Re: Some branding guidelines and historical info lost in migration

[Alexandre Franke]

On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 4:20 PM, Allan Day  wrote:
> I'm not sure I understand why the information on the origin of the logo type
> is useful to someone using our logos. People shouldn't be modifying the
> "GNOME" below the logo, and there's no requirement to use Bitstream Vera
> Sans with the logo or wordmark.

I think the info about which font we used as a base is relevant for
people who want to use the logo (with wordmark) and then write
something that looks consistent with by using the same(ish) font. In
this case, it's also important to mention we don't use the font as it
is because people could be mislead then and just write GNOME
themselves and think they reached the same result as if they were
using the logo.

-- 
Alexandre Franke
GNOME Hacker & Foundation Director
___
engagement-list mailing list
engagement-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list

reminder..

[Sriram Ramkrishna]

Please do not put anything related to Thomas Wood on our social network
account.  Someone recently posted something on G+, if you could remove the
post that would be great.

I realize that it might seem fine because it was a news story, but we are
purposely not distributing it publicly because it is an internal developer
story.

Thanks,
sri
___
engagement-list mailing list
engagement-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list