Re: [PSES] Cd exemption for art material

[Peter Tarver]

One hopes, then, that artists will not lick their brushes or hold them in
their mouths, the same way one hopes science academy janitors will not do
the same with their mops and brooms.


Peter Tarver

> -Original Message-
> From: Brian O'Connell
>
> The chemical principle of local concentration vs equilibria, and
> likelihood for direct exposure to users, seems to have been
> ignored.
>
> Brian
> Sr Janitorial Assistant For the Vulcan Science Academy
>

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 


All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas 
Mike Cantwell 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  
David Heald: 

Re: [PSES] Updating EU ErP reports for Level VI adapters?

[Pearson, John]

Hi David

Agreed re intrinsic value.

The EU in particular has been that way ever since the EMC and LV directives 
impose new requirements (harmonized stds) on arbitrary dates for continued 
supply of product lines.  Energy efficiency is becoming another with, I hear, 
plans for a level VII.

John



From: Dave Heald [mailto:emcp...@gmail.com]
Sent: 06 November 2015 22:48
To: Pearson, John
Cc: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Updating EU ErP reports for Level VI adapters?

Hi John,
  Agreed.  EMC & Safety reports should be updated as applicable as these could 
have meaningful changes in performance.

I was mostly focusing on the need for updated ErP (Energy related Products) 
reports, as they solely deal with energy efficiency & the Level VI change is to 
move to more efficient supplies.
It would seem that if I'm meeting the requirements with a less efficient EPS, 
that re-testing to qualify a more efficient EPS is simply a bureaucratic 
exercise that has little intrinsic value & just costs me money and time to 
re-test my entire product line.

Best Regards,
-David





On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 7:40 AM, Pearson, John 
> wrote:
Hi

Change of PSU to VI could affect EMC performance Radiated and Conducted as well 
as Immunity for the wacky places that insist on this (EEA etc).  You need 
representative results for these requirements (i.e. test reports with the 
correct/representative PSU)

John


From: Rodney Davis 
[mailto:rodney.da...@mitel.com]
Sent: 03 November 2015 21:20
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Updating EU ErP reports for Level VI adapters?


I would say that the limits are being exceeded, hence a manufactures technical 
letter of explanation in support of your DoC is sufficient ! No test required. 
Test data must be available though to support your technical judgement?


Rodney Davis


From: Dave Heald >
Sent: Tuesday, November 3, 2015 4:14 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] Updating EU ErP reports for Level VI adapters?

(apologies if this is a re-post - it's not showing on my 
mail.google.com inbox, so I'm assuming it didn't go 
through the first time around)

All,
  Do you think it's necessary to update EU ErP reports when transitioning from 
a Level V to a Level VI adapter?  Or would an explanatory statement suffice?

Technically our products are HiNA anyway, so that further reduces our 
compliance burden, but even without that consideration it would be nice to 
explain this away in my compliance folder rather than to pay for re-testing & 
new reports for all of our products.


Thoughts & feedback appreciated!

Best Regards,
-David Heald

Regulatory Engineer / Project Manager
Cradlepoint
-


This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to 
unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas >
Mike Cantwell >

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher >
David Heald >


NOTE: This e-mail (including any attachments) is for the sole use of the 
intended recipient(s) and may contain information that is confidential and/or 
protected by legal privilege. Any unauthorized review, use, copy, disclosure or 
distribution of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended 
recipient, please notify Mitel immediately and destroy all copies of this 
e-mail. Mitel does not accept any liability for breach of security, error or 
virus that may result from the transmission of this message.
-


This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE