Re: EN 61326 Vs EN 61131-2

2006-06-17 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
Hi,
 
here are the important differences:
 
EN 61326 is a product family standard.
EN 61131-2 is a product standard: IEC 61000-4-3 1,4 - 2,0 GHz / 800 / 960 MHz
with 10 V/m, more detailed requirements and test setups for conducted
disturbances in specific EMC zones.

 
The product standard has pre-eminence to the the product family standard.
 
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Yours sincerely
 
Dipl.-Ing. Michael Loerzer
Managing Director
Regulatory Affairs Specialist
Chairman of the Product Conformity Group (DIN ANP German Committee of
Standards Users)  
 
GLOBALNORM - Global Regulatory Compliance
Fon: +49 30 6392-3860, Direct Call: 3861
Fax: +49 30 6392-3863
 
Rudower Chaussee 29
12489 Berlin
Germany
 
 http://www.globalnorm.ca www.globalnorm.ca 
 http://www.Globalnorm.de www.Globalnorm.de

- Original Message - 
From: Derek Walton mailto:lfresea...@aol.com  
To: IEEE EMC Discussion Group mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org  
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 8:03 AM
Subject: EN 61326 Vs EN 61131-2

Morning all,

can anyone give me a quick overview of how these stds differ please?

I'm familier with EN 61326, but not EN 61131-2

Thanks,

Derek.
-  This
message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ 

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to emc-p...@ieee.org 


Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html 


List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 


For help, send mail to the list administrators: 


Scott Douglas emcp...@ptcnh.net Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org 


For policy questions, send mail to: 


Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org David Heald: emc-p...@daveheald.com 


All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 


http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc

-  This
message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ 

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to emc-p...@ieee.org 


Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html 


List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 


For help, send mail to the list administrators: 


Scott Douglas emcp...@ptcnh.net Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org 


For policy questions, send mail to: 


Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org David Heald: emc-p...@daveheald.com 


All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 


http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc 




VCCI-NVLAP, Site Registration MOU Status?

2006-06-17 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
Dear Peers,

Summary: Has anyone an authoritative and current word on the state of 
the NVLAP/VCCI MOU/MRA?

In early March 2006 a VCCI person informed me that a MOU with NVLAP was 
to be in place by the end of that month.  Indeed, the subsequent annual 
April update of the VCCI regulations showed NVLAP added to the 
accreditation bodies - with some vague phrase about when notification 
occurs.

Last month I arranged for VCCI technical requirements to be added to 
our NVLAP accreditation scope in preparation for some upcoming and 
overdue site registrations.  All seemed to be going smoothly...

Then this week, in an email exchange with VCCI I was informed that the 
MOU did not happen yet and may not for a few months.

Resolving this is important with regard to VCCI site registration fees: 
the old scheme costs money, the accreditation site registration scheme 
has no fees (and presumably, much faster).

I have at least 5 sites to register for my employer real soon now, 
including our recently acquired 10 meter semi-anechoic facility.  So 
the registration method will involve thousands of dollars and many 
hours of work if I the accreditation route is not available soon.

Best Regards,
Eric Lifsey

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list.Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to emc-p...@ieee.org

Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:

 Scott Douglas   emcp...@ptcnh.net
 Mike Cantwell   mcantw...@ieee.org

For policy questions, send mail to:

 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org
 David Heald:emc-p...@daveheald.com

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:

http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc



RE: NRTL mark required for goods shipped into USA?

2006-06-17 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
Hello Samuel,

And, what say you of products not used in the workplace (I don't
necessarily agree with the position stated by some that one's home is a
workplace - other than for home based businesses)?

Best regards, Art Michael

  -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
 |http://www.safetylink.com   |
 ||
 |  The Safety Link is the most comprehensive collection  |
 |  of product safety and standards resources on the WEB  |
 ||
 |  Int'l Product Safety News |
 |(It's our 18th Anniversary  1988-2006)  |
 | P.O.Box 1561 - WWW |
 |Middletown CT 06457-8061 U.S.A. |
 | Phone: (860) 344-1651 Fax: (860) 346-9066  |
 |http://www.safetylink.com/#IPSN |
  -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
===
On Fri, 16 Jun 2006, Samuel Lifshutz wrote:

 Group:



 Here are the reasons for safety compliance in USA.



 In United States, Code of Federal Regulations, CFR 29, Subpart S, Part
 1910.399 states that installation or equipment that utilizes electricity
 and used in the workplace must be acceptable to the Assistant Secretary
 of Labor.



 Acceptable. An installation or equipment is acceptable to the Assistant
 Secretary of Labor, and approved within the meaning of this Subpart S:

 (i) If it is accepted, or certified, or listed, or labeled, or otherwise
 determined to be safe by a nationally recognized testing laboratory; or

 (ii) With respect to an installation or equipment of a kind which no
 nationally recognized testing laboratory accepts, certifies, lists,
 labels, or determines to be safe, if it is inspected or tested by
 another Federal agency, or by a State, municipal, or other local
 authority responsible for enforcing occupational safety provisions of
 the National Electrical Code, and found in compliance with the
 provisions of the National Electrical Code as applied in this subpart;
 or

 (iii) With respect to custom-made equipment or related installations
 which are designed, fabricated for, and intended for use by a particular
 customer, if it is determined to be safe for its intended use by its
 manufacturer on the basis of test data which the employer keeps and
 makes available for inspection to the Assistant Secretary and his
 authorized representatives. Refer to 1910.7 for definition of nationally
 recognized testing laboratory.



 CFR 29 provides the list of NRTL and a list of standards acceptable to
 the Assistant Secretary of Labor.



 Failure to have product listed by NRTL is a violation of law.



 States laws, municipal, local and industry regulations may have
 additional acceptability requirements.



 Non-compliance may result in criminal and civil penalties.



 Samuel Lifshutz

 Manager QA

 MRV Communications Inc.

 20520 Nordhoff Street

 Chatsworth, CA 91311, USA

 Tel: (818) 772-6235 x265

 Fax: (818) 772-0576

 email: slifsh...@mrv.com

 Registered by QMI to ISO 9001:2000



 

 From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of
 Jayasinghe, Ryan
 Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 11:34 AM
 To: ted.eck...@apcc.com; charles.black...@sulisconsultants.com
 Cc: emc-p...@ieee.org
 Subject: RE: NRTL mark required for goods shipped into USA?



 Hello All,

 Also from GR1089: 7.2 Listing Requirements
 R7-1 [22] All network equipment that is directly powered by commercial
 ac, either through a hard-wire or plug-and-cord connection, shall be
 listed for the purpose by a Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratory
 (NRTL)and is mentioned in several other sections depending on
 product type-required tests.

 Applies also Customer Premise Equipment powered by AC.

 The folks performing NEBS testing might require NRTL listing.

 Ryan Jazz JayasingheCompliance Engineer x1198
 Canoga Perkins  Direct:(818) 678-3898
 20600 Prairie StreetCompany:(818) 718-6300
 Chatsworth, CA 91311-6008   e-mail: r...@canoga.com
 www.canoga.com  FAX:(818) 678-3798



 -Original Message-
 From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org]On Behalf Of
 ted.eck...@apcc.com
 Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 6:56 AM
 To: charles.black...@sulisconsultants.com
 Cc: emc-p...@ieee.org
 Subject: Re: NRTL mark required for goods shipped into USA?



 Hello Charlie,

 The United States National Electrical Code does not require NRTL Listing

 for general installations, but it is a benefit.  Products that are not
 NRTL
 marked are subject to the approval of the local electrical inspector.
 That
 person has the ability to accept unmarked product, but then you have to
 deal with their preferences and 

Re: Pop rivets as protective bonding devices

2006-06-17 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
John, 
Expanding on what Peter said, the contact pressure between two items
joined by a pop rivet(s) can only decrease from the as-manufactured
value, especially if there is any movement in the joint from rotation,
vibration, expansion/contraction from temperature changes, etc.   Thus
the contact resistance will increase with use and age, especially if
there is any oxidation or corrosion of the metals.

I developed network adapters for IBM Lexington and Lexmark for 11 years.
At first we pop-riveted the shielding brackets onto printed circuit
boards.  Then we discovered that we could reduce some radiated emissions
by up to 10dB -- ON BRAND-NEW CARDS -- by instead using:
*  A machine screw.
*  A split lock washer or star washer under the screw head.
*  The items to be joined.
*  Another split lock washer or star washer.
*  A nut.

The split lock washers or star washers ensured that the contact was held
under a high, constant pressure throughout the life of the product.  We
later simplified the assembly to:
*  A machine screw with integral Belleville washer.
*  The items to be joined.
*  A nut with a captive external-tooth star washer.

A further simplification for high-volume products was to pierce and tap
holes into the bottom piece of metal, making it into the nut(s).

This information is from pages 33-2 through 33-3 of my book, Robust
Electronic Design Reference Book, Volume 1 (Kluwer Academic Publisher,
2004).

John Barnes KS4GL, PE, NCE, NCT, ESDC Eng, ESDC Tech, PSE, SM IEEE
dBi Corporation
http://www.dbicorporation.com/

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list.Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to emc-p...@ieee.org

Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:

 Scott Douglas   emcp...@ptcnh.net
 Mike Cantwell   mcantw...@ieee.org

For policy questions, send mail to:

 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org
 David Heald:emc-p...@daveheald.com

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:

http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc