Re: [E-devel] Any plans to move E-MODULES-EXTRA to git ?
Don't forget we're talking about in-development, unreleased software. Why should it maintain compatibility with older systems? If you're going to be pulling software from VCS, it makes sense that it needs other things from VCS. First, because its extremely simple, specially using git, we have always used if's in C for enable or disable experimental code, is very simple to do if version e18 ; disable something, terminology does the same with the libs. By other side it becomes more difficult if we are talking about not only a small change, but on that way, stills very simple by using git because you can leave a stable branch on his state/point and work on your master or dev one, but if you add a commit that is a generic fix, you can apply this commit in both development and stable branches, and not leaving your code that is meant to be for stable use in a totally un-maintained and forgotten state, because this is not a stable release but a simple tag. If you have all the time of the world to live in bleeding-edge and found occasional bugs and be able to fix them each day, its fine for you, but a lot of people has different needs and they just needs a stable software that doesn't give problems and being able to work on other things. Second, it could be *very bad* for Enlightenment reputation to not follow a minimally stable/released maintaining (not only for e17 but also for its emodules), a lot of people talked bad about E for years because we had not any stable version released, now that we have it, we want to leave them just like a tag in a forgotten world? people can found bugs and they will be never solved because we don't worry? or they could not build emodules because there's simply not emodules for that version? the only thing that could conduce this behaviour is to* force users to make a fork of E* in the future for maintaint a better support/bugfixes and compatibility, and I'm pretty sure that we don't want to diverge the E work in different locations, nobody never seen the path of enlightenment to have 2 roads :) That's one of the problems on the free software world, they are not so forced to make stable releases as how happens on enterprises, and in fact, software is very unstable on the free software world, not everybody are developers, my mom also uses linux, fortunately with git these things are much easier and automated to reach, and a simple process of releasing stable states is not so difficult, this a simple workflow that can be done for that: * have a branch for stable, another for development, and another for frozen states * put all the finished features that you decide to include in the next release onto the frozen branch and wait for the bleeding-edge users to report you bugs for this RC version * you can still working on the development branch and experimental features, when you received a good amount of reports and you fix them on the frozen branch, you can decide to move it to the stable branch and publish a release announcement, you have now a version for the common users with recent features and a stable code * then move again your finished features from development to frozen and wait another cycle In fact you can do the same with only stable and development if your software is more small or you need to do it more simple, you can go back and forth in any time between the stable or development branch, having always their last leaved state 2013/6/14 Daniel Juyung Seo seojuyu...@gmail.com On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 3:06 AM, Davide Andreoli d...@gurumeditation.it wrote: 2013/6/13 Thanatermesis thanatermesis.e...@gmail.com Is not more simple to have something like a simple if for do something depending on the version of E (0.17.3, 0.18...) ? we should maintain some compatibility, ppl is tend to use e17 as a stable system and developers e18 as a development system In real it's not more simple for me, to keep compatibility I need to test everything two times and search solutions that fit both versions. If people use the released version of E should also use released version of places, think at the 83648 revision the places0.17 release. btw, Im thinking about moving places back to my googlecode svn instead of the new git. And maybe do a tag/branch for the version that work with 0.17. Yes we need a branch for e17 support. I hope we can do that in e's new git with extra modules like other components. Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ) 2013/6/12 Nikolas Arend sns...@gmail.com On 06/12/2013 07:23 PM, Davide Andreoli wrote: 2013/6/12 Nikolas Arend sns...@gmail.com On 06/12/2013 06:07 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote: On 29/05/13 19:41, Davide Andreoli wrote: Hi, I have 1 module and an half (places and penguins) that I fully support that are still hosted in the old svn E-MODULES-EXTRA folder. What we like to do with that? No more extra modules hosting? move only
Re: [E-devel] Any plans to move E-MODULES-EXTRA to git ?
+1 for thana idea, less work if we build from the same source if the source can detect what version we are on and have compatibility. it is never cool to have one program in this case (places-module) in two place and for example because you use e17 you cant have the new fixes that the e18 version has, although (what i have checked) the only function blocking places is e_popup_autoclose(). also if this function is based on e17 (improving e17), why not simply backport it. Thank You. --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- Deon Thomas [ http://www.elivecd.org ] Programmer / Network Admin / Microsoft Certified Technology Specialist On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 7:23 PM, Thanatermesis thanatermesis.e...@gmail.com wrote: Is not more simple to have something like a simple if for do something depending on the version of E (0.17.3, 0.18...) ? we should maintain some compatibility, ppl is tend to use e17 as a stable system and developers e18 as a development system 2013/6/12 Nikolas Arend sns...@gmail.com On 06/12/2013 07:23 PM, Davide Andreoli wrote: 2013/6/12 Nikolas Arend sns...@gmail.com On 06/12/2013 06:07 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote: On 29/05/13 19:41, Davide Andreoli wrote: Hi, I have 1 module and an half (places and penguins) that I fully support that are still hosted in the old svn E-MODULES-EXTRA folder. What we like to do with that? No more extra modules hosting? move only the supported ones to git? move everything? Depends on how we decide to do it. I think we should move each module to it's own repo. This means the switch will happen as needed. Apart from the fact that places currently does not compile for me you are on e 0.17 right? No, sorry, I thought we were talking about e18, i.e. git master. Nick instruction to checkout the correct revision for e17 are on the places wiki: http://code.google.com/p/e17mods/wiki/Places if instead you get the error on e18 please let me know davemds e_mod_main.c: In function '_places_popup_new': e_mod_main.c:482:6: error: too few arguments to function 'e_popup_autoclose' In file included from /usr/local/include/enlightenment/e_includes.h:44:0, from /usr/local/include/enlightenment/e.h:272, from e_mod_main.c:4: /usr/local/include/enlightenment/e_popup.h:52:46: note: declared here make[2]: *** [e_mod_main.lo] Error 1 I'm seconding moving places to git, as I can imagine that the module and its functionality is used by a significant number of users. Nick -- Tom. -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Re: [E-devel] Any plans to move E-MODULES-EXTRA to git ?
2013/6/13 Doug Newgard scimmi...@outlook.com Don't forget we're talking about in-development, unreleased software. Why should it maintain compatibility with older systems? If you're going to be pulling software from VCS, it makes sense that it needs other things from VCS. And Davide Andreoli, just in case Nikolas Arend's post wasn't clear, current trunk is not building for me with E18 built less than 12 hours ago. Same error. yep, you both right, thanks for reporting! fixed now in svn Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 01:23:10 +0200 From: thanatermesis.e...@gmail.com To: enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [E-devel] Any plans to move E-MODULES-EXTRA to git ? Is not more simple to have something like a simple if for do something depending on the version of E (0.17.3, 0.18...) ? we should maintain some compatibility, ppl is tend to use e17 as a stable system and developers e18 as a development system 2013/6/12 Nikolas Arend sns...@gmail.com On 06/12/2013 07:23 PM, Davide Andreoli wrote: 2013/6/12 Nikolas Arend sns...@gmail.com On 06/12/2013 06:07 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote: On 29/05/13 19:41, Davide Andreoli wrote: Hi, I have 1 module and an half (places and penguins) that I fully support that are still hosted in the old svn E-MODULES-EXTRA folder. What we like to do with that? No more extra modules hosting? move only the supported ones to git? move everything? Depends on how we decide to do it. I think we should move each module to it's own repo. This means the switch will happen as needed. Apart from the fact that places currently does not compile for me you are on e 0.17 right? No, sorry, I thought we were talking about e18, i.e. git master. Nick instruction to checkout the correct revision for e17 are on the places wiki: http://code.google.com/p/e17mods/wiki/Places if instead you get the error on e18 please let me know davemds e_mod_main.c: In function '_places_popup_new': e_mod_main.c:482:6: error: too few arguments to function 'e_popup_autoclose' In file included from /usr/local/include/enlightenment/e_includes.h:44:0, from /usr/local/include/enlightenment/e.h:272, from e_mod_main.c:4: /usr/local/include/enlightenment/e_popup.h:52:46: note: declared here make[2]: *** [e_mod_main.lo] Error 1 I'm seconding moving places to git, as I can imagine that the module and its functionality is used by a significant number of users. Nick -- Tom. -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
Re: [E-devel] Any plans to move E-MODULES-EXTRA to git ?
2013/6/13 Thanatermesis thanatermesis.e...@gmail.com Is not more simple to have something like a simple if for do something depending on the version of E (0.17.3, 0.18...) ? we should maintain some compatibility, ppl is tend to use e17 as a stable system and developers e18 as a development system In real it's not more simple for me, to keep compatibility I need to test everything two times and search solutions that fit both versions. If people use the released version of E should also use released version of places, think at the 83648 revision the places0.17 release. btw, Im thinking about moving places back to my googlecode svn instead of the new git. And maybe do a tag/branch for the version that work with 0.17. 2013/6/12 Nikolas Arend sns...@gmail.com On 06/12/2013 07:23 PM, Davide Andreoli wrote: 2013/6/12 Nikolas Arend sns...@gmail.com On 06/12/2013 06:07 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote: On 29/05/13 19:41, Davide Andreoli wrote: Hi, I have 1 module and an half (places and penguins) that I fully support that are still hosted in the old svn E-MODULES-EXTRA folder. What we like to do with that? No more extra modules hosting? move only the supported ones to git? move everything? Depends on how we decide to do it. I think we should move each module to it's own repo. This means the switch will happen as needed. Apart from the fact that places currently does not compile for me you are on e 0.17 right? No, sorry, I thought we were talking about e18, i.e. git master. Nick instruction to checkout the correct revision for e17 are on the places wiki: http://code.google.com/p/e17mods/wiki/Places if instead you get the error on e18 please let me know davemds e_mod_main.c: In function '_places_popup_new': e_mod_main.c:482:6: error: too few arguments to function 'e_popup_autoclose' In file included from /usr/local/include/enlightenment/e_includes.h:44:0, from /usr/local/include/enlightenment/e.h:272, from e_mod_main.c:4: /usr/local/include/enlightenment/e_popup.h:52:46: note: declared here make[2]: *** [e_mod_main.lo] Error 1 I'm seconding moving places to git, as I can imagine that the module and its functionality is used by a significant number of users. Nick -- Tom. -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
Re: [E-devel] Any plans to move E-MODULES-EXTRA to git ?
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 3:06 AM, Davide Andreoli d...@gurumeditation.itwrote: 2013/6/13 Thanatermesis thanatermesis.e...@gmail.com Is not more simple to have something like a simple if for do something depending on the version of E (0.17.3, 0.18...) ? we should maintain some compatibility, ppl is tend to use e17 as a stable system and developers e18 as a development system In real it's not more simple for me, to keep compatibility I need to test everything two times and search solutions that fit both versions. If people use the released version of E should also use released version of places, think at the 83648 revision the places0.17 release. btw, Im thinking about moving places back to my googlecode svn instead of the new git. And maybe do a tag/branch for the version that work with 0.17. Yes we need a branch for e17 support. I hope we can do that in e's new git with extra modules like other components. Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ) 2013/6/12 Nikolas Arend sns...@gmail.com On 06/12/2013 07:23 PM, Davide Andreoli wrote: 2013/6/12 Nikolas Arend sns...@gmail.com On 06/12/2013 06:07 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote: On 29/05/13 19:41, Davide Andreoli wrote: Hi, I have 1 module and an half (places and penguins) that I fully support that are still hosted in the old svn E-MODULES-EXTRA folder. What we like to do with that? No more extra modules hosting? move only the supported ones to git? move everything? Depends on how we decide to do it. I think we should move each module to it's own repo. This means the switch will happen as needed. Apart from the fact that places currently does not compile for me you are on e 0.17 right? No, sorry, I thought we were talking about e18, i.e. git master. Nick instruction to checkout the correct revision for e17 are on the places wiki: http://code.google.com/p/e17mods/wiki/Places if instead you get the error on e18 please let me know davemds e_mod_main.c: In function '_places_popup_new': e_mod_main.c:482:6: error: too few arguments to function 'e_popup_autoclose' In file included from /usr/local/include/enlightenment/e_includes.h:44:0, from /usr/local/include/enlightenment/e.h:272, from e_mod_main.c:4: /usr/local/include/enlightenment/e_popup.h:52:46: note: declared here make[2]: *** [e_mod_main.lo] Error 1 I'm seconding moving places to git, as I can imagine that the module and its functionality is used by a significant number of users. Nick -- Tom. -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
Re: [E-devel] Any plans to move E-MODULES-EXTRA to git ?
+1 2013/5/29 Davide Andreoli d...@gurumeditation.it Hi, I have 1 module and an half (places and penguins) that I fully support that are still hosted in the old svn E-MODULES-EXTRA folder. What we like to do with that? No more extra modules hosting? move only the supported ones to git? move everything? thanks davemds -- Introducing AppDynamics Lite, a free troubleshooting tool for Java/.NET Get 100% visibility into your production application - at no cost. Code-level diagnostics for performance bottlenecks with 2% overhead Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes. http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_ap1 ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
Re: [E-devel] Any plans to move E-MODULES-EXTRA to git ?
On 29/05/13 19:41, Davide Andreoli wrote: Hi, I have 1 module and an half (places and penguins) that I fully support that are still hosted in the old svn E-MODULES-EXTRA folder. What we like to do with that? No more extra modules hosting? move only the supported ones to git? move everything? Depends on how we decide to do it. I think we should move each module to it's own repo. This means the switch will happen as needed. -- Tom. -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
Re: [E-devel] Any plans to move E-MODULES-EXTRA to git ?
On 06/12/2013 06:07 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote: On 29/05/13 19:41, Davide Andreoli wrote: Hi, I have 1 module and an half (places and penguins) that I fully support that are still hosted in the old svn E-MODULES-EXTRA folder. What we like to do with that? No more extra modules hosting? move only the supported ones to git? move everything? Depends on how we decide to do it. I think we should move each module to it's own repo. This means the switch will happen as needed. Apart from the fact that places currently does not compile for me e_mod_main.c: In function '_places_popup_new': e_mod_main.c:482:6: error: too few arguments to function 'e_popup_autoclose' In file included from /usr/local/include/enlightenment/e_includes.h:44:0, from /usr/local/include/enlightenment/e.h:272, from e_mod_main.c:4: /usr/local/include/enlightenment/e_popup.h:52:46: note: declared here make[2]: *** [e_mod_main.lo] Error 1 I'm seconding moving places to git, as I can imagine that the module and its functionality is used by a significant number of users. Nick -- Tom. -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
Re: [E-devel] Any plans to move E-MODULES-EXTRA to git ?
2013/6/12 Nikolas Arend sns...@gmail.com On 06/12/2013 06:07 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote: On 29/05/13 19:41, Davide Andreoli wrote: Hi, I have 1 module and an half (places and penguins) that I fully support that are still hosted in the old svn E-MODULES-EXTRA folder. What we like to do with that? No more extra modules hosting? move only the supported ones to git? move everything? Depends on how we decide to do it. I think we should move each module to it's own repo. This means the switch will happen as needed. Apart from the fact that places currently does not compile for me you are on e 0.17 right? instruction to checkout the correct revision for e17 are on the places wiki: http://code.google.com/p/e17mods/wiki/Places if instead you get the error on e18 please let me know davemds e_mod_main.c: In function '_places_popup_new': e_mod_main.c:482:6: error: too few arguments to function 'e_popup_autoclose' In file included from /usr/local/include/enlightenment/e_includes.h:44:0, from /usr/local/include/enlightenment/e.h:272, from e_mod_main.c:4: /usr/local/include/enlightenment/e_popup.h:52:46: note: declared here make[2]: *** [e_mod_main.lo] Error 1 I'm seconding moving places to git, as I can imagine that the module and its functionality is used by a significant number of users. Nick -- Tom. -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
Re: [E-devel] Any plans to move E-MODULES-EXTRA to git ?
On 06/12/2013 07:23 PM, Davide Andreoli wrote: 2013/6/12 Nikolas Arend sns...@gmail.com On 06/12/2013 06:07 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote: On 29/05/13 19:41, Davide Andreoli wrote: Hi, I have 1 module and an half (places and penguins) that I fully support that are still hosted in the old svn E-MODULES-EXTRA folder. What we like to do with that? No more extra modules hosting? move only the supported ones to git? move everything? Depends on how we decide to do it. I think we should move each module to it's own repo. This means the switch will happen as needed. Apart from the fact that places currently does not compile for me you are on e 0.17 right? No, sorry, I thought we were talking about e18, i.e. git master. Nick instruction to checkout the correct revision for e17 are on the places wiki: http://code.google.com/p/e17mods/wiki/Places if instead you get the error on e18 please let me know davemds e_mod_main.c: In function '_places_popup_new': e_mod_main.c:482:6: error: too few arguments to function 'e_popup_autoclose' In file included from /usr/local/include/enlightenment/e_includes.h:44:0, from /usr/local/include/enlightenment/e.h:272, from e_mod_main.c:4: /usr/local/include/enlightenment/e_popup.h:52:46: note: declared here make[2]: *** [e_mod_main.lo] Error 1 I'm seconding moving places to git, as I can imagine that the module and its functionality is used by a significant number of users. Nick -- Tom. -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
Re: [E-devel] Any plans to move E-MODULES-EXTRA to git ?
Is not more simple to have something like a simple if for do something depending on the version of E (0.17.3, 0.18...) ? we should maintain some compatibility, ppl is tend to use e17 as a stable system and developers e18 as a development system 2013/6/12 Nikolas Arend sns...@gmail.com On 06/12/2013 07:23 PM, Davide Andreoli wrote: 2013/6/12 Nikolas Arend sns...@gmail.com On 06/12/2013 06:07 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote: On 29/05/13 19:41, Davide Andreoli wrote: Hi, I have 1 module and an half (places and penguins) that I fully support that are still hosted in the old svn E-MODULES-EXTRA folder. What we like to do with that? No more extra modules hosting? move only the supported ones to git? move everything? Depends on how we decide to do it. I think we should move each module to it's own repo. This means the switch will happen as needed. Apart from the fact that places currently does not compile for me you are on e 0.17 right? No, sorry, I thought we were talking about e18, i.e. git master. Nick instruction to checkout the correct revision for e17 are on the places wiki: http://code.google.com/p/e17mods/wiki/Places if instead you get the error on e18 please let me know davemds e_mod_main.c: In function '_places_popup_new': e_mod_main.c:482:6: error: too few arguments to function 'e_popup_autoclose' In file included from /usr/local/include/enlightenment/e_includes.h:44:0, from /usr/local/include/enlightenment/e.h:272, from e_mod_main.c:4: /usr/local/include/enlightenment/e_popup.h:52:46: note: declared here make[2]: *** [e_mod_main.lo] Error 1 I'm seconding moving places to git, as I can imagine that the module and its functionality is used by a significant number of users. Nick -- Tom. -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
Re: [E-devel] Any plans to move E-MODULES-EXTRA to git ?
Don't forget we're talking about in-development, unreleased software. Why should it maintain compatibility with older systems? If you're going to be pulling software from VCS, it makes sense that it needs other things from VCS. And Davide Andreoli, just in case Nikolas Arend's post wasn't clear, current trunk is not building for me with E18 built less than 12 hours ago. Same error. Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 01:23:10 +0200 From: thanatermesis.e...@gmail.com To: enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [E-devel] Any plans to move E-MODULES-EXTRA to git ? Is not more simple to have something like a simple if for do something depending on the version of E (0.17.3, 0.18...) ? we should maintain some compatibility, ppl is tend to use e17 as a stable system and developers e18 as a development system 2013/6/12 Nikolas Arend sns...@gmail.com On 06/12/2013 07:23 PM, Davide Andreoli wrote: 2013/6/12 Nikolas Arend sns...@gmail.com On 06/12/2013 06:07 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote: On 29/05/13 19:41, Davide Andreoli wrote: Hi, I have 1 module and an half (places and penguins) that I fully support that are still hosted in the old svn E-MODULES-EXTRA folder. What we like to do with that? No more extra modules hosting? move only the supported ones to git? move everything? Depends on how we decide to do it. I think we should move each module to it's own repo. This means the switch will happen as needed. Apart from the fact that places currently does not compile for me you are on e 0.17 right? No, sorry, I thought we were talking about e18, i.e. git master. Nick instruction to checkout the correct revision for e17 are on the places wiki: http://code.google.com/p/e17mods/wiki/Places if instead you get the error on e18 please let me know davemds e_mod_main.c: In function '_places_popup_new': e_mod_main.c:482:6: error: too few arguments to function 'e_popup_autoclose' In file included from /usr/local/include/enlightenment/e_includes.h:44:0, from /usr/local/include/enlightenment/e.h:272, from e_mod_main.c:4: /usr/local/include/enlightenment/e_popup.h:52:46: note: declared here make[2]: *** [e_mod_main.lo] Error 1 I'm seconding moving places to git, as I can imagine that the module and its functionality is used by a significant number of users. Nick -- Tom. -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
[E-devel] Any plans to move E-MODULES-EXTRA to git ?
Hi, I have 1 module and an half (places and penguins) that I fully support that are still hosted in the old svn E-MODULES-EXTRA folder. What we like to do with that? No more extra modules hosting? move only the supported ones to git? move everything? thanks davemds -- Introducing AppDynamics Lite, a free troubleshooting tool for Java/.NET Get 100% visibility into your production application - at no cost. Code-level diagnostics for performance bottlenecks with 2% overhead Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes. http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_ap1 ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
