether GDB is being run with --fullname or --annotate=3. The former gives the old Emacs 21 functionality (or lack of it!) and is worth using if all else fails. So they do indeed do the same thing, in most cases, when --annotate=3 is used (the default). There is a problem when GDB commands like run are included in GDB scripts because these get run _before_ GDB commands that Emacs uses to set up the mode. Perhaps I'll add a note in the manual. -- Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob ___ emacs-pretest-bug mailing list emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
Re: vc-cvs.el:953:42:Error: Lisp nesting exceeds `max-lisp-eval-depth'
Compiling /Users/pete/Quellen/Emacs_CVS/emacs/lisp/./vc-bzr.el Wrote /Users/pete/Quellen/Emacs_CVS/emacs/lisp/vc-bzr.elc Compiling /Users/pete/Quellen/Emacs_CVS/emacs/lisp/./vc-cvs.el In toplevel form: vc-cvs.el:953:42:Error: Lisp nesting exceeds `max-lisp-eval-depth' make[2]: *** [compile] Error 1 make[2]: Target `bootstrap' not remade because of errors. make[1]: *** [bootstrap-build] Error 2 make: *** [bootstrap] Error 2 Should be fixed now, Stefan ___ emacs-pretest-bug mailing list emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
