RE: PCB coating questions

1999-03-08 Thread Peter Tarver
Arjen -

Check the Conditions of Acceptability on the coatings you're interested in
using.  UL Recognized conformal coatings are, for the most part, are tested
for use on the bare board (base laminate) and are not tested for use on
solder masks.

Regards,

Peter L. Tarver
Nortel Networks
ptar...@nortelnetworks.com

 -Original Message-
 From: pe...@itl.co.il [SMTP:pe...@itl.co.il]
 Sent: Sunday, March 07, 1999 9:38 AM
 
 Dear Arjen,
 
 Solder mask is not considered as a conformal coating. You may 
 find UL Recognized conformal coating manufacturers in the UL 
 Recognized Component Directory under Coatings for Printed 
 Wiring Boards. To be able to use it on your boards, you must 
 obtain a copy of the UL Conditions of Acceptability (COAs) to 
 ensure that the coating is suitable for the ANSI grade (FR4, etc.) of 
 the board base material. 
 
 For ITE (UL1950/CSA C22.2 950), you can use a UL Recognized 
 conformal coating or alternatively must subject the the PWB with 
 coating to all the applicable construction and tests in UL1950/CSA 
 C22.2 950 for coated PWBs. 
 
 For ITE built for Europe, a US/Canadian Recognized/Certified 
 coating is usually not acceptable and the PWB with coating must 
 be subjected to all applicable tests in EN 60950 for coated PWBs.
 
 Best Regards,
 
 
 From: Arjen Dragt adr...@inverpower.com
 Date sent:Thu, 4 Mar 1999 14:59:16 -0500
 
  In looking at meeting CSA and UL spacing requirements for some of our
 PCB's
  (in power supplies up to 600 V) some questions concerning the use of
  conformal coatings (allowing reduction of spacing) have come up.  The
  information that  I am seeking is for both CSA and UL; the wording that
 they
  use concerning coatings on boards is similar, but not the same.
  
  Coatings on a PCB could include both a solder mask, and a strict
 conformal
  coating.  Does anybody have real-world knowledge as to whether or not a
  solder mask is accepted by UL/CSA as a coating, and if so, under what
  conditions?
  
  Also, the method by which a coating is applied to a board could have
  considerable impact on the effectiveness of that coating.  For instance,
  spraying a board will not get at any traces that are buried underneath
  components, whereas dipping will have a better chance of accessing those
  hidden areas.  The standards that I am looking at say nothing about
 method
  of applying a coating (the process).  I assume that the decision as to
 how a
  coating will be applied is left up to the manufacturer and board
 supplier.
  Does anybody out there have best practices that are worth considering
 when
  looking at our options for coating methods?
  
  Arjen Dragt
  
 
 
 PETER S. MERGUERIAN
 I.T.L. (PRODUCT TESTING) LTD.

-
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc (without the
quotes).  For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com,
j...@gwmail.monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or
roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).


Re: PCB coating questions

1999-03-07 Thread Peter Merguerian
Dear Arjen,

Solder mask is not considered as a conformal coating. You may 
find UL Recognized conformal coating manufacturers in the UL 
Recognized Component Directory under Coatings for Printed 
Wiring Boards. To be able to use it on your boards, you must 
obtain a copy of the UL Conditions of Acceptability (COAs) to 
ensure that the coating is suitable for the ANSI grade (FR4, etc.) of 
the board base material. 

For ITE (UL1950/CSA C22.2 950), you can use a UL Recognized 
conformal coating or alternatively must subject the the PWB with 
coating to all the applicable construction and tests in UL1950/CSA 
C22.2 950 for coated PWBs. 

For ITE built for Europe, a US/Canadian Recognized/Certified 
coating is usually not acceptable and the PWB with coating must 
be subjected to all applicable tests in EN 60950 for coated PWBs.

Best Regards,


From:   Arjen Dragt adr...@inverpower.com
To: EMC-PSTC Listserv emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject:PCB coating questions
Date sent:  Thu, 4 Mar 1999 14:59:16 -0500
Send reply to:  Arjen Dragt adr...@inverpower.com

 In looking at meeting CSA and UL spacing requirements for some of our PCB's
 (in power supplies up to 600 V) some questions concerning the use of
 conformal coatings (allowing reduction of spacing) have come up.  The
 information that  I am seeking is for both CSA and UL; the wording that they
 use concerning coatings on boards is similar, but not the same.
 
 Coatings on a PCB could include both a solder mask, and a strict conformal
 coating.  Does anybody have real-world knowledge as to whether or not a
 solder mask is accepted by UL/CSA as a coating, and if so, under what
 conditions?
 
 Also, the method by which a coating is applied to a board could have
 considerable impact on the effectiveness of that coating.  For instance,
 spraying a board will not get at any traces that are buried underneath
 components, whereas dipping will have a better chance of accessing those
 hidden areas.  The standards that I am looking at say nothing about method
 of applying a coating (the process).  I assume that the decision as to how a
 coating will be applied is left up to the manufacturer and board supplier.
 Does anybody out there have best practices that are worth considering when
 looking at our options for coating methods?
 
 Arjen Dragt
 


PETER S. MERGUERIAN
MANAGING DIRECTOR
PRODUCT TESTING DIVISION
I.T.L. (PRODUCT TESTING) LTD.
HACHAROSHET 26, P.O.B. 211
OR YEHUDA 60251, ISRAEL

TEL: 972-3-5339022
FAX: 972-3-5339019
E-MAIL: pe...@itl.co.il
Visit our Website: http://www.itl.co.il

-
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc (without the
quotes).  For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com,
j...@gwmail.monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or
roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).


RE: PCB coating questions

1999-03-05 Thread Lacey,Scott
Arjen,

For insulation over PCB traces, some types of dry film solder mask might be
suitable. These films are manufactured to a consistent thickness, and then
laminated to the PCB. You need to check with your board vendor as to types
and approval ratings. These films are very tough, just ask anyone who has
ever tried to scrape through one in order to expose a trace for rework.

You will want to make sure that your PCBs are fabricated as SMOBC, or solder
mask over bare copper.Tin coatings have a tendency to flow when boards are
wave soldered or reflowed, and may weaken the integrity of solder mask. You
will also get better performance at high frequencies.

As to conformal coatings, there are several issues to consider. The first is
cleanliness. No-clean flux leaves a thin film over the PCB surface which
will prevent proper adhesion of coatings. Most conformal coatings are
intended for protection against moisture and humidity, and voids under the
coating won't matter. For arc prevention, the coating must adhere tightly to
the board and components.

The second issue is how much of the board to coat. Coatings tend to
interfere with repairs. Even repairable coatings make the job more
difficult, and more importantly, tend to create voids when heated with a
soldering iron. If only certain portions of your boards require protection
you might consider selectively applying an epoxy potting compound to those
areas.

I hope that this will be of some help.

Scott

-
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc (without the
quotes).  For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com,
j...@gwmail.monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or
roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).


RE: PCB coating questions

1999-03-05 Thread Daniel Sicard
Arjen,

Board with only solder mask is considered as non coated.

Conformal coating is the type accepted to be allowed to reduce the spacing
between trace.  However be aware that your safety agency will have to test
that coating.  The test is described in UL1950 (I do not remember the
section and do not have the standard at hand now).  Also an audit of your
process for applying the coating will be performed periodically.  This is in
addition to the normal safety audit.

Daniel Sicard 
Compliance Engineer / Ingénieur Certification
Transport Systems Business Unit
RELTEC Corporation
Tel: 514-685-1737 Ext. 4631  Fax: 514-822-4054
Web: http://www.relteccorp.com E-mail: mailto:dsic...@positronfiber.com


 -Original Message-
 From: Arjen Dragt [SMTP:adr...@inverpower.com]
 Sent: Thursday, March 04, 1999 2:59 PM
 To:   EMC-PSTC Listserv
 Subject:  PCB coating questions
 
 In looking at meeting CSA and UL spacing requirements for some of our
 PCB's (in power supplies up to 600 V) some questions concerning the use of
 conformal coatings (allowing reduction of spacing) have come up.  The
 information that  I am seeking is for both CSA and UL; the wording that
 they use concerning coatings on boards is similar, but not the same.
  
 Coatings on a PCB could include both a solder mask, and a strict
 conformal coating.  Does anybody have real-world knowledge as to whether
 or not a solder mask is accepted by UL/CSA as a coating, and if so,
 under what conditions?
  
 Also, the method by which a coating is applied to a board could have
 considerable impact on the effectiveness of that coating.  For instance,
 spraying a board will not get at any traces that are buried underneath
 components, whereas dipping will have a better chance of accessing those
 hidden areas.  The standards that I am looking at say nothing about
 method of applying a coating (the process).  I assume that the decision as
 to how a coating will be applied is left up to the manufacturer and board
 supplier.  Does anybody out there have best practices that are worth
 considering when looking at our options for coating methods?
  
 Arjen Dragt

-
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc (without the
quotes).  For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com,
j...@gwmail.monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or
roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).