Re: Marking - Made in XXX

2002-04-20 Thread Robert Macy

Amund,

I believe it's a law in the US that all products be labeled with their
country of origin.

   - Robert -

   Robert A. Macy, PEm...@california.com
   408 286 3985  fx 408 297 9121
   AJM International Electronics Consultants
   619 North First St,   San Jose, CA  95112

-Original Message-
From: am...@westin-emission.no am...@westin-emission.no
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
Date: Saturday, April 20, 2002 3:08 PM
Subject: Marking - Made in XXX



Is it necessary to describe where a product is manufactured, as in Made in
XXX. I have see this statement/label on many products, but is it only
voluntary ?

Best regards
Amund Westin, Oslo/Norway



---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@attbi.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list


---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@attbi.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list


Marking - Made in XXX

2002-04-20 Thread amund

Is it necessary to describe where a product is manufactured, as in Made in
XXX. I have see this statement/label on many products, but is it only
voluntary ?

Best regards
Amund Westin, Oslo/Norway



---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@attbi.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list


Re: High Temp Caps and Inductors

2002-04-20 Thread Jacob Schanker

Derek:

You obviously are facing a challenge (a.k.a. problem).

Sometimes you actually have to make things yourself, and this may be one of
those times.

For the inductors, I'd say you will have to go with air core. I've done air
core inductors up to the hundreds of microhenries (for LF antenna couplers)
but we are talking big - 6 inch diameter by 18 inch length. I was also
looking for high unloaded Q, which also influenced the size. But even with
air core, you still have problems with the coil former and wire insulation.

I used fiberglass, but although I haven't checked, I don't think that will
work at 180C. Possibly Teflon (expensive) or maybe Delrin.

For capacitors, you could go back to basics and make your own, with metal
plates and dielectric. How about depleted Uranium for the plates, and
Gandolinium dioxide for the dielectric?  -( ;)

Jack

Jacob Z. Schanker, P.E.
65 Crandon Way
Rochester, NY 14618
Phone: 585 442 3909
Fax: 585 442 2182
j.schan...@ieee.org


- Original Message -
From: lfresea...@aol.com
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 5:19 PM
Subject: High Temp Caps and Inductors


| Hi all,
|
| I'm designing a filter that has to live and work with an Ambient temp of
180
| C. Does anyone have suggestions as to component vendors that I could
contact
| for parts?
|
| Thanks,
|
| Derek Walton.
| L F Research
|



---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@attbi.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list


SV: Decoupling - capacitor values

2002-04-20 Thread amund

Tim,

The standard is IEC/EN60945:1997, Maritime navigation and radio
communication equipment and systems - General requirements- Methods of
testing and required test results. Almost all ship classification societies
as Lloyd's Register (LR), Germanischer Lloyd (GL), American Bureau of
Shipping (ABS), Bureau Veritas (BV), Det Norske Veritas (DNV), Registro
Italiano Navale (RINA), Korean Register of Shipping (KR), China
Classification Society (CCS) refer to IEC60945.


The limits are:

150kHz-300kHz   80-52dBmV/m
300kHz - 30MHz  52-34dBmV/m
30M - 156MHz54dBmV/m
156M -165MHz24dBmV/m
165M - 1000MHz  54dBmV/m

The 156M -165MHz band is used for marine radio communication, what's why
they have stringent demands on radiated emission.

Amund


-Opprinnelig melding-
Fra: Wan Juang Foo [mailto:f...@np.edu.sg]
Sendt: 20. april 2002 06:30
Til: am...@westin-emission.no
Kopi: ieee pstc list
Emne: Re: Decoupling - capacitor values



Amund,
Cortland may be right, a chamber 'may not' be needed, high ambient
considerations to be put aside for the moment,  even if the emission is
measured to be on the  24dBuV/m @ 3m, freq.band 155MHz-165MHz.  I am just
curious, what are the limits (or standards) are you trying to meet?  From
what I read here, is it CISPR22 (or EN 55022) or something like that (Class
B) scaled back to 3 m?  I note that it is about 20dB below FCC limits for
class B (at 3m).

If it is a single frequency line emission you can use a home made E or H
field probe and work in the near field.  Douglas Smith (who post frequently
in this forum) have some good articles on DIY 1Ghz probes.

You would need a E-field probe to 'sniff' out the CM portion of the
emission and a H-field 'loop' to sniff out the offending loop before you
can hug a 'return wire' to the offending signal line to cut the return loop
down to size.  I like to use the (thinisy, i.e. small gauge) wire-wraping
wires for this.

Good luck and hope that EMC don't always meant that it lead to Even More
Coffee for the all nighter.

Tim Foo



  Cortland Richmond
  72146.373@compuserve. To:
am...@westin-emission.no am...@westin-emission.no, ieee pstc
  com   list
emc-p...@ieee.org
  Sent by:   cc:  (bcc: Wan
Juang Foo/ece/staff/npnet)
  owner-emc-pstc@majordo Subject: Decoupling -
capacitor values (ESR, layout, CM filter)
  mo.ieee.org


  04/20/02 05:39 AM
  Please respond to
  Cortland Richmond





Cortland Richmond 72146@compuserve.com

04/20/02 05:39 AM

Amund,
You do not HAVE to be in a chamber to keep working on this. Since there is
only one Vcc pin (which processor IS this? - be SURE there is only one Vcc
pin; you may have an unfiltered, unconnected Vcc pin or two) you are
limited in how many capacitors you can attach to it.  This doesn't matter;
if you filtered power, and got 7 dB, you've done there what CAN be done
there and should look look at other things.

Troubleshoot the board.  I too have thrown solutions at problems without
knowing what exactly was wrong.  It takes too long and costs too much.
Find the source. A small 'scope probe, with the end taped over, makes a
serviceable E-field probe.  snip








---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@attbi.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list


Re: High Temp Caps and Inductors

2002-04-20 Thread John Woodgate

I read in !emc-pstc that lfresea...@aol.com wrote (in 194.5bfc605.29f1e
f...@aol.com) about 'High Temp Caps and Inductors', on Fri, 19 Apr 2002:
I'm looking for Ceramics, 0.01 through 1 microfarad. Inductors, 1 to 100 
microhenry, about 0.5 amps.

You will not, I think, get ceramic capacitors in that value range that
keep anything like their low-temperature value at 180 C. You probably
need to look at glass-dielectric, but AFAIK a 1 uF glass cap would be
physically very large. 

The normal core materials for inductors in that value range may well be
near or above their Curie temperatures, too, so permeability values will
be low and very temperature-sensitive. 
-- 
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk 
Interested in professional sound reinforcement and distribution? Then go to 
http://www.isce.org.uk
PLEASE do NOT copy news posts to me by E-MAIL!

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@attbi.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list


Magnetic Testing

2002-04-20 Thread Jim Ericson

Bud, I don't have a copy of the IATA Packing Instruction here at the lab,
but from what you described, it may be similar to the Compass Safe
Distance test which is called out in the Maritime Navigation and
Communication EMC Standard EN 60945:1997.  This magnetic test determines
the distances above which an equipment will not cause an unacceptable
deviation of the ship's standard and steering compasses.  The EUT is tested
against a compass or magnetometer after magnetization in a specified DC
field with a superimposed AC stabilizing field.   A baroque-sounding test
indeed, but it so happens that a four-foot high by two-foot diameter
double-wound solenoid of solid 12-ga copper wire used in the Compass Safe
test resides just to the left of my desk here in the lab (only 'cause it's a
handy place to store it!).  I'd be happy to discuss this test, if it seems
relevant.  My phone at work is: (360) 595-2785.

Jim Ericson
Senior EMC Engineer
Acme Testing Company
j...@acmetesting.com







- Original Message -
From: Pittman, Bud
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 11:44 AM
Subject: Magnetic Testing




Although this is not an EMC standard it is related. My lab has been asked to
test our products to the magnetic standards of IATA Packing Instruction 902.
This test determines the ability of a device to change a compass reading.  I
have the regulations and know how to do the test, but do not do it
routinely.  Products that fail this test must be labeled and additional
shipping charges are imposed.   I know that one of our products fails and we
are labeling it.  Fines for non-compliance are substantial, yet I am having
a hard time finding anyone who knows about or complies with this standard.
My questions are:

Does anyone else perform this test, or have it performed on their products?
What kind of results are you getting depending upon product size, shape,
metal content?
Are there exceptions or conditions that would exclude product families from
this regulation.

Any help or discussion would be appreciated.

Bud Pittman
Compliance Engineer
LSI Logic Storage Systems, Inc. - Wichita KS
bud.pitt...@lsil.com
Tel 316-636-8718
Fax 316-636-8321






---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@attbi.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list


Re: Decoupling - capacitor values

2002-04-20 Thread Wan Juang Foo


Amund,
Cortland may be right, a chamber 'may not' be needed, high ambient
considerations to be put aside for the moment,  even if the emission is
measured to be on the  24dBuV/m @ 3m, freq.band 155MHz-165MHz.  I am just
curious, what are the limits (or standards) are you trying to meet?  From
what I read here, is it CISPR22 (or EN 55022) or something like that (Class
B) scaled back to 3 m?  I note that it is about 20dB below FCC limits for
class B (at 3m).

If it is a single frequency line emission you can use a home made E or H
field probe and work in the near field.  Douglas Smith (who post frequently
in this forum) have some good articles on DIY 1Ghz probes.

You would need a E-field probe to 'sniff' out the CM portion of the
emission and a H-field 'loop' to sniff out the offending loop before you
can hug a 'return wire' to the offending signal line to cut the return loop
down to size.  I like to use the (thinisy, i.e. small gauge) wire-wraping
wires for this.

Good luck and hope that EMC don't always meant that it lead to Even More
Coffee for the all nighter.

Tim Foo



   
  Cortland Richmond 
   
  72146.373@compuserve. To:  
am...@westin-emission.no am...@westin-emission.no, ieee pstc 
  com   list emc-p...@ieee.org   
   
  Sent by:   cc:  (bcc: Wan Juang 
Foo/ece/staff/npnet) 
  owner-emc-pstc@majordo Subject: Decoupling - 
capacitor values (ESR, layout, CM filter)   
  mo.ieee.org   
   

   

   
  04/20/02 05:39 AM 
   
  Please respond to 
   
  Cortland Richmond 
   

   

   



Cortland Richmond 72146@compuserve.com

04/20/02 05:39 AM

Amund,
You do not HAVE to be in a chamber to keep working on this. Since there is
only one Vcc pin (which processor IS this? - be SURE there is only one Vcc
pin; you may have an unfiltered, unconnected Vcc pin or two) you are
limited in how many capacitors you can attach to it.  This doesn't matter;
if you filtered power, and got 7 dB, you've done there what CAN be done
there and should look look at other things.

Troubleshoot the board.  I too have thrown solutions at problems without
knowing what exactly was wrong.  It takes too long and costs too much.
Find the source. A small 'scope probe, with the end taped over, makes a
serviceable E-field probe.  snip







---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@attbi.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list


RE: High Temp Caps and Inductors

2002-04-20 Thread Robert Wilson
A lot depends on the frequency you are operating at. A low frequency filter may 
use electrolytic caps, for example, and there is no way you will ever get 180°C 
electrolytics! Most of the common non-electrolytic capacitor dielectrics won't 
have a hope of operating at this temperature either. Maybe if you clarify the 
type and frequency of the filter...
 
You are also at or above the melting point of normal tin-lead solder, so that 
is going to make things just a tad difficult.
 
Bob Wilson 
TIR Systems Ltd. 
Vancouver. 
-Original Message-
From: lfresea...@aol.com [mailto:lfresea...@aol.com] 
Sent: April 19, 2002 2:19 PM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: High Temp Caps and Inductors
 
Hi all,

I'm designing a filter that has to live and work with an Ambient temp of 180 C. 
Does anyone have suggestions as to component vendors that I could contact for 
parts?

Thanks,

Derek Walton.
L F Research