Hi Mohit > > The chairs had an email discussion which hadn't concluded. The main > sticking point was that both Joe and I prefer TEAP being addressed in a > separate update document that fixes all other TEAP errata as well. > However, this can be discussed after adoption.
Oleg has addressed the TEAP errata and it would be very helpful if Joe and Jouni could give it a stare. I also posted one issue relating to the use of Request-Action, which may require an additional TLV to correct. Also, I am aware of one additional erratum that I will open shortly that is minor (conflicting terms in the Request-Action frame). If we can collect all of these, then it would be good for the group to decide what else needs to be updated. FWIW, I see a TLS 1.3 update for TEAP as raising some questions around the way that restart is incorporated into 7170. We could simply rule out restart for 1.3, or do something smarter. I dunno yet. Eliot > > > A working group adoption call is now issued and we intend to move this > document forward rapidly. > > --Mohit > >> >> Alan DeKok. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Emu mailing list >> Emu@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu > _______________________________________________ > Emu mailing list > Emu@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu _______________________________________________ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
