Re: [Emu] EAP Erratum 6154 on RFC 3579:
Ok. I've updated the errata text. On 01.04.22 14:16, Alan DeKok wrote: +1 Other than that, they look OK, thanks. On Apr 1, 2022, at 1:16 AM, Bernard Aboba wrote: I think the note in eid6259 is now superfluous. Can we remove it? On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 10:09 PM Independent Submissions Editor (Eliot Lear) wrote: Corrected URLs below: On 01.04.22 06:48, Independent Submissions Editor (Eliot Lear) wrote: Ok. I have edited – but not yet verified – the two errata accordingly. Please see: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6154 https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6259 ___ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
Re: [Emu] EAP Erratum 6154 on RFC 3579:
Ok. Then I will reject eid6259. Eliot On 01.04.22 14:16, Alan DeKok wrote: +1 Other than that, they look OK, thanks. On Apr 1, 2022, at 1:16 AM, Bernard Aboba wrote: I think the note in eid6259 is now superfluous. Can we remove it? On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 10:09 PM Independent Submissions Editor (Eliot Lear) wrote: Corrected URLs below: On 01.04.22 06:48, Independent Submissions Editor (Eliot Lear) wrote: Ok. I have edited – but not yet verified – the two errata accordingly. Please see: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6154 https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6259 ___ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
Re: [Emu] EAP Erratum 6154 on RFC 3579:
+1 Other than that, they look OK, thanks. > On Apr 1, 2022, at 1:16 AM, Bernard Aboba wrote: > > I think the note in eid6259 is now superfluous. Can we remove it? > > On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 10:09 PM Independent Submissions Editor (Eliot Lear) > wrote: > Corrected URLs below: > > On 01.04.22 06:48, Independent Submissions Editor (Eliot Lear) wrote: > > Ok. > > > > I have edited – but not yet verified – the two errata accordingly. > > Please see: > > > > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6154 > > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6259 ___ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
