Jim: Good question. The current draft allows for multiple request TLV items, but only says a single Result TLV, indicating the what EAP Success/Failure result the peer would expect if the requested action is not granted.
I can definitely see the need for the case you cited. If we want to extend existing design to include individual Result TLVs for the individual request items, we can do that. But I think this might be more complicated and unnecessary. Maybe we can use the mandatory bit in the requested TLVs to indicate whether ignoring it would cause the failure in the result TLV. Thoughts? On 3/30/12 3:34 AM, "Jim Schaad" <jim...@augustcellars.com> wrote: > In the presentation you stated that the plan was to make the TLVs that are > requested become a sub TLV of the request TLV items. If that is true, then > should it be possible to allow for multiple request TLVs to be present in a > message. Thus one could say: > Please do A - and if not then fail authentication > Please do B - and if not then succeed authentication > > Jim > > > _______________________________________________ > Emu mailing list > Emu@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu _______________________________________________ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
