[PSES] PSES: EMC engineer, Salem VA
FYI, folks. Greetings,My name is Deepak Prasher from USG ("United Software
Group"). I am an Account Manager. I came across your resume and wanted to send
a quick note your way. We have an opening that might be a great next step for
you. Please carefully read the Job Description below, and if you would like to
pursue this opportunity please email me an updated resume and Let me know the
best time to reach you. I appreciate your time and look forward to hearing from
you.Job description:Role: Electromagnetic Compatibility engineerSalem VA
The EMC (Electromagnetic Compatibility) engineer is an electrical engineer who
possesses analog and electrical circuit design and analysis capability in
conjunction with a specialization in the domain of electromagnetic
susceptibility and emissions. In this role the EMC engineer will assist in the
testing and certification of electronic equipment by accompanying the equipment
to a certified lab, preparing the equipment for test, analyzing the test
results, diagnosing any non-conformances, and recommending potential solutions.
If any design changes are required, the EMC engineer may implement the changes
and prepare the equipment for retesting.Familiarity and practical experience
with Mark VIe control systems is a desire Account ManagerThanks & RegardsDeepak
Prasher
United Software Group Inc.
565 Metro Place S. Suite # 110
Dublin, OH 43017
Direct: 614-588-8479 (Ext: 491)||Fax: 1-866-764-114www.usgrpinc.com||
https://www.linkedin.com/in/deepak-kumar-4131b378/ To unsubscribe from this
mailing, please reply to this email with the word UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject
line, or click here UNSUBSCRIBE.USG is an Equal Opportunity Employer. Qualified
applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race,
color, religion, gender, age, disability, military status, national origin or
any other characteristic protected under federal, state, or applicable local
law Brian Gregory
720-450-4933
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas
Mike Cantwell
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:
David Heald:
Re: [PSES] Construction Site Power Cords, Germany
Colleagues - I contacted DGUV on 29 January 2020 via their website to determine if "comparable work equipment" included such things as cord connected equipment that is not hand held. The 29 January response from their engineer Hans-Peter Steimel was that such equipment was indeed "comparable work equipment" because it was considered "mobile equipment, because it is possible to move them during operation or it can be moved easily from one location to another whilst connected to the supply circuit." This apparently stems from a different DGUV safety document, BGV/GUV-V A3 E, 1979, section 5(1)2, specifically its instructions for implementation. Thanks to all for you help! And thanks to Herr Steimel for his quick response. Mike Sherman Product Safety Engineer Graco Inc. > On January 29, 2020 at 8:29 AM "Bender, Curtis" > <10270e3f0a68-dmarc-requ...@ieee.org> wrote: > > Hi Mike, > > More info supporting Ted and Bernd… > > > > In answer to your question Does anyone know what is meant by "comparable > work equipment"? > > From a German colleague: Different equipment that is hand held during > usage. Hand held means also where the weight of the machine is supported > during holding a machine. Equipment which is hand-guided, like a vacuum > cleaner or a high pressure washer, you don’t have the weight supported by > hand as you are not carrying the machine in your hand. > > > > And… “within DGUV Information 203-006, section 5.1.5 there is an example > depicted (page 28 Abb. 14). > > > > I’ll forward you additional information under separate email. > > > > Curt > > > > The opinions expressed are my own and do not necessarily reflect those of > my employer. > > __ > > Curtis Bender | IEEE Senior Member > curtis.ben...@tennantco.com mailto:curtis.ben...@tennantco.com > > > > > > From: Charlie Blackham > Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2020 3:41 AM > To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG > Subject: Re: [PSES] Construction Site Power Cords, Germany > > > > Looking at an example cable spec for H07BQ-F > https://ajhcables.com/types-of-cable/rawflex-pur-cables/h07bq-f-halogen-free-pur-cable/ > several things jump out over and above a “normal” H05VV-F mains cable: > > * Extended temperature range > * UV resistance > * Lubricant/acid/alkali resistance > > > > Regards > > Charlie > > > > Charlie Blackham > > Sulis Consultants Ltd > > Tel: +44 (0)7946 624317 > > Web: https://sulisconsultants.com/ > > Registered in England and Wales, number 05466247 > > > > From: Dürrer Bernd mailto:bernd.duer...@wilo.com > > Sent: 29 January 2020 08:29 > To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG mailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG > Subject: [PSES] AW: [PSES] Construction Site Power Cords, Germany > > > > Hello Mike, > > > > the original German phrase is „Handgeführte Elektrowerkzeuge und > vergleichbare Arbeitsmittel“ (page 27 of > https://www.bghm.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Arbeitsschuetzer/Gesetze_Vorschriften/Informationen/203_006.pdf > > https://www.bghm.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Arbeitsschuetzer/Gesetze_Vorschriften/Informationen/203_006.pdf > ). I would translate „handgeführt“ rather as hand-operated or manually > controlled. The German term for hand-held is „handgehalten“, which is a > special case of hand-operated/handgeführt. In the original document, there is > an example illustration on page 28 that shows a wall chaser with integrated > dust collection system that is hand-operated, while the whole equipment is > portable, but not hand-held. > > > > So I agree with Ted’s interpretation that portable tools are in the scope > of “comparable work equipment”, but I would go even further that electrical > equipment that is temporarily fixed on the construction site (like hoists or > cranes) is also in the scope of this definition. > > > > Kind regards, > > > > Bernd > > > > Von: John Woodgate mailto:j...@woodjohn.uk > > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 29. Januar 2020 08:53 > An: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG mailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG > Betreff: Re: [PSES] Construction Site Power Cords, Germany > > > > You would probably have to ask for the meaning of the original vague > German phrase, because much may be obscured in translation. > > On 2020-01-29 02:04, MIKE SHERMAN wrote: > > > > > > A German insurance document, DGUV Information 203-006 ( Selection > > and operation of electrical systems and equipment on construction and > > assembly sites ), has a requirement for either rubber or polyurethane > > jacketed power cables in its section 5.15: > > " Hand-held power tools and comparable work equipment
[PSES] Test please ignore
Please ignore - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe) List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas Mike Cantwell For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: David Heald:
[PSES] Keeping cellphone noise out of audio op-maps
I see two apparent ways of keeping cellphone noise out of audio op-amps: - 10 pF between + and - inputs; - 47 pF (or similar) from output to inverting input. Which is usually more effective? I suspect that the first one is, but I see it less often. - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe) List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas Mike Cantwell For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: David Heald:
