RE: RE: test equipment

1997-08-12 Thread Frazee, Doug
Environmental ambients are also a problem on OATS testing.  Getting to
know the environmental ambient profile helps.  If you have a receiver
with A-B trace capability, you can do a rough check by scanning with and
without the UUT powered, and subtracting the scans, theoretically
subtracting out the environmental ambients only.  ALL potential UUT
emanations need  to be verified.  On our 10m OATS, we control UUT power
from the test bench for convenience.

Doug Frazee
EMC Compliance Engineer
Alliant Techsystems, Inc.
Advanced Technology Applications
401 Defense Highway
Annapolis, Maryland  21401
USA
Tel:(410) 266-1793
FAX:(410) 266-1853
doug_fra...@atk.com



--
From:
   
 moshe_vald...@isr-rhv-p1.ccmail.compuserve.com[SMTP:Moshe_Valdman@ISR-RHV-P1
.CCMAIL.CompuServe.COM]
Sent:  Sunday, August 10, 1997 5:25 AM
To:r_flind...@emulex.com; jschippano...@sstech.on.ca; emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject:   Re:RE: test equipment

Hello all,

I guess the biggest problem with in-plant radiated measurements
is environmental noise. Apart from turning the UUT (unit under test)
on and off, does anyone have a good technique to separate the UUT emissions
from
the environment?
In my experience (assuming you do not gave a shielded room)this could save up
to
50 percent of the testing time.
(A shielded room has its own problems of course re emissions amplitude
relative to an open site)

thanks
moshe valdman

 

 I'm looking for low end new/used equipment to set up a small test   
lab
 for radiated emissions.  Any names of  suppliers of such equipment   
in
 North America would be greatly appreciated.  Specifically, I am
 looking to purchase a spectrum analyzer and antenna that would be
 acceptable for pre scans before going to a registered lab.
   

 Any suggestions for equipment is greatly appreciated.
 Thanks in advance
   

 John Schippanoski
 jschippano...@sstech.on.ca







RE: test equipment

1997-08-12 Thread Flinders, Randall

Greetings All!

Just a quick note on test equipment..Be careful if you come accross   
HP Spectrum Analyzers for sale, make sure you purchase from a reliable   
source.  There have been several recent robberies at local test labs,   
where ony HP 8566Bs were taken.  So,  there are stolen units floating   
around out there!


regards,


Randy Flinders
EMC Test Engineer
Emulex Network Systems
 --
From:  Jim Bacher[SMTP:j...@mmsday.com]
Sent:  Tuesday, August 12, 1997 7:40 AM
To:  emc-pstc
Subject:  Re: test equipment

 

A friend of mine is getting out of the EMC Business and has all of his
equipment up for sale.  His name is Dick Heaton.  His company is
Midwest EMC Measurements.  He can be reached at 937-667-3467 Voice or
937-667-6180 fax.

Jim Bacher

Senior Engineer,  Monarch Marking Systems, Inc.
email: j...@mmsday.com  voice: 1-937-865-2020 fax: 1-937-865-2048


Re[2]:RE: test equipment

1997-08-12 Thread Moshe_Valdman
Hello Gordon,

Indeed most of the environment is coming from within the building, is
unpredictable, changes during the day, and sometimes has frequencies similar or
identical to the UUT (since some of it is generated by similar equipment).
The TV/Radio type of environment is normally not the problem.

thanks 
moshe


RE: Status of prEN50178

1997-08-12 Thread POWELL, DOUG

Georg,

My representative from LGA America did a little research for me some time 
ago about leakage current as associated with prEN50178.  The research was on 
the 1994 issue of the standard but it still applies in the 1995 issue.

The results are based on section 5.2.11.1 of the standard:

1) For pluggable (removable or modular line cord) equipment the limit is 
3.5mA AC / 10 mA DC.

2) If the leakage current exceeds this level then there are three possible 
ways of dealing with the problem.  a) a duplicate PE conductor or an 
automatic disconnect which monitors the continuity of the PE conductor or a 
double-wound transformer.  I believe the double-wound transformer is 
referring to an isolation transformer in the primary circuit which actually 
reduces leakage current.  We have always used an auxiliary PE conductor 
which is bonded to the rear of the chassis and the PE symbol is located at 
both the conductors bonding points.  When the second PE conductor is used a 
note is required in the operating documents which requires the connection of 
this conductor for proper installation (section 7.2.3.2).

3) For fixed installations there is effectively no limit to the amount of 
leakage current allowed. See section 5.2.11.1 paragraph 4, Measurement of 
leakage current is required on EE which is not intended for permanent 
connection.  Conversely, for EE that is intended for permanent connection 
(fixed wiring), the measurement is not required.

There was a letter written by LGA Nrnberg  with instructions to this 
effect.  I do not readily have my copy but if you contact LGA in Nurnberg 
and reference a letter written to Mr. Werner P„ster of LGA America / 
EuroConsult, Inc.  They should be able to copy you with the information. 
 Also the letter was originated in German, if you want an English version I 
believe Mr. P„ster still has a translated copy.  You reference myself and 
reach him at:

 Mr. Werner P„ster / EuroConsult, Inc.
 euroc...@shore.net

However he is a consultant and he may charge for his time.

As far as the status of the standard is concerned, I was told that even 
though it is still in preliminary status, the standard has been released for 
type testing.  Once again you may validate this with LGA Nrnberg.

Hope this helps you.

Doug Powell
Advanced Energy Industries, Inc.
Ft. Collins, Colorado USA
do...@ftc2.aei.com



 --
From: Georg M. Dancau
To: emc-pstc discussion group
Subject: Status of prEN50178
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
Date: Tuesday, August 12, 1997 6:28AM


Hi compliance folks

Does anybody have information about the status of prEN50178.

This standard specifies some measures which must be taken if the leakage
greater than
3.5 mA (clause 5.2.11).

Best regards

George

 --
**
* Dr. Georg M. Dancau *  HAUNI MASCHINENBAU AG   *
* g.m.dan...@ieee.org *  EMC Lab *
* TEL: +49 40 7250 2102   *  Kampchaussee 8..32  *
* FAX: +49 40 7250 3801   *  21027 Hamburg, Germany  *
**
* home: Tel: +49 4122 99451   *  Hauptstr. 60a   *
*   Fax: +49 4122 99454   *  25492 Heist, Germany*
**





Varistors Allowed - Line to Ground? for European App's

1997-08-12 Thread Art Michael
Hello All,

Have heard from some sources that surge-suppressors (Varistors, MOVs,
Tranzorbs, etc) are not allowed between Line to Ground, in EN 60950
products, except perhaps for permanently mounted, wired-in equipment.  The
concern seems to be that of increased leakage-current over time. 

Looking for authoritive substantiation (citations - please) for allowance
or disallowance of surge-surpressors from Line to Ground under European
compliance considerations.   

And, if you know of any  surge-suppressors which bear European approvals
for this application (line-ground), I'd appreciate that info too.

ThanX, Art Michael

Int'l Product Safety News
A.E. Michael, Editor
P.O. Box 1561 EMC-PSTC
Middletown CT 06457-8061 U.S.A.

Phone  :  (860) 344-1651
Fax:  (860) 346-9066
Email  :  i...@connix.com
Website:  http://www.safetylink.com
ISSN   :  1040-7529




Software Icons - Reply

1997-08-12 Thread Cindy Johnson
In response:  IEC 417 Series entitled Standards for Graphic symbols For
Use on Equipment may be of assistance.

C. Johnson
CSA
email: johns...@csa.ca


You Wrote:
 ray_russ...@leco.com 08/05/97 08:06am 
 Greetings Friends,
 
 As technology grows, and the push is for user friendly interfacing 
 of equipment, I find that software icons are taking the place of the  
 good old push button. We have a piece of equipment where the
software 
 controls a function of turning a gas supply on, off, or in the stand 
 by mode. We would like to make the icons international. However, I do

 not think that 1 and 0 can be correctly used in this application. 
 
 Would anyone have a source for this information or any ideas?
 
 Thank you for your assistance,
 
 Ray Russell
 ray_russ...@leco.com
 
 
 


Re[2]:RE: test equipment

1997-08-12 Thread Moshe_Valdman
Hello Gordon,

Indeed most of the environment is coming from within the building, is
unpredictable, changes during the day, and sometimes has frequencies similar or
identical to the UUT (since some of it is generated by similar equipment).
The TV/Radio type of environment is normally not the problem.

thanks 
moshe


RE: OATS gndplane surface

1997-08-12 Thread Upson,Darrell
We have had great results using hardware cloth, overlapped about 5cm or
more and spot soldered every 20cm or so with a heavy duty soldering iron.
Our oats site has shown no deterioration in the last 5 years of existence.
Very inexpensive.  I don't know if the same material is available in Australia,
but the material we use solders very easily.

Regards,
Darrell Upson

--
From: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Cc: Martin Garwood
Subject: OATS gndplane surface
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
Date: Tuesday, August 12, 1997 12:00AM

Hi Gang,
 
We are currently building another OATS and are looking into the most 
cost  time effective way of achieving a uniform conductive groundplane 
without using mesh. Does anyone have experience with using galvanised 
metal sheet, and if so, the best method to join the sheets together 
(silver solder, braze etc), bearing in mind temperatures 45deg C in 
summer.
 
Alternatively has anyone had success with conductive coating or paint 
over concrete ?
 
Any thoughts would be appreciated.
 
Best Regards.
-- 
Martin Garwood, Manager, Austest Laboratories
4/87 Reserve Road Artarmon NSW 2064 AUSTRALIA
ph: 61-2-94374500  fax: 61-2-94374600
http://www.austest.com.au


Re: test equipment

1997-08-12 Thread Jim Bacher

A friend of mine is getting out of the EMC Business and has all of his
equipment up for sale.  His name is Dick Heaton.  His company is
Midwest EMC Measurements.  He can be reached at 937-667-3467 Voice or
937-667-6180 fax.

Jim Bacher

Senior Engineer,  Monarch Marking Systems, Inc.
email: j...@mmsday.com  voice: 1-937-865-2020 fax: 1-937-865-2048 


AW: Status of prEN50178

1997-08-12 Thread Thomas, Andreas -425
Hello,

please find attached the information from my database. 

 

Kind regards

Andreas Thomas
EPPS
Toshiba Europe
andre...@toshiba-teg.com



 --
 Von:  Georg M. Dancau[SMTP:dan...@compuserve.com]
 Gesendet: Dienstag, 12. August 1997 19:13
 An:   emc-pstc discussion group
 Betreff:  Status of prEN50178
 
 
 Hi compliance folks
 
 Does anybody have information about the status of prEN50178.
 
 This standard specifies some measures which must be taken if the
 leakage
 greater than
 3.5 mA (clause 5.2.11).
 
 Best regards
 
 George
 
 --
 **
 * Dr. Georg M. Dancau *  HAUNI MASCHINENBAU AG   *
 * g.m.dan...@ieee.org *  EMC Lab *
 * TEL: +49 40 7250 2102   *  Kampchaussee 8..32  *
 * FAX: +49 40 7250 3801   *  21027 Hamburg, Germany  *
 **
 * home: Tel: +49 4122 99451   *  Hauptstr. 60a   *
 *   Fax: +49 4122 99454   *  25492 Heist, Germany*
 **
 
 
 
 Copyright 1996 by AFNOR, BSI, DIN  Page:   1


  Document identifier   DIN EN 50178*VDE 0160

  Publication date  1994-11-00

  StatusDC*N-E

  Update flag   U


  Title(English)Electronic equipment for use in power
installations; German version prEN 50178:1994

  Title(German) Ausruestung von Starkstromanlagen mit
elektronischen Betriebsmitteln; Deutsche Fassung
prEN 50178:1994


  Abstract (English)This document applies to electronic equipment
(EE) used in power installations. It is
particularly concerned with the design and
testing of EE and their integration into a system
for power installations. This document refers to
EE with control action on systems and processes
such as for generation, distribution, conversion
and control of electrical energy. It stipulates
minimum requirements for the  design and
manufacture of EE, for protection against
electric shock, for testing and for its
integration into systems for power installations.

  Abstract (German) Das Dokument gilt fuer das Ausruesten von
Starkstromanlagen mit elektrischen
Betriebsmitteln. Es behandelt insbesondere die
Bemessung und Pruefung von EB sowie ihren Einbau
in eine Starkstromanlage. Das Dokument bezieht
sich auf EB mit Steuereinwirkung auf Systeme und
Prozesse, z.B. zur Erzeugung, Verteilung,
Umwandlung, Steuerung und Regelung von
Elektroenergie. Es stellt Mindestanforderungen an
die Bemessung und Herstellung der EB, fuer den
Schutz gegen gefaehrliche Koerperstroeme, fuer
die Pruefung und fuer ihren Einbau in
Starkstromanlagen.


  Expiry date   1994-12-31

  Issuing body  DIN Deutsches Institut fuer Normung e.V.

  Available fromBeuth Verlag GmbH*VDE-VERLAG GMBH

  Classification29.240.01

  Committee reference   Deutsche Elektrotechnische Kommission im DIN und
VDE
 Copyright 1996 by AFNOR, BSI, DIN  Page:   2


  Original language de

  Amended byDIN-Mitt., 1995, Nr. 6, S. A 430

  Replaces  DIN VDE 0160(1990.12)

  Internat'l Relationship   prEN 50178-1994, EQV

  Cross references  DIN 40101-1*DIN EN 50081-1*DIN EN 50082-1*DIN EN
60146-1-1*DIN EN 60204-1*DIN EN 60439-1*DIN EN
60950*DIN EN 61010-1*DIN IEC 68-2-3*DIN IEC
68-2-6*DIN IEC 352-1*DIN IEC 352-2*DIN IEC
654-3*DIN VDE 0100-410*DIN VDE 0100-430*DIN VDE
0100-540*DIN VDE 0100-600*DIN VDE 0106-1*DIN VDE
0106-102*DIN VDE 0111-3*DIN VDE 0303-1*DIN VDE
0470-1*DIN VDE 0636-10*DIN VDE 0800-5*EN
29000-1988*EN 50081-1-1992*EN 50081-2-1993*EN
50082-1-1992*EN 60068-2-2-1993*EN
60068-2-31-1993*EN 60146-1-1-1993*EN
60204-1-1985*EN 60269-1-1989*EN 60439-1-1990*EN
  

Power Outages

1997-08-12 Thread Tom Brose
I am trying to decide how much backup battery capacity I should have in a 
particular product for the home environment. The only purpose of the battery is 
to allow product operation during the more common (hopefully short) power 
outages. 

Could anyone point me in the direction of data about the frequency and duration 
of utility power outages? The areas I am most interested in are North and South 
America and Europe. 

Thanks.
Tom Brose
tbr...@aksys.com


RE: test equipment

1997-08-12 Thread DouglasScott
John,

I had been using an HP 8591A with EMI options for 5 years. Saw the new HP 8591 
EM and wanted it. but what to do with my old one? The boss wouldn't let me 
spend $$$ for a new one when the old one still worked. So my HP salesperson 
arranged to have Telogy buy my old one for a really good price. With that 
arrangement I was able to convince the boss to allow me to buy the new one. 
Telogy was happy, HP was happy, my boss was happy and so was I. I haven't 
failed to pass EMI at an outside test house on any product I have tested 
in-house in 6 years. That makes my boss really happy.

Telogy was extremely responsive, friendly and helpful. Highly recommended.

Telogy
3885 Bohannon Dr.
Menlo Park, CA  94025
1-800-835-6494

Attn: Cheryl Holmes
email:  chol...@telogy1.com

Regards,
Scott Douglas
Principal Compliance Engineer
ECRM Incorporated
Telephone:  1-508-851-0207
Facsimilie: 1-508-851-7016
e-mail:  sdoug...@ecrm.com


___
From: jschippano...@sstech.on.ca on Tue, Aug 12, 1997 9:11 AM
Subject: test equipment
To: emc-p...@ieee.org


 I'm looking for low end new/used equipment to set up a small test lab
 for radiated emissions.  Any names of  suppliers of such equipment in
 North America would be greatly appreciated.  Specifically, I am
 looking to purchase a spectrum analyzer and antenna that would be
 acceptable for pre scans before going to a registered lab.

 Any suggestions for equipment is greatly appreciated.
 Thanks in advance

 John Schippanoski
 jschippano...@sstech.on.ca



-- RFC822 Header Follows --
Received: by macgtwy.ecrm.com with SMTP;12 Aug 1997 09:04:59 -0400
Received: by highlight.ecrm.com (AA17565); Fri, 8 Aug 97 18:00:11 EDT
Received: from ruebert.ieee.org by maildrop.ecrm.com (RAA11489); Fri, 8 Aug 
1997 17:57:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
by ruebert.ieee.org (8.7.5/8.7.3)
id NAA20623; Fri, 8 Aug 1997 13:31:12 -0400 (EDT)
From: jschippano...@sstech.on.ca
Message-Id: 9708088710.aa871060...@hub.sstech.on.ca
X-Mailer: ccMail Link to SMTP R6.00.02
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 97 13:28:34 -0500
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: test equipment
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: jschippano...@sstech.on.ca
X-Resent-To: Multiple Recipients emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
X-Listname: emc-pstc
X-List-Description: Product Safety Tech. Committee, EMC Society
X-Info: Help requests to  emc-pstc-requ...@majordomo.ieee.org
X-Info: [Un]Subscribe requests to  majord...@majordomo.ieee.org
X-Moderator-Address: emc-pstc-appro...@majordomo.ieee.org


Re: OATS gndplane surface

1997-08-12 Thread HANS_MELLBERG
 I once inherited an outdoor aluminum ground plane 10m OATS. The 
 contraction and expansion was quite evident and out of spec. We ended 
 up sawing slots to relieve the TCE warp. The slots 12 inches each, 8 
 of them per 4'x8' section were aligned in the same direction as to the 
 tower/TT direction. Steel, however, I have been told will not warp as 
 much but needs fillet welding after the edges have been beveled. There 
 are welding techniques that reduce warpage. A guy in Redding, Rocky 
 Largent has welded large refrigerators the size of anechoic chambers. 
 I would use him if I had to have a steel ground plane.
 
 Good Luck, 
 Hans


__ Reply Separator _
Subject: OATS gndplane surface
Author:  Non-HP-austest (aust...@mpx.com.au) at HP-ColSprings,mimegw5
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
Date:8/12/97 8:09 AM


Hi Gang,
 
We are currently building another OATS and are looking into the most 
cost  time effective way of achieving a uniform conductive groundplane 
without using mesh. Does anyone have experience with using galvanised 
metal sheet, and if so, the best method to join the sheets together 
(silver solder, braze etc), bearing in mind temperatures 45deg C in 
summer.
 
Alternatively has anyone had success with conductive coating or paint 
over concrete ?
 
Any thoughts would be appreciated.
 
Best Regards.
-- 
Martin Garwood, Manager, Austest Laboratories 
4/87 Reserve Road Artarmon NSW 2064 AUSTRALIA 
ph: 61-2-94374500  fax: 61-2-94374600 
http://www.austest.com.au


Non-wood OATS weather protection enclosures

1997-08-12 Thread Bob Sykes
 Good Day List,
 
 We are considering replacing our barn and I would prefer not
 to use wood for the new structure.  I am seeking information
 on alternate materials / construction techniques as well as
 vendors of turnkey solutions.
 
 Thanks in advance for any help,
 
 -Bob
 
 bob_sy...@gilbarco.com


OATS gndplane surface

1997-08-12 Thread Martin Garwood
Hi Gang,
 
We are currently building another OATS and are looking into the most 
cost  time effective way of achieving a uniform conductive groundplane 
without using mesh. Does anyone have experience with using galvanised 
metal sheet, and if so, the best method to join the sheets together 
(silver solder, braze etc), bearing in mind temperatures 45deg C in 
summer.
 
Alternatively has anyone had success with conductive coating or paint 
over concrete ?
 
Any thoughts would be appreciated.
 
Best Regards.
-- 
Martin Garwood, Manager, Austest Laboratories
4/87 Reserve Road Artarmon NSW 2064 AUSTRALIA
ph: 61-2-94374500  fax: 61-2-94374600
http://www.austest.com.au