Re: Public Health and Safety Signs - Tomfoolery so delete if you

2001-05-21 Thread John Woodgate

200105211432.kaa24...@interlock2.lexmark.com, oover...@lexmark.com
inimitably wrote:
I once read a safety article (tongue-in-cheek I believe) that said that the
safety industry was weaking the species by allowing the weak and feable to
continue exist and procreate.  I believe that this was directed toward the
mentally weak and feable (read stoopid).

By warning them about things that generally intellegient people would know were
hazardous, this special group would reproduce and create even more special
people.  Ultimately, the special people would out number the others to such 
an
extent that homosapiens would face extinction.

One of the assumptions was that these special people, through their routine
actions, would eliminate most of the other people through collateral damage.
(e.g.  drunk drivers, cell phone drivers, equipment operators, greedy managers
with only the bottom line in mind (otherwise known as bottom feeders))

Well, it has gotten to the point, as Tania has so elegantly pointed out, that
the safety profession only facilitates this; but the legal and political system
now rewards being special (again read stoopid).  Not only do we protect them
and allow them to procreate, we pay them large sums of money to those special
people for being so special.

This is a distasteful posting, and even if you wrote it in innocence you
may find you get attention from extreme right-wing elements. 

The idea that low intelligence is a dominant inherited characteristic is
simply not true. There is a heuristic observation of an 'equalization'
principle in human and other animal inheritance; unusually tall parents
have tall but not so unusually tall children. Many highly intelligent
parents have children whose intelligence is not so outstanding. Some
simple parents have genius-level children.
-- 
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. Phone +44 (0)1268 747839
Fax +44 (0)1268 777124. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Why not call a vertically-
applied manulo-pedally-operated quasi-planar chernozem-penetrating and 
excavating implement a SPADE?

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org
 Dave Healddavehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.rcic.com/  click on Virtual Conference Hall,




RE: Public Health and Safety Signs - Tomfoolery so delete if you don't have the time.

2001-05-21 Thread Nerad, Daren HS-SNS

Gary,
We learned about this one almost 13 years ago with the first baby...
My wife inadvertently went through about a pot of coffee while on the phone
(long distance) with a rarely seen friend.  In a way, the results of that
were much worse than passing on a glass of wine or two!!  Since neither one
was used to that much coffee, in that short a period, it was unpleasant, but
educational.  From an engineering perspective: it was a very conclusive
test!

Daren A. Nerad
EMC Engineer
815.226.6123


-Original Message-
From: Gary McInturff [mailto:gary.mcintu...@worldwidepackets.com]
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 4:40 PM
To: 'Michael Mertinooke'; wo...@sensormatic.com;
emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: Public Health and Safety Signs - Tomfoolery so delete if
you don't have the time.



Here in the US, awhile back,  a woman was suing the liquor industry
because she gave birth to a fetal alcohol syndrome child. Apparently, nobody
in their right mind would assume that consuming a fifth of whiskey a day
could be harmful to a developing fetus making the liquor industry patiently
and damnably negligent in not putting warning labels on the bottles. (We got
them now thank God!)
During the coverage of the trial, and I don't remember the context,
but the issue of passing nastiness to infants who were being breast fed was
also brought up. While I didn't hear the end of this I often have wondered
that if that was true, and this woman's case had merit (her lawyer took it
up didn't he?) then the logical extension would be that mothers milk should
come with a warning. 

Soo Just what the heck will this label look like, and even
more importantly, just where are they going to put it so that people, can
easily read it!

Gary

-Original Message-
From: Michael Mertinooke [mailto:mertino...@skyskan.com]
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 12:37 PM
To: wo...@sensormatic.com; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: Public Health and Safety Signs




signs at work. Is there a similar Directive for health and safety signs for
the general public?

Whoo! The mind boggles! You mean with like people with exclamation
point in triangle tattoos on various portions of the anatomy? Or
biohazard labels on the door of the kids' rooms? Judging
from some of the ANSI Z535 safety labels I see in the catalogs, the
Human Warning Labels would be interesting indeed.   =]

Cheers!
Mike


---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org
 Dave Healddavehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.rcic.com/  click on Virtual Conference Hall,

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org
 Dave Healddavehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.rcic.com/  click on Virtual Conference Hall,

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org
 Dave Healddavehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.rcic.com/  click on Virtual Conference Hall,




Re: Public Health and Safety Signs - Tomfoolery so delete if you

2001-05-21 Thread ooverton



I once read a safety article (tongue-in-cheek I believe) that said that the
safety industry was weaking the species by allowing the weak and feable to
continue exist and procreate.  I believe that this was directed toward the
mentally weak and feable (read stoopid).

By warning them about things that generally intellegient people would know were
hazardous, this special group would reproduce and create even more special
people.  Ultimately, the special people would out number the others to such an
extent that homosapiens would face extinction.

One of the assumptions was that these special people, through their routine
actions, would eliminate most of the other people through collateral damage.
(e.g.  drunk drivers, cell phone drivers, equipment operators, greedy managers
with only the bottom line in mind (otherwise known as bottom feeders))

Well, it has gotten to the point, as Tania has so elegantly pointed out, that
the safety profession only facilitates this; but the legal and political system
now rewards being special (again read stoopid).  Not only do we protect them
and allow them to procreate, we pay them large sums of money to those special
people for being so special.







Tania Grant taniagrant%msn@interlock.lexmark.com on 05/18/2001 09:11:49
PM

Please respond to Tania Grant taniagrant%msn@interlock.lexmark.com

To:   Gary McInturff
  gary.mcinturff%worldwidepackets@interlock.lexmark.com, 'Michael
  Mertinooke' mertinooke%skyskan@interlock.lexmark.com,
  woods%sensormatic@interlock.lexmark.com,
  emc-pstc%majordomo.ieee@interlock.lexmark.com
cc:(bcc: Oscar Overton/Lex/Lexmark)
Subject:  Re: Public Health and Safety Signs - Tomfoolery so delete if you



Gary,

Kudos to you for trying;--  but I think you are confusing your metaphors.   And
you can't equate logic with brainless juries or judges.   And you know better
than to rely on warning labels for safety protection!

1.  It is assumed that intelligent people will make intelligent choices when
opening a bottle with Warning labels that state the content can do you in.

2.  It is assumed that a nursing baby, while potentially intelligent, does not
have the capability to make any choices whatsoever as to what she is consuming.

3.  It is assumed that a lactating mother has a direct effect on the well being
of her baby.

4.  Therefore, the mother is the responsible party for any adverse effects the
baby may suffer due to conditions such as described in 1. above.

5.  Therefore, we can assume that any decision rendered otherwise by judge
and/or jury is brainless.

For technological widgets we bend over backwards to make them safe and we don't
rely on labels to protect the general user (trained service persons, however,
can be protected by labels in certain cases).  However, our
legislators/politicians think they can affect and protect our behavior by labels
and warning statements.This does not really work;--warning labels are for
others, never for ourselves!

So, what is the answer? --  Education for intelligent people; and safe design
(in case of a single fault, and a subsequent fault)  for dumb widgets.

Plastering warning labels on breasts will no more eliminate alcoholic babies
than plastering warning labels on men's ...  will eliminate HIV.

Tania Grant
taniagr...@msn.com



- Original Message -
From: Gary McInturff
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 5:33 PM
To: 'Michael Mertinooke'; wo...@sensormatic.com; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: Public Health and Safety Signs - Tomfoolery so delete if you



Here in the US, awhile back,  a woman was suing the liquor industry
because she gave birth to a fetal alcohol syndrome child. Apparently, nobody
in their right mind would assume that consuming a fifth of whiskey a day
could be harmful to a developing fetus making the liquor industry patiently
and damnably negligent in not putting warning labels on the bottles. (We got
them now thank God!)
During the coverage of the trial, and I don't remember the context,
but the issue of passing nastiness to infants who were being breast fed was
also brought up. While I didn't hear the end of this I often have wondered
that if that was true, and this woman's case had merit (her lawyer took it
up didn't he?) then the logical extension would be that mothers milk should
come with a warning.

Soo Just what the heck will this label look like, and even
more importantly, just where are they going to put it so that people, can
easily read it!

Gary

-Original Message-
From: Michael Mertinooke [mailto:mertino...@skyskan.com]
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 12:37 PM
To: wo...@sensormatic.com; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: Public Health and Safety Signs




signs at work. Is there a similar Directive for health and safety signs for
the general public?

Whoo! The mind boggles! You mean with like people with exclamation
point in triangle tattoos on various portions of the anatomy

Re: Public Health and Safety Signs - Tomfoolery so delete if you

2001-05-19 Thread Tania Grant
Gary,

Kudos to you for trying;--  but I think you are confusing your metaphors.   And 
you can't equate logic with brainless juries or judges.   And you know better 
than to rely on warning labels for safety protection!

1.  It is assumed that intelligent people will make intelligent choices when 
opening a bottle with Warning labels that state the content can do you in.

2.  It is assumed that a nursing baby, while potentially intelligent, does not 
have the capability to make any choices whatsoever as to what she is consuming.

3.  It is assumed that a lactating mother has a direct effect on the well being 
of her baby.

4.  Therefore, the mother is the responsible party for any adverse effects the 
baby may suffer due to conditions such as described in 1. above.

5.  Therefore, we can assume that any decision rendered otherwise by judge 
and/or jury is brainless.

For technological widgets we bend over backwards to make them safe and we don't 
rely on labels to protect the general user (trained service persons, however, 
can be protected by labels in certain cases).  However, our 
legislators/politicians think they can affect and protect our behavior by 
labels and warning statements.This does not really work;--warning labels 
are for others, never for ourselves!

So, what is the answer? --  Education for intelligent people; and safe design 
(in case of a single fault, and a subsequent fault)  for dumb widgets.

Plastering warning labels on breasts will no more eliminate alcoholic babies 
than plastering warning labels on men's ...  will eliminate HIV.

Tania Grant
taniagr...@msn.com



- Original Message -
From: Gary McInturff
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 5:33 PM
To: 'Michael Mertinooke'; wo...@sensormatic.com; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: Public Health and Safety Signs - Tomfoolery so delete if you



Here in the US, awhile back,  a woman was suing the liquor industry
because she gave birth to a fetal alcohol syndrome child. Apparently, nobody
in their right mind would assume that consuming a fifth of whiskey a day
could be harmful to a developing fetus making the liquor industry patiently
and damnably negligent in not putting warning labels on the bottles. (We got
them now thank God!)
During the coverage of the trial, and I don't remember the context,
but the issue of passing nastiness to infants who were being breast fed was
also brought up. While I didn't hear the end of this I often have wondered
that if that was true, and this woman's case had merit (her lawyer took it
up didn't he?) then the logical extension would be that mothers milk should
come with a warning.

Soo Just what the heck will this label look like, and even
more importantly, just where are they going to put it so that people, can
easily read it!

Gary

-Original Message-
From: Michael Mertinooke [mailto:mertino...@skyskan.com]
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 12:37 PM
To: wo...@sensormatic.com; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: Public Health and Safety Signs




signs at work. Is there a similar Directive for health and safety signs for
the general public?

Whoo! The mind boggles! You mean with like people with exclamation
point in triangle tattoos on various portions of the anatomy? Or
biohazard labels on the door of the kids' rooms? Judging
from some of the ANSI Z535 safety labels I see in the catalogs, the
Human Warning Labels would be interesting indeed.   =]

Cheers!
Mike


---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org
 Dave Healddavehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.rcic.com/  click on Virtual Conference Hall,

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org
 Dave Healddavehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.rcic.com/  click on Virtual Conference Hall,br 
clear=allhrGet your FREE

RE: Public Health and Safety Signs - Tomfoolery so delete if you don't have the time.

2001-05-18 Thread Gary McInturff

Here in the US, awhile back,  a woman was suing the liquor industry
because she gave birth to a fetal alcohol syndrome child. Apparently, nobody
in their right mind would assume that consuming a fifth of whiskey a day
could be harmful to a developing fetus making the liquor industry patiently
and damnably negligent in not putting warning labels on the bottles. (We got
them now thank God!)
During the coverage of the trial, and I don't remember the context,
but the issue of passing nastiness to infants who were being breast fed was
also brought up. While I didn't hear the end of this I often have wondered
that if that was true, and this woman's case had merit (her lawyer took it
up didn't he?) then the logical extension would be that mothers milk should
come with a warning. 

Soo Just what the heck will this label look like, and even
more importantly, just where are they going to put it so that people, can
easily read it!

Gary

-Original Message-
From: Michael Mertinooke [mailto:mertino...@skyskan.com]
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 12:37 PM
To: wo...@sensormatic.com; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: Public Health and Safety Signs




signs at work. Is there a similar Directive for health and safety signs for
the general public?

Whoo! The mind boggles! You mean with like people with exclamation
point in triangle tattoos on various portions of the anatomy? Or
biohazard labels on the door of the kids' rooms? Judging
from some of the ANSI Z535 safety labels I see in the catalogs, the
Human Warning Labels would be interesting indeed.   =]

Cheers!
Mike


---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org
 Dave Healddavehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.rcic.com/  click on Virtual Conference Hall,

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org
 Dave Healddavehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.rcic.com/  click on Virtual Conference Hall,




RE: Public Health and Safety Signs

2001-05-18 Thread Michael Mertinooke


signs at work. Is there a similar Directive for health and safety signs for
the general public?

Whoo! The mind boggles! You mean with like people with exclamation
point in triangle tattoos on various portions of the anatomy? Or
biohazard labels on the door of the kids' rooms? Judging
from some of the ANSI Z535 safety labels I see in the catalogs, the
Human Warning Labels would be interesting indeed.   =]

Cheers!
Mike


---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org
 Dave Healddavehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.rcic.com/  click on Virtual Conference Hall,