[-empyre-] Archives that trespass

2010-09-28 Thread Jon Ippolito
Thanks to Tim and Renate for inviting me and to everyone who's contributed to 
this discussion so far. My background in the subject comes from working with 
the Variable Media Network, first under the auspices of the Guggenheim and then 
now under Still Water in its new incarnation as the Forging the Future alliance.

I'm intrigued by the two seemingly conflicting ideals for an archive I've seen 
emerge from empyre this past week. Claudia Kozak proposed that a weak archive 
could be a good thing, while Lynn Hershman wrote that trespassing  geographies 
 is very much what this is about, on every level. 

Isn't the problem now facing preservationists of all sorts--but especially 
those distant from capitals of colonial culture--that our archives are too weak 
to trespass boundaries? Our precious magnetic tape is too fragile, our 
financial backing is too flimsy, our archivists are too exhausted by the 
monumental task in front of them. 

Yet we have come to expect more of archivists than simply filing negatives in 
solander boxes. We expect them to transcend the bounds of time and medium, 
safeguarding flammable film canisters and precarious video codecs from the 
ravages of climate and fashion, translating them when necessary into new 
formats to survive the onslaught of obsolescence. To judge from this 
discussion, we also expect them to cross boundaries of culture and prejudice, 
attracting deserved recognition to the works they painstakingly preserve, not 
just from their own backyards but from New York, Linz, Beijing, and everywhere 
art history books are written.

Don't get me wrong: I think these undertakings are more valuable than filing 
negatives in solander boxes, and I'm glad folks on this list seem to agree. But 
I think anyone running a small archive or museum needs a boost, and this is 
where some of the networking tools Still Water's Craig Dietrich and John Bell 
built for Forging the Future can help.

Because a lot of small things can network more effectively than a few big 
things. And as Cildo Meireles said, the further you are from the center the 
faster you move.

Sure, the big museums and archives in North America and Europe have databases 
that can be searched via their Web sites. So a curator who wants to search for 
television can consult the comprehensive databases of the Langlois 
Foundation, MedienKunstNetz, or the Database of Virtual Art.

What a researcher currently cannot do, however, is to search for the theme 
television across all, or even a handful, of such databases. For efficiency, 
such online databases are typically accessed via server-side scripts that take 
the form index.php?theme=television, a formula that Google et al. cannot 
spider. As a result, millions of dollars and countless hours of staff time and 
expertise are spent squirreling data away in private silos inaccessible to a 
broader public, in idiosyncratic formats that can't and don't talk to each 
other.

Enter the weak archive. What if instead of trying to jam every culturally 
distinct artifact from across the globe into a single union database, we set 
ourselves the goal of making weak ties between disparate archives that 
respected their differences? Then a researcher could take the minimum required 
information to specify an artist--Cildo Meireles, say--and find every record in 
other archives (no matter what size or location) holding another work by that 
artist.

This approach describes the Metaserver, a sort of ISBN for art devised by John 
Bell to generate unique, portable ids for people, works, and vocabulary. Any 
database with access to the Internet--even a desktop application like 
Filemaker--can hook into the Metaserver through an open API, at which point a 
registrar adding records to that database could simultaneously view or add to 
related data from every other database on the system.

As co-developer Craig Dietrich likes to say, the Metaserver isn't an archive, 
but rather an inverse archive, that archives pointers to records in other 
folk's archives. Of course, the Semantic Web has promised this for some time, 
but there are plenty of doubts about when, and whether, it will ever arrive. 
The good news is that registries like the Metaserver are lightweight and easy 
to build with practical techniques we have right now.

So far the Metaserver team has prototyped the API and is working on testbed 
implementations with external databases like the Rhizome's Artbase, Franklin 
Furnace's VocabWiki, The Pool, and the 3rd-generation Variable Media 
Questionnaire (an independent Forging the Future project). If you're interested 
in hooking up your archive to the Metaserver or just learning more, give me a 
shout on- or off-list.

In the meantime, you can learn more about Forging the Future at 
http://forging-the-future.net. There's a presentation with a section on the 
Metaserver at http://forging-the-future.net/presentation/.

Looking forward to a stimulating discussion!

jon

[-empyre-] from Jon Ippolito: Archives that trespass

2010-09-28 Thread Timothy Murray

Hi, everyone,


Please apologize for any cross-posting, but Jon sent along this post 
earlier tonight which arrived in my mailbox, but without the normal 
-empyre- header.  I thought I just cleared it through our admin. 
server (which will hold suspicous headers) but it doesn't seem to 
have materialized on my screen.  So I'm forwarding Jon's post. 
Again, Jon please accept our apologies for the many mishaps we have 
had getting you online this week.


tim


From: Jon Ippolito jon.ippol...@gmail.com
To: soft_skinned_space emp...@gamera.cofa.unsw.edu.au
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 20:10:14 -0400



Thanks to Tim and Renate for inviting me and to everyone who's 
contributed to this discussion so far. My background in the subject 
comes from working with the Variable Media Network, first under the 
auspices of the Guggenheim and then now under Still Water in its new 
incarnation as the Forging the Future alliance.


I'm intrigued by the two seemingly conflicting ideals for an archive 
I've seen emerge from empyre this past week. Claudia Kozak proposed 
that a weak archive could be a good thing, while Lynn Hershman 
wrote that trespassing  geographies  is very much what this is 
about, on every level.


Isn't the problem now facing preservationists of all sorts--but 
especially those distant from capitals of colonial culture--that our 
archives are too weak to trespass boundaries? Our precious magnetic 
tape is too fragile, our financial backing is too flimsy, our 
archivists are too exhausted by the monumental task in front of them.


Yet we have come to expect more of archivists than simply filing 
negatives in solander boxes. We expect them to transcend the bounds 
of time and medium, safeguarding flammable film canisters and 
precarious video codecs from the ravages of climate and fashion, 
translating them when necessary into new formats to survive the 
onslaught of obsolescence. To judge from this discussion, we also 
expect them to cross boundaries of culture and prejudice, attracting 
deserved recognition to the works they painstakingly preserve, not 
just from their own backyards but from New York, Linz, Beijing, and 
everywhere art history books are written.


Don't get me wrong: I think these undertakings are more valuable 
than filing negatives in solander boxes, and I'm glad folks on this 
list seem to agree. But I think anyone running a small archive or 
museum needs a boost, and this is where some of the networking tools 
Still Water's Craig Dietrich and John Bell built for Forging the 
Future can help.


Because a lot of small things can network more effectively than a 
few big things. And as Cildo Meireles said, the further you are from 
the center the faster you move.


Sure, the big museums and archives in North America and Europe have 
databases that can be searched via their Web sites. So a curator who 
wants to search for television can consult the comprehensive 
databases of the Langlois Foundation, MedienKunstNetz, or the 
Database of Virtual Art.


What a researcher currently cannot do, however, is to search for the 
theme television across all, or even a handful, of such databases. 
For efficiency, such online databases are typically accessed via 
server-side scripts that take the form index.php?theme=television, 
a formula that Google et al. cannot spider. As a result, millions of 
dollars and countless hours of staff time and expertise are spent 
squirreling data away in private silos inaccessible to a broader 
public, in idiosyncratic formats that can't and don't talk to each 
other.


Enter the weak archive. What if instead of trying to jam every 
culturally distinct artifact from across the globe into a single 
union database, we set ourselves the goal of making weak ties 
between disparate archives that respected their differences? Then a 
researcher could take the minimum required information to specify an 
artist--Cildo Meireles, say--and find every record in other archives 
(no matter what size or location) holding another work by that 
artist.


This approach describes the Metaserver, a sort of ISBN for art 
devised by John Bell to generate unique, portable ids for people, 
works, and vocabulary. Any database with access to the 
Internet--even a desktop application like Filemaker--can hook into 
the Metaserver through an open API, at which point a registrar 
adding records to that database could simultaneously view or add to 
related data from every other database on the system.


As co-developer Craig Dietrich likes to say, the Metaserver isn't an 
archive, but rather an inverse archive, that archives pointers to 
records in other folk's archives. Of course, the Semantic Web has 
promised this for some time, but there are plenty of doubts about 
when, and whether, it will ever arrive. The good news is that 
registries like the Metaserver are lightweight and easy to build 
with practical techniques we have right now.


So far the Metaserver team has prototyped the API and is 

[-empyre-] Welcome Mona Jimenez, Gabriela Previd illo, Lluis Roqué

2010-09-28 Thread Renate Ferro
For our final week's discussion (which will take 
us through Monday, Oct. 4, we are pleased to be 
joined by three very experienced 
curators/archivists of international new media. 
We have long admired the work of Mona Jimenez on 
preserving new media, particularly the heroic 
work she has done with Sherry Miller Hocking and 
Kathy High in preserving the 40 years of 
videotapes produced at the Experimental 
Television Center in Owego, New York 
(http://www.experimentaltvcenter.org/). Tim 
was delighted to meet Gabriela Previdello  of the 
renowned FILE electronic language international 
festival and Lluis Roqué of the Museum of 
Contemporary Art of Barcelona durig the 
Taxonomedia Buenos Aires conference.  They 
represent a range of approaches and opinions that 
will be welcome in the last week of September's 
focus on Archiving New Media Art: Ephemerality 
and/or Sustainability.


Welcome to you all.

Mona Jimenez (US) teaches Arts and is Associate
Director of New York University's graduate
program in Moving Image Archiving and
Preservation, where she teaches  video
preservation and the preservation of complex
media.  From 2005-2010, she was a participating
researcher with DOCAM
http://www.docam.ca/en.htmlhttp://www.docam.ca/en.html.
As a Researcher-in-Residence at the Daniel
Langlois Foundation for Art, Science, and
Technology, she created a cataloging template for
custom and commercial machines used to make media
art.
http://www.fondation-langlois.org/flash/e/index.php?NumPage=708
She is currently working with Kathy High (RPI)
and Sherry Miller Hocking (Experimental
Television Center) on a book project on 1970s
custom-built electronic art tools, and dialogues
between pioneers of tool development and
current practitioners. For the past two years has
led teams of moving image archivists to Ghana to
work with caretakers of audiovisual collections.

Gabriela Previdello (Brazil) lives and works in
São Paulo, Brazil. Graduated in Fine Arts, she
developed her work in art direction, producing
different events, media and art exhibitions,
including FILE electronic language international
festival.   As FILE Archive Coordinator, she
works on digital memory research, with emphasis
in conservation, preservation and exhibition of
electronic and digital art.

Lluis Roqué (Argentina) works in the Department
of Conservation and Restoration at the Museum of
Contemporary Art of Barcelona
(http://www.macba.cat/) where he is responsible
for the conservation of audiovisual and
photographic materials.  He was trained in Fine
Arts at the University of Barcelona where he
specialized in the Conservation and Restoration
of Images.

We are looking forward to a very helpful and provocative discussion.

Best,

Renate and Tim




--
Renate Ferro and Tim Murray
Managing Moderators, -empyre- a soft-skinned space
Department of Art/ Rose Goldsen Archive of New Media Art
Cornell University
Ithaca, New York  14853
___
empyre forum
empyre@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au
http://www.subtle.net/empyre