RE: Definitions - Safety Critical, Safety Circuit

2001-11-08 Thread Gregg Kervill

My experience agrees with yours Gert - there is no simple formula to follow.

In my early days as a PSE I tried to draw a flow-diagram of product safety
assessment and decisions.

On the first line I had about 20 options and each of those dropped down to
about 20 more - many of which interlocked.after a couple of weeks I gave
up.


I believe there is a real danger when one tries to provide general guidance.
There will always be exceptions - hence standardization and harmonization
will (I believe) never satisfy all conditions.


When I write product descriptions I deliberately over specify the safety
aspects of critical components - or systems. There is one reason for this -
to ensure that everyone on the project understands the impact of changing
components.

When the PD is cut down my the agency I send a file copy of my original for
the manufacturing/design file. That way there is a history. (e.g. if I use
an HB enclosure because the product if powered from and SELVEL PSU with
current fold-back, then that goes into the general description AND the
description of the PSU.)

I get despondent reading some agency reports to do not include that level of
detail - but a telephone call to the manufacturer usually gets the answer.


I know that not everyone does writes descriptions the way I do and I am not
suggesting that it is the best way (or ought to be standardized) - it just
happens to work for me and my clients.

Best regards

Gregg


P.O. Box 310
Reedville, Virginia 22539
Phone: (804) 453-3141
Fax: (804) 453-9039
Web:www.test4safety.com



-Original Message-
From: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
[mailto:owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org]On Behalf Of CE-test - Ing.
Gert Gremmen - ce-marking and more...
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 2:13 AM
To: Doug McKean; EMC-PSTC Discussion Group
Subject: RE: Definitions - Safety Critical, Safety Circuit


Hi Dough, Group,

I agree that is approach is much more simple to understand,
but most definitions up to now have the problem of defining
A LOT of components as safety critical.  The safety critical parts
need much more attention then just specification and name it.
They need to be maintained in brand , type and material f.a.
If an ECO (Engineering Change Order) is made, replacing a
safety critical component needs re-assessment of the whole
safety concept.

Safety related components need however just fulfill their safety specs
and they will do the job, and ordinary components
may be replaced at will by the manufacturer by any other part
that does the functional job.


A similar reasoning can be made to measures, procedures, circuits
(build from components) and construction.


The approch i treid in an eralier mail made use of the double layer
concept in safety (electrical mechanical chemical radiation heat
and fire) to identify components.

Those who bridge two layers of safety, or can invalidate the safety of
a circuit are Safety Critical. (f.a. a cap that goes from hazardous
voltageto an ungrounded accessible part)

Those that bridge only one layer are Safety Related.
(f.a. one of the two insulations in double insulation)

Those that are redundant (from safety point of view) are ordinary
components.


What do you think of this: can this approach simplify the job ?



Regards,

Gert Gremmen, (Ing)

ce-test, qualified testing

===
Web presence  http://www.cetest.nl
CE-shop http://www.cetest.nl/ce_shop.htm
/-/ Compliance testing is our core business /-/
===


-Original Message-
From: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
[mailto:owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org]On Behalf Of Doug McKean
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 4:07 AM
To: EMC-PSTC Discussion Group
Subject: Re: Definitions - Safety Critical, Safety Circuit



Couldn't we just go to the front of the UL1950/60950
standard and agree that a safety critical part or device
or circuit or construction is simply something used

...
to prevent injury or damage due to:
- Electric shock hazard
- Energy hazards
- Fire hazard
- Mechanical hazard
- Heat hazard
- Radiation hazard
- Chemical hazard
...

Regards, Doug McKean



---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org
 Dave Healddavehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
No longer online until our new server is brought online and
the old messages are imported into the new server

RE: Definitions - Safety Critical, Safety Circuit

2001-11-08 Thread CE-test - Ing. Gert Gremmen - ce-marking and more...
Hi Dough, Group,

I agree that is approach is much more simple to understand,
but most definitions up to now have the problem of defining
A LOT of components as safety critical.  The safety critical parts
need much more attention then just specification and name it.
They need to be maintained in brand , type and material f.a.
If an ECO (Engineering Change Order) is made, replacing a
safety critical component needs re-assessment of the whole
safety concept.

Safety related components need however just fulfill their safety specs
and they will do the job, and ordinary components
may be replaced at will by the manufacturer by any other part
that does the functional job.


A similar reasoning can be made to measures, procedures, circuits
(build from components) and construction.


The approch i treid in an eralier mail made use of the double layer
concept in safety (electrical mechanical chemical radiation heat
and fire) to identify components.

Those who bridge two layers of safety, or can invalidate the safety of
a circuit are Safety Critical. (f.a. a cap that goes from hazardous
voltageto an ungrounded accessible part)

Those that bridge only one layer are Safety Related.
(f.a. one of the two insulations in double insulation)

Those that are redundant (from safety point of view) are ordinary
components.


What do you think of this: can this approach simplify the job ?



Regards,

Gert Gremmen, (Ing)

ce-test, qualified testing

===
Web presence  http://www.cetest.nl
CE-shop http://www.cetest.nl/ce_shop.htm
/-/ Compliance testing is our core business /-/
===


-Original Message-
From: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
[mailto:owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org]On Behalf Of Doug McKean
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 4:07 AM
To: EMC-PSTC Discussion Group
Subject: Re: Definitions - Safety Critical, Safety Circuit



Couldn't we just go to the front of the UL1950/60950
standard and agree that a safety critical part or device
or circuit or construction is simply something used

...
to prevent injury or damage due to:
- Electric shock hazard
- Energy hazards
- Fire hazard
- Mechanical hazard
- Heat hazard
- Radiation hazard
- Chemical hazard
...

Regards, Doug McKean



---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org
 Dave Healddavehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
No longer online until our new server is brought online and
the old messages are imported into the new server.


attachment: Gert Gremmen.vcf

Re: Definitions - Safety Critical, Safety Circuit

2001-11-08 Thread Doug McKean

Couldn't we just go to the front of the UL1950/60950 
standard and agree that a safety critical part or device 
or circuit or construction is simply something used 

... 
to prevent injury or damage due to:  
- Electric shock hazard 
- Energy hazards 
- Fire hazard 
- Mechanical hazard 
- Heat hazard 
- Radiation hazard 
- Chemical hazard
 

Regards, Doug McKean 



---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org
 Dave Healddavehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
No longer online until our new server is brought online and the old 
messages are imported into the new server.



Definitions - Safety Critical, Safety Circuit

2001-11-07 Thread Dan Teninty

Group,

I pulled these from Cigital labs web site. A good first crack at definitions
that perhaps the community could agree on.  I am familiar with
MIL-HDBK-882C and have used it on several occasions to evaluate things that
go boom in a loud way.  This is generally considered BAD by those in close
proximity to the event.  The details are left to the skill and experience of
a competent safety engineer to ensure that those in close proximity are
them and not us.


Safety-Critical
A term applied to a condition, event, operation, process, object, function
or system whose proper recognition, control, performance or tolerance is
essential to safe system operation or use; e.g., safety critical function,
safety critical path, safety critical component (882C).

Safety Circuit
A single, or a network of, simple circuit element(s) which are required to
function in the support or enabling of a safety function. Where a simple
circuit element is the mathematical model of a two terminal device, or
function, which cannot be further subdivided into other two-terminal
devices, or functions.

Best regards,

Daniel E. Teninty, P.E.
Managing Partner
DTEC Associates LLC
http://www.dtec-associates.com
Streamlining the Compliance Process
5406 S. Glendora Drive
Spokane, WA 99223
(509) 443-0215
(509) 443-0181 fax


---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org
 Dave Healddavehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
No longer online until our new server is brought online and the old 
messages are imported into the new server.