Re: [Emc-users] Mesa 5i20 vs 22 vs 23 ?

2009-11-18 Thread Frank Tkalcevic
> I have a lathe I converted to cnc and I am curious, what is 
> the probe being used for? Are there any pictures anywhere?

Actually, I meant probe input.  I have a touch off plate (actually a z
height setter that I also use on my mill) that I use to set the lathe tool
Z.  I zero Z to tool T01, and then set the tool table offsets for the rest
of the tools using the touch off (documented in the wiki somewhere).  I use
a modified tool Z height setter (similar to enco part 636-7044, but mine has
a magnetic base).  I removed the battery and ran a wire through.  The
magnetic base allows it to be mounted to the headstock or chuck.


--
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Mesa 5i20 vs 22 vs 23 ?

2009-11-18 Thread Gary Corlew
I have a lathe I converted to cnc and I am curious, what is the probe being
used for? Are there any pictures anywhere?

-Original Message-
From: Frank Tkalcevic [mailto:fr...@franksworkshop.com.au] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2009 4:24 PM
To: 'Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)'
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Mesa 5i20 vs 22 vs 23 ?

> - How stable is the hm2 fpga-code + driver right now? anyone 
> using it routinely for 'production' ?

I can't comment on 'production' stability as I am only a hobbiest, but my
lathe conversion with a 5i20 and hm2 (my first foray into emc) went
painlessly (ie none of the problems were emc/5i20 related).  I used the
lathe last week for the whole day and I had no problems.


> For the lathe I will have servos on the Z- and X-axes, not 
> sure about DC-brush vs. brushless yet, but Jon Elsons PWM 
> amps work very well on the mill so I am leaning towards them. 
> Then the spindle will hopefully be driven by a big 1.75kW 
> brushless servo. 

I picked up second hand AC servos and drivers on ebay.  I use a 1.5kW AC
servo on the spindle (geared 3:1 so max rpm is down to 1500).  I use the
encoder and index directly on the spindle to synchronise threading.  My plan
is to use the servo on the spindle as an A axis, and add a Z (Y?) axis with
another spindle to be able to machine rotary table style - this is more of a
dream.

> The lathe project also calls for a 
> revolver-type toolchanger which needs one I/O bit for a 
> pneumatic cylinder, and one servo/stepper axis to rotate the revolver.
> In addition I will need the usual jog-pendant I/O: MPG 
> (thinking about two, separate for X and Z), a few 
> selection-switches, and some buttons. Live tooling is a dream 
> for the future :) Looking at the schematic for the mill[1], I 
> think the lathe setup will be pretty similar and I should be 
> OK with 72 I/O pins.

I've only used 2 I/O pins so far - home X and touch probe.  I have a USB
pendant.  I can't see myself ever using all the I/Os.



--
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus
on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


--
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Mesa 5i20 vs 22 vs 23 ?

2009-11-18 Thread Jon Elson
dave wrote:
> Hmmm! Resolver for position or AC servo control or both?
>   
Note that I have a resolver to quadrature converter board, for those
cases where you can't, or don't want to, replace the resolvers on a
machine, or insude a motor.

It seems they only work with traditional variable-transformer resolvers,
not the variable-reluctance type that need more drive current.

See my web page at
http://pico-systems.com/oscrc4/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=4&products_id=20

Jon

--
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Mesa 5i20 vs 22 vs 23 ?

2009-11-18 Thread Frank Tkalcevic
> - How stable is the hm2 fpga-code + driver right now? anyone 
> using it routinely for 'production' ?

I can't comment on 'production' stability as I am only a hobbiest, but my
lathe conversion with a 5i20 and hm2 (my first foray into emc) went
painlessly (ie none of the problems were emc/5i20 related).  I used the
lathe last week for the whole day and I had no problems.


> For the lathe I will have servos on the Z- and X-axes, not 
> sure about DC-brush vs. brushless yet, but Jon Elsons PWM 
> amps work very well on the mill so I am leaning towards them. 
> Then the spindle will hopefully be driven by a big 1.75kW 
> brushless servo. 

I picked up second hand AC servos and drivers on ebay.  I use a 1.5kW AC
servo on the spindle (geared 3:1 so max rpm is down to 1500).  I use the
encoder and index directly on the spindle to synchronise threading.  My plan
is to use the servo on the spindle as an A axis, and add a Z (Y?) axis with
another spindle to be able to machine rotary table style - this is more of a
dream.

> The lathe project also calls for a 
> revolver-type toolchanger which needs one I/O bit for a 
> pneumatic cylinder, and one servo/stepper axis to rotate the revolver.
> In addition I will need the usual jog-pendant I/O: MPG 
> (thinking about two, separate for X and Z), a few 
> selection-switches, and some buttons. Live tooling is a dream 
> for the future :) Looking at the schematic for the mill[1], I 
> think the lathe setup will be pretty similar and I should be 
> OK with 72 I/O pins.

I've only used 2 I/O pins so far - home X and touch probe.  I have a USB
pendant.  I can't see myself ever using all the I/Os.


--
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Mesa 5i20 vs 22 vs 23 ?

2009-11-18 Thread dave
Hmmm! Resolver for position or AC servo control or both?

Dave


On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 11:39 -0800, Peter C. Wallace wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Nov 2009, Anders Wallin wrote:
> 
> > Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 19:48:17 +0200
> > From: Anders Wallin 
> > Reply-To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)"
> > 
> > To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)" 
> > Subject: [Emc-users] Mesa 5i20 vs 22 vs 23 ?
> > 
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have a mill which runs a mesa 5i20 card and I am now starting a
> > lathe build/retrofit (more on that later!). Compared to a few years
> > ago there are now three or four variants of these cards available:
> > 5i20, 5i22-1, 5i22-1.5 and 5i23.
> > Also, I know there has been some good work on the modular hm2
> > fpga-code and emc2-driver for these cards.
> >
> > - How stable is the hm2 fpga-code + driver right now? anyone using it
> > routinely for 'production' ?
> 
> There seem to be at least several people using it in production. There are 
> undoubtedly some remaining firmware and driver bugs, but the basics look to 
> be 
> pretty solid. (Thanks Sebastian!)
> 
> > - Any benefits of the 5i23 (400kgate fpga) over the 5i20 (200k fpga) ?
> > - The 5i22 cards are more expensive, have a bit more I/O, but isn't
> > the large fpga overkill for a setup where emc2 runs the pid-loops on
> > the cpu anyway?
> 
> The main advantage of the 5I22 and 5I23 is future growth potential. Here are 
> some advantages of the 5I22 and 5I23:
> 
> 1. The PCI bridge chips used on the 5I23 and 5I22 support DMA. The HostMot2 
> driver was designed at the outset to eventually support DMA to lower the
> overhead of card access.
> 
> 2. The larger FPGAs will support fancier configurations, for example
> the resolver configuration I'm working on will not fit in the 5I20s Spartan2
> chip (Mainly because theres no hardware multiplier in Spartan2)
> 
> 3. Higher speed, the Spartan3 chips used on the 5I22 and 5I23 are about 50% 
> faster than Spartan2 used on the 5I20. This is especially noticeble when 
> processors are embedded in the FPGA.
> 
> On the other hand, the 5I20 is probably overkill for controlling a lathe, if 
> 72 pins are sufficient. (GPIO will eventually be expandable via SPI anyway) 
> the HostMot2 firmware supports up to 12 axis of servo interface on the 5I20, 
> so a 3/4 axis lathe is not taxing its capabilities.
> 
> 
> 
> >
> > For the lathe I will have servos on the Z- and X-axes, not sure about
> > DC-brush vs. brushless yet, but Jon Elsons PWM amps work very well on
> > the mill so I am leaning towards them. Then the spindle will hopefully
> > be driven by a big 1.75kW brushless servo. The lathe project also
> > calls for a revolver-type toolchanger which needs one I/O bit for a
> > pneumatic cylinder, and one servo/stepper axis to rotate the revolver.
> > In addition I will need the usual jog-pendant I/O: MPG (thinking about
> > two, separate for X and Z), a few selection-switches, and some
> > buttons. Live tooling is a dream for the future :)
> > Looking at the schematic for the mill[1], I think the lathe setup will
> > be pretty similar and I should be OK with 72 I/O pins.
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > Anders W
> >
> > [1] 
> > http://www.anderswallin.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/dc_servo_schematic_2008jan19.pdf
> >
> > --
> > Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
> > trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus 
> > on
> > what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
> > Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
> > ___
> > Emc-users mailing list
> > Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
> >
> 
> Peter Wallace
> Mesa Electronics
> 
> (\__/)
> (='.'=) This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your
> (")_(") signature to help him gain world domination.
> 
> 
> --
> Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
> trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
> what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
> Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
> ___
> Emc-users mailing list
> Emc-users@lists.source

Re: [Emc-users] Mesa 5i20 vs 22 vs 23 ?

2009-11-18 Thread Peter C. Wallace
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009, Anders Wallin wrote:

> Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 19:48:17 +0200
> From: Anders Wallin 
> Reply-To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)"
> 
> To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)" 
> Subject: [Emc-users] Mesa 5i20 vs 22 vs 23 ?
> 
> Hi all,
>
> I have a mill which runs a mesa 5i20 card and I am now starting a
> lathe build/retrofit (more on that later!). Compared to a few years
> ago there are now three or four variants of these cards available:
> 5i20, 5i22-1, 5i22-1.5 and 5i23.
> Also, I know there has been some good work on the modular hm2
> fpga-code and emc2-driver for these cards.
>
> - How stable is the hm2 fpga-code + driver right now? anyone using it
> routinely for 'production' ?

There seem to be at least several people using it in production. There are 
undoubtedly some remaining firmware and driver bugs, but the basics look to be 
pretty solid. (Thanks Sebastian!)

> - Any benefits of the 5i23 (400kgate fpga) over the 5i20 (200k fpga) ?
> - The 5i22 cards are more expensive, have a bit more I/O, but isn't
> the large fpga overkill for a setup where emc2 runs the pid-loops on
> the cpu anyway?

The main advantage of the 5I22 and 5I23 is future growth potential. Here are 
some advantages of the 5I22 and 5I23:

1. The PCI bridge chips used on the 5I23 and 5I22 support DMA. The HostMot2 
driver was designed at the outset to eventually support DMA to lower the
overhead of card access.

2. The larger FPGAs will support fancier configurations, for example
the resolver configuration I'm working on will not fit in the 5I20s Spartan2
chip (Mainly because theres no hardware multiplier in Spartan2)

3. Higher speed, the Spartan3 chips used on the 5I22 and 5I23 are about 50% 
faster than Spartan2 used on the 5I20. This is especially noticeble when 
processors are embedded in the FPGA.

On the other hand, the 5I20 is probably overkill for controlling a lathe, if 
72 pins are sufficient. (GPIO will eventually be expandable via SPI anyway) 
the HostMot2 firmware supports up to 12 axis of servo interface on the 5I20, 
so a 3/4 axis lathe is not taxing its capabilities.



>
> For the lathe I will have servos on the Z- and X-axes, not sure about
> DC-brush vs. brushless yet, but Jon Elsons PWM amps work very well on
> the mill so I am leaning towards them. Then the spindle will hopefully
> be driven by a big 1.75kW brushless servo. The lathe project also
> calls for a revolver-type toolchanger which needs one I/O bit for a
> pneumatic cylinder, and one servo/stepper axis to rotate the revolver.
> In addition I will need the usual jog-pendant I/O: MPG (thinking about
> two, separate for X and Z), a few selection-switches, and some
> buttons. Live tooling is a dream for the future :)
> Looking at the schematic for the mill[1], I think the lathe setup will
> be pretty similar and I should be OK with 72 I/O pins.
>
> regards,
>
> Anders W
>
> [1] 
> http://www.anderswallin.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/dc_servo_schematic_2008jan19.pdf
>
> --
> Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
> trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
> what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
> Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
> ___
> Emc-users mailing list
> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>

Peter Wallace
Mesa Electronics

(\__/)
(='.'=) This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your
(")_(") signature to help him gain world domination.


--
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


[Emc-users] Mesa 5i20 vs 22 vs 23 ?

2009-11-18 Thread Anders Wallin
Hi all,

I have a mill which runs a mesa 5i20 card and I am now starting a
lathe build/retrofit (more on that later!). Compared to a few years
ago there are now three or four variants of these cards available:
5i20, 5i22-1, 5i22-1.5 and 5i23.
Also, I know there has been some good work on the modular hm2
fpga-code and emc2-driver for these cards.

- How stable is the hm2 fpga-code + driver right now? anyone using it
routinely for 'production' ?
- Any benefits of the 5i23 (400kgate fpga) over the 5i20 (200k fpga) ?
- The 5i22 cards are more expensive, have a bit more I/O, but isn't
the large fpga overkill for a setup where emc2 runs the pid-loops on
the cpu anyway?

For the lathe I will have servos on the Z- and X-axes, not sure about
DC-brush vs. brushless yet, but Jon Elsons PWM amps work very well on
the mill so I am leaning towards them. Then the spindle will hopefully
be driven by a big 1.75kW brushless servo. The lathe project also
calls for a revolver-type toolchanger which needs one I/O bit for a
pneumatic cylinder, and one servo/stepper axis to rotate the revolver.
In addition I will need the usual jog-pendant I/O: MPG (thinking about
two, separate for X and Z), a few selection-switches, and some
buttons. Live tooling is a dream for the future :)
Looking at the schematic for the mill[1], I think the lathe setup will
be pretty similar and I should be OK with 72 I/O pins.

regards,

Anders W

[1] 
http://www.anderswallin.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/dc_servo_schematic_2008jan19.pdf

--
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users