Re: accidentally posted a blog post on w.g.o

2015-08-23 Thread Andrea Veri
Don't worry as blogs.gnome.org/wp-admin manages the blog at [1] which
was used by the Sysadmin Team in the past to broadcast updates of the
blogging platform at blogs.gnome.org [2]. The Wordpress instance at
blogs.gnome.org has nothing to do with w.g.o so your blog post didn't
end up on the main GNOME Website.

[1] https://blogs.gnome.org
[2] https://blogs.gnome.org/blog/2013/11/04/wordpress-now-at-3-7-1/


2015-08-15 21:10 GMT+02:00 Sriram Ramkrishna s...@ramkrishna.me:
 For some reason, I ended up posting a blog post on w.g.o when I meant to put
 it on my personal blog.  Instead of going to blogs.gnome.org/sri/admin, I
 ended up at blogs.gnome.org/admin.  Anyways, sorry about that.  I have
 deleted the post.  But I wanted to mention it here in case people wondered
 what happened.

 sri

 ___
 engagement-list mailing list
 engagement-list@gnome.org
 https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list




-- 
Cheers,

Andrea

Debian Developer,
Fedora / EPEL packager,
GNOME Infrastructure Team Coordinator,
GNOME Foundation Board of Directors Secretary,
GNOME Foundation Membership  Elections Committee Chairman

Homepage: http://www.gnome.org/~av
___
engagement-list mailing list
engagement-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list


Re: Keeping external resources updated

2015-08-23 Thread Andrea Veri
Thanks for bringing this up Kat. I was suggested by Sri that Sumana
was possibly going to be our contact for helping us out managing our
external resources at Wikipedia. Unfortunately I tried to reach her
out about this back in April with no responses so far.

The various wiki pages you mentioned are definitely out of date (they
don't even mention the Groupon trademark dispute at all) and so is the
italian page at [1]. Is there anything we can do on this side? do we
have any other contact at Wikipedia other than Sumana?

[1] https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNOME_Foundation

2015-08-20 17:18 GMT+02:00 Ekaterina Gerasimova kittykat3...@gmail.com:
 Hi all,

 there are a number of external resources about GNOME which are used by
 people for information. I am specifically thinking about the pages on
 Wikipedia here, but I'm sure that there is other stuff as well. It
 would look more professional if GNOME's public-facing resources are at
 least correct.

 Is the engagement team willing to maintain at least the most prominent
 of these resources? Would it help to have a list of them with
 frequencies on how often they should be checked?

 For example:
 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNOME_Foundation - had an old list of
 board members (fixed now) and doesn't have up-to-date information
 about the Foundation
 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_GNOME_Project - is out of date
 (apparently next GUADEC is in A Coruña)
 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNOME_Users_And_Developers_European_Conference
 is… well, dull and outdated
 ___
 engagement-list mailing list
 engagement-list@gnome.org
 https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list



-- 
Cheers,

Andrea

Debian Developer,
Fedora / EPEL packager,
GNOME Infrastructure Team Coordinator,
GNOME Foundation Board of Directors Secretary,
GNOME Foundation Membership  Elections Committee Chairman

Homepage: http://www.gnome.org/~av
___
engagement-list mailing list
engagement-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list


Re: [guadec-list] [General Info] Plan for GUADEC 2015 videos

2015-08-23 Thread Andrea Veri
2015-08-16 21:34 GMT+02:00 Bastien Nocera had...@hadess.net:
 On Fri, 2015-08-14 at 18:54 +0200, Andrea Veri wrote:
 We should definitely find a better location for GUADEC videos as we
 can't provide the bandwidth or the disk space for them to be hosted
 under the GNOME Infrastructure.

 About the FTP access: we don't and won't offer that as the Red Hat
 network where our machines currently live has the relevant port
 firewalled for security reasons. What we can probably do is
 investigating whether having torrents might work out long term.

 Could we run a bittorrent tracker to offer videos, test USB images of
 new releases and the likes, if we can't make them available via other
 means?

The Fedora Project Infrastructure makes use of torrents since many
years already, I'll get in touch with Kevin about this and hear what
kind of torrent server they're using behind the scenes and come up
with a plan for the GNOME Infrastructure to implement.

-- 
Cheers,

Andrea

Debian Developer,
Fedora / EPEL packager,
GNOME Infrastructure Team Coordinator,
GNOME Foundation Board of Directors Secretary,
GNOME Foundation Membership  Elections Committee Chairman

Homepage: http://www.gnome.org/~av
___
engagement-list mailing list
engagement-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list


Re: Keeping external resources updated

2015-08-23 Thread Karen Sandler

On 2015-08-23 10:44, Andrea Veri wrote:

Thanks for bringing this up Kat. I was suggested by Sri that Sumana
was possibly going to be our contact for helping us out managing our
external resources at Wikipedia. Unfortunately I tried to reach her
out about this back in April with no responses so far.

The various wiki pages you mentioned are definitely out of date (they
don't even mention the Groupon trademark dispute at all) and so is the
italian page at [1]. Is there anything we can do on this side? do we
have any other contact at Wikipedia other than Sumana?


Sumana is no longer at Wikimedia, but Quim Gil is probably a good 
contact. I don't think we necessarily need someone at WMF for this 
though...


karen



[1] https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNOME_Foundation

2015-08-20 17:18 GMT+02:00 Ekaterina Gerasimova 
kittykat3...@gmail.com:

Hi all,

there are a number of external resources about GNOME which are used by
people for information. I am specifically thinking about the pages on
Wikipedia here, but I'm sure that there is other stuff as well. It
would look more professional if GNOME's public-facing resources are at
least correct.

Is the engagement team willing to maintain at least the most prominent
of these resources? Would it help to have a list of them with
frequencies on how often they should be checked?

For example:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNOME_Foundation - had an old list of
board members (fixed now) and doesn't have up-to-date information
about the Foundation
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_GNOME_Project - is out of date
(apparently next GUADEC is in A Coruña)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNOME_Users_And_Developers_European_Conference
is… well, dull and outdated
___
engagement-list mailing list
engagement-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list



--
Cheers,

Andrea

Debian Developer,
Fedora / EPEL packager,
GNOME Infrastructure Team Coordinator,
GNOME Foundation Board of Directors Secretary,
GNOME Foundation Membership  Elections Committee Chairman

Homepage: http://www.gnome.org/~av
___
engagement-list mailing list
engagement-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list

___
engagement-list mailing list
engagement-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list