Re: sigfault with 2.0b9
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 07:36:00PM +0100, Benni Baermann wrote: > [Mon Nov 10 14:58:24 2003] [notice] child pid 7675 exit signal > Segmentation fault (11) Problem solved. It was my own fault. An unlucky combination of wrong configurations. We apologize for the inconvenience. Benni -- http://www.aymargeddon.de - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: sigfault with 2.0b9
How did you solve the problem exactly??? I've got a very similar problem. My apache sigfaults when i generate a graph (using GD::Graph) under mod_perl-1.99_11. The exact system specs are in one of my previous mails I absolutely don't know what to do now...I compiled mod_perl with debugging symbols but I never get core dump files. Which directory has to be writeable for the apache process for the core dump??? THX Alex Von: Benni Baermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> am 11.11.2003 12:09 An: Embperl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Kopie: Thema:Re: sigfault with 2.0b9 On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 07:36:00PM +0100, Benni Baermann wrote: > [Mon Nov 10 14:58:24 2003] [notice] child pid 7675 exit signal > Segmentation fault (11) Problem solved. It was my own fault. An unlucky combination of wrong configurations. We apologize for the inconvenience. Benni -- http://www.aymargeddon.de - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *1* - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: sigfault with 2.0b9
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 12:48:55PM +0100, Alexander Hartmaier wrote: > > > How did you solve the problem exactly??? I installed the apache2-mpm-prefork instead of apache2-mpm-worker debian package and i corrected my apache configuration to point to the correct modules. mod_perl.so and emb_perl.so has both to be compiled using the same perl-version. Benni -- http://www.aymargeddon.de - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: sigfault with 2.0b9
> > I installed the apache2-mpm-prefork instead of apache2-mpm-worker Good hint!. Currently Embperl doesn't work with threads (this is planned for 2.1, which will hopefully be out soon after 2.0) Gerald P.S. Did you still need to include the Apache include path manualy into Makefile.PL? -- Gerald Richter ecos electronic communication services gmbh IT-Securitylösungen * dynamische Webapplikationen * Consulting Post: Tulpenstrasse 5 D-55276 Dienheim b. Mainz E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: +49 6133 939-122 WWW:http://www.ecos.de/ Fax: +49 6133 939-333 -- | | ECOS BB-5000 Firewall- und IT-Security Appliance: www.bb-5000.info | +- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: sigfault with 2.0b9
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 01:44:57PM +0100, Gerald Richter wrote: > P.S. Did you still need to include the Apache include path manualy into > Makefile.PL? After i tryed it again without the additional include: Magically: No :-) Whats the reason for this behaviour? Is /usr/include/apr-0 only needed by apache2-mpm-worker? Benni -- http://www.aymargeddon.de - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: sigfault with 2.0b9
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 02:26:24PM +0100, Benni Baermann wrote: > On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 01:44:57PM +0100, Gerald Richter wrote: > > P.S. Did you still need to include the Apache include path manualy into > > Makefile.PL? > > After i tryed it again without the additional include: > > Magically: No :-) Sorry, bad news: I was wrong. It is still needed. Benni -- http://www.aymargeddon.de - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DBIx::Recordset struggles to pass tests
Michael Gray wrote:
Hs anyone had any luck getting DBIx::Recordset to pass its tests using
recent versions of perl, DBI and DBD::Oracle?
Angus Lees and myself have several patches for Recordset, most are
archived in the embperl mailing list.
Gerald was supposed to have a subversion repository setup by now, but
hasn't done it.
DBI 1.38 seems okay, no need to mess there. Platform is Red Hat Linux 9,
but with perl built locally. Oracle client is 9.2.0.1.0.
DBIx::Recordset is 0.24.
I can get DBIx::Recordset to pass its test with perl 5.8.0 and
DBD::Oracle 1.12.
With DBD::Oracle 1.14, and either perl 5.8.0 or perl 5.8.2,
DBIx::Recordset fails its tests as follows:
...
DeleteWithLinks... ok
- 2 ...
Test terminated with fatal error! Look at test.log
test.log:
...
Clear (Delete all) disabled for table at blib/lib/DBIx/Database.pm line 57
DBIx::Database::Base::savecroak('DBIx::Recordset=HASH(0x86790f4)','Clear (Delete all)
disabled for table ') called at blib/lib/DBIx/Recordset.pm line 2715
DBIx::Recordset::DeleteWithLinks('DBIx::Recordset=HASH(0x86790f4)','HASH(0x8685b30)','HASH(0x86859f8)')
called at blib/lib/DBIx/Recordset.pm line 2760
DBIx::Recordset::DeleteWithLinks('DBIx::Recordset=HASH(0x867e2fc)','HASH(0x867baf4)')
called at test.pl line 1933
main::DoTest('Oracle','dbi:Oracle:testdb','mjg17/roingtbet','undef') called at test.pl
line 3991
...
With DBD::Oracle 1.12 and perl 5.8.2, DBIx::Recordset fails its tests
a little later:
...
Select with sub table... ok
- 2 ...
Test terminated with fatal error! Look at test.log
test.log:
...
Can't upgrade that kind of scalar at test.pl line 83.
...
Having to hold back on upgrades for both perl and DBD::Oracle is making me
uncomfortable. Any tips would be gratefully received.
Hmm, I wonder what could be causing this to happen. I have only open
source databases available, or I would do some testing and patching
myself. There's no free version of Oracle for Windows is there? I run
Cygwin.
Thanks
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DBIx::Recordset struggles to pass tests
Terrence Brannon wrote: . There's no free version of Oracle for Windows is there? I run Cygwin. Actually there is a free version for personal use on windows: http://otn.oracle.com/software/products/8i_personal/index.html - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [mp2] segfault when generating graphs with GD::Graph under Embperl
> > 3. This is the core dump trace: (if you get a core dump): > > I tried but I can't catch any (I don't know and didn't manage to find out which > directory has to be writeable for the apache2 process under Embperl). > Please try to start your httpd under gdb: gdb /path/to/httpd set args -X -f /path/to/httpd.conf r Now request the page that segfaults, gdb should show the segfault, then type BT and you should get the backtrace. Gerald P.S. -X tell Apache to only start one process, which is better for debugging - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
