[-empyre-] David Tolchinsky: Resolution for Digital Futures

2009-01-21 Thread Renate Ferro
Regardless of the technology being used, regardless of the mode, the 
sphere, interactive or linear, often what separates what is 
effective, moving, intellectually fascinating from the one-liner, 
the distant, and the trivial is the quality of the writing.

So I resolve in 2009 and beyond to as much as possible put the 
writing first, the technology second. To start with an idea, a 
shape, an arc. To ask myself: How do I want to affect my audience? 
What is there about the work that forces the user to remain 
immersed? Why can't we walk away? What can I do in the digital 
sphere that has been done in writing-centric films like Sullivan's 
Travels, Raging Bull, Mulholland Drive, Memento, and more recently 
The Wrestler?  

Mulholland Drive (MD) in particular is a great model for me as I 
think about the digital as MD is mysterious and the subject is not 
just the story, but also the apparatus. That is it's as much about 
the filmmaking and filmmaker as it is about the story, which has 
been my experience with a lot of emergent projects. The digital box 
is as important as the contents.  But what makes MD accessible and 
profound: each scene is well-written:  simple, moving and/or scary. 
The film is built on a traditional 4-act structure (yes, 4 acts not 
3 acts in my world). It has shape and purpose -- a series of 
clues/tasks/missions for its terrified and terrifying characters and 
a series of questions for its audience -- even though on first 
glance it seems like just a dream. 

So back to resolutions for the digital:  whether an immersive 
environment, a game, an installation, etc: There should be structure 
even though the structure may not be apparent. There should be 
characters (whatever that means to you) that people can relate to, 
with problems that need to be solved. There should be questions, 
secrets and/or mysteries that force us to remain connected. The 
technology should be secondary to story or the immersive aspects of 
the projects, even as we're aware of the technology. We don't have 
to wrap everything up, but there should be some sense of a 
background purpose that drives the piece forwards and deeper.

Traditional I know and certainly only one vision and certainly not 
relevant to all projects (maybe just relevant for me as I make my 
way from narrative project to emergent project and back again), but 
I do believe if the writing is considered first, there will be many 
long happy lives in the digital realm.  I welcome the evolving 
conversation.


Bio: David E. Tolchinsky (US) is Chair of Northwestern University's 
Department of Radio-TV-Film and Director of Northwestern's MFA in 
Writing for the Screen+Stage/Creative Writing for the Media 
Program. As a screenwriter, he has been commissioned by such studios 
as Touchstone/Disney, MGM Pictures, Ivan Reitman's Montecito 
Pictures, USA Networks, Edward R. Pressman Film Corp, and 
Addis-Wechsler  Assoc. to write feature screenplays. He also 
creates sound designs for interactive computer projects and video 
installations.  He is a graduate of Yale (BA) and USC School of 
Cinema-Television (MFA). Last year, he was chosen to be a 
Northwestern University Charles Deering McCormick Professor of 
Teaching Excellence.

-- 
Renate Ferro and Tim Murray
Co-Moderators, -empyre- a soft-skinned-space
Department of Art/ Rose Goldsen Archive of New Media Art
Cornell University
___
empyre forum
empyre@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au
http://www.subtle.net/empyre


[-empyre-] Doron Golon: Resolution for Digital Futures

2009-01-21 Thread Timothy Murray
Hey Tim and Renate,

how about an artwork instead of a statement. it's a remix and 
resizing of one of Lev Manovich 'little movies' series. speaks on the 
subject.

Train Coming  (quicktime, 3MB, 52 sec)
http://www.the9th.com/07/train_coming/


bio:
Doron Golan (Israel) lives and works in and Tel Aviv. He works 
primarily with digital video and computer animation. Golan has shown 
extensively internationally. He is founder of DVblog.org, a daily 
video blog for art films on the web and computerfinearts.com, an 
online collection of Internet art.
-- 
Renate Ferro and Tim Murray
Co-Moderators, -empyre- a soft-skinned-space
Department of Art/ Rose Goldsen Archive of New Media Art
Cornell University
___
empyre forum
empyre@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au
http://www.subtle.net/empyre


Re: [-empyre-] David Tolchinsky: Resolution for Digital Futures

2009-01-21 Thread Gabriela Vargas-Cetina
I think that what makes 'MD'accessible and profound is its very purposeful
dislocation of time, which gives it that dreamlike quality.  Lynch seems to
deconstruct in each of his works the fabric of what we take for granted: in
Twin Peaks and Blue Velvet he thoroughly smashes preconceptions of
small-town innocence, along with the rigidity of the border between 'fact'
and 'fiction'.  Each film of his tampers with what we understand as 'real'.

I have always thought that his films resemble the stories and ways of seeing
the world of rural people around the world, where what happens on earth, in
our dreams and in some realm inhabited by non-earthly characters (gods,
false-face gods, tricksters, devils, supernatural guardians, miraculous and
vengeful saints, witches, and beings that can enter the human world when
they wish or when they are conjured).

It would be wonderful if digital art, or any kind of art, could approach
that craftsmanship and bring back the ineffable into our experience of the
everyday, hammering at our certainties of 'the real'; Lynch's work is
indeed, a great model for art, but also for the humanities.  Thinking of
art-i-facts as 'apparata' would mean that the boundary between 'art' and
everything else could also be shattered or, at least, permanently cracked.

Gabriela


Gabriela Vargas-Cetina

http://sites.google.com/site/representacionesculturales/vargas-cetina
http://antropuntodevista.blogspot.com
-- 



On 1/21/09 6:28 AM, Renate Ferro r...@cornell.edu wrote:

 Regardless of the technology being used, regardless of the mode, the
 sphere, interactive or linear, often what separates what is
 effective, moving, intellectually fascinating from the one-liner,
 the distant, and the trivial is the quality of the writing.
 
 So I resolve in 2009 and beyond to as much as possible put the
 writing first, the technology second. To start with an idea, a
 shape, an arc. To ask myself: How do I want to affect my audience?
 What is there about the work that forces the user to remain
 immersed? Why can't we walk away? What can I do in the digital
 sphere that has been done in writing-centric films like Sullivan's
 Travels, Raging Bull, Mulholland Drive, Memento, and more recently
 The Wrestler?  
 
 Mulholland Drive (MD) in particular is a great model for me as I
 think about the digital as MD is mysterious and the subject is not
 just the story, but also the apparatus. That is it's as much about
 the filmmaking and filmmaker as it is about the story, which has
 been my experience with a lot of emergent projects. The digital box
 is as important as the contents.  But what makes MD accessible and
 profound: each scene is well-written:  simple, moving and/or scary.
 The film is built on a traditional 4-act structure (yes, 4 acts not
 3 acts in my world). It has shape and purpose -- a series of
 clues/tasks/missions for its terrified and terrifying characters and
 a series of questions for its audience -- even though on first
 glance it seems like just a dream.
 
 So back to resolutions for the digital:  whether an immersive
 environment, a game, an installation, etc: There should be structure
 even though the structure may not be apparent. There should be
 characters (whatever that means to you) that people can relate to,
 with problems that need to be solved. There should be questions,
 secrets and/or mysteries that force us to remain connected. The
 technology should be secondary to story or the immersive aspects of
 the projects, even as we're aware of the technology. We don't have
 to wrap everything up, but there should be some sense of a
 background purpose that drives the piece forwards and deeper.
 
 Traditional I know and certainly only one vision and certainly not
 relevant to all projects (maybe just relevant for me as I make my
 way from narrative project to emergent project and back again), but
 I do believe if the writing is considered first, there will be many
 long happy lives in the digital realm.  I welcome the evolving
 conversation.
 
 
 Bio: David E. Tolchinsky (US) is Chair of Northwestern University's
 Department of Radio-TV-Film and Director of Northwestern's MFA in
 Writing for the Screen+Stage/Creative Writing for the Media
 Program. As a screenwriter, he has been commissioned by such studios
 as Touchstone/Disney, MGM Pictures, Ivan Reitman's Montecito
 Pictures, USA Networks, Edward R. Pressman Film Corp, and
 Addis-Wechsler  Assoc. to write feature screenplays. He also
 creates sound designs for interactive computer projects and video
 installations.  He is a graduate of Yale (BA) and USC School of
 Cinema-Television (MFA). Last year, he was chosen to be a
 Northwestern University Charles Deering McCormick Professor of
 Teaching Excellence.


___
empyre forum
empyre@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au
http://www.subtle.net/empyre