Re: [E-devel] Azure Devop's CI

2019-02-06 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
Correct me if I am wrong but isn’t travis a bit limited to an extent. I can 
actually give you guys control over this team so to speak so those that need to 
make changes can.

I think we need to have a chat somewhere maybe a conference call on this Stefan 
or a chat on slack.

-Original Message-
From: Stefan Schmidt  
Sent: 06 February 2019 14:04
To: Enlightenment developer list ; 
Jonathan Aquilina 
Subject: Re: [E-devel] Azure Devop's CI

Hello Jonathan.

On 16.01.19 07:31, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> Hi Guys,
> 
> I am looking to propose that I setup for the project CI on azure. There is no 
> charge as far as I can gather for this. It seems like I would just need to 
> tie it in to git to pull in the changes and schedule runs. From what I can 
> see this is ubuntu based as a platform. What do you guys think do you think 
> it's a good idea to have it do CI testing on each build?

I assume you know that we already have an actively used Travis CI setup?
https://travis-ci.org/Enlightenment/efl/branches

We have an instant github mirror by now and if azures ties into Github to get 
the new pushes that would work for us.

If you want to add an Azure CI for testing to crunch on our efl commits I would 
be interested in see how it goes. But as many other things this needs time and 
bandwidth to work at. For me personally trying out another CI system is 
interesting but way down my todo list.

If you are willing to work on this let me know. I certainly should be able to 
configure things on github top get commits notified to Azure.
As a good starting point I would suggest to look at the .travis.yml file and 
everything below .ci/ to see what we have so far and how it is setup with 
Travis. Most of the actual build testing as well as unit tests are executed in 
docker containers and not bound to any Travis specifics. If you set things up 
to execute jobs in docker containers on Azure most of it should be possible to 
bring over.

regards
Stefan Schmidt

___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] 1.22 schedule proposal

2019-02-06 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
I just landed a new job which I start on Monday but I am willing to help and 
take over this. I am sure a lot more can be automated for sure.

I think best place to get this rolling would be to do a conference call or a 
chat on slack.

-Original Message-
From: Stefan Schmidt  
Sent: 06 February 2019 13:56
To: enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Jonathan Aquilina 

Subject: Re: [E-devel] 1.22 schedule proposal

Hello Jonathan.

On 09.01.19 16:26, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> I'm ready to step and take charge of this but I think we need a bit more 
> frequent minor release updates both for those in the community that want to 
> Be on the bleeding edge and those that want to help bug fix more incremental 
> stable releases.

So, a 1.21.2. We currently have 4 patches pending in the 1.21.x branch which 
are not in the 1.21.1 release. When announced that there will be a stable 
update we might see more backports coming.

> Stefan do you have any documentation on how release plan works?

I posted this very link to you a couple of times, but I had no feedback from 
you if that covers what you asked for.

https://phab.enlightenment.org/w/release_procedure/

Jonathan, are you willing top work on a 1.21.2 stable release?
I can give you a hand but I would need to know if you are willing, have the 
time and the bandwidth to do this.

regards
Stefan Schmidt


___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] Azure Devop's CI

2019-02-06 Thread Stefan Schmidt
Hello Jonathan.

On 16.01.19 07:31, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> Hi Guys,
> 
> I am looking to propose that I setup for the project CI on azure. There is no 
> charge as far as I can gather for this. It seems like I would just need to 
> tie it in to git to pull in the changes and schedule runs. From what I can 
> see this is ubuntu based as a platform. What do you guys think do you think 
> it's a good idea to have it do CI testing on each build?

I assume you know that we already have an actively used Travis CI setup?
https://travis-ci.org/Enlightenment/efl/branches

We have an instant github mirror by now and if azures ties into Github
to get the new pushes that would work for us.

If you want to add an Azure CI for testing to crunch on our efl commits
I would be interested in see how it goes. But as many other things this
needs time and bandwidth to work at. For me personally trying out
another CI system is interesting but way down my todo list.

If you are willing to work on this let me know. I certainly should be
able to configure things on github top get commits notified to Azure.
As a good starting point I would suggest to look at the .travis.yml file
and everything below .ci/ to see what we have so far and how it is setup
with Travis. Most of the actual build testing as well as unit tests are
executed in docker containers and not bound to any Travis specifics. If
you set things up to execute jobs in docker containers on Azure most of
it should be possible to bring over.

regards
Stefan Schmidt


___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] 1.22 schedule proposal

2019-02-06 Thread Stefan Schmidt
Hello Jonathan.

On 09.01.19 16:26, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> I’m ready to step and take charge of this but I think we need a bit more 
> frequent minor release updates both for those in the community that want to 
> Be on the bleeding edge and those that want to help bug fix more incremental 
> stable releases.

So, a 1.21.2. We currently have 4 patches pending in the 1.21.x branch
which are not in the 1.21.1 release. When announced that there will be a
stable update we might see more backports coming.

> Stefan do you have any documentation on how release plan works?

I posted this very link to you a couple of times, but I had no feedback
from you if that covers what you asked for.

https://phab.enlightenment.org/w/release_procedure/

Jonathan, are you willing top work on a 1.21.2 stable release?
I can give you a hand but I would need to know if you are willing, have
the time and the bandwidth to do this.

regards
Stefan Schmidt


___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel