RE: FCC and Hi Temp operation

2003-06-11 Thread Kurt Fischer
My recommendation is to look at the radio performance issues as well as the
regulatory. It is possible that you have no FCC compliance issues but the
radio does not perform! The FCC could not care less if your radio works or not.
 
Kurt
 
Kurt Fischer 


HYPER Corporation 
1279 Quarry Lane, Suite B 
Pleasanton, CA 94566-8499 
+1.925.462.9105 ext. 205 (Voice) 
+1.925.577.5517 (PCS) 
+1.925.280.7751 (Fax) 
mailto:kurt.fisc...@hyperinterop.com 
www.hyperinterop.com 

 





From: richwo...@tycoint.com [mailto:richwo...@tycoint.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 9:58 AM
To: chuck.bu...@cubic.com; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: FCC and Hi Temp operation


My recommendation is for the supplier to provide you with a device that they
certify to operate within the scope of their FCC Grant at your specified temp
range. In other words, place the ownership of the problem back on the
supplier. Let them determine if they need to resumit data to the FCC for the
higher temp operation.
 
Richard Woods 
Sensormatic Electronics 
Tyco International 


From: Burns, Chuck [mailto:chuck.bu...@cubic.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:25 AM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: FCC and Hi Temp operation



Hello, everyone. 

We are integrating a purchased 802.11b device into our product, but face
ambient temperature requirements up to 80 degrees C. This brings up two
problems:

1. Will it work at that temperature? One vendor advertises 55 degrees max,
another 70 but with an offer to screen products at 80.

2. What are the FCC requirements? The FCC Rules for the 2.45 GHz band, 15.249,
specify a frequency tolerance of 0.001% over the -20 to +50 degree range, but
do not specifically address higher temperatures. Do we simply fall back onto
the more general provisions of 15.215, keeping the 20dB bandwidth signal
within the designated band, with a recommendation to keep it within the
central 80% of the permitted range? Since we are not manufacturing the
transmitter, which already carries FCC certification, who is responsible to
the FCC for ensuring compliance at our extreme temperature?

Regards, 

Chuck Burns 
Manager of Compliance 
Cubic Transportation Systems, Inc. 
5650 Kearny Mesa Road 
San Diego, CA 92111 
Tel.: (858) 627-4562 
Fax: (858) 292-9987 
chuck.bu...@cubic.com 





RE: FCC and Hi Temp operation

2003-06-11 Thread Barbara Judge
Hi Chuck,
 
The device in question would fall under 15.247, which has no extreme
temperature requirement in the U.S.  If the WLAN device was tested for use in
the EU the European Norm (EN 300 328) does involve extreme temperature testing
of -20 to +55 C, unless it is for indoor use or controlled environment only,
in which case they would still have to test from 0 to + 35 C.  If it is a plug
in device for use in a host system, the standard only requires that the WLAN
device meet the temperature extremes declared for the host system.  I hope
that you find this info helpful.
 
Best Regards,
Barbara


From: Burns, Chuck [mailto:chuck.bu...@cubic.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 8:25 AM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: FCC and Hi Temp operation



Hello, everyone. 

We are integrating a purchased 802.11b device into our product, but face
ambient temperature requirements up to 80 degrees C. This brings up two
problems:

1. Will it work at that temperature? One vendor advertises 55 degrees max,
another 70 but with an offer to screen products at 80.

2. What are the FCC requirements? The FCC Rules for the 2.45 GHz band, 15.249,
specify a frequency tolerance of 0.001% over the -20 to +50 degree range, but
do not specifically address higher temperatures. Do we simply fall back onto
the more general provisions of 15.215, keeping the 20dB bandwidth signal
within the designated band, with a recommendation to keep it within the
central 80% of the permitted range? Since we are not manufacturing the
transmitter, which already carries FCC certification, who is responsible to
the FCC for ensuring compliance at our extreme temperature?

Regards, 

Chuck Burns 
Manager of Compliance 
Cubic Transportation Systems, Inc. 
5650 Kearny Mesa Road 
San Diego, CA 92111 
Tel.: (858) 627-4562 
Fax: (858) 292-9987 
chuck.bu...@cubic.com 





Re: FCC and Hi Temp operation

2003-06-11 Thread garymcintu...@aol.com
   The first thing to do is to check the component temperature ratings to
see if you will even meet the parts manufacturers operating limits. Many
commercial components are rated at 70C, meaning that the parts vendors only
guarantee the operation up to that point, after that you are on you own. They
will likely have some level of safety margin, but I wouldn't be betting my
equipment and company reputation on what the vendor's sales guys told you. If
the equipment hasn't been designed for that kind of ambient it may well pass
the relatively short duration screening test but you will see a sharp
reduction in the life of the product. The major stress on integrated circuits,
etc., is temperature. As the ambient and component temperatures increase the
failure rate increases exponentially and conversely life, and reliability
decrease exponentially. Screening the parts by the vendor will only tell you
that these particular units made it for an extremely short time (compared to
expected product life). How they play with the rest of the system and there
associated variables is nothing but a crap shoot, and its going to be a new
risk for every lot the vendor produces.
   The last time I checked the FCC mainly identified the test ambient as
between 50F and 100F (but I'm fuzzy on the upper limit), and that the
equipment be in a well warmed condition. That implies that the testing done
under a normal test site condition would be acceptable. However, I have had a
couple of instances when increased temperatures changed, and indeed failed,
some equipment. The components and impedances change somewhat, but the problem
I encountered was more mechanical in nature. There were some spring tension
components that were used for grounding of flex PCB's etc, that expanded under
the higher temperatures and they lost there ground contact. I would at least
confirm the emissions compliance at the higher temperatures.
   Gary McInturff