RE: Surge Test Performance Criterion

2000-01-20 Thread cetest

I agree with Jim and Carlos ,

If the design includes a specification that in case of a surge impulse
the equipment is switched off, ok that's fine.

It exhibits as specified so full compliance.

If I would like to have that power supply in my electronics, that's
another question.

If that is a good way to protect any electronics, I doubt it, although
I am not aware of the nature of the design protected by the supply.

I agree too that the surge impulse in it's various level is of no
real concern to any PWS designer, most supplies exhibit Crit A
for the surge impulse all the time, and nothing of the pulse is
seen on the secondary.

Please Jim, you made us curious about the specific electronics that
need such a protection ;))

Gert Gremmen

ce-test, qualified testing

==
http://www.cetest.nl
Do you know our
CE/E mark True type Font ?
http://www.cetest.nl/cettf.htm
==


-Original Message-
From: owner-emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:owner-emc-p...@ieee.org]On Behalf
Of Jim Hulbert
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2000 9:08 PM
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: Surge Test Performance Criterion





A product has a switched mode power supply with a current sensing
circuit that
causes the supply to shut down when a surge pulse is applied to
the AC mains in
accordance with EN61000-4-5/IEC1000-4-5.  After about 10 minutes,
the supply can
be turned back on and normal operation of the product can be resumed by the
operator.   Does this product conform to criterion B of the EN
50082-1 or EN
55024 standards?  I believe it does because the sensing circuit is
specifically
designed to protect the product against this kind of
voltage/current surge and
the product operation is fully recoverable by the operator
afterward.   However,
I would like to hear how others who do this testing would interpret this.

Jim Hulbert
Senior Engineer - EMC
Pitney Bowes



-
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc (without the
quotes).  For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com,
jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or
roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).





-
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc (without the
quotes).  For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com,
jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or
roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).



Re: Surge Test Performance Criterion

2000-01-14 Thread Ralph Cameron

It wasn't done derek because there is no requirement that is mandatory. My
humble opinion says voluntary standards don't work as well as they should..
Sometimes it requires a resistor to limit the current going to the switch as
it obviously rectifies some of the RF. In some cases a bypass capacitor is
required also.
on the hot lead to ground.


Ralph

- Original Message -
From: Derek Walton l...@rols1.net
To: Ralph Cameron ral...@igs.net
Cc: carlos.perk...@eu.effem.com; Jim Hulbert hulbe...@pb.com;
emc-p...@ieee.org
Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2000 3:12 PM
Subject: Re: Surge Test Performance Criterion


 Ralph,

 if all it takes is a resistor, I wonder why it wasn't done 99% of the
 population are stuck with a crap product The idea with CE was that
this
 shouldn't happen!

 Derek.

 Ralph Cameron wrote:

  Derek:
 
  You want to locate one of those lights next to a transmitter that is
used
  intermittently - the light sequences through LO-Medium-high then turns
off
  only to come back on again when the transmitter is keyed.
 
  The AC switching device lacks immunity to RF but it may be easily cured
with
  the addition of a single resistor.
 
  Ralph Cameron
 
  EMC Consultant and Suppression of Consumer Electronic Equipment.
  (After sale)
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Derek Walton l...@rols1.net
  To: carlos.perk...@eu.effem.com
  Cc: Jim Hulbert hulbe...@pb.com; emc-p...@ieee.org
  Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2000 8:57 AM
  Subject: Re: Surge Test Performance Criterion
 
  
   Sorry Carlos,
  
   I can't go along with this one. If I'm using my PC here in the USA
midwest
  and a
   storm comes along I don't want my PC shutting itself off every few
  minutes Only
   been hit directly with two lightning strikes this last 2 years, but
during
  a storm
   you can continuously heat squeaking as the modem is hit, I know the
power
  is seeing
   voltage surges too. I'll have to put a Dranitz on the power just to
see
  what kinds
   of voltage surges arrive The same applies to surges generated by
  motors etc. If
   every time a motor switches on and my equipment does something, well
that
  would have
   to go back to the store.
  
   By the way, I don't expect to find in the small print all sorts of get
out
  clauses
   once I buy something
  
   A controlled shut down is there to prevent loss of life, destruction
of
  the device,
   or something as equally bad.
  
   By the way, I was back home ( Manchester, England ) last October and
  bought my Mum a
   light that turns on when you touch any metal part of it, it was CE
marked.
  I have a
   similar light here in the USA, mine's not CE marked. BOTH turn on/off
when
  there are
   voltage transients on the power line. Now you can wrangle all you
want,
  but being
   woken up in the middle of the night because the light turned on when
the
  dishwasher
   began it's Saver Seven ( low cost overnight electricity ) cycle, is
not
  acceptable
   performance! If then manufacturer calls this acceptable performance,
then
  perhaps I
   should call him/her in the middle of the night each time to confirm
that
   opinion...;-)
  
   What products do you make again;-)))
  
   Derek.
  
  
   During surge
  
   carlos.perk...@eu.effem.com wrote:
  
Jim,
   
I agree with you, on the basis that in this case, a complete
shut-down
  is a
designed-in function of the product, and the standard says No
  degradation of
performance or loss of function is allowed below a performance level
  specified
by the manfucturer.  You, as the manufacturer, are specifying this
  'loss of
function'.
   
In my mind, all you have to do is make the end user aware that a
  shut-down will
occur when a surge is detected, and you should be OK.
   
Cheers,
   
Carlos.
   
Please respond to Jim Hulbert hulbe...@pb.com
   
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
cc:  (bcc: Carlos A. Perkins/WIN/Effem)
From:   Jim Hulbert hulbe...@pb.com on 12/01/2000 20:08
   
Subject:  Surge Test Performance Criterion
   
A product has a switched mode power supply with a current sensing
  circuit that
causes the supply to shut down when a surge pulse is applied to the
AC
  mains in
accordance with EN61000-4-5/IEC1000-4-5.  After about 10 minutes,
the
  supply can
be turned back on and normal operation of the product can be resumed
by
  the
operator.   Does this product conform to criterion B of the EN
50082-1
  or EN
55024 standards?  I believe it does because the sensing circuit is
  specifically
designed to protect the product against this kind of voltage/current
  surge and
the product operation is fully recoverable by the operator
afterward.
  However,
I would like to hear how others who do this testing would interpret
  this.
   
Jim Hulbert
Senior Engineer - EMC
Pitney Bowes
   
-
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your

Re: Surge Test Performance Criterion

2000-01-13 Thread Derek Walton

Sorry Carlos,

I can't go along with this one. If I'm using my PC here in the USA midwest and a
storm comes along I don't want my PC shutting itself off every few minutes 
Only
been hit directly with two lightning strikes this last 2 years, but during a 
storm
you can continuously heat squeaking as the modem is hit, I know the power is 
seeing
voltage surges too. I'll have to put a Dranitz on the power just to see what 
kinds
of voltage surges arrive The same applies to surges generated by motors 
etc. If
every time a motor switches on and my equipment does something, well that would 
have
to go back to the store.

By the way, I don't expect to find in the small print all sorts of get out 
clauses
once I buy something

A controlled shut down is there to prevent loss of life, destruction of the 
device,
or something as equally bad.

By the way, I was back home ( Manchester, England ) last October and bought my 
Mum a
light that turns on when you touch any metal part of it, it was CE marked. I 
have a
similar light here in the USA, mine's not CE marked. BOTH turn on/off when 
there are
voltage transients on the power line. Now you can wrangle all you want, but 
being
woken up in the middle of the night because the light turned on when the 
dishwasher
began it's Saver Seven ( low cost overnight electricity ) cycle, is not 
acceptable
performance! If then manufacturer calls this acceptable performance, then 
perhaps I
should call him/her in the middle of the night each time to confirm that
opinion...;-)

What products do you make again;-)))

Derek.


During surge

carlos.perk...@eu.effem.com wrote:

 Jim,

 I agree with you, on the basis that in this case, a complete shut-down is a
 designed-in function of the product, and the standard says No degradation of
 performance or loss of function is allowed below a performance level specified
 by the manfucturer.  You, as the manufacturer, are specifying this 'loss of
 function'.

 In my mind, all you have to do is make the end user aware that a shut-down 
 will
 occur when a surge is detected, and you should be OK.

 Cheers,

 Carlos.

 Please respond to Jim Hulbert hulbe...@pb.com

 To: emc-p...@ieee.org
 cc:  (bcc: Carlos A. Perkins/WIN/Effem)
 From:   Jim Hulbert hulbe...@pb.com on 12/01/2000 20:08

 Subject:  Surge Test Performance Criterion

 A product has a switched mode power supply with a current sensing circuit that
 causes the supply to shut down when a surge pulse is applied to the AC mains 
 in
 accordance with EN61000-4-5/IEC1000-4-5.  After about 10 minutes, the supply 
 can
 be turned back on and normal operation of the product can be resumed by the
 operator.   Does this product conform to criterion B of the EN 50082-1 or EN
 55024 standards?  I believe it does because the sensing circuit is 
 specifically
 designed to protect the product against this kind of voltage/current surge and
 the product operation is fully recoverable by the operator afterward.   
 However,
 I would like to hear how others who do this testing would interpret this.

 Jim Hulbert
 Senior Engineer - EMC
 Pitney Bowes

 -
 This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
 To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
 with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc (without the
 quotes).  For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com,
 jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or
 roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).

 -
 This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
 To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
 with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc (without the
 quotes).  For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com,
 jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or
 roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).


-
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc (without the
quotes).  For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com,
jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or
roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).



Re: Surge Test Performance Criterion

2000-01-13 Thread reheller



I agree with Carlos.

The standard says, This clause gives you a guide for evaluation of the
test results.
It also says, The variety and diversity of equipment and systems to be
tested makes the task of establishing the effects of surges on equipment
and systems difficult.
It also says, The test results shall be classified on the basis of the
operating conditions and the functional specifications of the equipment
under test...

The standards committees are smart enough to know that they cannot possibly
write descriptions of test evaluations that would cover every conceivable
piece of equipment ever designed in the past or ever to be designed in the
future, so they provided guidelines for evaluation. If product
specifications provide different operating conditions and functional
specifications than are provided in the guidelines then testing is
evaluated to the product specifications.








carlos.perk...@eu.effem.com on 01/13/2000 01:15:25 AM

Please respond to carlos.perk...@eu.effem.com


To:   Jim Hulbert hulbe...@pb.com
cc:   emc-p...@ieee.org (bcc: Robert E. Heller/US-Corporate/3M/US)
Subject:  Re: Surge Test Performance Criterion





Jim,

I agree with you, on the basis that in this case, a complete shut-down is a
designed-in function of the product, and the standard says No degradation
of
performance or loss of function is allowed below a performance level
specified
by the manfucturer.  You, as the manufacturer, are specifying this 'loss
of
function'.

In my mind, all you have to do is make the end user aware that a shut-down
will
occur when a surge is detected, and you should be OK.

Cheers,

Carlos.





Please respond to Jim Hulbert hulbe...@pb.com


To: emc-p...@ieee.org
cc:  (bcc: Carlos A. Perkins/WIN/Effem)
From:   Jim Hulbert hulbe...@pb.com on 12/01/2000 20:08

Subject:  Surge Test Performance Criterion








A product has a switched mode power supply with a current sensing circuit
that
causes the supply to shut down when a surge pulse is applied to the AC
mains in
accordance with EN61000-4-5/IEC1000-4-5.  After about 10 minutes, the
supply can
be turned back on and normal operation of the product can be resumed by the
operator.   Does this product conform to criterion B of the EN 50082-1 or
EN
55024 standards?  I believe it does because the sensing circuit is
specifically
designed to protect the product against this kind of voltage/current surge
and
the product operation is fully recoverable by the operator afterward.
However,
I would like to hear how others who do this testing would interpret this.

Jim Hulbert
Senior Engineer - EMC
Pitney Bowes



-
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc (without the
quotes).  For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com,
jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or
roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).






-
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc (without the
quotes).  For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com,
jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or
roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).









-
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc (without the
quotes).  For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com,
jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or
roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).



Re: Surge Test Performance Criterion

2000-01-13 Thread bfagley

Jim:

To me, the usual interpretation of performance criteria B is that the product
has some deviation of performance during the test but the basic functionality of
the product remains.  The product must resume normal operation after the test,
without operator intervention.  Complete shutdown of the product is not
acceptable, this is criteria C.



Bruce Fagley
TUV Rheinland
EMC Dept.



-
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc (without the
quotes).  For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com,
jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or
roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).



RE: Surge Test Performance Criterion

2000-01-13 Thread Robert Tims (EMX)

Hello All,

My take on establishing whether a temporary shut down (loss of function) is
acceptable is by knowing your customers' or potential customers'
requirements, expectations, or at least tolerances. The trick is getting
this information. It can be asked directly to customers, covered in
requirement specifications from product groups who researched those issues,
or may be inferred from specific product standards that are similar to or
directly apply to your type of product. Many product standards have immunity
requirements that give specific minimum performance criterion. Applying
those criterion from similar product standards to your product can
indirectly cover expectations of your customer.
As for criterion B, I would say no, shut down for ten minutes and then
recoverable is criterion C.
Hope this helps.

Regards,

Robert Tims
Compliance Engineer
Ericsson Messaging Systems Inc.

 -Original Message-
 From: rehel...@mmm.com [SMTP:rehel...@mmm.com]
 Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2000 7:54 AM
 To:   emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
 Subject:  Re: Surge Test Performance Criterion
 
 
 
 
 I agree with Carlos.
 
 The standard says, This clause gives you a guide for evaluation of the
 test results.
 It also says, The variety and diversity of equipment and systems to be
 tested makes the task of establishing the effects of surges on equipment
 and systems difficult.
 It also says, The test results shall be classified on the basis of the
 operating conditions and the functional specifications of the equipment
 under test...
 
 The standards committees are smart enough to know that they cannot
 possibly
 write descriptions of test evaluations that would cover every conceivable
 piece of equipment ever designed in the past or ever to be designed in the
 future, so they provided guidelines for evaluation. If product
 specifications provide different operating conditions and functional
 specifications than are provided in the guidelines then testing is
 evaluated to the product specifications.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 carlos.perk...@eu.effem.com on 01/13/2000 01:15:25 AM
 
 Please respond to carlos.perk...@eu.effem.com
 
 
 To:   Jim Hulbert hulbe...@pb.com
 cc:   emc-p...@ieee.org (bcc: Robert E. Heller/US-Corporate/3M/US)
 Subject:  Re: Surge Test Performance Criterion
 
 
 
 
 
 Jim,
 
 I agree with you, on the basis that in this case, a complete shut-down is
 a
 designed-in function of the product, and the standard says No degradation
 of
 performance or loss of function is allowed below a performance level
 specified
 by the manfucturer.  You, as the manufacturer, are specifying this 'loss
 of
 function'.
 
 In my mind, all you have to do is make the end user aware that a shut-down
 will
 occur when a surge is detected, and you should be OK.
 
 Cheers,
 
 Carlos.
 
 
 
 
 
 Please respond to Jim Hulbert hulbe...@pb.com
 
 
 To: emc-p...@ieee.org
 cc:  (bcc: Carlos A. Perkins/WIN/Effem)
 From:   Jim Hulbert hulbe...@pb.com on 12/01/2000 20:08
 
 Subject:  Surge Test Performance Criterion
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 A product has a switched mode power supply with a current sensing circuit
 that
 causes the supply to shut down when a surge pulse is applied to the AC
 mains in
 accordance with EN61000-4-5/IEC1000-4-5.  After about 10 minutes, the
 supply can
 be turned back on and normal operation of the product can be resumed by
 the
 operator.   Does this product conform to criterion B of the EN 50082-1 or
 EN
 55024 standards?  I believe it does because the sensing circuit is
 specifically
 designed to protect the product against this kind of voltage/current surge
 and
 the product operation is fully recoverable by the operator afterward.
 However,
 I would like to hear how others who do this testing would interpret this.
 
 Jim Hulbert
 Senior Engineer - EMC
 Pitney Bowes
 
 
 
 -
 This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
 To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
 with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc (without the
 quotes).  For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com,
 jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or
 roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).
 
 
 
 
 
 
 -
 This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
 To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
 with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc (without the
 quotes).  For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com,
 jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or
 roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 -
 This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
 To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
 with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc (without the
 quotes).  For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com,
 jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or
 roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators

Re: Surge Test Performance Criterion

2000-01-13 Thread carlos . perkins

Jim,

I agree with you, on the basis that in this case, a complete shut-down is a
designed-in function of the product, and the standard says No degradation of
performance or loss of function is allowed below a performance level specified
by the manfucturer.  You, as the manufacturer, are specifying this 'loss of
function'.

In my mind, all you have to do is make the end user aware that a shut-down will
occur when a surge is detected, and you should be OK.

Cheers,

Carlos.





Please respond to Jim Hulbert hulbe...@pb.com


To: emc-p...@ieee.org
cc:  (bcc: Carlos A. Perkins/WIN/Effem)
From:   Jim Hulbert hulbe...@pb.com on 12/01/2000 20:08

Subject:  Surge Test Performance Criterion








A product has a switched mode power supply with a current sensing circuit that
causes the supply to shut down when a surge pulse is applied to the AC mains in
accordance with EN61000-4-5/IEC1000-4-5.  After about 10 minutes, the supply can
be turned back on and normal operation of the product can be resumed by the
operator.   Does this product conform to criterion B of the EN 50082-1 or EN
55024 standards?  I believe it does because the sensing circuit is specifically
designed to protect the product against this kind of voltage/current surge and
the product operation is fully recoverable by the operator afterward.   However,
I would like to hear how others who do this testing would interpret this.

Jim Hulbert
Senior Engineer - EMC
Pitney Bowes



-
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc (without the
quotes).  For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com,
jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or
roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).






-
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc (without the
quotes).  For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com,
jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or
roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).



Re: Surge Test Performance Criterion

2000-01-13 Thread Derek Walton

Ralph,

if all it takes is a resistor, I wonder why it wasn't done 99% of the
population are stuck with a crap product The idea with CE was that this
shouldn't happen!

Derek.

Ralph Cameron wrote:

 Derek:

 You want to locate one of those lights next to a transmitter that is used
 intermittently - the light sequences through LO-Medium-high then turns off
 only to come back on again when the transmitter is keyed.

 The AC switching device lacks immunity to RF but it may be easily cured with
 the addition of a single resistor.

 Ralph Cameron

 EMC Consultant and Suppression of Consumer Electronic Equipment.
 (After sale)

 - Original Message -
 From: Derek Walton l...@rols1.net
 To: carlos.perk...@eu.effem.com
 Cc: Jim Hulbert hulbe...@pb.com; emc-p...@ieee.org
 Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2000 8:57 AM
 Subject: Re: Surge Test Performance Criterion

 
  Sorry Carlos,
 
  I can't go along with this one. If I'm using my PC here in the USA midwest
 and a
  storm comes along I don't want my PC shutting itself off every few
 minutes Only
  been hit directly with two lightning strikes this last 2 years, but during
 a storm
  you can continuously heat squeaking as the modem is hit, I know the power
 is seeing
  voltage surges too. I'll have to put a Dranitz on the power just to see
 what kinds
  of voltage surges arrive The same applies to surges generated by
 motors etc. If
  every time a motor switches on and my equipment does something, well that
 would have
  to go back to the store.
 
  By the way, I don't expect to find in the small print all sorts of get out
 clauses
  once I buy something
 
  A controlled shut down is there to prevent loss of life, destruction of
 the device,
  or something as equally bad.
 
  By the way, I was back home ( Manchester, England ) last October and
 bought my Mum a
  light that turns on when you touch any metal part of it, it was CE marked.
 I have a
  similar light here in the USA, mine's not CE marked. BOTH turn on/off when
 there are
  voltage transients on the power line. Now you can wrangle all you want,
 but being
  woken up in the middle of the night because the light turned on when the
 dishwasher
  began it's Saver Seven ( low cost overnight electricity ) cycle, is not
 acceptable
  performance! If then manufacturer calls this acceptable performance, then
 perhaps I
  should call him/her in the middle of the night each time to confirm that
  opinion...;-)
 
  What products do you make again;-)))
 
  Derek.
 
 
  During surge
 
  carlos.perk...@eu.effem.com wrote:
 
   Jim,
  
   I agree with you, on the basis that in this case, a complete shut-down
 is a
   designed-in function of the product, and the standard says No
 degradation of
   performance or loss of function is allowed below a performance level
 specified
   by the manfucturer.  You, as the manufacturer, are specifying this
 'loss of
   function'.
  
   In my mind, all you have to do is make the end user aware that a
 shut-down will
   occur when a surge is detected, and you should be OK.
  
   Cheers,
  
   Carlos.
  
   Please respond to Jim Hulbert hulbe...@pb.com
  
   To: emc-p...@ieee.org
   cc:  (bcc: Carlos A. Perkins/WIN/Effem)
   From:   Jim Hulbert hulbe...@pb.com on 12/01/2000 20:08
  
   Subject:  Surge Test Performance Criterion
  
   A product has a switched mode power supply with a current sensing
 circuit that
   causes the supply to shut down when a surge pulse is applied to the AC
 mains in
   accordance with EN61000-4-5/IEC1000-4-5.  After about 10 minutes, the
 supply can
   be turned back on and normal operation of the product can be resumed by
 the
   operator.   Does this product conform to criterion B of the EN 50082-1
 or EN
   55024 standards?  I believe it does because the sensing circuit is
 specifically
   designed to protect the product against this kind of voltage/current
 surge and
   the product operation is fully recoverable by the operator afterward.
 However,
   I would like to hear how others who do this testing would interpret
 this.
  
   Jim Hulbert
   Senior Engineer - EMC
   Pitney Bowes
  
   -
   This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
   To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
   with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc (without the
   quotes).  For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com,
   jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or
   roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).
  
   -
   This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
   To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
   with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc (without the
   quotes).  For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com,
   jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or
   roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).
 
 
  -
  This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
  To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord

Re: Surge Test Performance Criterion

2000-01-13 Thread Ralph Cameron

Derek:

You want to locate one of those lights next to a transmitter that is used
intermittently - the light sequences through LO-Medium-high then turns off
only to come back on again when the transmitter is keyed.

The AC switching device lacks immunity to RF but it may be easily cured with
the addition of a single resistor.

Ralph Cameron

EMC Consultant and Suppression of Consumer Electronic Equipment.
(After sale)

- Original Message -
From: Derek Walton l...@rols1.net
To: carlos.perk...@eu.effem.com
Cc: Jim Hulbert hulbe...@pb.com; emc-p...@ieee.org
Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2000 8:57 AM
Subject: Re: Surge Test Performance Criterion



 Sorry Carlos,

 I can't go along with this one. If I'm using my PC here in the USA midwest
and a
 storm comes along I don't want my PC shutting itself off every few
minutes Only
 been hit directly with two lightning strikes this last 2 years, but during
a storm
 you can continuously heat squeaking as the modem is hit, I know the power
is seeing
 voltage surges too. I'll have to put a Dranitz on the power just to see
what kinds
 of voltage surges arrive The same applies to surges generated by
motors etc. If
 every time a motor switches on and my equipment does something, well that
would have
 to go back to the store.

 By the way, I don't expect to find in the small print all sorts of get out
clauses
 once I buy something

 A controlled shut down is there to prevent loss of life, destruction of
the device,
 or something as equally bad.

 By the way, I was back home ( Manchester, England ) last October and
bought my Mum a
 light that turns on when you touch any metal part of it, it was CE marked.
I have a
 similar light here in the USA, mine's not CE marked. BOTH turn on/off when
there are
 voltage transients on the power line. Now you can wrangle all you want,
but being
 woken up in the middle of the night because the light turned on when the
dishwasher
 began it's Saver Seven ( low cost overnight electricity ) cycle, is not
acceptable
 performance! If then manufacturer calls this acceptable performance, then
perhaps I
 should call him/her in the middle of the night each time to confirm that
 opinion...;-)

 What products do you make again;-)))

 Derek.


 During surge

 carlos.perk...@eu.effem.com wrote:

  Jim,
 
  I agree with you, on the basis that in this case, a complete shut-down
is a
  designed-in function of the product, and the standard says No
degradation of
  performance or loss of function is allowed below a performance level
specified
  by the manfucturer.  You, as the manufacturer, are specifying this
'loss of
  function'.
 
  In my mind, all you have to do is make the end user aware that a
shut-down will
  occur when a surge is detected, and you should be OK.
 
  Cheers,
 
  Carlos.
 
  Please respond to Jim Hulbert hulbe...@pb.com
 
  To: emc-p...@ieee.org
  cc:  (bcc: Carlos A. Perkins/WIN/Effem)
  From:   Jim Hulbert hulbe...@pb.com on 12/01/2000 20:08
 
  Subject:  Surge Test Performance Criterion
 
  A product has a switched mode power supply with a current sensing
circuit that
  causes the supply to shut down when a surge pulse is applied to the AC
mains in
  accordance with EN61000-4-5/IEC1000-4-5.  After about 10 minutes, the
supply can
  be turned back on and normal operation of the product can be resumed by
the
  operator.   Does this product conform to criterion B of the EN 50082-1
or EN
  55024 standards?  I believe it does because the sensing circuit is
specifically
  designed to protect the product against this kind of voltage/current
surge and
  the product operation is fully recoverable by the operator afterward.
However,
  I would like to hear how others who do this testing would interpret
this.
 
  Jim Hulbert
  Senior Engineer - EMC
  Pitney Bowes
 
  -
  This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
  To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
  with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc (without the
  quotes).  For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com,
  jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or
  roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).
 
  -
  This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
  To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
  with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc (without the
  quotes).  For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com,
  jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or
  roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).


 -
 This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
 To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
 with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc (without the
 quotes).  For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com,
 jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or
 roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).





-
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord

Re: Surge Test Performance Criterion

2000-01-13 Thread Derek Walton

Jim,

all the power supplies I design are capible of riding through the EN1000-4-5 
surge.
I would class this as Cat A. Cat B would be if the power supply momentarally (
literally this could imply once the surge has gone ) dropped out, and came back
right away on its own. I would expect to see none of the input surge passed 
through
for either Cat A or Cat B. What you describe is Cat C, where something has to be
done to get the EUT working again.

Derek Walton

Jim Hulbert wrote:

 A product has a switched mode power supply with a current sensing circuit that
 causes the supply to shut down when a surge pulse is applied to the AC mains 
 in
 accordance with EN61000-4-5/IEC1000-4-5.  After about 10 minutes, the supply 
 can
 be turned back on and normal operation of the product can be resumed by the
 operator.   Does this product conform to criterion B of the EN 50082-1 or EN
 55024 standards?  I believe it does because the sensing circuit is 
 specifically
 designed to protect the product against this kind of voltage/current surge and
 the product operation is fully recoverable by the operator afterward.   
 However,
 I would like to hear how others who do this testing would interpret this.

 Jim Hulbert
 Senior Engineer - EMC
 Pitney Bowes

 -
 This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
 To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
 with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc (without the
 quotes).  For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com,
 jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or
 roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).


-
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc (without the
quotes).  For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com,
jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or
roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).



RE: Surge Test Performance Criterion

2000-01-12 Thread efo

Hi Jim, 
A guideline I use for Criteria B is that the E.U.T may exhibit degradation
due to the field disturbance, but must self-recover after the field
disturbance is removed. What I have seen is that in certain power supplies
the secondary output voltage drops due to the surge, causing telco systems
to re-set. If you have to manually turn the system back on your dealing with
Criteria C. Hope this helps!
  
Eddie O'Toole
-Original Message-
From: Jim Hulbert [mailto:hulbe...@pb.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2000 3:08 PM
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: Surge Test Performance Criterion





A product has a switched mode power supply with a current sensing circuit
that
causes the supply to shut down when a surge pulse is applied to the AC mains
in
accordance with EN61000-4-5/IEC1000-4-5.  After about 10 minutes, the supply
can
be turned back on and normal operation of the product can be resumed by the
operator.   Does this product conform to criterion B of the EN 50082-1 or EN
55024 standards?  I believe it does because the sensing circuit is
specifically
designed to protect the product against this kind of voltage/current surge
and
the product operation is fully recoverable by the operator afterward.
However,
I would like to hear how others who do this testing would interpret this.

Jim Hulbert
Senior Engineer - EMC
Pitney Bowes



-
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc (without the
quotes).  For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com,
jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or
roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).


-
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc (without the
quotes).  For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com,
jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or
roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).



RE: Surge Test Performance Criterion

2000-01-12 Thread Mark Schmidt

Jim,

I forget where I procured this definition for Criteria B but if you abide by
this definition, it would indicate to me that Due Diligence was exercised
when testing your apparatus. 10 minutes however seems to be a bit long,
where does this constraint come from? 

the apparatus shall continue to operate as intended after the test. No
degradation of performance or loss of function is allowed 
below a performance level specified by the manufacturer, when the apparatus
is used as intended. In some cases the performance level may be replaced by
a permissible loss of performance. If the minimum performance level or the
permissible performance loss is not specified by the manufacturer than
either of these may be derived from the product description and
documentation and what the user may reasonably expect from the apparatus if
used as intended.

Regards,

Mark

-Original Message-
From: Jim Hulbert [mailto:hulbe...@pb.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2000 3:08 PM
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: Surge Test Performance Criterion





A product has a switched mode power supply with a current sensing circuit
that
causes the supply to shut down when a surge pulse is applied to the AC mains
in
accordance with EN61000-4-5/IEC1000-4-5.  After about 10 minutes, the supply
can
be turned back on and normal operation of the product can be resumed by the
operator.   Does this product conform to criterion B of the EN 50082-1 or EN
55024 standards?  I believe it does because the sensing circuit is
specifically
designed to protect the product against this kind of voltage/current surge
and
the product operation is fully recoverable by the operator afterward.
However,
I would like to hear how others who do this testing would interpret this.

Jim Hulbert
Senior Engineer - EMC
Pitney Bowes



-
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc (without the
quotes).  For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com,
jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or
roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).


-
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc (without the
quotes).  For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com,
jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or
roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).



RE: Surge Test Performance Criterion

2000-01-12 Thread Lacey,Scott

Jim,

The situation you describe would be criterion C, because there is a
temporary loss of function and it is recoverable.

Scott Lacey

 -Original Message-
 From: Jim Hulbert [SMTP:hulbe...@pb.com]
 Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2000 3:08 PM
 To:   emc-p...@ieee.org
 Subject:  Surge Test Performance Criterion
 
 
 
 
 A product has a switched mode power supply with a current sensing circuit
 that
 causes the supply to shut down when a surge pulse is applied to the AC
 mains in
 accordance with EN61000-4-5/IEC1000-4-5.  After about 10 minutes, the
 supply can
 be turned back on and normal operation of the product can be resumed by
 the
 operator.   Does this product conform to criterion B of the EN 50082-1 or
 EN
 55024 standards?  I believe it does because the sensing circuit is
 specifically
 designed to protect the product against this kind of voltage/current surge
 and
 the product operation is fully recoverable by the operator afterward.
 However,
 I would like to hear how others who do this testing would interpret this.
 
 Jim Hulbert
 Senior Engineer - EMC
 Pitney Bowes
 
 
 
 -
 This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
 To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
 with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc (without the
 quotes).  For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com,
 jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or
 roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).
 

-
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc (without the
quotes).  For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com,
jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or
roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).



Surge Test Performance Criterion

2000-01-12 Thread Jim Hulbert



A product has a switched mode power supply with a current sensing circuit that
causes the supply to shut down when a surge pulse is applied to the AC mains in
accordance with EN61000-4-5/IEC1000-4-5.  After about 10 minutes, the supply can
be turned back on and normal operation of the product can be resumed by the
operator.   Does this product conform to criterion B of the EN 50082-1 or EN
55024 standards?  I believe it does because the sensing circuit is specifically
designed to protect the product against this kind of voltage/current surge and
the product operation is fully recoverable by the operator afterward.   However,
I would like to hear how others who do this testing would interpret this.

Jim Hulbert
Senior Engineer - EMC
Pitney Bowes



-
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc (without the
quotes).  For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com,
jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or
roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).