Re: [Emu] Call for EMU agenda items for IETF 116
Thanks for sharing the link to the OpenSSL implementation, Heikki.
FWIW there is another EMU draft that also relies on RFC 7250 support ->
draft-ietf-emu-bootstrapped-tls
Ciao
Hannes
Am 03.03.2023 um 10:16 schrieb Heikki Vatiainen:
On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 at 03:34, Meiling Chen
wrote:
I noticed that Openssl 3.2 support for RFC7250 is being discussed.
Has it been supported now?
It seems OpenSSL 3.1 is going to be released later this month. Based
on the pull request related to the Raw Public Key support issue, it
still seems to be target for release 3.2 with plenty of current activity:
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18185
Related to implementations; for me OpenSSL support would be required
for an implementation. While this seems to be progressing, a client
implementation would be needed for testing since I work on the EAP
server side. Is there any news on the client side? For example, would
wpa_supplicant be a possible client? The IOT use case might be
something where a client could be based on wpa_supplicant.
Thanks,
Heikki
Best,
Meiling
*From:* Alexander Clouter <mailto:alex+i...@coremem.com>
*Date:* 2023-03-01 14:12
*To:* EMU WG <mailto:emu@ietf.org>
*Subject:* Re: [Emu] Call for EMU agenda items for IETF 116
On Wed, 1 Mar 2023, at 01:44, Meiling Chen wrote:
I would like to discuss EAP-TLS-IBS this time, Since last
adoption process, we are still waiting for more people to be
interested.
I thought the hold up was OpenSSL does not support RFC7250
without patching?
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/6929
This makes building and playing with an implementation difficult.
Get this solved and I suspect there will be a lot more active
interest.
Just my thoughts.
___
Emu mailing list
Emu@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
--
Heikki Vatiainen
h...@radiatorsoftware.com
___
Emu mailing list
Emu@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
___
Emu mailing list
Emu@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
Re: [Emu] Call for EMU agenda items for IETF 116
On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 at 03:34, Meiling Chen wrote: > I noticed that Openssl 3.2 support for RFC7250 is being discussed. > Has it been supported now? > It seems OpenSSL 3.1 is going to be released later this month. Based on the pull request related to the Raw Public Key support issue, it still seems to be target for release 3.2 with plenty of current activity: https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18185 Related to implementations; for me OpenSSL support would be required for an implementation. While this seems to be progressing, a client implementation would be needed for testing since I work on the EAP server side. Is there any news on the client side? For example, would wpa_supplicant be a possible client? The IOT use case might be something where a client could be based on wpa_supplicant. Thanks, Heikki > Best, > Meiling > > > *From:* Alexander Clouter > *Date:* 2023-03-01 14:12 > *To:* EMU WG > *Subject:* Re: [Emu] Call for EMU agenda items for IETF 116 > On Wed, 1 Mar 2023, at 01:44, Meiling Chen wrote: > > I would like to discuss EAP-TLS-IBS this time, Since last adoption > process, we are still waiting for more people to be interested. > > > I thought the hold up was OpenSSL does not support RFC7250 without > patching? > > https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/6929 > > This makes building and playing with an implementation difficult. > > Get this solved and I suspect there will be a lot more active interest. > > Just my thoughts. > > ___ > Emu mailing list > Emu@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu > -- Heikki Vatiainen h...@radiatorsoftware.com ___ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
Re: [Emu] Call for EMU agenda items for IETF 116
I noticed that Openssl 3.2 support for RFC7250 is being discussed. Has it been supported now? Best, Meiling From: Alexander Clouter Date: 2023-03-01 14:12 To: EMU WG Subject: Re: [Emu] Call for EMU agenda items for IETF 116 On Wed, 1 Mar 2023, at 01:44, Meiling Chen wrote: I would like to discuss EAP-TLS-IBS this time, Since last adoption process, we are still waiting for more people to be interested. I thought the hold up was OpenSSL does not support RFC7250 without patching? https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/6929 This makes building and playing with an implementation difficult. Get this solved and I suspect there will be a lot more active interest. Just my thoughts. ___ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
Re: [Emu] Call for EMU agenda items for IETF 116
On Wed, 1 Mar 2023, at 01:44, Meiling Chen wrote: > I would like to discuss EAP-TLS-IBS this time, Since last adoption process, > we are still waiting for more people to be interested. I thought the hold up was OpenSSL does not support RFC7250 without patching? https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/6929 This makes building and playing with an implementation difficult. Get this solved and I suspect there will be a lot more active interest. Just my thoughts.___ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
Re: [Emu] Call for EMU agenda items for IETF 116
Hi, I would like to discuss EAP-TLS-IBS this time, Since last adoption process, we are still waiting for more people to be interested. Best, Meiling From: Peter Yee Date: 2023-02-27 18:10 To: 'EMU WG' Subject: [Emu] Call for EMU agenda items for IETF 116 We are now about one month out from IETF 116. Please inform the chairs if you have items for discussion before the EMU WG at the upcoming meeting in Yokohama. Cheers, Joe and Peter ___ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu ___ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
Re: [Emu] Call for EMU agenda items for IETF 116
On Feb 27, 2023, at 5:10 AM, Peter Yee wrote: > > We are now about one month out from IETF 116. Please inform the chairs if you > have items for discussion before the EMU WG at the upcoming meeting in > Yokohama. It wouldn't hurt to have a final discussion of TEAP and 7170bis. I think we're pretty much done at this point. Alan DeKok. ___ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
Re: [Emu] Call for EMU agenda items for IETF 116
Peter Yee wrote: > We are now about one month out from IETF 116. Please inform the chairs > if you have items for discussion before the EMU WG at the upcoming > meeting in Yokohama. There are no meaningful changes to draft-richardson-emu-eap-onboarding. Our work on running code is much slower than anticipated, but it is occuring. It's not clear to me what else the document can/should say. -- Michael Richardson. o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
