Re: [E-devel] Re: E CVS: e kwo

2003-12-15 Thread Kim Woelders
JC Wong wrote:
Starting E for the first time, cause Enlightenment Message Dialog box appear;
Enlightement caused Segment Violation (Segfault).No respond from F1 -
Ignore this,F2 - Restart E and F3 - Quit E either.Have to hit
Ctrl+Alt+F1 to manually kill it.Restarting the 2nd time solved it.Menu's
did generated though.
Yes, there was a segfault on menu reload (like in "eesh -e reload_menus").
Should be fixed now.
Thanks.
/Kim
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills.  Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials.  Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


[E-devel] CVS gets a haircut

2003-12-15 Thread Ben Rockwood

It's finally time, I think, to prune CVS.  The prune would only involve
e17/.  e16/ is fine, I already pruned web/ awhile back, and misc is
supposed to be a mess. This means we need to confront some issues we've
been avoiding for awhile, like:  Should we migrate proto/ into libs/ ? Do
we whack the old dead apps? (etcher, e, etc)

My initial hit list of things to go are:

libs/ebg
libs/ebits
libs/emenu
libs/eprog
libs/evas2
libs/imlib2_loader_db

apps/ebindings
apps/efm
apps/efileinfo
apps/elogin
apps/esmall
apps/etcher
apps/ewidgetd
apps/foo
apps/med
apps/ebony

  Okey, some of these are questionable.  Like, would anyone ever be
interested in resurecting Ebits?  Someone from outside the project
might.  Which means Ebony and Etcher would be handy.  Do we whack E?  Or
leave it
for historical reference in the rewrite?

  When we do that whack I'll make a backup using the nightly CVS tar
(which is the raw cvsroot itself) just in case we change our minds
later.

  If anyone thinks maybe it's too early to clean up CVS thats valid too.

  Project owners!: Any directories inside your code that need to be pruned
please let me know about.

benr.


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills.  Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials.  Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] CVS gets a haircut

2003-12-15 Thread Corey Donohoe
* Ben Rockwood ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> 
> It's finally time, I think, to prune CVS.  The prune would only involve
> e17/.  e16/ is fine, I already pruned web/ awhile back, and misc is
> supposed to be a mess. This means we need to confront some issues we've
> been avoiding for awhile, like:  Should we migrate proto/ into libs/ ? Do
> we whack the old dead apps? (etcher, e, etc)
> 
> My initial hit list of things to go are:
> 
> apps/elogin
fwiw this is in misc/
> 
>   Okey, some of these are questionable.  Like, would anyone ever be
> interested in resurecting Ebits?  Someone from outside the project
> might.  Which means Ebony and Etcher would be handy.  Do we whack E?  Or
> leave it
> for historical reference in the rewrite?
> 
I'd be for keeping ebony and etcher around since some people(Azu) are
still using these things.  But she's sucked ebits/ebg into evidence, so
those libs could be forgotten :)

__
Corey Donohoe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills.  Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials.  Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel